The Ocean Waif (1916) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Quite enchanting!
silent-1218 August 2000
I just saw this film as part of TCM's Women Pioneer Filmmakers Series. What a fascinating woman Alice Guy Blache was! And what a shame (although that isn't a strong enough word) that her legacy is not well-known to the public. This film is quite enchanting--parts of it reminded me of "Broken Blossoms" (1919). But while it has elements of tragedy, and even a dark streak of incest courtesy of the foster father, there are tender and light-hearted moments of comedy that keep it from bogging into too much sentiment. Guy's motto was "Be Natural", and it's amazing how well the actors in her company took this to heart--there is very little of the histrionic style of acting in this film, which makes it so much easier for a modern audience to watch.

Alice Guy Blache's films should be revived, they should be available on VHS and DVD, and her legacy needs to be recognized!
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ocean Waif
Michael_Elliott5 November 2015
The Ocean Waif (1916)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Silent melodrama about author Ronald Roberts (Carlyle Blackwell) who gets word that his latest book is a huge seller so he's asked to write another. He winds up in a small location to write but he ends up getting involved with a young woman named Millie (Doris Kenyon) who is trying to get away from her abusive father.

Alice Guy directed this film, which has enough good moments to make it worth viewing, although there's no doubt that it's still far from being a classic or even a good movie for that matter. I think the main reason to watch it is for the performances that are actually pretty good. Blackwell certainly makes you believe his character but it's Kenyon who steals the picture. I thought she was very good no matter what type of emotion her character was playing and I especially liked the chemistry of the two actors.

The film features some nice cinematography and there's no doubt that Guy has a good way to build up the relationship. With that said, even for 1916 standards the story itself really isn't anything we hadn't already seen and there's no question that it's quite predictable. Fans of silents will want to check it out.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Deteriorating Beauty
Cineanalyst13 January 2010
"The Ocean Waif" is a run-of-the-mill production for 1916, with a simplistic romance that turns melodramatic at the bookends with an abusive stepfather. The treatment is mostly light in the middle. One especially funny moment, intentional or not, comes after the writer finds his muse in the runaway ocean waif; he claims to have written his best story and then reads this line from it: "The girl was as beautiful as a rose." At least, the leads, Carlyle Blackwell and Doris Kenyon, were attractive.

The film was directed by Alice Guy, who was the world's first female filmmaker, beginning with Gaumont in France back in 1896. It's impressive enough that she managed to remain in the business for twenty-some years during a period of the most rapid development; she outlasted Edwin S. Porter, Georges Méliès and many other of her contemporaries. If not much else, "The Ocean Waif" demonstrates that she, or at least her assistants, adopted new techniques and practices, such as quick scene dissection, closer camera perspectives and star treatment, which is what men like Porter and Méliès failed to do by the 1910s. The film isn't particularly good in any of these respects, but it's at least not outdated for 1916. I was confused, however, by the use of an oval frame masking in the opening sequences; the effect didn't appear to have a function.

More interesting than the film proper is the preservation, restoration and presentation of its, reportedly, sole surviving print. The film apparently lacks some footage, and there's considerable deterioration, but when there's not, it's a beautiful, antique fine-grain 35mm print transfer under the typical scratches and mottling. I'm, perhaps, even more impressed and thankful that one of the leaders in distributing silents to home video would risk its reputation by presenting such an aged film. I commend Kino for that. I hope they and others continue to release rare films that lack pristine prints, because most silents that survive, which is not most of them, do not exist in the great condition of some of the more popular home video presentations.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Still Beautiful After 100 Years...
framptonhollis11 February 2016
Alice Guy-Blanche was one of cinema's true pioneers, yet it seems as if her work barely gets any recognition. Kino has released quite a few of her films on DVD (including this one), which I'm definitely pleased to see. But even with quite a few of her films being available on disc, she still doesn't have as big a following as she deserves. From my point of view, she belongs on the same list as great early film pioneers like the Lumiere brothers, Georges Melies, D.W. Griffith, and Edwin S. Porter. She was one of the first female filmmakers, and a lot of her films are truly amazing, from the 1906 epic "The Birth, The Life, and the Death of Christ" to the sweet 1912 drama that is "Falling Leaves", she left quite a legacy behind her. A legacy that deserves more attention.

What about THIS Alice Guy Blanche film? Is it any good?

It certainly is very good. In fact, it's MAGNIFICENT!!!

There's just something about this film that I found to be very beautiful. It's hard to put into words the beauty of "The Ocean Waif", I'd recommend you see it for yourself just to take in the experience. The truly impacting experience.

If I had to put into words what makes "The Ocean Waif" so beautiful to me, it would be the pure sweetness of it. It's just so sweet and lovely! The characters are so charming and likable (except for the antagonist), the humor is so funny, and the emotion is so strong. There's scenes that are intense, there's scenes that are hilarious, and there's scenes that are just plain romantic.

It never really gets all too melodramatic like some silent films seem to do. It manages to be a very calm and peaceful film for a majority of its running time. The plot is simple, the length is short, and it never goes over the top with drama. Sure, there's drama, but that drama manages to be very well written and well shot. Everything works on both technically and script wise. To me, it was all around perfect.

After 100 full years of existence, "The Ocean Waif" still manages to be charming, funny, heartwarming, and unspeakably beautiful...and on top of all of that it's only 40 minutes!

A true masterpiece, if there were only more films like it!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Waif or Wraith
wes-connors13 October 2015
Handsome young novelist Carlyle Blackwell (as Ronald Roberts) receives a message while yachting. His current novel is wildly successful and the publisher wants a follow-up. Meanwhile, on shore, pretty Doris Kenyon (as Millie) is beaten and pushed around by her alcoholic foster-father William Morris (as Hy Jessup). Having finally had enough, Ms. Kenyon runs away and moves into an abandoned mansion. There are rats living there, but Kenyon manages to stay out of their way. They are joined by Mr. Blackwell and his fussy valet Edgar Norton (as Hawkins). Blackwell needs a romantic and inspirational place to write his new book...

At first, Kenyon tries to stay hidden. The men wonder if she's the ghost talked about in the village. With Blackwell in the picture, you can count on romance. He is attracted to Kenyon, but his fiancée visits. There could even be a murder...

"The Ocean Waif" has deteriorated in spots, but can be enjoyed and understood. Directed by Alice Guy and produced by her husband Herbert Blache, the movie features nice Gothic house and fairly representative performances. The main draw, Carlyle Blackwell was a very big star. There is a limited level of restoration; due to severe damage, taking out every white spot would have been visually disarming. The film was certainly a longer feature, with at least 15 minutes missing. Apparently, a "bathing scene" featuring Kenyon is cut. Even more obvious, much of the ending is lost. A couple title cards, short clips and flashbacks successfully end the story.

**** The Ocean Waif (1916-11-02) Alice Guy ~ Carlyle Blackwell, Doris Kenyon, Edgar Norton, William Morse
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Carlyle Blackwell and Doris Kenyon
drednm4 December 2016
About 43 minutes of a 5 reeler exist. Story by Eustace Hale Ball tells of a waif (Doris Kenyon) who escapes a brutal stepfather and hides out in an abandoned house only to see a writer seeking solitude (Carlyle Blackwell) move in shortly thereafter. Of course he falls for her although he is engaged to be married. She goes back to her home and needs to be rescued from the clutches of her stepfather.

There are some beautiful scenes and pictorial compositions, but director Alice Guy undermines the story by presenting Kenyon's waif as the film's central character (though Blackwell gets top billing). In Hale's story, the writer is the protagonist and in the film, Blackwell also serves this function despite Guy's focus on Kenyon. Bottom line is that too much of the film focuses on Kenyon's antics in the abandoned house, which might be charming but do nothing to advance the story. There's also a silly bit in which the servant (Edgar Norton) thinks the house is haunted.

A rather dour Lyn Donaldson (aka Lyn Donelson) plays the jilted fiancée, William Morris is the stepfather, and Fraunie Fraunholz plays Sem, a sort of village idiot. Blackwell and Kenyon are certainly watchable and were big stars of the time.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A shame more of it doesn't survive
gbill-748778 January 2019
You may have to calibrate expectations to just how early a film this is, as it shows signs of wear, some cheesy acting (Eek! A mouse! Oh no! A ghost!), and only 41 minutes of it have survived. On the other hand, pioneering director Alice Guy-Blaché tells a complete story and captures some endearing shots. The casting of 19-year-old Doris Kenyon was wise; she has such a wonderful, almost modern screen presence and a big, natural smile. The fragmented scene with her milking a cow really shows this off. She's also engaging when she dusts off an old mirror to peer into her reflection, and when she's out in a field gathering flowers with the leading man (Carlyle Blackwell). The film is not all lightness though, and there are cringe-worthy moments with her abusive foster father (William Morris), who tries to rape her. It's too bad the entire print doesn't survive, but what does is easily worth the quick watch.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Maybe this one should NOT have been restored and produced on DVD
planktonrules12 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Let me explain what I wrote in the summary. Nitrate film stock decays very quickly. In fact, sometimes it even turns to powder, goo or explodes! It's a very unstable medium and as a result, a very high percentage of films pre-1950 (or so) have degraded so much that they are unwatchable. Some can be salvaged by piecing together various copies to make one semi-pristine copy. However, some are just a mess--even after significant restoration work. "The Ocean Waif" is one of these film that is so degraded that I think, in hindsight, it should not have been released--at least not the copy released by Kino. I noticed that some talked about seeing it on TCM and that they enjoyed it--it surely must have been a better copy than the DVD. If it wasn't, then perhaps it too should just be shelved until they can hopefully find some better prints or pieces of prints to construct a better film. It is simply a mess--and is often unwatchable.

The film itself is pretty watchable...and pretty weird. It begins with a young lady who lives with her step-father and step-brother. It seems they found her as a child along the seashore and decide to keep her. The problem is that her new dad treats her like a dog and she's miserable. Eventually, she runs away and hides out in what she thinks is an abandoned home. However, soon a writer moves in to begin working on his next story. So, she hides and in the process scares the butler--he thinks every time she moves about the house at night that it's haunted. This is a cute idea, but the butler WAY over-acted.

Later, when she is discovered by the writer, he allows her to stay. He feels sorry for her and takes care of her. However, when the step-dad finds out, he wants his 'property' back and comes to get her. Now here's the weird part. The step-dad now tells her he is NOT her biological father and proposes to her!!! Ewww!!! And, when she refuses, he's about to rape her--when her step-brother sees this and shoots the man dead. No one saw this happen and somehow the writer (who is in love with the lady) is accused.

Here is where the movie completely falls apart and is the biggest reason why the film should not have been commercially released. Unlike the rest of the film, where the print is very bad, here it's obvious that MAJOR portions of the film (the most important parts, by the way) are missing!! So, how all this is resolved AND what happens to the killer are all explained in a series of intertitle cards at the very end. You see NONE of this--just a long explanation!! This just cannot be for a film you might have paid to own (fortunately, I only rented it from Netflix). To reiterate--the entire ending is gone!!! My score of 3 represents the film in the current state only. If it were ever to be fully restored, I'd be glad to see it again and re-review it. But as is, I suggest you see another more complete silent film instead.

At the very least, Kino should CLEARLY warn customers of the state of this film (missing ending included) before they purchase the DVD.
3 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I was not blown away
Horst_In_Translation9 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
"The Ocean Waif" is a 40-minute black-and-white short film from 1916, so it's gonna have its 100th anniversary in roughly a year. The director is Alice Guy in her early 40s and this is already among her later career efforts. She did not make the transition into the sound era, but made over 400 films, mostly short films, between 1896 and 1920. "The Ocean Waif" is also a nice little play on words and it seems Guy really liked these. She has some fairly funny and smart movie title in her body of work. And looking at the duration of this film, it also shows that she was not scared of pretty long movies. Yep 40 minutes was considered long during that time. Just ask Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton, whose films usually did not cross the 25-minute mark. At least not before 1920.

Unfortunately, in terms of the action, I cannot be too positive here. It starts interestingly with a case of domestic violence, but after the woman leaves humiliated and in anger, the level drops a bit for the rest of the film. Oh yeah, do not be fooled by piano soundtracks and similar stuff. This is obviously still a silent film. Not one of Guy's best though in my opinion. Thumbs down.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
not 'orrible house but odd
kekseksa20 August 2018
Frederic Chapin who wrote the story and Eustace Hale Ball who wrote the screenplay have put together a very hybrid concotion here. The ocean waif part of the story is lkie somethig out of a Mary Pickford film while the plot about the novelist coming to write in a haunted house is straight out of George Cohan's hit play of 1913, Seven Keys to Baldpate which was actually filmed in 1916 in Australia and would be filmed again, with Cohan himself in the lead, in 1917. It's quite neatly done if one ignores those very tiresome close-ups that were fashionable in nearly all US films 1915-1918. The best thing is perhaps Londoner Edward Norton doing the "British servant" act that he would continue to do for in umpteen films for three further decades......

The glaring close-ups contribute to the even more glaring predictability of the rest of the plot.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed