Wild Girl (1932) Poster

(1932)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
She prefers trees to men... Well anyway, most men.
mark.waltz16 June 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Trees are straight and strong the young Joan Bennett exclaims in the unique opening credits which introduces most of the characters of this atmospheric drama with a western feeling. Bennett has been pursued by nearly all of the men in her community, married and single, and has declared her love for none of them. But when Charles Farrell comes along and finds her skinny-dipping, a spark is felt. He's coming to town to seek revenge against a notorious bad man for abusing his sister and this results in him being sentenced to hanging along with the husband of Sarah Padden for stagecoach robbing. it's obvious that a lot of people in town had reasons to want to see the man Farrell is accused of killing dead, and that includes some of the men who wanted then it for themselves. They include gambler Ralph Bellamy (dressed all in black) and the slimy Irving Pichel.

While slow-moving and a bit creaky, this is an enjoyable film if you allow yourself to get past its technical flaws. Eugene pallette is big-hearted and funny as Bennett's wealthy father who brings food to the poor and Louise Beavers, in an unbilled part, makes the most of her role as Bennett's loving companion. The outdoor setting, showing dear, bears and a gorgeous hooting owl, is nicely photographed. Fans of Joan Bennett will barely recognize her here although the toughness that she showed in later rolls is obviously present. Her voice hadn't yet deepened and she was still in her platinum blonde stage.

While Bellamy's character appears to be a villain in the credits, he has a light-hearted attitude in general, as shown in his card game with a group of kids, and is eventually accepting of the fact that he'll never win Bennett. Of the supporting cast, Sarah Padden comes off the best as the tired wife of a bad man she can't escape. This is an intriguing pre-code film that may not quite stand the test of time but has elements that for fans of this era and the terriffic cast will make it quite memorable. The direction by rausch is top-notch and helps pull the film together.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not great, but has its moments
gbill-7487717 January 2023
"Here was this bandit, a-strippin' these women..." "What?!?" "...of their jewelry." "Oh."

The plot to this pre-Code western is a melodramatic mix of subplots, none of which are terribly satisfying, but there are a few things which made it mildly entertaining:

  • The magnificent California redwoods in Sequoia National Park, where filming took place.


  • The equally magnificent Joan Bennett, flitting about in tight shirts, skinny dipping, and finding love. She's divine. Don't read too much into the title though, it's salacious clearly to sell tickets, and the character is actually modest and virtuous. In fact, it's a little disappointing that the "tomboy" comfortable with climbing atop a moving stagecoach is wearing a dress after falling for a handsome stranger (Charles Farrell).


  • Eugene Palette imitating agitated horses.


  • Raoul Walsh's style of scenes ending with the film turning a page as it's rolling, a neat little effect. He also uses it after the opening credits, when the main actors introduce themselves.


  • Ralph Bellamy's character having the grace to know that the young woman doesn't truly love him and then backing off, telling her she'll know when the right one comes along instead of being aggressive, which is so often seen in these films.


  • The town prostitute (Minna Gombell) brazenly introducing herself as "I'm called a lot of names, by different men," and then later mocking the hypocrisy of the sheriff and the "Purity League" he represents, probably a clever dig at the Catholic League of Decency, who a couple of years later would finally succeed in getting the Production Code enforced.


  • The notable way that for the two crimes committed, the sheriff and a posse capture the men and without any semblance of a trial by jury, take them off to be executed by hanging, and no one bats an eye over this process.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wild Girl has it all: action, romance, bear cubs and skinny-dipping
wmorrow5914 October 2012
When this rare Western was shown recently at the Museum of Modern Art I happened to overhear a conversation, just before the screening, between two women sitting in the row ahead of me. One had already seen Wild Girl, and assured her friend that it's very enjoyable, then added that the opening credits alone are worth the price of admission. That struck me as puzzling, but once the movie started I understood what she meant. The first thing we see is an old-fashioned photo album on a desk, with a lit candle nearby. As if by magic the book opens itself, and the film's credits appear on its pages, which turn one by one, in a forerunner to the "storybook" style credits the Disney studio would favor for their cartoon features in later years. It's pleasant enough, but the truly memorable part comes with the introduction of the featured players. We see them one at a time, first Charles Farrell, then Joan Bennett, Ralph Bellamy, etc., each standing as if posing for a formal portrait, in costume. And each in turn delivers a brief speech, telling us something about the character he or she is playing. This photo album motif continues throughout the film, recurring at key points in the story, when the page-turn effect reappears as an optical wipe that provides a change of scene.

The motif is charming and well suited to the material. Wild Girl is an adaptation of "Salomy Jane," a novella by Bret Harte published in the late 1800s. (There was also a 1907 stage version called "Salomy Jane's Kiss.") Director Raoul Walsh's highly cinematic presentation reminds us that what we're experiencing is, above all, a movie and not a book or a play, and also helps us make allowances when the plot turns melodramatic, or when the acting occasionally comes off as stage-y. What isn't at all stage-y is the scenery: Wild Girl was filmed on location in Northern California at Shasta National Forest, and it's plain from the opening sequence, as Salomy Jane (Joan Bennett, blonde and dazzling) and her Mammy Lou (Louise Beavers) run through the woods among bear cubs, that the giant redwood trees we're seeing are the real thing, not a studio set. The scenery is amazing and beautifully photographed, and it's also noticeable that the editing tempo is brisk, and the use of sound in this outdoor setting is sophisticated. There's no need to make excuses for this film as an "early talkie" in terms of its technique, for Walsh was past that phase, and well ahead of many of his contemporaries in utilizing the still new, still evolving technology.

Naturally the title refers to Salomy Jane, a very attractive tomboy who lives in a mountain town, where, naturally, several of the men folk compete for her affections. There's Jack Marbury the gentleman gambler (Ralph Bellamy), whom she likes, and loutish Rufe Waters (Irving Pichel), whom she dislikes. And then there's the pseudo-pious political climber Phineas Baldwin (Morgan Wallace), whom she loathes. But the man of the hour, who appears out of nowhere and swiftly steals Jane's heart, is a handsome stranger (Charles Farrell) who comes to town to settle an old score with Baldwin. Colorful characters abound in this locality. There's a family headed by no-account Red Pete, whose wife Lize loves him anyhow (Willard Robertson and Sarah Padden portray this pathetic couple, and both are excellent). But despite all these folks jostling for our attention, stagecoach driver Yuba Bill (played by the one and only Eugene Palette) deftly steals the show. He's a timorous, long-winded braggart, and the scene where he breathlessly attempts to describe a hold-up, only to digress into a series of horse whinnies and snorting noises, is an indisputable high-point. And I haven't even mentioned yet that Salomy Jane goes skinny-dipping in a lake. When she first encounters the handsome stranger, she's naked as a jay bird. That's how they "meet cute," and come to think of it, that's the sequence I personally consider worth the price of admission.

Wild Girl offers a little of everything. One minute you're laughing at Yuba Bill's antics, the next you're gazing awestruck at the scenery, and then suddenly there's a chase and a shoot-out. In the midst of it all comes a lynching scene that is as powerful as anything this director ever staged. Yet somehow, with all the plots and subplots and shifts in tone, Walsh keeps it together, running smoothly. The film has its flaws: some of the actors get histrionic at times, and there are moments when the dialog creaks a bit, giving off echoes of that 1907 stage play. Over all, however, Wild Girl works the way it was meant to work. I do hope this beautifully restored, richly detailed and unjustly forgotten film, which seems to have gone unnoticed on its initial release, can now at last find its audience. It's one of the great popcorn movies of its era.
29 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Exasperating
view_and_review9 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Well, let's see. The most noble and celebrated person of this movie was a Confederate soldier who fought alongside Robert E. Lee. After him was the love interest and the only pretty girl in town. She had a mammie (Louise Beavers) who she playfully kicked and dragged around in her games. I'm sure this movie was just like real life--whenever a mammie's mistress was happy she was happy.

And if you believe that then you can get bent.

"Wild Girl" took place in the sequoias in California just after the Civil War. There were a lot of different characters of which it seemed half of them were lusting after Salomy Jane (Joan Bennett). Apparently she was the only desirable girl for miles.

None could land her except the soldier boy (Charles Farrell). He won her over by killing Phineas Baldwin (Morgan Wallace), resident creep and attempted rapist. When Salomy found out that the soldier killed Baldwin she fell in love (which was very common in 1930's movies). Without knowing anything further about him she was ready to die for him.

He had to be good if good ol' Salomy loved him.

This movie was indicative of a lot of the movies of this era that I have a problem with. The moral compass is off with regards to treatment of people, and the people fell in love too quickly. And it wasn't just that they fell in love, they fell in love and got married before vetting as though the gooey feeling they were mistaking for love was a substitute for getting to know someone.

This was a clumsy dumb romance in which a thief was hanged and a killer was able to escape because he was in love with the pretty girl. These old movies exasperate me and I have a lot of patience. I don't criticize the cinematic quality, the dialogue, or even the acting, but these plots and these characters slay me. I can't get over the attitudes, mores, and behavior of that era, especially when I have known people who were teens and young adults then. I try to give these movies a lot of latitude, yet I find myself cringing more often than not.

Free on YouTube.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Salomy Jane's Kiss
boblipton11 October 2012
Raoul Walsh tackles Bret Harte in this one. It's a natural for this usually muscular director with a vicious sense of humor; he was fond of repeating Jack Pickford's comment that his idea of light comedy was to burn down a whorehouse.

Although he has fallen out of favor, Harte and Mark Twain were judged neck-and-neck for the two best writers to come out of the Old West. Harte's characters were not one-dimensional; he approached them as complex human beings with conflicting sets of emotions and self-justifications. As a result, this movie, derived from "Salomy Jane's Kiss" has a lot going for it. Add in the outdoor shooting among the redwoods around Mount Shasta and the lovely conceit of using frame wipes that freeze the frame and then make it look like a page being turned, and you have a beautiful motion picture.

Unhappily, few of the performances are up to the visuals. Perhaps it was due to the fact that handling of sound outdoors was still pretty primitive and some of the performers are either unseasoned for the screen or still not out of the silent era and the line readings sound very stagey. Whatever the reasons, they act best when they are doing things, not saying things -- the hanging sequence is devastating.

Even with that cavil, this is a wonderful picture. Everyone looks right and Joan Bennett is stunningly beautiful. If you get a chance to see it -- mine came with the 2012 Museum of Modern Art 'To Preserve and Project' festival -- take it.
16 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
pre-Code western-romance-comedy, highly recommended
rohsenow6 February 2013
An exceptionally rare pre-Code western-romance-comedy starring Joan Bennett, Charles Farrell, Ralph Bellamy, and Eugene Palette, and directed by the always-brash Raoul Walsh. Adapted from the Brete Harte short story 'Salomy Jane's Kiss' and filmed on location among majestic California redwoods, this film features a young blonde Joan Bennett as the titular "wild girl"—a nature-loving free-spirit who is wooed by many but who falls for an out-of-town stranger (Farrell). Made in 1932 before the Hayes Office Code was strictly in force, Wild Girl shuttles between romance, adventure, raucous comedy, and titillation (a skinny-dipping Bennett). The unusual opening credit sequence is one of the most memorable of the period. This film is full of rowdy fun -- highly recommended!
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Exceptional Example of the Characterization "Blond Is Beautiful" on the Screen!
malvernp17 March 2023
To the extent that she ever enters into the consciousness of today's moviegoers, Joan Bennett is probably best remembered for four films------two directed by Fritz Lang and two helmed by Vincente Minnelli. The Lang pair are film noir classics from his American period that also starred Edward G. Robinson and Dan Duryea: The Woman in the Window (1944) and Scarlett Street (1946). The Minnelli duo featured Spencer Tracy and Elizabeth Taylor, and are beloved comedies from the Golden Age of Hollywood: Father of the Bride (1950) and Father's Little Dividend (1951). All of these movies presented us with a mature Joan Bennett from her brunette period (the better remembered one), when she looked a lot like Hedy Lamarr and often acted like her on the screen. Bennett was glamorous in a kind of worldly adult way during this period. She seldom generated real excitement but was always attractive and dependable. Bennett was regarded as the consummate professional while on the set.

Many (perhaps most) do not remember the Joan Bennett of her earlier (pre-1939) blond period, with the possible exception of appearing as Amy in the George Cukor version of Little Women (1933). During that period, she was radiant in her youthful beauty-----possibly striking would be a better description. She was charming, engaging, natural and likable in a wide variety of different roles-----a real audience pleaser. The virtually unknown Raoul Walsh production of Wild Girl (WG) was made for Fox Studio during Bennett's blond period, and captures a 22 year old youngster with all her lovely fresh appeal on full view. It is a real pity that WG is so rare and hard to find today.

The only male in the cast who matches Bennett in talent and attractiveness is supporting player Ralph Bellamy. Bellamy is by far the best actor in the film. He presents us with a complex, subtle and nuanced performance that seems quite modern for its time. Unfortunately, leading man Charles Farrell, once a silent film star, tries hard to register some romantic chemistry with Bennett-------but the best he appears able to muster is projecting a warm, sincere image.

WG has a good supporting cast that is largely unknown to contemporary audiences with the possible exception of frog-voiced Eugene Pallette. Walsh is considered by film historian Ephraim Katz to be "one of the most durable, prolific and proficient of Hollywood's directors" and is regarded by many critics to be "one of the great primitive artists of the screen." His mastery in 1932 of the problems posed by location photography and the related technical sound challenges of that time is quite remarkable.

For the fortunate few who will have the pleasure of seeing WG, you are in for a real treat! Seek it out!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed