The Old Homestead (1935) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
It's Roy Rogers' full-length picture debut...which is reason enough to watch it.
planktonrules12 February 2021
"The Old Homestead" is an important film because it marks the first time Roy Rogers appeared in a full-length film...after having made two previous shorts. However, his Roy Rogers persona wasn't yet established and here he's just the founder and leader of the Sons of the Pioneers, a singing group that later appeared in many of Rogers' films. Interestingly, Rogers is billed as Len Sly...his real name, though misspelled (it should have been Len Slye). Because he was such a newcomer, here he mostly sings and doesn't really show off his acting abilities one way or the other. Sadly, you barely notice him in the film.

When the story begins, a big city radio producer arrives in some rural country town after receiving a letter from Nancy Abbott (Mary Carlisle). He's there to look for talent for his program and soon is bowled over by the talented locals she mentioned in the letter....so much so, he offers some of them a radio show. In particular, he loves the Sons of the Pioneers, which in this case, oddly, are headed by Fuzzy Knight as well as Lawrence Gray. Neither were bad...but it was interesting that they chose this comedic singer and a weaker voiced 'pretty guy' instead of Rogers since Roy had a much better voice....and was much prettier! But Rogers wasn't yet known....and in 1935 Knight and Gray were.

So is the film any good? Well, some of the music is really nice. One I especially liked was one where Roy and the Sons of the Pioneers yodeled....and I usually HATE yodeling! But it was VERY catchy...much more than I expected. I think it was called "Moonlight in Heaven"...though I am not sure. As far as the plot goes, it's okay but nothing more. In fact, there really isn't a lot of plot...it's mostly a lot of singing. I'd say that it's only a fair movie overall except that it stands out as Roy's debut....which for his fans, like me, is more than reason enough to see it. But I'd only recommend it to fans..otherwise there is just too much singing and not enough Roy!

By the way, this film is from tiny Liberty Pictures...a company that later merged with six other itty-bitty studios to form Republic Pictures. Republic was the studio associated most with Roy Rogers pictures in the 1940s-50s.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Curiosity Value Only!
JohnHowardReid27 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
The feature film debut of Roy Rogers (billed here, second last, as Len Sly) is hardly a foretaste of things to come. Although the DVD cover is quick to draw attention to Rogers' presence, Len Sly spends almost all of his footage on-screen strumming his guitar (or whatever) and exchanges only three or four words of inconsequential dialogue in a brief rest break. Just about all the talking in this movie is handled by Lawrence Gray and Willard Robertson, with the assistance of Mary Carlisle and Dorothy Lee. All told, it's a Poverty Row movie in which production values are almost non- existent. If there are any rabid, anything-goes Rogers' fans out there, a somewhat washed-out and well-used print is available on an Alpha DVD. For my money, however, although the DVD cover is quick to draw attention to Rogers' presence, there's no way in the world that this cash-strapped Poverty Row production will prove of much interest to either patrons of the Sons of the Pioneers (here making their movie debut) or Mr. Rogers' legion of fans.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed