34
Metascore
7 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 70Billed as a comedy spectacle, Steven Spielberg’s 1941 is long on spectacle, but short on comedy. The Universal-Columbia Pictures co-production is an exceedingly entertaining, fast-moving revision of 1940s war hysteria in Los Angeles spawned by the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and boasts Hollywood’s finest miniature and special effects work seen to date.
- 50TV Guide MagazineTV Guide Magazine1941 is loaded with slam-bang sight gags and action, but comedy isn't director Steven Spielberg's forte and the movie isn't nearly as funny as it might have been.
- 40The New York TimesVincent CanbyThe New York TimesVincent Canby1941 is less comic than cumbersome, as much fun as a 40-pound wrist-watch.
- 40NewsweekDavid AnsenNewsweekDavid AnsenSpielberg has brought forth a farce that is both relentlessly spectacular and spectacularly unfunny. [17 Dec 1979, p.111]
- 38Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertIt's not fair to say Steven Spielberg's 1941 lacks "pacing." It's got it, all right, but all at the same pace: The movie relentlessly throws gags at us until we're dizzy. It's an attempt at that most tricky of genres, the blockbuster comedy, and it tries so hard to dazzle us that we want a break.
- 30Washington PostGary ArnoldWashington PostGary Arnold1941 represents an appalling waste of filmmaking and performing resources. As one would expect, Spielberg, who directed "Jaws" and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," sustains a high energy level. But the energy is expended on material that is pointless at best and occasionally hateful. [15 Dec 1979, p.C1]
- 25The Globe and Mail (Toronto)Jay ScottThe Globe and Mail (Toronto)Jay ScottNot only is it mindless, it is also racist. Not only is it racist, it is also incompetent. Not only is it incompetent, it is also unfunny. [17 Dec 1979]