Homicide (1949) Poster

(1949)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Major bad guy in big movies plays a good guy
tanstaafl201411 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The audience is led on a path that ends with a unemployed ex-sailor hanging himself in a fleabag hotel he just checked into. The one detective that has some good forensic skills and plan good smarts thinks otherwise. The audience knows some of the details as to who did kill the ex-sailor but not why.

Robert Douglas played some very big bad guys in "The Flame and the Arrow", "Ivanhoe", "The Prisoner of Zenda" with Stewart Granger, and "The Adventures of Don Juan" with Errol Flynn. In this film he is a wise-cracking Canadian (to explain the accent) that works out step-by- step how and why and who killed a relatively innocent and innocuous young man in his town of LA.

There are some "CSI" and "NCIS" moments of scientific skills used to explain evidence items. And this was 1949! A good film with some good character actors, one of whom is Alan Alda's dad, Robert Alda as one of the bad guys.

I like good actors whether they play "good" guys or "bad" guys. But the ones who play bad guys always seem to say that they have more fun. Enjoy this movie with a well know bad guy playing the lead good guy and how he uses his head, his personality and excellent voice to make viewing a very pleasurable experience.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not great but it's always wonderful to find a vintage noir.
Handlinghandel25 May 2002
This begins auspiciously but becomes implausible.

Still, it's always a treat to run into Robert Alda. And the character actress playing the landlady is the real McCoy, as are the farm folk earlier in the movie.

So many noirs are lost and forgotten, I tip my hat -- fedora, of course -- to the major cable channel that unearthed this one! May it do so with many more.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Crime programmer suffers from British lead trying to pass as Yankee
bmacv24 May 2002
A serviceable police procedural from 1949, Homicide veers from the mildly absorbing to the silly. Its opening shows promise: A drifter just out of the Navy, looking for work as a farm hand, stumbles across a murder in an orange grove. The killers pay him off to testify that he witnessed an accident, then dispose of him too, making it look like he hanged himself in a cheap Los Angeles boarding house (its landlady is Esther Howard, best remembered as Jessie Florian in Murder, My Sweet).

One police detective (Robert Douglas) thinks there's something fishy and, going by a book of matches and a saccharin tablet, takes a leave of absence to pursue his investigation to a desert spa, where the bartender (Robert Alda) suffers from diabetes. A clue! The plot involves an underground wire used by a nationwide gambling syndicate. But Douglas, operating on his own, finds that his cover is burned and his life is in danger....

Homicide's worst misstep is in the casting of its lead. The ostentatiously British Douglas (40 at the time and looking comfortably middle-aged) is passed off as a Canadian to somehow explain his working for the LAPD. A better explanation would be why they hired a detective who's thick as a brick. The most entertaining part of the movie is listening to him try to sling American slang in his brittle B.B.C. accent; it's like watching a movie with subtitles.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Routine, but interesting
bux25 May 2002
This routine little murder mystery is not so much on plot, however, I always find the movies made on location in the Los Angeles area in the '40s and early '50s interesting-it's nice to see that there were actually areas that were not covered with glass and concrete, before the Eastern Carpetbaggers moved in and turned the area into what they had fled, i.e. the worst of Detroit, Chicago and NYC. Another reason to recommend this one is that it features the lovely Ms. Westcott, second only in B movie beauty to Marie Windsor. Otherwise this is a routine tale of a detective hunting thieves that have turned to murder.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
If there's anything smaller then this town it's my memory
sol121813 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
****SPOILERS**** British actor Robert Douglas is as convincing as a snowman in the Gobi desert playing transplanted Canadian L.A homicide detective Let.Michael Landers in the film. Landers gets on the case of drifter Brad Clifton's, Warren Douglas, suicide after he had testified at the inquiry of Farmer Webb's tragic death. It's Clifton who claimed that he saw Farmer Webb fall off his tractor dead drunk and smash his skull on on a rock killing himself. What in fact really happened is that Farmer Webb was murdered by L.A bookies Kimmel & Foster, John Harmon & Richard Benedict, for threatening to turn them and their bookie operation over to the police. That in them using his farm to lay cable on his property that pipes in the latest horse-racing results from tracks like Santa Anita Hollywood Park & Del Mar.

Taking his vacation time to track down Clifton's killers Let. Landers in finding a pack of matches from the place in Clifton's hotel room travels down to the out of the way and nearly deserted Glorietta Hotel in the heart of the Mojave Desert to find who in fact murdered him. Acting like an pot smoking and espresso drinking Greenwich village hipster with a very pronounced British accent didn't help Let.Landers either. His actions made Landers look silly at best or utterly annoying at worse to those in town that he ran into or dealt with.

Let. Landers foolishly runs around town like a chicken with its head chopped off claiming that he's an insurance investigator looking for a Brad Cliffton in paying him a $5,000.00 insurance policy left to him by an aunt of his. This act on Let. Landers part is so ridicules and obvious as well that no one in town, in them thinking that he's suffering from a serious case of heat stroke, takes the guy seriously! Except for both Kimmel and Foster as well as the hotel bartender the diabetic Andy, Robert Alda, who were all involved in Clifton's murder. Also as a love interest Landers gets romantically involved with cigarette girl Jo Ann Rise, Helen Westcott, who thinks he's not just interesting, in just how off the wall he acts, but cute as well.

****SPOILERS**** It's a miracle that Let. Landers wasn't offed as soon as he got to the Glorietta Hotel in just how nuts he acted in alerting Clifton's stone cold killers, Andy Kimmel & Forster, that he was out to bust them. Despite getting shot and left for dead in a blinding rainstorm Landers with the help of his girlfriend Jo Ann manages to get the upper hand and get diabetic and need for insulin Andy, the weak link in the chain, to break down and admit his involvement in Clifton's murder with Kimmel & Foster checking out of town as well as the movie never to be seen or heard from again. Which all made the bulldog like and go it along Let. Landers efforts in catching the two of them both useless and ineffective.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Good start, then progressively abysmal
mbhur3 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The first five minutes or so if this movie got me excited, as I felt like I'd discovered a solid minor noir. After a montage with voice over narration about the different motives for homicide, we're presented with a classic noir scenario of an Average Joe being in the wrong place at the wrong time, in this case witnessing a murder, with disastrous consequences. But the movie does a quick nosedive into improbability, as even though the Average Joe does exactly what the killers want, lie for them at an inquest, they still murder him, therefore bringing on a police investigation when they were already in the clear.

I wasn't bothered by actor Robert Douglas' English accent as other reviewers were. What bothered me was that his character was arrogant, smarmy, and for me really unlikeable. He's also, we're supposed to believe, one hell of a detective. A fellow cop refers to him as Sherlock, but Sherlock Holmes based his deductions on scientific evidence. In this movie our hero makes one giant supposition after another, all without a shred of actual evidence, and in every instance he's right. He's not a detective so much as a psychic.

We're also supposed to believe that he's a suave ladies' man, despite his seduction technique consisting of slinging a bunch of corny, third rate Romeo lines. Pretty Helen Westcott inexplicably falls head over heels in love with him. It was so inexplicable that I thought we might find out she was working for the bad guys and pretending, but no, it's true love, until he dumps her at the end. His farewell line to her is something that Humphrey Bogart might've been able to bring off, but he's no Bogie. (Though he might be Superman. Even after getting shot in the head and lying in a muddy ditch in a pouring rain for hours, he's quickly out of bed against doctor's orders and traipsing across the desert after the bad guys. What a hero!)

By the time we got to the explanation of what the crooks were up to, something involving buried telegraph wires conveying race results to bookies, I was only half listening, so I couldn't tell you if it made any sense or not. Actually, in this kind of movie that doesn't really matter, as long as you've been reasonably well entertained. I wasn't. (Too bad the Average Joe killed off early on wasn't the main protagonist. I liked him a lot better than the detective.)
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
No knots for a Navy man
bkoganbing29 June 2020
An itinerant laborer is found hanging by the rafters in his Los Angeles boardinghouse room and the cops are ready to wrte it off as a suicide. All but Detective Robert Douglas who says an ex-Navy man wouldn't have done sch a sloppy job with knots.

A book of matches takes him to a resort hotel where there was another murder that the locals have listed as an accident. of course that's not right either.

The big problem with homicide is that there is no suspense so we know that it is murder and by two men. We don't know who's in charge, but that cat's out of the bag soon too.

Despite a lack of suspense there are some good performances from Robert Douglas, Helen Westcott, and Robert Alda in the leads.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Meandering
dougdoepke15 June 2013
A cop is drawn rather inexplicably into an apparent suicide, leading him into a meandering investigation.

Despite a promising start, the movie descends into a lackluster crime drama with little to salvage it from the celluloid wastebasket. The plot's neither tight nor coherent, plodding along in uninspired fashion, with the usual bruising fist fights where no one gets marked up and a wounded hero who quickly recovers in true Hollywood fashion. In a better movie, these clichés could be overlooked, but here they simply add to the general contrivance. What surprises me is that this is a studio production (Warner Bros.). I could understand the slipshod results coming from a cheap indie outfit, but not from the gangster experts at Warners. Still, no film with that great tough-talking slattern Esther Howard (the landlady) can be a total loss. My suggestion-- catch the movie if the only alternative is a political speech.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not Really Noir, and Not Really Good Either
mackjay212 September 2020
A talky disappointment, HOMICIDE is decently reasonably well-acted, but there's not much more to say about it. The detective lead, Robert Douglas is quite good. However he lacks on-screen appeal. It may have been better to cast Warren Douglas (no relation) who plays the unfortunate victim, in that role. We do see Helen Westcott--an underrated Warners player, Robert Alda, and the always colorful Esther Howard as a flop-house owner. The interaction between Howard and Douglas are among the best things in the picture. Also pretty good are the flirtation scenes with Douglas and Westcott, while a desert fight between Douglas and Alda is a highlight. So it's not a total letdown. But it certainly isn't a Film Noir by any stretch of anyone's imagination, just because it's a crime drama in b&w from 1949.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Very stupid movie
newjersian9 January 2021
This is a totally unrealistic film. It is full of foolishness, illogical and stupid actions. Absolutely impossible behaviors and dialogues of real people. A squalor in all categories.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed