The Declaration of Independence (1938) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The Midnight Ride Of Caesar Rodney
bkoganbing14 February 2011
Although this highly dramatic ride to break the tie in Delaware's delegation to the Second Continental Congress was surely important in keeping American independence from being stillborn it doesn't truly square with the facts. Caesar Rodney was not the dashing young patriot that you see here portrayed by Ted Osbourne nor was he the cancer ridden old man you see in 1776. And at least part of the journey was made by carriage from Dover to Philadelphia.

This short subject did win an Oscar in that category for Warner Brothers and it does tell a nice story. Rodney's ride to break the tie was an important event though the dramatic lily gets a good gilding here, the short is an enjoyable one.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun, but not history...
dano-8274925 December 2015
Fun and entertaining to watch, but please don't learn your history from this short film. Full of inaccuracies and Hollywood license, the film shows the highlights all mashed together. Thomas Jefferson was not an original delegate to the Convention; he was sent in when another Virginia had to return home. The Declaration was not signed on July 4, 1776 -- the large parchment copy was not written until the middle of July and signing began on August 2, 1776. Caesar Rodney didn't ride to the convention after escaping from his fiancé's home. The slavery section of the Declaration was voted out by the entire Congress, not by the committee of writers Those are just a few of the "liberties" taken by the film makers.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Drama About Last-Minutes Leading Up To Historic Signing
ccthemovieman-122 December 2006
Not being a history expert, I don't how much of this short dramatization is accurate. Knowing Hollywood, I have my doubts.

The second half is the dramatic part as one man rides bravely, fending off bullets and other obstacles, to cast his deciding vote at the last minute to give the U.S. it's "Declaraton of Independence." That man is Delaware's "Caesar Rodney." I guess I learned some history because I had never heard nor read of Mr. Rodney before this film.

Meanwhile, we see Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, John Hancock, John Adams and others as they write and vote on the famous document, giving the "rebels" their victory over the "Tories," as explained in this work.

For someone who watched TV shows in the 1950s, seeing John Litel, who played a villain in a lot of those shows (like Steve McQueen's "Wanted: Dead Or Alive series), playing Jefferson was a little strange and a stretch for me.

Overall, as entertainment, it was okay, watchable but not something I'd look at again.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very Good Short
Michael_Elliott15 February 2009
Declaration of Independence, The (1938)

*** 1/2 (out of 4)

Oscar-winning, Technicolor short centers in on the signing of the Declaration of Independence and the vote of Caesar Rodney (Ted Osborne) who will push it one way or the other. Knowing the history of Hollywood as I do, it's doubtful this film is too accurate in terms of history but that doesn't really matter as the film remains quite entertaining from start to finish. Shorts from this era only used Technicolor on films the studio thought were important enough for it so the colors adds a lot here. Even though the print shown on Turner Classic Movies is rather faded, the color of the outfits still manages to shine through as does the various scenes in the forest. Osborne does a fine job in his role as does John Litel as Thomas Jefferson and Walter Walker as Benjamin Franklin. The film ends with a mad horse dash as Rodney tries to get to the vote and we even get a nice fight and some gun play as well.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Caesar Rodney
utgard1410 July 2014
I'm apparently a poor student of American history as I had absolutely no clue who Caesar Rodney was prior to seeing this short film. The short's about the days leading up to the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The fate of the nation hangs on a deadlocked vote about whether to pass the Declaration or not. Apparently it's all down to one vote and that man, Caesar Rodney, isn't present to vote. From this we get the most dramatic parts of the short as Rodney rides likes the dickens, fighting off one obstacle after another, to arrive just in time to cast the deciding vote. It's all very Hollywood but also fun. I don't need to read up on the events depicted here to know it's loosely adapted from the real events. But, as I've always said, I don't watch movies to be educated; I watch to be entertained. This Technicolor short film is enjoyable and fun. For anything more, pick up a history book.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
WB freedom short
SnoopyStyle4 July 2023
It's 1776. American leading figures are debating and coalescing around what is to become the Declaration of Independence. It's a WB short in Technicolor. The Technicolor keeps it of a time in cinematic history. It also isn't the best in depicting night. The actors are doing costumed stage acting. The characters do come fast and furious. There are so many of them. I'm sure school kids who studied history may recognize some of the names. I am surprised that they deem to mention slavery. It may not be crowd pleasing, but it is part of the WB drive to rally the nation for freedom as Europe descends into tyranny.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Should've Been Released In July
boblipton8 June 2019
Here's another of the flag-waving shorts that Warner Brothers produced in the late 1930s, covering historical subjects, but mostly to show off Technicolor; given the immense amounts of light needed to produce the three-strip image, there's a sepia cast to the entire procedure that modern color techniques tell us means the events portrayed in the movie took place long ago, just as a blue tint tells us the events take place at night.

Even with John Litel playing Thomas Jefferson, it's pretty much a pantomime, with people declaiming their lines. Cesar Rodney's beating down highwaymen trying to stop his gallant ride to attend the Congress and cast the deciding vote is nonsense. While his vote to sign the Declaration was key, he was not at home courting his future wife. He was lying at home, dying when they dragged him back to Philadelphia.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I showed this to a neighbor who spent the U.S. Bicentennial . . .
oscaralbert1 April 2015
Warning: Spoilers
. . . as a National Park Service Historical Interpreter splitting her time between the Liberty Bell Pavilion and the recreated Thomas Jefferson writing pad in Philadelphia. (Since I was troubled by the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE live action short's use of a "God Save the King" as a continuous-looping soundtrack, I wanted to find out if the rest of this piece was equally bogus and anachronistic.) Tamika said that this Oscar-nominated trash is about 5% factual and 95% bull. Most glaringly, it lies about the date that the Declaration was signed: July SECOND, 1776--NOT July Fourth, as stated here! The Declaration was not distributed in a first printing until July 4th, in order to give its signers two days to scurry into "spider hole" hiding places (not unlike where Saddam Hussein was hounded from and strung up, destroying the country known as Iraq). Further, this farce is LESS accurate than that mendacious Red State fable GONE WITH THE WIND, in its showing of Massachusetts battling an Abolitionist Virginia to KEEP Blacks enslaved! Though this mess probably helped out novelist Ian Fleming during his formative years by presenting Delaware's Caesar Rodney as a James Bond Agent 007 prototype, the 10 minutes devoted to Rodney are less believable than the old Disney cartoon shorts about Paul Bunyan, John Henry, and Pecos Bill. Any third grade American history teacher would fail this script with a red "F."
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Declaration of Mediocrity
Horst_In_Translation27 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
"The Declaration of Independence" is an American 17-minute live action short film that focuses on one of the most crucial events in American history. You can read it in the title. This is from 1938, so already over 80 years old and written by the pretty prolific Tedford and directed by Crane Wilbur, who was not only a prolific director, but also one with many credits as actor and writer under his belt. The cast list you can check for yourself, no big names there, which shows it is all about the story, not about the actors too. Overall, there were just two positive aspects I want to mention here. The first would be the fact taht this is in color and despite Robin Hood, we should not take that for granted by any means and I think this definitely made it a better watch. The second would be the costumes. These are closely linked to the color aspects, but yeah the outfits look really nice and I found myself taken back several centuries in time when seeing them. But story-wise I am not convinced, this one did not entertain me well and did not have me once at the the edge of my seat. It is also pretty strange for me that this was made during a time that is so far back now already and it is about a time that may be even further back, way further, but it is somewhat challenging to really make that connection because for me the 1930s already feel like a different age. It is a bit difficult to explain right now. As for the acting, they were all solid I guess. It clearly isn't an actors movie the way the characters were written. None of them, even the one in the center of it all had really time to shine. Maybe it was also too many characters for a film of under 20 minutes. Overall, it's a thumbs-down for me. Technically fine, the rest is too mediocre.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Somewhat fanciful, but engaging, Hollywood dramatization of history
llltdesq25 April 2001
Hollywood is known to take liberties with fact in its productions and certainly did so here. But for all that, this is a visually beautiful and very engaging short that won an Oscar (deservedly). The short runs as filler on Turner Classic Movies on no set schedule along with tons of other shorts. Recommended.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Academy Awards' Best Short Subject on America's Most Crucial Event
springfieldrental28 January 2024
Movies about historical events spur viewers to dive into the reference library to check and expand on the facts presented. One such film that won the Academy Awards Best Short Subject, November 1938's "Declaration of Independence," dramatized the situation leading up to the July 2, 1776 signing of the document in Philadelphia to be presented to the king of England. The Warner Brothers re-enactment of the event is one of the very few movies dealing with the American Revolution.

"Declaration of Independence" was one episode in Warner Brothers' series of short films dealing with the history of the United States. The Oscar winner focused on the complexities of the tension surrounding those who wanted to break away completely from England while the Loyalists and Tories fiercely opposed such moves. At 17 minutes, the film condenses the events of the drafting, voting and signing of the statement to be handed over to King George III.

A few obscure but historically accurate points are made in the short movie. The delegates to the Continental Congress who decided on whether to write the declaration were a diverse group representing all 13 colonies. The body wanted unanimous approval from those colonies, but failed to achieve that goal since one of them, New York, abstained while Delaware's delegates were split before the deciding vote was to take place. Delaware's Caesar Rodney, who favored passage, was delayed in attending the conference and left his home state at the last minute. His 80-mile ride from Dover, Delaware, to Philadelphia, just as the final vote was underway, was as dramatic as Paul Revere's ride in Massachusetts a year earlier. Rodney and his horse are portrayed on Delaware's state quarter struck in 1999 depicting his galloping to Philadelphia to make his vote count.

The documentary also portrayed the author of the declaration, Thomas Jefferson, wanting to include an anti-slavery clause in the independence statement. But he was overruled by those who opposed, citing that a couple of Southern states as well as the New England ones would vote against its passage since the thriving slave trade was lucrative to those northern states' shipping merchants in the African human trafficking. The Technicolor short was directed by Crane Wilber, a former actor who was the male lead in 1914's "The Perils of Pauline." Wilber later became a writer, scripting the screenplay for 1953's "House of Wax."
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed