Phantom from Space (1953) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
70 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
better than you'd expect
grizzledgeezer23 March 2012
Looked at solely from a technical and directorial perspective, "Phantom from Space" is a far better film than you'd expect. The acting is consistently competent, and the director keeps things moving briskly, without the longueurs that afflict most low-budget films. Scenes often use multiple camera setups, virtually unheard-of in films shot in a couple of days.

I have to take exception to the reviewer who complained about the cheapness of the special effects. They are exceptionally good, done by Howard Anderson, at that time one of Hollywood's leading opticals/effects houses. They wouldn't be out of place in a bigger-budget film (eg, "Abbott and Costello Meet the Invisible Man").

Don't get me wrong. This is not a particularly good movie, its principal problem being the lack of a compelling story. Had it had one, it might have become a classic.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I Know They Didn't Have Much to Work With. But Still!!!
Hitchcoc26 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those things where, given a little imagination, the producers of this movie could have made it much better. The first half is insufferable. People riding around in cars with antennas. Stopping to talk to each other. When the young woman says her husband and another man have been attacked on the beach, they sit around and chat, getting out there about fifteen minutes later. By then he had died. We also have the interrogation. One of the poor guys is all beat up and he ends up being accused. These cowboys are going to nail him. Anyway, we finally get to see the "monster" or "spaceman" as he runs all over the place. He just runs and runs and runs. He never hides. He pops out from behind things and then runs some more. It's sad for him that he is really a victim. Our cold war police force wants nothing more than to destroy him, without any effort to remedy the situation. The guy ends up looking like a fugitive from the Gumby factory. If one were to take the premise that a space creature was fighting for his existence on earth, you could make a pretty decent movie. This isn't it, I'm afraid.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Boring 50s Sci-Fi
vtcavuoto28 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit I really wanted to enjoy this film but the lack of any sustained action brought my rating down. The story about an alien from space and his adventures while not original made me want to view this. There are some nice B movie stars(James Seay, Michael Mark) but the acting is pedestrian at best.I've seen more emotion at a grammar school play.The music score is very good and the special effects are well done for a film from this era. This film had so many opportunities to be decent but missed out. Better directing and acting would have saved this film big time. All in all, one to catch once if you're a 50s Sci-Fi/Horror fan. One benefit of this film-it's a cure for insomnia.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Very First Sci-Fi Movie
jw.jones19 September 1998
I will never forget this movie. It is the very first sci-fi that I had ever seen. My parents took me to see this film when I was about 6-7 years old.

I was very frightened by the whole thing. I could not stop watching however. Every night for months after seeing the film, I made certain my bedroom curtains were securely drawn. I just knew that the alien was out there looking into my window at me.

By todays standards, the special effects were really Mickey Mouse. Perhaps a remake of this film will happen some day. If so, I will be first in line to see it. This time I will not worry about my bedroom curtains.
31 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
As exciting as watching paint dry
kevinolzak21 March 2019
W. Lee Wilder's science fiction debut was 1953's "Phantom from Space," elder brother of comedy specialist Billy Wilder ("Some Like It Hot"), 'Willie' was described by his younger sibling as 'dull,' and truth be told it sadly comes across on the screen. Though he helmed two decent vehicles for Lon Chaney (1950's "Once a Thief" and 1955's "Manfish") his genre outings can only boast of a general lethargy encapsulated in this early sci-fi entry. With a title like "Phantom from Space" the audience is treated to 72 minutes of dimwitted on screen stereotypes trying to catch on to what we already know, that there is an alien human on the loose, his two (unintended) murders and one explosion discussed rather than shown, depicted by a no name cast that at least boasts some faces familiar to seasoned viewers. When they're not seated in Wilder's own cramped office or chasing around Griffith Observatory, they venture only so far as Griffith Park again (but not Bronson Caverns). To avoid costly special effects the invader is conveniently invisible without his spacesuit and diving helmet, in fact nothing is learned about who he is or where he came from, and the poor sap expires without even an acknowledgement of his purpose on Earth. Boredom kicks off early with stock footage and lazy narration, though there is a female lead of sorts, at least Noreen Nash's pretty scientist possesses more aptitude than the military morons on display. Among the cast members can be spotted Michael Mark (Ludwig, father of Little Maria in "Frankenstein"), who saw bigger parts this decade in items like "Attack of the Puppet People" and "The Wasp Woman," James Seay from Wilder's upcoming "Killers from Space," and Peter Lorre's underworld nemesis in "The Face Behind Mask," Rudolph Anders going on to play Boris Karloff's closest confidante in "Frankenstein-1970." W. Lee Wilder did several more titles for his newly formed Planet Filmways company, many of which were scripted by his son Myles - "Killers from Space," "The Snow Creature," "Fright," "The Man Without a Body," "Spy in the Sky!" and "Bluebeards Ten Honeymoons."
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Invisible Alien, plot, characters, etc
mstomaso29 January 2007
The alien, plot and characters in this W. Lee Wilder travesty are not just transparent, not just invisible, in truth, they practically do not exist. W. Lee Wilder, brother of the talented William Wilder, continued his descent into low-budget sci fi cinema oblivion with 1953' Phantom from Space. Casting actors with names like Nora Nash and Sandy Sanders, our fearless director solved the age old problem of having no budget by creating a film which really required no budget - he left out the action, any need for special effects, and, for the most part - the plot.

The "Phantom" is an alien who has crash landed on earth. Capable of intergalactic travel, but can't avoid crashing on an inhabited planet among thousands of uninhabited ones? OK...) He wears an unremarkable space suit and seems on a quest for something. By the time "the authorities" - various military personnel, a cliché German scientist, and some newspaper reporters - figure out what is going on, "the phantom" comes to them, apparently for the sole purpose of taking off his clothes to reveal that he is, in fact, invisible. The story reveals how all this is possible and what it means, but it is not worth typing out. It is a pseudoscientific muddle that would only convince the most undereducated. Might have been improved by consultation with an actual scientist!

The story involves no real action and is driven entirely by the lackluster script (most of the characters being somewhat interchangeable). There is a tremendous amount of dryly delivered flat dialog and very little to see. Most of the action takes place off-camera and is explained by seemingly disinterested observers. The end of the film is the only part which had any real potential and, had it been attached to a different film, might have been really dramatic. Nevertheless, it is worth sticking around for if you've managed to survive the rest of the film - or you could just fast-forward.
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The illegal, invisible and exhibitionist alien.
Coventry23 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I generally LOVE low-budget Sci-Fi films from the 1950's, but you have to admit they also made some pretty darn stupid and pointless movies back them! Take this oddity, for example! The opening sequences follow a meteor - at least they all think it is a meteor - whisking over the earth from Alaska to Santa Monica for SIX WHOLE MINUTES! All you hear is a typically 50's narrating voice rambling off coordinates and all you see is a type of rock flying through the sky! Fascinating!! The meteor turns out to be a spaceship and its captain immediately kills two earthlings because they were hostile to him. He then thinks they attacked him because they were afraid of his flamboyant spacesuit, so he takes it off and continues his trip naked. That's alright, though, because he also happens to be invisible. The rest of the film concerns a bunch of dreadfully boring scientists trying to figure out whether this visitor has friendly intentions or not, and by the end of the film we STILL don't know this. I can appreciate a lack of financial means & acting talent in B-cinema, but so much boredom in such a little film is really unforgivable. The people hunting for the alien simply sit around in their offices or laboratories waiting for him to come and pick up the suit he left behind at the scene of his first crimes. There's never any outer space menace or suspenseful sequences of mass hysteria and the conversations these people are having are dull, dull, dull!
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Someone's backyard effort
ctomvelu117 June 2012
One reviewer here refers to this movie as a "stick with it" flick. Sorry, I just couldn't. I sat through tons of stock footage and non-actors standing around talking about some weird guy wandering around in a deep sea diving suit. I see from the cover art the guy is indeed wearing a deep sea diving suit! I also understand the character is invisible without his suit. Now there's something to look forward to. Not. This horrible flick looks like someone's homemade product, built around a rented or cast-off deep sea diving suit. Me, I think I'll stick with "Plan 9 From Outer Space." That one at least had Bela -- and his dentist (real movie buffs will know what I'm talking about).
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Done on the cheap, but oddly watchable
MartianOctocretr519 June 2007
Something flying really fast approaches the Earth in the form of stoic military jargon type narration. We see stock footage of army and naval training films, also some radar equipment, even jet vapor trails. It's all left to your imagination what the streaking object is, since this film obviously has a budget so small you'd need a microscope to find it. But they almost get away with the cheap effects for a while.

We don't see the object land. But it landed in the Los Angeles area. The narrator said so. After that, some cars race around with antennae on their roofs. Stories of a guy in scuba gear abound, and the authorities are in hot pursuit. The director liked the pursuit sequence. There's one camera shot of the mysterious visitor's shadow fleeing past a wall. The director thought this was so cool, he had the guy run by the same wall two more times.

But the thing has another trick up his sleeve: he's invisible! The movie leaves ET's actions and intents ambiguous, but this seems to be intentional. Learning what little the film wants to tell you is usually accomplished through expository dialogue of the characters, who seem to be able to figure things out in seconds. The sympathetic ending is done awkwardly, but works anyway. Oh, and I loved the eerie music they played when the invisible entity was sneaking around.

Drive-In second-feature stuff all the way, but worth a laugh or two.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A "Stick-with-it" little gem!
nelsmonsterx23 February 2003
Phantom from Space is a rare little treat for classic monster movie/sci-fi fans. The first half is incredibly dull with not a single monster sighting for about 25 minutes! Instead of thrills, the beginning offers a set-up of the boring police/news reporter/government agent business that seems to permeate many old moster flicks. BUT, once you get to the good stuff it really holds up well. It's always fascinating to watch the old invisibilty tricks harking back to Universal's Invisible Man. And check out that cool space suit! The ending tops all, thought, with a really cool effect that finally lets the viewer see the man behind the mask. Alpha Video has a release of this film on DVD with spectacular, color cover art, a quite nice print of the film, and a budget savvy price of around $5-$6 bucks! Definitely worth the price of admission for classic monster fans!
47 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dull movie from golden age of science fiction
drystyx8 July 2008
This movie was made during the golden era of science fiction, when characters and scenery were so much better than today's garbage. This movie doesn't fit the bill, however. It will probably be most appreciated by those who like movies made after 1970. There is an invader from space. he is very dull, and so are the characters looking for him, mostly arrogant detectives. None of them get our attention, even in a satirical way. Unlike most older science fiction, this movie just plods on and on, with mostly city shots of cars, buildings, offices, the same hum drum people see every day, and with nothing of interest to add onto these sets. Even the heroine is plain looking.

If you like the ho hum dull plodding method of modern movies, you may like this. Otherwise, avoid, and watch a good older science fiction, which includes most of the others.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A TOTAL GEM OF ITS TIME! NEVER TO BE REPEATED!
skoogs-311 May 2019
When sci-fi came to the movies in short trousers, this was the fare served to the young masses. Total 'B' movie hokum for vintage sci-fi buffs only. It was probably made on a budget of $300.00 and possibly came in with a profit of $200.00. But put it this way; Steven Spielberg, wonderful and fantastic director as he is, could not replicate this film in the exact same form. It belongs where it is in the past.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A Decent Effort
sddavis6331 August 2009
As low-budget 1950's sci-fi stuff goes, this movie turns out to be relatively entertaining, certainly better than a lot of similar type movies from the era. The movie is set on a single night, and follows various government officials (police, military and communications) in the search for an alien being who's crash landed on earth, and who's killed a couple of people. The problem in finding him is that he's invisible, except when under ultra-violet lights. The effects are really what makes this seem very low-budget. They're pretty typical for the era, which means not very good. The movie also gets off to a bit of a slow start, as all we get to do for a while is watch "Mobile 1" and "Mobile 7" keep reporting into "Central" as they try to pinpoint the location of a mysterious signal of some type that's blocking communications. The first 10-15 minutes contain a lot of "Roger, Wilco, Out" kind of stuff. However, the actual story isn't bad and has a bit of mild suspense about it, particularly because we're not really sure about the motive of the alien. Did he deliberately kill the two people, or was it an accident or possibly self-defence? Ultimately, I thought this was a decent enough movie to spend a bit of time with. 6/10
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
ranks up there with ed wood classics
asinyne29 August 2005
Yes, this is one of the worst of the worst. I just watched it on a DVD i bought for a buck. Its mostly just talk, talk, talk. Then, when the alien arrives and things pick up a bit you realize you miss the talk!!!!! I love b sci-fi movies from the fifties but this one is only interesting for the fact that there is nothing interesting in this movie. The only decent acting is by the guy with the bandage on his head who survived the initial alien attack. The director made a wise choice by taking off the aliens spacesuit(which was unbearably hokey). There is a bit of cool trivia here though, Harry Landers who played police Lt. Bowers was a guest star on the very last broadcast of the original star trek series. He played Dr. Coleman. Pretty cool i guess, he can claim he was in one of the absolute worse Hollywood sci-fi productions and the best ever made for television.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Can be enjoyed as juvenile entertainment.
onnanob227 May 2002
United Artists sure had a mess on their hands when they distributed Phantom From Space in 1953. The story is of an alien spacecraft that seems to have crash landed somewhere near Santa Monica, and the humanoid alien that runs around. The alien gets involved with murdering a couple humans, and also causes an explosion. It is later learned the alien most likely killed because it was being attacked by the humans. A manhunt for the alien is then organized. The alien is cornered but escapes by taking off his helmet and radioactive suit, which makes him invisible to humans. The suit and helmet are taken to a lab (We know it's a lab because of the roughly made "lab" sign that can be seen.) It is guessed the alien will come to the lab for it's helmet, which it needs for breathing most of the time. The alien shows up and soon the crime investigators, the scientists, and a dog are running here, there, and everywhere looking for either the alien or the woman who has encountered the alien. There is so much running around in the lab building that it becomes humorous; like a Three Stooges comedy. It is also humorous during all this running to see people slipping on the slippery floor in the building's hall. These shots of people slipping slightly were either unnoticed while being filmed, or the director didn't want to do another take. Much of Phantom From Space screams "amateur." Some of the sci-fi elements in this movie are interesting (the invisible alien being viewed under ultra-violet light, the description of foreign gasses the alien breathes in its helmet) while other sci-fi elements do not seem likely. The movie seems more like a cops and criminal story than a science fiction thriller. Even the music sounds like a crime-drama score most of the time. There are several things in the movie which may cause unintended laughter; including the monotone narrator who begins the movie, and again speaks during other parts of the movie. Unintended laughter may also be brought about by some of the situations and dialogue in this movie, and by the acting. For the most part the acting is bad. Some actors display wooden acting. Other actors seem extremely amateur. The special effects are mostly bad when compared to other low-budget films from this era, and they may also lead to unintended snickers. Only near the end do the special effects seem better when the alien is seen under ultra-violet lighting. All the running around and silly situations make the movie seem more like a feature for children. The movie can be entertaining only if viewed with a juvenile frame of mind. Phantom From Space is a bad film, but may actually be a fun reminder of comic books and science fiction serials.
15 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"How do you explain that stuff about the missing head?"
classicsoncall12 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
When it comes to 1950's sci-fi, there's good bad, and bad bad; "Phanton From Space" isn't bad, if you know what I mean. There's an interesting back story about the alien's arrival, your typical lab scenes played out with scientific endeavor, and an invisible alien that comes to play on the viewer's sympathy once it's learned that all he's trying to do is survive in Earth's atmosphere.

I got a kick out of some of the governmental jargon thrown around. There's Washington, D.C.'s 'Central Bureau', the 1950's version of an early warning system (hey, it's got a yellow and red alert!), and the mysterious apparatus known as the Communications Commission. The best though were vehicles Mobile #1 and #7, rigged up with those goofy roof top antennas; how did they make it through tunnel overpasses?

There were some clever bits thrown in to keep you guessing about the alien, Dr. Wyatt (Rudolph Anders) refers to him as 'superhuman'. Some fuss was made over the creature's spacesuit, it couldn't be cut and was resistant to flame and acid. Pretty comical though when the Major (James Seay) tried to rip it apart with his bare hands, how scientific was that? Fortunately, the Randall's dog was on hand to keep everyone on track, what do you expect from a canine named Venus?

Also imaginative was the ultra violet light gimmick used to expose the alien's footprint and human like hand. His full disclosure at the end of the story is amazingly similar to descriptions of alien beings today, compliments of writers like Whitley Strieber. How curious is that?

The cast by and large is a group of relative unknowns, though I did get a kick out of seeing Michael Mark as the oil refinery watchman. He would graduate to a top billed role as the beekeeper/inventor in 1960's "The Wasp Woman".

One final thought - the various folks trying to sort out the alien mystery often refer to him as the 'X-Man', pre-dating by a decade the beginning of one of Marvel Comics' most popular titles. I'd be interested to find out if this was the first time the term was ever used - Anyone?
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Invisible Invader
bkoganbing29 December 2011
This low budget science fiction thriller which takes its plot as a combination from King Kong and The Invisible Man is about an invisible invader from another planet who wears a spacesuit and what looks like a diving helmet as he goes around trying to make contact. His suit is radioactive and there are a few fatalities which sends the authorities looking.

When the locals figure it out that this guy is not a human that's doing the killings the military is called in. Of course some of the scientists would like to make contact, but they're taking no chances.

Sad that this very cheaply shot film does in fact strive to be a bit better than the usual run of budget science fiction. The message about this man's intentions in the paranoid days of the early Cold War would never have been made by a major studio at that time.

Worth a look, but I think you'll agree that the intentions outweighed the efforts.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
not THAT bad
planktonrules23 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I noticed a comment that compared this to an Ed Wood film. While this is not a particularly good film, it seems to be a great overstatement to compare this to the work of the worst writer/director/actor/editor/producer that ever lived. This movie does not come close to the ineptitude of his films or even no-Ed Wood schlocky sci-fi such as ROBOT MONSTER or KILLERS FROM SPACE. The plot, at times, actually is a tad interesting and isn't a complete waste of time.

The movie concerns an alien who wears a space suit and a silly space helmet. It has killed a few people and every one who has seen it says that there is no face inside the mask! Well, that's because the alien is invisible and this becomes a serious problem when it becomes naked and they can't find it. However, despite having killed, the alien at times shows restraint towards the humans pursuing it and one of the scientists realizes the alien is not hell-bent on murder. The problem, though, is that the alien is so ALIEN! It cannot talk or communicate with the humans despite trying and in the end, the humans are powerless to stop the space creature from dying after its air supply is depleted (our air is toxic to it).

The film has a cast of complete unknowns and while they aren't that bad, they aren't all that good either. And the plot, at times, drags. But I score the film a 4 because it is a little different and I liked the special effects late in the film when the alien became visible. Not a bad film and worth seeing if you love the 50s sci-fi genre. Otherwise, a skipable film for everyone else.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Guy without a Face
richardchatten9 April 2022
As much a location-shot police procedural as a science fiction movie in which the cast all wear straight faces as they pursue what was probably the kinkiest alien of the Cold War; who like the Invisible Man attains full invisibility simply by stripping off. Due the current political climate they start out by thinking he's a foreign agent, only eventually figuring out he's actually from outer space.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Now you see him, now you don't.
Hey_Sweden5 July 2017
An alien (Dick Sands) comes to Earth only to be met with hostility. While it is tracked by a "communications team" and assorted others, it makes its way through L.A., inadvertently causing a fair bit of damage. The hook is that once its special space suit is removed, it is invisible to the human eye.

One does ultimately take some pity on this creature, which does not go out of its way to invite trouble. People react the way they do because of their own ignorance and fear. The phantom even tries to communicate with Barbara Randall (Noreen Nash), assistant to a scientist (Rudolph Anders).

Produced & directed by W. Lee Wilder ("The Snow Creature"), this extremely modest production had some potential in its premise, but it's never as much fun as one might like. Due to the limitations of the budget, it just doesn't have that much good Phantom action. The invisibility effects actually are better than expected, though. The story, such as it is, largely consists of the human protagonists conversing about the creature, or fussing over its seemingly indestructible suit, etc.

The cast is rather nondescript, but that doesn't mean that the actors are necessarily all that bad. Nash is appealing, Harry Landers is a jut jawed hero, Jack Daly is amusingly annoying as a pushy reporter, James Seay is fine as Major Andrews, and it's nice to see Michael Mark ("Frankenstein", "The Wasp Woman") in a small role as a watchman.

If you're fond of old black & white B pictures, like this viewer, you'll be sure to derive some pleasure from this one.

Five out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
This guy's walking around in in a monkey suit killing people!
sol121815 January 2005
Warning: Spoilers
(Some Spoilers) Early 1950's man from space movie where in this case, it's the spaceman thats in trouble not the earthmen and women. A UFO is tracked from Point Barrow Alaska entering the earth's atmosphere traveling at some 5,000 MPH as it heads south some 3,000 miles down the Pacific coast it loses speed and crashes in the ocean off Santa Monica Calif.

The local police are alerted when all the electricity around Santa Monica gets blacked-out and a number of people are found dead; one on the beach and another, a night watchman, outside an oil field that was set on fire. It turns out that the person responsible for all this is the spaceman, who ejected from the spacecraft before it crashed, and only killed in self-defense when he thought that he was being threatened by the people in the area. A local man-hunt is on to find the killer who sheds his space outfit and turns out to be invisible but he also finds it difficult to breath the air in the earth's atmosphere. The spaceman has to get back to the local observatory where his suit and helmet are to put on in order to stay alive.

Slowing suffocating the alien tries to make contact with the earthmen, with some kind of Morse Code, but to no avail. With the scientists and police trying to make contact and show the spaceman that they mean no harm a local reporter takes a photo of the alien which has it drop it's life saving helmet, due to the camera flash that excited it, and it breaks.

With that the last hope to stay alive for the spaceman is gone and as he runs up to the top of the observatory, chased by the earthmen, he starts to become visible as he slowly loses his ability to breath and dies. Even though the special effects in the movie "Phatom from Space" are of the bargain basement variety the very interesting and imaginative story more then makes up for them. We see in the film that it's the alien thats the victim of the earth's environment not the earthlings being threatened by the alien's advance technology.

The space alien didn't want to do the people of earth any harm, all he wanted to do was get back home to his planet,but it was the earth's atmosphere like in the movie "War of the Worlds" that in the end killed him.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lots of running. Hands in pockets. More running.
Oak Owl8 December 2020
Shot exclusively in Griffith Park and the observatory. Always empty, this observatory; no visitors, no staff - maybe they were invisible? Lots of talking. Nobody knows anything. Consistent plot points: keep the reporter away, put your hands in your pockets, appear confused. Lots of running. A noisy dog. More running. Theremin squealing. More running. More barking. Possibly lethal flash bulb. More running. "And now it's morning." THE END.

HOWEVER the colorized version has wonderful textures and hues; worth watching for at least a few minutes.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Top notch B movie hokum
mickey-brady4 July 2018
Came across this rarely shown gem on talking pictures tv channel. A must see for sci if b movie fans.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Phantom is Good Fun
Space_Mafune24 August 2002
An alien spaceship lands on Earth and an Invisible alien soon begins to terrorize ordinary citizens.

This low-budget science fiction film actually strives to reach above its limitations. Now it doesn't entirely succeed and a lot of the film(especially the narration) is laughable but the ending does surprise you. Much better than I expected and while I wasn't expecting much , this does deserves marks for trying. Great fun for a Saturday afternoon.
13 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Most annoying dog in any movie
thompsonm-050311 August 2019
Not a bad movie. Extremely cheap but interesting. I only with the phantom would have silenced that stupid mutt once and for all.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed