Christopher Strong (1933) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
An interesting role for Hepburn early in her career
AlsExGal15 November 2009
This film is Katharine Hepburn's second film and her first in a starring role. In her first film, 1932's "A Bill of Divorcement", Billie Burke had starred with Hepburn fourth billed. Here the situation has reversed itself, and Hepburn supplants Burke in more ways than one. Hepburn plays Lady Cynthia Darrington, a member of the British gentry whose family has lost its money. As a result, she pursues aviation for both her love of it and for money to try and restore the family fortune. She has forsaken love up to this point in her life, and as the result of a human scavenger hunt at a party attended by one of her friends, she winds up at the party because she is a virgin, and Christopher Strong (Colin Clive) winds up there because he is a faithful husband to Billie Burke's character. The two meet, fall in love, and eventually this leads to the loss of what distinguished both of them in the first place.

There are several things that make this film interesting - not the least of which being that Hepburn's role turns out to be semi-autobiographical. In actuality Hepburn was an athletic and independent woman of aristocratic roots who fell for a married Spencer Tracy who also never technically divorced his wife. Then there's that metallic moth suit complete with antennae that Cynthia wears to a party - yikes! And the middle-aged Lord Strong doesn't even do a double take when she walks in wearing this outfit. So much for the stuffy image of the British aristocracy. The ending is odd since it doesn't seem consistent with Cynthia's strong independent streak. Her solution to her dilemma when she realizes that, although Strong loves her, he would only actually leave his wife out of a sense of duty to Cynthia, seems completely out of character. Also, Billie Burke does such a good job of playing the wronged wife who suffers in silence and dignity that it is really hard to sympathize with anyone but her. Finally, the title is a bit of a mystery. The title character, Christopher Strong, is really secondary to Hepburn's Cynthia Darrington, and I can't help but wonder why the film wasn't titled after Hepburn's character instead.

Director Dorothy Arzner, the only female director in Hollywood during this time, certainly took some chances with this one. Some of the film worked and some of it didn't, but I don't think it would have had a chance without Hepburn in the lead. I recommend this film to anyone interested in the evolution of Hepburn's acting style.
15 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Title Should Have Been Cynthia Darrington
bkoganbing7 May 2007
I'm not quite sure why the title of this film is not Lady Cynthia Darrington since the film rises and falls on the action of Hepburn's character and not on Colin Clive's title role of Christopher Strong.

Clive is a most proper member of Parliament, probably a Tory, who through a treasure hunt, a la My Man Godfrey, he meets Hepburn who is a young titled woman who has an interest in aviation. In fact she's the British version of Amelia Earhart.

Clive and wife Billie Burke have a daughter, Helen Chandler, who is something of a wild child. She's having an affair with the unhappily married Ralph Forbes. But before long it's Clive and Hepburn who get involved.

Colin Clive gives us a perfect portrayal of a man going through midlife crisis when everything just seems to settle in a dull routine. He's so taken by Hepburn's vitality and independence that their affair has an inevitability about it.

Dorothy Arzner one of the few women directors around at that point also gives us one of Kate's very first feminist icon roles. Her first film, A Bill of Divorcement, had Kate as a dutiful daughter who gives up her man to care for an insane father. Kate has some critical choices to make in Christopher Strong as well.

What she does might not make sense to today's audience, but made perfectly good sense in post Victorian Great Britain. She and Clive make a wonderful pair of tragic lovers in a drama that while old fashioned still holds up.
27 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
B+ grade melodrama
funkyfry9 October 2002
None too subtle story of a famous aviatrix (Hepburn -- the movie calls her a "girl flier") in love with a married nobleman (Clive). They put off consumating their affair, even muttering to each other in one ridiculous scene about how "special" they are. Burke turns in a quality performance given a very standard mother role, giving her character the convincing quality it needs to withstand the transition from anger to frustration to final acceptance of the situation. A story that could not have been filmed this way 2 or 3 years later. Includes Hepburn in her infamous "moth suit." Clive does well, and Hepburn is great, but given how it's written and (especially) how she plays it, it's no surprise this film did nothing to improve her standing in the eyes of the more prurient elements in the audience. Perhaps, even, some of their later vindictiveness (including placing her on the list of so-called "box-office poison") could be seen as their own reaction to her character transferred onto Katherine Hepburn. Well directed and photographed. Unconvincing ending unhinges the movie in its final reel, but I guess last reel reconciliations by way of death were soon to be the rule in Hollywood (as they always had been in more conservative film centers), so it's good Selznick got in fairly early in the game. Will be remembered more by Hepburn's fans than by fans of good, solid movies, because she provides many of its most memorable moments.
22 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pre-code lovers can pass
MissSimonetta22 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Christopher Strong (1933) belongs to that breed of pre-code that has not aged gracefully. Though it concerns spicy topics such as infidelity, alcoholism, and pregnancy out of wedlock, this picture plays like a musty melodrama with only a young Katharine Hepburn endowing it with any interest for the modern viewer.

One wonders why the film was named after Colin Clive's character, a middle-aged politician whose long-lasting faithfulness to his wife comes to an end when he takes up an affair with Hepburn's free-spirited and virginal aviatrix, Lady Cynthia Darrington. Cynthia is the real main character, certainly the character who goes through the biggest transformation and suffers the most. The film ends with her learning she is pregnant. Rather than give up her career and ruin her reputation, she kills herself in a plane crash. It's as melodramatic as melodrama gets.

Unlike most other pre-codes which sizzle and even feel modern, CS is rather moldy. Unless you're a die hard Katharine Hepburn or Colin Clive completionist, this isn't worth your time.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Strong to the finish
lugonian9 February 2001
CHRISTOPHER STRONG (RKO Radio, 1933), directed by Dorothy Arzner, with a haunting score by Max Steiner, began production as "A Great Desire." Starring Katharine Hepburn in her second feature film following her successful debut in A BILL OF DIVORCEMENT (1932), it pairs her opposite Colin Clive for the only time. Set in England, she plays Lady Cynthia Darrington, an enthusiastic aviatrix (possibly inspired on Amelia Earheart), who is over 21 and has never had a lover or an affair because she makes no time for it. All that changes when she meets Sir Christopher Strong (Colin Clive), whose life is not only absorbed in his political career, but with his wife (Billie Burke) and his single adult daughter (Helen Chandler) who has a married lover (Ralph Forbes), but becomes her husband after he is finally granted his divorce.

CHRISTOPHER STRONG is particularly interesting mainly because of some pre-production code stuff, and seeing Kate playing "the other woman" on screen for the only time who meets her dismal climax, something not common in a Hepburn movie. There is even a "bedroom scene" which camera focuses mainly on Kate's hand by the lamp while the viewer only hears some mono dialog exchange between her and Chris before she turns off the lights, leaving something to the viewer's imagination. By today's standards, this is nothing compared to what Hollywood would make of this particular scene today. I won't reveal any more about the plot, but this is early Kate Hepburn as the liberated woman with carefree ideas that come back to punish her. Maybe casting Hepburn in this type of role was RKO 's way of trying to develop her into a tragic heroine like MGM's own Greta Garbo. Worth a look, however, especially seeing Colin Clive in something other than that as Dr. Henry Frankenstein, his most famous performance(s) in Universal's FRANKENSTEIN (1931) and THE BRIDE OF FRANKENSTEIN (1935). CHRISTOPHER STRONG, which formerly played on the American Movie Classics cable channel prior to 2001, can be seen occasionally on Turner Classic Movies. It was once available on video cassette through the Nostalgia Merchant and RKO Home Video, but presently, it's out of print. Look quickly for future Warner Brothers actress Margaret Lindsay appearing in a small role as a girl who wants to get Cynthia's autograph. Not a box office success when released, but better roles for Kate in 1933 would soon follow with MORNING GLORY and LITTLE WOMEN. (**1/2)
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Early Hepburn
blanche-214 August 2006
Katharine Hepburn is a beautiful and accomplished aviatrix in "Christopher Strong," a 1933 film also starring Clive Owen and Billie Burke, and directed by Dorothy Arzner. Hepburn's role of Lady Cynthia is loosely based on Amelia Earhart, a young, ambitious career woman who is not interested in marriage and home but rather accomplishment. She's an early feminist, and the role is perfect for Hepburn, who with her androgynous looks and strong performances would go on to play many such roles in her very long career.

"Christopher Strong" is of interest because it's early Hepburn, has a feminist theme in the early '30s, and also because it's pre-Code. Arzner does a great job depicting the love affair of Hepburn and Owen and yet shows nothing, with a hand reaching up and checking the time on a small clock...then the light is turned off and plunges the room into darkness after the lovers exchange a few words.

The problem with the movie is that it's badly dated, a '30s melodrama with tremulous, "we must be honorable," pip-pip and all that rot dialogue. Owen tells everyone at a party that he will never be unfaithful to his wife, that it is a moral charge he holds high - and seconds later he meets Hepburn and you can tell he's already falling. Owen is an odd choice of a romantic partner - he's not exactly the man one would give up everything for.

A bigger problem is the performance of Billie Burke, a fine actress. She is extremely sympathetic as the suffering wife - so sympathetic, in fact, and Hepburn seems so callous about the whole thing for most of the film, that one sides with what I'm sure is the wrong person. Also, putting up with your husband's infidelity and not saying anything brings us right back into aggressive non-feminism.

I am forced to agree with one of the other comments - yes, it is directed by an important director, yes, it stars an important, legendary star, yes, it's early feminism, and yes, it's not that great a movie, rather, an artifact. Worth seeing? To catch Hepburn in that moth costume - absolutely.
21 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not the strongest
ReganRebecca16 March 2017
Christopher Strong is a rather short and underbaked movie. The film starts out with a young woman and her boyfriend participating in a treasure hunt where they have to find a woman over twenty who has never had a love affair and a man who has been married over 5 years who has never had an affair. The woman brings her father, the titular Christopher Strong, along and her boyfriend finds a career driven aviator Cynthia Darrington, who will cop to being over twenty and having had no boyfriends. There is an immediate attraction between Christopher and Cynthia and the bulk of the movie is devoted to the eventual consummation of their love affair and the consequences that follow.

This was only Hepburn's second movie, but Darrington is a classic Hepburn role, independent, honest, and tomboyish. Colin Clive is really too young for the role he was meant to play and has ridiculously little chemistry with Hepburn. They barely register as a couple at all.

Unless you're a fan of one of the stars or an Arzner completist, this pre-code film isn't really worth your time.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Real Tragedy Was Behind The Scenes
Dan1863Sickles14 September 2006
This early Katherine Hepburn picture about a daring woman pilot united the most liberated, confident and assertive female in film history, Hepburn herself, with the early sound era's most tragic female victim, Helen Chandler. Chandler was a gifted actress who gained film immortality as the exquisite blonde Mina in Dracula, only to fall victim to bad parts, bad choices, and a casual drinking habit that cost her roles and swiftly became compulsive and fatal alcoholism.

Haunting and heart-wrenching in the extreme, the film almost unintentionally sets up the brave Lady Cynthia (Hepburn) in direct contrast to the embittered, tormented and weak-willed Monica (Chandler.) Hepburn is the daring lady pilot enjoying a wicked affair with strong, solid Sir Christopher Strong, while Chandler is Strong's weak daughter, the jealous and resentful Monica.

"Of course I do whatever I choose," Hepburn announces, striding into the drawing room in her daring and very masculine attire. "What woman doesn't?" The only woman wearing pants in this movie, Hepburn hardly seems to notice that other women lack her strength. Only a few feet away we see a lovely blonde on the sofa, her eyes blazing and her hands shaking as she gulps down a drink in helpless defiance. Helen Chandler hardly needed to act as she portrays a woman whose guts have been torn out already, but her smallest gestures are still remarkable. Taking the first drink, waiting for the effect, shuddering with relief. The constant fidgeting, the inability to look anyone in the eye. The twitching of her hand when trying to wave off questions about her drinking.

As the film unfolds, Monica is supposed to be spoiled and disdainful, but Helen Chandler willingly or not somehow puts across an almost pitiable quality of spineless dependency. Monica lives in terror that her father will discover her drinking, yet hates the laughing, confident and healthy woman who has engaged his interest. Trapped in her own life of appearances and lies, her weak, sweet-faced mother can do nothing but look on worriedly as angry Monica stews on the sofa, either puffing greedily on a cigarette or gulping another drink.

In the big "party" scene, Hepburn is is calm and triumphant, while Chandler's Helen is just the opposite -- her laughter too loud, her movements too frantic, her wild gestures almost a savage parody of youthful enjoyment. It's like there's a fiend inside her, a demon who has taken the soul and left only a fragile and hopeless shell.

The demon was alcohol, and by the time this movie was made Helen Chandler was only a shell of her former self.
37 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Does He Love Me, Even Though I'm Not Perfect?
rmax30482316 July 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Katherine Hepburn was a forceful actress with unconventional good looks but some critical mogul labeled her "box office poison" in the late 1930s. Maybe because she often wore slacks. But she was competent enough and was to become much more than merely "competent" as she matured.

Still, in the 1930s, with all her spirit and beauty, she was stuck in a number of movies of the genre that were called -- without any implication of male superiority -- "women's pictures." They were simply aimed at a certain audience, perhaps to provide some balance for the "men's pictures" in which Jimmy Cagney punched everybody out. Beginning with "A Bill of Divorcement," they mostly seemed to involve romantic intrigues and difficulties, the kind that can be found on many afternoon domestic dramas on television. This entry in the series doesn't add much to her box-office impact or, if it somehow does, I missed it. The director gives Hepburn a grand entrance into a ball room dressed in a shimmering gown and tight skull cap that is supposed to be stunning but to an insensitive male only makes Hepburn look a little like the False Maria in "Metropolis."

This one was directed by a woman but it fits the template fairly well. Hepburn is Lady Cynthia Darlington. She's an aviatrix, but don't worry. There isn't much flying in it. She falls in love with a married man, Colin Clive. Clive's daughter falls in love with an older man too, even after she's been seduced by a rogue named Carlo. The echoing dual contretemps is handled better in "King Lear," where it's not handled very well either. Will Katherine wind up with Colin? Will Colin's daughter catch the man she truly loves? Will this movie never end? It's full of people who might have populated a Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers movie at the same studio, RKO. Everybody not wearing riding breeches is dressed in evening clothes. They rush from one all-night party to another. Some of them are reckless. They think nothing of zipping off to vacations in Italy and riding around in speedboats. Colin Clive -- you'll remember him as Dr. Frankenstein. You know, the white-coated scientist who shouts, "Get BECK. Get BECK! It's ALIVE. Ohhh, it's alive!" His name here is Sir Christopher Strong, just as Hepburn is Lady Cynthia Darlington.

Actually, I didn't really care who ended up with whom. The movie did leave me with a strong feeling, however. I wish I'd been born rich instead of poor, into a world in which the worst tragedies one had to face were the prospect of divorce and the immutable fact of having been seduced because one was lonely.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kate seduces!
HotToastyRag7 April 2020
In this obvious fictionalized version of Amelia Earhart, Katharine Hepburn plays the independent, strong, masculine flyer. It's perfect casting, given her offscreen persona, but what's really great about this role is the against-type aspect of it: Kate has a couple of seduction scenes in Christopher Strong and even shows off her figure in a skintight gown!

Kate makes friends with Helen Chandler, but when she meets Helen's parents, everything changes. Helen's mother, Billie Burke, is nice enough, but her father, Colin Clive, catches Kate's attention. Kate and Colin can't resist each other, which makes things awkward when Helen continues to look up to her as a mentor.

Hepburn fans will want to rent this classic to see their favorite actress act as tough onscreen as she did offscreen-and just like in real life, we get to see her turn into a softie when she falls in love with a married man. In one scene, the camera frames only Colin and Kate's wrists. It's implied that they're talking in bed together, which is why the camera doesn't pan out. Then, Kate says it's getting late, and she turns the lamp off-how risqué!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A strong performance from Hepburn in this early talkie melodrama
jem13219 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Chiefly of interest as one of Katharine Hepburn's early RKO films, "Christopher Strong" is worth a look for her fans, yet other than that, it's pretty much just another melodrama. Hepburn plays a feminist flier who falls in love with the married man of the title, played by Colin Clive. Lots of tears and hand-wringing follows as the affair deepens. I like Hepburn in the role, she is always interesting to watch, but even now (as she did back then) she seems a bit too arch to really connect to the audience. I have no idea why she falls for Clive in this one. The man is as stiff as a board and not that attractive. Helen Chandler's performance as Clive's troubled daughter fascinated me. Chandler herself was an alcoholic, and she is unnervingly right for her role. Billie Burke also stars as the wife who Clive cheats on. It's a pre-code so we even get a bedroom scene of sorts, but the film reaches a very post-code solution by the end. All in all, a decent melodrama from Arzner, and a striking Hepburn (she wears the moth suit in this one) performance, but not really anything great here.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Hepburn Soars
Ron Oliver9 September 2001
Sir CHRISTOPHER STRONG, staunch family man and Conservative MP, finds himself falling in love with a free-spirited aviatrix.

Given splendid production values by RKO Radio Pictures, this high-class soap opera proved to be an excellent showcase for the talents of young Katharine Hepburn. Tall, angular, tomboyish, in a role patterned after Amelia Earhart, Hepburn is utterly fascinating as the woman who's never loved. Whether striding about in men's clothing or swathed in an outrageous moth costume, she makes the heartache & jubilation of her character play across her expressive features. It is almost painful to try imagining anyone else in the role. Her final scene, as she gives the ultimate sacrifice, is especially poignant.

Colin Clive seems an unlikely choice as the object of Hepburn's passion, but he acts his part with great earnestness, deftly underplaying what could have easily been a stiff & cardboard characterization. In a serious role, the wonderful Billie Burke skillfully delineates the agony of the unloved wife. Like Hepburn, she remains in the memory long after the film ends.

Helen Chandler & Irene Browne, as Clive's daughter & sister respectively, do well with their portrayals of socially irresponsible females. Ralph Forbes, as an upper class philanderer, also resonates in an important supporting role; here was an actor with the talent & charm to have become a major Hollywood star, but it was not to be.

Pioneering director Dorothy Arzner includes subtle suggestions of the sapphist in Hepburn's character, to be rejected or respected by individual viewers. As it is, certain situations in the plot show its pre-Production Code status.
22 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Katharine's second
SnoopyStyle21 August 2021
Monica and Harry are on a scavenger hunt organized by her aunt Carrie. The final challenge is to find a man who has been married over 5 years and is still faithful or a woman over 20 who has never had a love affair. Monica goes to fetch her father Sir Christopher Strong (Colin Clive) who is faithful to her mother. Harry gets into an accident with Lady Cynthia Darrington (Katharine Hepburn), an adventurer flier. She had never found love.

The problem is that the meet-cute is actually between Harry and Lady Darrington. There is no chemistry with Christopher. The story needs to manufacture a way for the car accident to be between Sir Strong and Lady Darrington. At least that way, there is a chance for this tragic romance to build. As it stands, it's all rather unseemly. One does not root for this relationship. It could be solved if he's a widower. This movie is still an interesting star vehicle for the up-and-comer Katharine Hepburn. It's only her second film and she outshines everybody.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Interesting pre-feminist melodrama, though one with all the 'woman's picture' clichés intact...
moonspinner5513 August 2006
Merry madcaps in London stage a treasure hunt, with one young woman inadvertently fixing up her married politician father with a strong, independent lady-flier who's never been in love. Intriguing early vehicle for Katharine Hepburn, playing an Amelia Earhart-like aviatrix who's been too self-involved to give herself over to any man. The director (Dorothy Arzner) and the screenwriter (Zoe Akins, who adapted Gilbert Frankau's book) were obviously assigned to this project to get the female point of view, but why are all the old clichés kept intact like frozen artifacts? Billie Burke plays the type of simpering, weepy wife who takes to her bed when thing go wrong, and Hepburn's final scene is another bummer. A curious artifact, but not a classic for Kate-watchers. ** from ****
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A film made great by Kate's splendid performance
ladylavende6 August 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Christopher Strong is a film of clichés- daring, independent woman meets devoted, trustworthy husband of kind, albeit prudish wife. He's never cheated on his wife, she's never been in love. Will a clandestine affair ensue? Oh, gee, the suspense might leave you hanging.

But before you write this one off, remember that it stars the incomparable Katharine Hepburn in one of her first screen roles. And she is divine. I love Kate when she's strong and brash and carelessly independent. She breathes life into what would be a tired role in any other actress's hands. Her performance makes you believe at once in the worldliness and naiveté of an aviatrix who's never known love before.

The ending is rushed and lacks credibility. It feels forced, as though they had to give some closure to a rather untidy relationship. It would have been better without the closure. But through it all, you believe in Hepburn; even in the final moments, you believe that maybe she regrets her irreversible decision after all.

It's not an original look at adultery, but Kate's performance gives you an interesting view of the other woman- one who is brave but scared, happy but miserable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fairer Avis
writers_reign8 February 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Already in only her second film and second year in Hollywood Hepburn displays all the assurance of a veteran. The plot is pure soap and Billie Burke, lovely though she looks, has an unfortunate habit of addressing her lines - especially in her initial scene with Colin Clive - to the middle distance whilst selecting a suitable expression to complement the dialogue. If Hepburn plays a pioneer of sorts - an aviatrix clearly modelled on Amelia Earhart - director Dorothy Arzner is also something of a pioneer standing virtually alone in a Hollywood dominated by male directors. For its time (1933) the exposition may have appeared slick; a group of 'bright young things' engaged in a treasure hunt are instructed by the hostess to find someone who has been faithful to his or her spouse for more than five years and someone who has never had a love affair. The first is easy for one of the guests who simply brings her father whilst someone else brings Hepburn; the age gap is as nothing and they embark on an affair doomed to end in tears. As I said it's world-class hoke but Hepburn makes it watchable.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What is the cost of being noble?
mark.waltz26 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
In an eerie forecast of the disappearance of Amelia Earhart, the story of female pilot Cynthia Darrington and her love affair with an older married man (Colin Clive) is a haunting melodrama of one woman's search for independence and the revelation that her sins make her more dependent. She is the best friend of Clive's rebellious daughter (Helen Chandler), an amoral young woman also in love with a married man. Torn between her love for Clive and her own scruples, Cynthia is forced to make a drastic decision, especially after helping Chandler through her ordeal and being thanked for her kindness by Clive's noble wife (Billie Burke in a very serious part) who is disappointed by the lack of "nice" people in their social circle. Will Hepburn choose to break up this marriage in order to secure her own happiness, or will she break it off to prevent herself from becoming one of those selfish social nothings who don't care whom they hurt, as long as their own happiness is secure?

In just her second film, Katharine Hepburn proves that she has what it takes to be more than just a one-hit wonder. She's simply breathtaking to watch, a plethora of emotions and in definite conflict with herself because of something which occurred that was beyond her control. Colin Clive is quite different here as the romantic older man she can't bear to be without, not at all like his mad doctor in "Frankenstein". This is quite a nice dramatic role for Billie Burke who didn't start acting all dizzy in her movies until after she had been established. With this and her outstanding bitchy role as the society woman planning "Dinner at Eight", she would have been the front runner for a Supporting Actress Oscar had they been given out in 1933.

Wearing a gold lamé costume in one sequence which looks like something borrowed from MGM's "Madame Satan", Katherine Hepburn photographs gorgeously, and that voice is "rally" spectacular to listen to, obviously theatrically trained and truly nobody's fool as she takes over the male dominated world of early talking pictures. Her career would be a bumpy ride during her first decade of movie acting because her personality off screen and on was something nobody had seen before. But what makes a star? The ability to stand out on your own and create something that is like no other, and that is what the essence of the great Kate remains to this day. She remains, along with a few others, a truly great icon of entertainment, and that is what makes a legend most!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Just Too Darn Sad
ldeangelis-757089 April 2023
This was a good movie, but I wish I had written the script, so I could have given it a different ending.

The story of star-crossed lovers, pilot Cynthia Darrington (Katharine Hepburn) and married MP Christopher Strong (Colin Clive) is played out well, avoiding a lot of melodrama and sentimentality, and yet with enough emotion to make you feel for the characters and understand - even if you don't condone - their affair, which was based on love and not a meaningless fling. At the same time, you can't help but feel for the wife (Billie Burke), as well.

A secondary plot involves Christopher's daughter, Monica (Helen Chandler), who falls for a married man and - ironically - turns to Cynthia for advice. It's not easy being confidant to a young woman when you're sleeping with her father.

Do they continue their love, despite the hurt it'll cause others, not to mention the damage to his political career? Cynthia takes matters into her own hands, from which there's no return.

It's an old movie worth watching, but not for the faint of heart.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Rare Newsreel Footage-
Jim A31 March 2015
Aviation is my hobby, and I DVRed this to see if it had any worthwhile aviation footage. The scene with the takeoffs for the around the world race is actually the beginning of the Dole Air Race (financed by the pineapple magnate), a tragic fiasco that lead to a number of deaths, two aircraft never found, and only a few of the contestants actually making it from Oakland to Honolulu. Hepburn's plane (G-FERN) might be the famous Winnie Mae, a Lockheed Vega, that was the first plane flown solo around the world by Wiley Post, the pilot that was killed with Will Rogers in Alaska. I must admit, I really did not pay much attention to the plot after listening to some English drawing room dialogue at the beginning.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fascinating Film
hcoursen14 May 2007
The film does a wonderful job of integrating newsreel footage with its narrative. I assume that Lindbergh's triumphal Broadway procession after his return from Paris in 1927 was the basis for Darrington's ticker tape parade after her round the world flight. It was hard to believe that her aircraft insisted on such a dangerous entrance to its cockpit. The pilot had to climb in while only a couple of feet from a rotating propeller (or "airscrew" as the Brits would say). Hepburn is utterly convincing as an aviation obsessed and sexually neutral aristocrat. Her love affair with Strong is nicely contrasted with that of his daughter with her boyfriend. The film also shows how a missed appointment -- insignificant to one person but all the world to the other -- can have fatal consequences. Well-made, well-sequenced -- the kind of film they used to make in wonderful black and white.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Christopher Strong
CinemaSerf4 April 2024
The eponymous and successful politician (Colin Clive) is happily married to "Elaine" (Billie Burke) and both are trying to rein in their increasingly wayward daughter "Monica" (Helen Chandler) who is spending way too much time with the married "Harry" (Ralph Forbes). They've all read of the derring-do of aeronaut "Lady Cynthia" (Katharine Hepburn) and a chance meeting as a result of a silly bet introduces her to the erstwhile unimpeachable and loving father. Initially, they all take an hand in trying to keep "Monica" on the rails, but we can see the frequency of their associations is leading to a temptation that could have disastrous consequences for just about everyone. I thought the subject matter of this film quite racy for 1933 and the workmanlike Hepburn successfully exhibits a tom-boyish persona then seems equally at home in the shining "moth" dress that shows she can turn her sartorial hand as required to societal needs and expectations. The production is all a bit static, though, and the episodic nature of the storytelling does rather lead us by the nose. I couldn't decide if the denouement was a cop out or a clever and fitting one but that's really the only thing to ponder in this otherwise watchable but forgettable Dorothy Arzner drama.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Horribly dull and dated--it's only worth a peek to see the Moth!
planktonrules21 August 2007
The film is about Sir Christopher Strong (MP--member of Parliament--played by Colin Clive) and his affair with the Amelia Earhart-like character played by Katherine Hepburn. Up until they met, he had been a very devoted husband but when he met the odd but fascinating Hepburn, he "couldn't help himself" and they fell in love. You can tell, because they stare off into space a lot and talk ENDLESSLY about how painful their unrequited love is. Frankly, this is a terribly dated and practically impossible film to watch. Part of the problem is that in the Pre-Code days, films glamorizing adultery were very common. Plus, even if you accept this morally suspect subject, the utter sappiness of the dialog make it sound like a 19th century romance novel...and a really bad one at that. Sticky and with difficult to like characters (after all, Clive's wife is a nice lady and did no one any harm) make this one a big waste of time. About the only interesting aspect of this film is the costume Hepburn wears in an early scene where she is dressed in a moth costume! You've gotta see it to believe it--and she looks like one of the Bugaloos (an obscure, but fitting reference).
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wonderfully Ironic
Therese_Letanche363 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This was the second Katharine Hepburn movie I ever saw, and I have to say that it impressed me enough to keep watching her in other films (to end up eventually loving her!).

The is the kind of movie that needs to be watched a few times before a viewer can fully understand and recognize all the plots, ironies, patterns, reflections, etc. The movie starts out with Cynthia as the woman who has never had a love affair, and Christopher as the man who's always been faithful to his wife. Meanwhile, Monica (Christopher's daughter) is having a love affair, and Bill is being unfaithful to his wife with Monica. Monica and Bill are the ones who bring Cynthia and Christopher together. When Cynthia and Christopher meet, it still seems unlikely that the whole situation will change. Cynthia imposes herself more and more onto the Strong family, until one can begin to get the sense that something is going on between Cynthia and Chris.

The family and Cynthia go to France, where the tables really turn. At a party, Monica has a one-night-stand with some random fellow (after being told she is not allowed to see Bill until he is divorced). At the very same party, Chris ditches his wife for Cynthia. The whole night ends with a very sappy boat-ride between Chris and Cynthia and with Monica going off with the man she met at the party. At this point, Cynthia is having a love affair with Chris, and Chris is being unfaithful to his wife. Monica has no boyfriend (just her one-night-stand) and Bill is being faithful to his wife.

When they return home, Bill and Monica end up having a fight about Monica being frivolous in France. Monica rushes to Cynthia and confides that she is going to commit suicide. Cynthia explains that suicide is not the way to go (which Cynthia herself ends up resorting to at the end of the movie) and encourages Monica to make up with Bill. It works, and Bill and Monica end up getting married. Eventually they find out that they are expecting a baby. . .and Cynthia finds out that she is expecting a baby as well. Christopher's baby, of course. Cynthia tries to tell Chris about the baby, but she keeps getting interrupted through his distraction with Monica's pregnancy.

One day, Chris and Cynthia go out to lunch at a place where they think that they will not be seen. Of course, Bill and Monica end up eating at the very same place, and Monica sees her father and Cynthia together. Monica and Cynthia have a fight where Monica says that Cynthia will never know anything about life, that Cynthia knows nothing about love and one day she will crash down in her plane and die, not knowing what life was about at all (which is the half-true prediction of Cynthia's fate).

Not long after, Cynthia goes up in her plane to break the altitude record. Someone tells her to put on her oxygen mask once she gets to a certain height, which is basically our big hint. She puts on her oxygen mask at the level at which she was told and begins to cry from behind the mask as she keep flying toward the goal height. She sees a montage of all her recent experiences with flying, with Chris, with life. Finally, she rips off the oxygen mask and plummets to her death, having broken the altitude record. She never tells Chris about her pregnancy.

This movie has such a sophisticated, complicated plot. You see the correlation of Monica and Bill's relationship with Chris and Cynthia's. Eventually the relationship situations become reversed, while remaining similar at the same time. The reflections of the relationships are like the symmetry of a butterfly's wings. . .or of a moth's (ha-ha). It's not really even the aviation that is important (although Cynthia does fly around the world at one point in the movie).

Sorry if I have some of the scenes out of order, it's been a long time since I've seen the movie. I just wanted to emphasize the irony of the plot. This movie is one of my all-time favorites, and although some filming and acting techniques are out of date, the overall story could stand the test of time. If you didn't like it the first time, watch it a few more times. I think you could appreciate it more that way.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Positively Terrible
view_and_review24 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
For years I had an aversion to old movies, which were any black & white movies. From what little clips I saw here and there I had images of a lame plot, bad mood setting music, and gross overacting to make the plot seem more dramatic than it was. In other words, I had thoughts of "Christopher Strong."

This was a stupid movie with a stupid ending.

"Christopher Strong" is a typical 1930's movie regarding rich people. They attend parties until dawn, speak with stuffy accents, and are always fooling around. There's always a mistress or a lover. It's so common that it's just accepted and it would be bad manners to quarrel about it. Us commoners are too unsophisticated to understand.

In this tripe Sir Christopher Strong (Colin Clive) began the movie as a faithful husband who was fully devoted to his wife, Lady Elaine Strong (Billie Burke). His fidelity was a rarity. In fact, it was so rare that his daughter, Monica (Helen Chandler), used him for her scavenger hunt when the guests at yet another swanky party were told to find a man who'd been married more than five years and had remained faithful. Monica dragged her dutiful father to the party where he lectured all the partygoers about the happiness monogamy brings.

The participants were told that they could also find a woman above the age of twenty-one who'd never been in love. And that's where Lady Cynthia Darrington (Katharine Hepburn) comes in. She was brought to the party where she met Christopher Strong and I don't need to even tell you what happened next.

The two fell in love and kept the whole matter a secret because their relationship would positively destroy Christopher's wife. What a selfless gentleman.

Meanwhile, Christopher's daughter, Monica, was openly and happily seeing a married man named Harry (Ralph Forbes). Her prude and "old fashioned" parents forbade it and took her to Paris to take her mind off of the forbidden fruit known as Harry. But what you must understand is that we were supposed to view the Monica/Harry relationship favorably. Why? A.) Because his wife was never shown and B.) Harry and Monica were so happy together. That adds up to the fact that he was miserable with his wife who must've been a miserable person if Harry, this wonderful guy, didn't love her anymore. It was one of Hollywood's weak tricks of establishing which characters are to be admired and which are to be despised.

In Paris Monica met a guy named Carlo (Jack La Rue). Carlo was smooth and quick to profess his love for Monica which was an easy way for her to forget Harry. They did what young people do (even in the 30's) while Christopher and Cynthia sneaked around doing the same thing.

I bring up Monica in Paris because that incident led to her becoming one of the most pathetic creatures I've ever witnessed.

Harry eventually divorced his nameless and faceless wife which made him available. He wanted to marry Monica but he heard about her tryst with Carlo and decided better of it.

Before I go into Monica's response to the news that Harry gave her the kybosh, I have to say what a hypocrite Harry was. It went totally unmentioned that he'd been cheating on his wife yet had the nerve to be upset with his side chick for hooking up with someone. Harry was painted as a decent guy who was denounced by only "old fashion" Elaine.

Back to Monica.

There was a two month period Cynthia and Christopher separated. He knew he was wrong so he did the right thing before things got deeper between the two. For reasons unknown Monica hunted down Cynthia to proclaim that she was going to commit suicide because Harry wouldn't marry her. I don't know if it was the melodramatics of it or just because I think it was a small-minded response to rejection, but I hated no one more than I hated Monica in that moment. She was so utterly weak and pathetic that it drove me to want to commit a violent act. I wanted to end her life just so I wouldn't have to see her face or hear her sorry voice again.

Cynthia talked her out of the suicide by telling her that Harry would come around and profess his love for her and then she'd be happy again.

I'm married and I love my wife, but there is no way that I'm attaching that much value to her love and acceptance. I value and respect myself far too much to let another person dictate whether or not I'll be happy.

As for Cynthia and Christopher, they reunited with all of the oaths and proclamations of love everlasting and love unparalleled and feelings indescribable. They vowed never to part ways again, and Cynthia went one step further. She was a renowned aviator, yet she vowed never to fly again just to appease Christopher. She was willing to give up her one true passion just so her lover could feel safe knowing she wasn't doing something unsafe.

Their affair went on for months until the easily predictable happened. She got pregnant. Cynthia was on her way to tell Christopher of the wonderful news, but before she could tell him she was chastised by Monica.

Monica and Harry, now married and legit, saw Christopher and Cynthia in a restaurant doing what they did most: stating their unequivocal love for one another. Monica told Cynthia she saw them and that she was ruining a happy home.

Cynthia: "What about it? You both must have very short memories."

Translation: "Monica, you were dating a married man not too long ago, so who are you two to lecture me?"

Monica: "Well at least I didn't take Harry away from a woman who was an angel whom he always loved."

Translation: "it's OK to be a homewrecker if the dude didn't love his wife anymore or if she's not an 'angel.' "

The hogwash that was coming out of Monica's mouth wasn't the least bit digestible. Didn't she even hear herself. People will say anything to justify their bad acts compared to someone else's bad acts. Just say you don't like it because it's your mother being cheated on and kill all the extra noise.

In any case, the lecture worked. Cynthia felt guilty and decided not to tell Christopher about his unborn child lest she harm an "angel."

What she did instead, though, was so much worse and so much more pitiful.

She killed herself.

And I knew she would! That's the Hollywood answer to a disturbing love triangle. Kill one third of the triangle and then you can have a drama free ending with the remaining two.

Instead of surreptitiously moving away, or breaking it off with Christopher in strong terms, she killed herself.

I loathed this ending for two reasons.

1.) It didn't fit her character. She was a gregarious woman full of life and adventure. She was strong and unapologetic about what she did, yet her affair with Christopher reduced her to a sappy wuss who couldn't cope. Or perhaps she thought her suicide was the noble thing to do, but even still it didn't fit her character.

2.) It's weak. Like I said, Hollywood does that. They take the easy way out of things with deus ex machinas, easy changes of heart, or suicides when it fits. And by suicide I also mean those actions a person takes which he/she knows has a high likelihood of death.

This movie was tragic, and not in the Shakespeare way. It was a pretentious stuffy movie devoid of any value. There was nothing to be gleaned from this heaping pile whatsoever. I don't watch movies to be irked, angered, or riled up. If I want to feel any of those emotions I'd just watch the news.

Free on Odnoklassniki.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A little gem in Hepburn's career
jrgirones23 May 2002
It's ironical this film to be titled as the main male character, above all when this raises among film classics for its accurate depiction, not only of the main female one, but also of the female secondary roles. It is probably due to the fact that it is directed by a woman, but the talent of Arzner goes beyond through accurate cinematography and a sense for lyrical melodrama far from the soapy tone of the majority of its contemporaneous. Katharine Hepburn is exulting as the brave woman always a step further its era, here in love for the first time with a married man. Particularly moving is the last sequence, with Hepburn trying to achieve the altitude record with her airplane as she confronts the most relevant facts of her story. A little gem to be discovered.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed