The President Vanishes (1934) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Save America's Honor!"
planktonrules18 August 2023
In the decades following WWI, Americans became more and more disillusioned with the country's involvement in this war. More and more folks began demanding our nation stay out of external fights and a strong neutrality movement began. So, in light of this, stories like "The President Vanishes" make a lot of sense.

In this story, the American president is a decent sort of man who is bent on keeping the US out of wars. However, when a new war breaks out in Europe, various evil war profiteers in the States push to get Americans to join in on the war simply in order to make money. As one says, in the previous war 'there were just 400,000 casualties '! And so with their urging, the "Save America's Honor" program began...and the Grey Shirts begin agitating in favor of this war. So, with most opposition crushed by these thugs, the only major impediment left is this peace-loving president...and he's their next target.

The 'Grey Shirts' in the movie are obviously modeled after the Fascist paramilitary thugs, the Italian Black Shirts and the German Brown Shirts. Both organizations enforced obedience and compliance through violence and threats.

While the movie might seem a bit quaint and naïve when seen today, it clearly represented what most Americans were thinking at the time...that foreign wars were a waste and that profiteering industrialists were behind such wars. It's hard to imagine that just a few short years later, the US would be back at war!

So is this film any good? Well, it is an interesting curio. It also is a bit uncomfortable to watch, as the movie seems to excuse dictatorial powers by the Secretary of War, ultra-nationalism and martial law...all in the name of pacifism! Strange...but also tough to stop watching. Well acted and most unusual...a film history teachers in particular should enjoy.

Overall, a very strange 'what if' scenario...and one of the oddest studio films of the 1930s.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Manchurian Candidate of the 30's.
mark.waltz19 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A powerful Washington D.C. couple (Sidney Blackmer and Rosalind Russell) are given scenes that reminded me of James Gregory and Angela Lansbury in that 1962 classic. It's a parallel United States, with a different president than FDR, yet surrounding the United States is the possibility of world war.

Arthur Byron, a forgotten character actor, plays the president in this film, seen at his inauguration telling wife Janet Beecher that he hopes to stay out of war at all costs. But manipulation by Blackmer's lobbyist has a group of wealthy powerful men (which includes Charley Grapewin of "The Wizard of Oz") pushing the public in to various acts of violence and turning them against each other.

What is a peace-loving president to do as fascism seems to be taking over the law of the land that he is supposed to be governing? Quick edits in the photography shows the violence erupting, and the group of money men secretly in power behind the president suddenly turn into a flock of flesh hungry vultures.

This is a disturbing view of the future as seen through the eyes of the depression, a variation of an Orwellian world long before that fear struck into the heart of the public. The president really is only a figurehead here, the real power held with the men who control the Congress and the Senate. "The Gray Shirts" are as vicious an extremist group that has ever ripped across the headlines, and this is only fictional. It's up to the president to take drastic action to bring about a change, and here, he's doing it for a good cause, not to just get attention.

An all-star cast of character actors each are given moments to shine, with Edward Arnold top billed as a Secretary of war. There is no real star, maybe perhaps the script and direction (William A. Wellman), and irregardless of whether or not those who see this film like it or not, it does corrupt discussions if they are watching it in a group.

Whether or not this stands the test of time is also up to the viewer as it is a film that doesn't really express a point of view but possibilities if the public doesn't get their act together and stand up to those who would destroy freedom. It is apparent why this film was written considering what was happening in the world at the time, and deserves credit for its courage in confronting those ideals that threatened to destroy humanity.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The issue of this film is pertinent today, but could have been better made.
reginadanooyawkdiva17 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The issue of fascism and should America go to war is the focus of this film. The subject could be taken from today's headlines instead of headlines of 80 years ago. However, this film tends to drag in parts and the story is way too convoluted and unbelievable when viewed in this millennium.

President Craig (Arthur Bryon, whom I keep mistaking for Arthur Q. Bryan, the voice of Elmer Fudd) is an anti-war president. Everyone wants him to go to war. So what is he to do? He disappears. Today this would bring the country to its knees, but not in this goofy film. Edward Arnold (who gets star billing, but shows up at the 35 minute mark) is declared in charge. Now I love Edward Arnold, but I found him ridiculous in this role. He is the Secretary of War, but has by his own admission "never shot a gun". He brings in a bunch of rag tag characters and starts interrogating them like a bunch of shoplifters. He's in charge, but all he does is a lot of yelling and pacing. How they got around the Constitution and made him in charge is never explained. Also in this mess is Secret Service Agent Paul Kelly, who gives his sweetie a good sock in the jaw so she won't go blabbing to Edward Arnold that he knows about the Prez' whereabouts. (It was okay to slug your girl back then.) It seems he's in on the president's disappearance. They want people to think that these people called the "gray shirts" (a/k/a Fascist or union organizers) have kidnapped the president and that will turn the tide in the president's favor. (The beginning of the film shows the Gray Shirts going all Ferguson on the city.) Well, it works. The leader of the Gray Shirts is killed by Kelly and everyone who was in on it (Kelly, his sweetie, the dopey grocery boy, played by Andy Devine,the President's aide and the First Lady) all congratulate themselves for pulling off this chicanery, therefore avoiding war and the world is safe for democracy.

Lots of stock footage takes up about 1/4 of the film, which also made it almost unwatchable. If you like Edward Arnold and events that may have been pulled out of today's headlines, this is the movie for you. However, it may be had to find, because Paramount (Now NBC Universal) refuses to let people view their old film library and prefer to keep their gems (and non gems) locked away in a vault. I found my copy on Ebay and it wasn't the best copy in the world. How I long for the late late late show again where I could see old movies at their best (Or their worst.)
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A curio with a lot of dust on it
marcslope27 June 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Europe is at war, and our isolationist President is determined to stay out of it. That's the most compelling component of this muddled government thriller, which suffers from too many principal characters, an unstarry cast, B-movie production values, and a rather ludicrous premise. To get the public's mind off war and stanch a coup by labor-fascist "gray shirts," the Prez stages his own kidnapping, while a White House secretary romances a Secret Serviceman, while big business (in the form of five fatcats in one smoke-filled room) rub their hands in anticipatory glee of munitions profits, while the Eleanor-like First Lady grieves stoically, while... oh, skip it.

The normally excellent William Wellman can't salvage this script, which simplifies Washington politics down to absurdity and has lots of character actors unconvincingly waving guns at each other and making stentorian statements of the war-is-bad variety. There are a few compensations: the unlikely sight of Paul Kelly flattening Peggy Conklin in one punch, a snappy line or two, and a very young Rosalind Russell, impressive as a cynical lobbyist's wife.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Interesting moral dilemma
jwellington23 October 2001
Warning: Spoilers
This movie presents the moral dilemma -- do the ends justify the means? The president of the United States fakes his own abduction to prevent a facscist takeover of the country. Unfortunately, too many of the few people who have seen this picture can grasp the importance as the appreciation for the horror of a fascist state and the possibility of it happening here (USA) have faded over time -- witness the lack of concern for the resurgence of know-nothing ultra-right-wing groups .
17 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Feast Of Supporting Players
boblipton24 November 2023
Financial and industrial titans meet. Led by a lazily malign Charley Grapewin, they decide on war, which will make them lots of money. They have Congress sewn up. Even though President Arthur Byron is steadfastly against war, there are enough votes to over-ride his veto. And so the bill passes both Houses, and the President steps out for a walk on the White House grounds and disappears. All business of government stops -- there being no 25th Amendment yet -- and Secretary of War Edward Arnold is put in charge of the investigation. Is the President dead or alive? Who grabbed him? Is it the Gray Shirts, led by megalomaniacal Edward Ellis? Communists? Half-witted delivery boy Andy Devine?

If this seems like a mystery movie, it's because it's based on a book that was published anonymously, but later turned out to have been written by Rex Stout. Clearly ancestral to political thrillers like Seven Days In May, its contemporaries in the field were those which toyed with fascism as a good idea, like GABRIEL OVER THE WHITE HOUSE. Although when it comes to good guys versus bad guys, director William Wellman, and his writers, Carey Wilson, Ben Hecht, and Charles MacArthur were going to side with peace and the little guy.

What's most remarkable about this movie is that it's 80% older men talking, yet it's always very cinematic. Credit cameraman Barney McGill and editor Hanson Fritsch, as well as performances by actors you've seen a hundred times, but here they turn up the wattage, often until they seem insane, like Ellis, or oily like Osgood Perkins.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed