The Beast of Hollow Mountain (1956) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
67 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Precursor to The Valley of Gwangi
lorenellroy6 January 2005
This movie is scripted by Willis O'Brien ,who obviously thought so much of it ,that he used it again in 1969 for the superior The Valley of Gwangi It is a curiosity among movies, being a science fiction and Western hybrid .Mexican based rancher Jimmy -woodenly played by Guy Madison -believes that his dead cattle are the result of predators .He is thinking "Mountain lion " or "coyote " maybe .Wrong!Its a T-Rex and the pattern then follows the standard monster movie template -capture and escape ,rampage and eventually happy ever after resolution . The monster effects are okay for the era but completely overshadowed by the genius of Ray Harryhausen ,employed in the remake .Add somewhat muddy colour and you have a movie whose technical side is deficient by today's standards It still remains worth watching however if only for its being such a rare commodity in combining monster movie and Western
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Great Story by Willis O'Brien but what happened to the Stop-Motion Animation Work?
retromaster200029 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I got this movie a long time ago on VHS from Incredibly Strange Filmworks who deals with rare Sci-Fi, Horror Classics & more. I got it for Christmas one year I believe. I saw it it was pretty good I was disappointed by the Stop-Motion Animation I was used to seeing good smooth animation from Willis O'Brien & Pete Peterson also Ray Harryhausen & David Allen. Jim Danforth is also one of the best won 2 Oscars. I didn't know of him at the time though. Anyway it is a Sci-Fi / Western / Thriller about a Dinosaur hiding out in Hollow Mountain & the swamps & only coming out during times of drought to feed on the local Cattle. Good script by O'Brien. Edward Nassour who Directed also did The Stop-Motion Work which is too jerky not very good animation. Willis O'Brien & Pete Peterson should of did the animation I heard that the budget was too low so O'Brien turned it down. I guess that makes sense to do good smooth animation u need a lot of time. Nassour didn't have that time & Budget. The next year's The Black Scorpion (1957) was done by O'Brien & Peterson excellent Animation up their with the best Stop-Motion Work. Obviously with Scorpion they had the time & the budget to make good effective animation. When it comes to Stop-Motion to make it good u need time & a lot of money in those days. Nassour obviously didn't have it. The Allosaurus looks really nice & detailed I am sure nice armature & the rest was great & very detailed. Just Nassour didn't know what he was doing with the Stop-Motion Work. It is an Allosaurus too not a T-Rex I am sick of reading these other comments saying it's a T-Rex if u know dinosaurs like me count the fingers a Rex has 2 Fingers an Allosaurus has 3 fingers. In the film it has three so it's an Allosaurus. Same with "The Valley Of Gwangi" (1969) which was 100 times better of a Sci-Fi / Western / Thriller with more dinosaurs & brilliant Stop-Motion Work from the master Ray Harryhausen. Gwangi was also an Allosaurus. Anyway Hollow Mountain is alright it isn't the greatest animation but it is decent I guess. With the budget & time that's all that could be done so. Any O'Brien & Peterson, Harryhausen, Allen, or Danforth Film is far better cause they are among the Stop-Motion Masters. Nassour was a Director & isn't known for animation he just did it cause he couldn't get anyone else Harryhausen would of probably turned it down as well. Anyway "Earth vs. The Flying Saucers" (1956) came out & he was already probably working on "20 Million Miles To Earth" which came out the previous year 1957. It is still a good combination & story it isn't the worst Dinosaur Movie I have seen worse. It just isn't as good as u would expect especially for Dino & Stop-Motion Fans. I have this film on DVD+R Pan & Scan Version from Flix Movie Channel it is on their often so if u wanna check it on it's on their a lot. I also have a VHS Transfer on DVD+R of The 2.35:1 Letter-Box Version. Anyway 5 out of 10 for this. Thought I would mention I just recently got on a website like eBay called ioffer a far surperior Laserdisc Transfer of the film on DVD-R in LBOX 2.35:1 also includes a nice menu with chapter stops & Trailer. It was only 10 bucks too in all with shipping beat that! Plus I got 2 other Sci-Fi Films with it for free "The Cosmic Monsters" (1958) & "Fire Maidens From Outer Space" (1956) Cosmic I really like but Fire Maidens was alright they also have the trailers along with nice menus.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Worth a look
Django4415 April 2002
When looking through a book of film reviews you would (as I've found) not always find this film. It's minor, old and unacclaimed, and as a result largely unknown. It's worth a look, though. While most reviews would not rank it at all highly, and while it's hardly 'Godzilla' or 'King Kong', it's not that bad. The build up and Mexican scenery promise much, and the story (about a strange beast eating ranchers' sheep in a small Mexican town) does have its fair share of suspense. However, the climax, marred by awful special effects (due to the low budget) lets the whole thing down. This film has its good points, so watch it, but don't expect to be overwhelmed.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Scarey to a nine-year-old
pshore124 August 2002
I saw The Beast of Hollow Mountain in the theatre when I was nine. I slept under my bed for weeks. I just knew that T. Rex was going to walk up to 504 5th Avenue West and look in my second storey window and consider me a tender morsel. The world has changed considerably since this movie was in theatres. While it was just as primitive as described by the other reviewers here, this little boy had the be-Jesus scared out of him. I call that good film-making.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Gore Mongral's Movie Review: Beast of Hollow Mountain
ChiefGoreMongral9 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The 50's is one of my favorite eras for horror and sci-fi as most of my fond memories as a kid come from watching Harryhausen flicks and Universal Horror movies of that time frame (thanks to my father introducing me to them of course, Im not that old). Along the way there was some really good ones and then there were others like the film here Im reviewing TBFHM.

The story has a basic premise, a Mexican village has a legend that when the waters lower a creature comes out of an unexplored mountain and looks for food anywhere it can get it. Like a lot of the 50's monster films this would be enough to satisfy and entertain. Top that off with stop motion effects and your thinking pure 50's fun right,wrong. The movie also has another story of an angry cattle herder feuding with another herder to gain a monopoly on the cattle business in the area. This part of the story is focused on for nearly the first 60 minutes only briefly bringing up the monster that the title describes.

As a western, which the movie predominately is, it really isn't that good. As a monster movie it is not good either. The monster which finally shows up in the last 20 minutes is more or less to be a T-Rex. It is a very unconvincing stop motion sub par on every level and the way the monster is finally defeated is so stupid you have to see it to believe it. The funny thing about the T-Rex is he has a tongue that Gene Simmons would be envious of and at times they us a guy in rubber monster legs and feet to show it walking, another effect that added a level of badness to the movie.

In the end there is not much here to see. several of the cast would go on to star in the better stop motion monster gone amok film, The Black Scorpion. This seemed like a warm up to that film. If you want to see the best cowboy monster movie out there see "The Valley of Gwangi" which is light years ahead of this dreck. A lot of talking with very little action and the action, when there, being of the very lame variety I have no choice but to give TBFHM: 3/10: Bad, one of the worst 50's stop motion monster films. despite a respectable cast the story and pacing were dreadful along with the special effects.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Beef... it's what's for dinner!
mark.waltz2 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
With a taste for running cattle, the slow moving T-Rex (a victim of poor slow motion animation) is more capable of causing a stampede which kills more people than the medium sized dinosaur does in this slow-moving Western sci-fi. In general, science fiction fans probably don't go to see as many westerns as Western fans would go to see science fiction films, and this mid-1950's combination of both genres is a silly entry in the monster movie craze of this period of time. The Mexican town is surrounded by Hollow Mountain, which as it sounds, has caves that the locals can't get to because it is surrounded by a deep swamp that when the water runs down releases this creature.

The main plot actually concerns American Guy Madison who is involved in a fight over land and has a romance with a wealthy Mexican lady who lives nearby. Best plot cakes about three-quarters of the film, and the monster doesn't make its appearance until the last 20 minutes. The special effects are poor and the creature's movements are shaky at best. This has the advantage of being in color, but that makes the weak affects all the more obvious. To make matters worse, the creatures noises actually sounds more like snoring than growling, and that adds to the silliness of the film. The ridiculously long tongue on the T-Rex istruly silly. It is very apparent that Steven Spielberg was not influenced by this when he began to create "Jurassic Park". "The Valley of Gwangi", released over a decade later, is a much better dino western.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hey! You got your dinosaur in my cowboy movie! Well, you got your cowboy in my dinosaur movie!
lemon_magic10 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Cowboys being the archetypal movie hero for many previous movie generations, it's surprising that no one even seemed to try to combine a "real" Western with a monster movie and done it "straight" before this. And no, I'm not counting tripe such as "Jesse James Meets Frankenstein's Daughter" - gimmicky novelty movies wearing Western trappings." "Beast" plays fair with the audience of its day - it is a Western through and through and really is built around all the standard Western trappings of its time. And when the monster comes out to play in the final 20 minutes, it's a genuine surprise and gives the movie a badly needed jolt of energy.

It's just too bad that the use of Western screenplay staples is so clichéd - except for the actual monster plot elements ("who is stealing or eating the cattle?"), nothing that any character says or does will surprise you in any way. And someone needed to throttle the soundtrack guy down a bit - it's simultaneously overbearing and overdone.

And the special effects aren't all that great, although I can respect the amount of back breaking work that must have gone into using "replacement" animation for some of the dinosaur sequences(as opposed to the more well known stop motion techniques mastered by Harryhausen.) "Replacement animation" involves creating a new wax figure for each and every frame of the stop motion sequences (as opposed to just changing limb placement, expressions etc on several models) and it must have made such demands on the production budget that they could only use a very limited amount...and it still doesn't look very good to eyes accustomed to Harryhausen.

A devoted fan of the Western genre (and Mexican movies) will probably like this movie more than I did...but I give it credit for trying something interesting and playing it straight instead for exploitation value. (All the exploitation is in the title, nowhere else in the film).
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Too long.
13Funbags31 October 2017
First of all, I don't know why this site says this movie is Horror, Romance, Sci-Fi. It's not any of those. It's a light-hearted western comedy. If a man failing to steal a woman is a romance, then this is a romance. I haven't seen many westerns but from what I have heard they all have this plot. The bad guy wants to chase someone off their land. And there's a drunk Mexican. The only really bad thing about this movie is that it is way too long. There are several extended periods of nothing and it's hard to keep paying attention. Basically, this movie is a family friendly monster flick that no child would ever have the patience to sit through. I'm sure if you could force a first grader to watch the whole thing, they might thing it was awesome. A second grader would know better.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Beast is a Turkey
DarkKnight557 March 2006
Don't waste your time with this one. The movie is about an hour old (it's only 1 hour 20 minutes total) before you even see the "beast", then you wish you'd hadn't. I've seen better SFX on old Gumby reruns which is terrible considering that even the original King Kong had better SFX more than 20 years earlier. The first thing that you wonder is if there's a beast at all because the story centers around a feud between 2 cattle barons and a woman. After about 40 minutes there's finally something to show that there's actually a creature in the movie but it's not until the last 20 minutes before you finally get to the point. As a western, this film could have been a decent B film. As it is though, 'nuff said. The filmmaker should have used the money to finance better effects but chose to use it on color and Panoramic widescreen. Rather than bother with this film at all, watch Valley of the Gwangi instead.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is no 'King Kong', but it's still a treat.
G.Spider30 June 1999
It is said that a mountain surrounded by a swamp is hollow and that a prehistoric monster from 'the dawn of time' comes out during times of drought to stalk the land.

Alright, so the plot lacks any sense of reality (there would have to be a whole race of dinosaurs for them to survive until the present day). The special effects also leave something to be desired. But look over these faults and you'll find that this film is actually very enjoyable and entertaining. The dinosaur isn't revealed until the last twenty minutes, but when it shows its face there's non-stop action, and for once the dinosaur can move fast and so poses a genuine threat. The dinosaur itself is fairly well-animated and there is a wonderful 'golden age of monster movies' feel about the whole thing.
32 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible dinosaur film.
poolandrews6 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
The Beast of Hollow Mountain tells the extraordinary tale of an American cowboy named Jimmy Ryan (Guy Madison) & his Mexican partner Felipe Sanchez (Carlos Rivas) who own a piece of land in the back country of Mexico where they breed cattle, it's a cushy little number & the scenery is nice but lately they have been having problems. Some of their cattle, that's right THEIR cattle, have disappeared & they ain't happy about it. Now it's personal, could it be the local villain Enrique (Eduardo Noriega) who owns a rival ranch? Could it just be bad luck? Or could it have something to do with the terrifying legends of monsters that surround Hollow Mountain where the cattle disappeared? I ain't telling you so if you want to know how this gripping story unfolds you'll have to watch it yourself!

This Mexican American co-production was directed by Edward Nassour & Ismeal Rodriguez & is pretty monstrous in all senses of the word. The script by Robert Hill is a horrible mixture of a western & a dinosaur on the loose monster flick & neither compliment the other that well. For a start I wanted to see more of the 'Beast', it doesn't make an appearance until after the 40 minute mark & even then it's just it's shadow & it's not until after the hour mark until we finally see the 'Beast' in all it's jerky stop-motion glory. So basically all us die hard monster fans have to sit through over an hour of what is best described as a horrendous western about a feud between two cattle ranches as nobody knows about the existence of the 'Beast' so it isn't even mentioned. There's an awful comedy relief fat geezer & his annoying son, there's the love interest &, well, not much else as it plods along. By the time the 'Beast' does show itself it felt like I'd been sat there watching it for hours! The dialogue is corny, the character's are clichéd & this really is quite hard to sit through, the dinosaur scenes save it a bit at the end but they look so poor & it does so little they have minimal impact.

Directors Nassour & Rodrigeuz do alright, I suppose it's due to when it was made but the cast of cowboys in their brightly coloured shirts, sombrero's & cowboy hats look utterly gay & camp. There's no realism here at all. The dinosaur was animated using 'replacement animation' where lots of models of the same character were made in a slightly different pose & when filmed one at a time an illusion of motion is achieved, as far as I'm concerned it looks terrible. I'm sorry but it looks just like ordinary stop-motion animation only worse, it's far more jerky & less convincing. What's with having the dinosaur waggle it's tongue all the time? There is also an hilarious shot of it walking along, there's a close up of it's feet & legs which is obviously an actor walking along in terrible looking rubber monster legs & they even forgot to give him a tail! There's no blood or violence & only one person is shown to be killed by the dinosaur. You know I have to say I felt a bit sorry for the dinosaur, I mean it's not his fault he exists is it? He was just finding food to stay alive wasn't he? Why did all those gay looking cowboys have to murder it? They wiped out the last remaining one of it's species, it's now extinct. I hope those multi coloured cowboys are happy now.

Technically the film is alright, awful dinosaur effects apart it's well filmed with some nice bright widescreen cinematography which uses the locations quite well. The acting is, well, lets say stiff. They probably couldn't get over what they were made to wear.

The Beast of Hollow Mountain is an unsuccessful mix of western & monster film, there's nowhere near enough 'Beast' in it to make it a worthwhile viewing experience. More or less remade as Valley of the Gwangi (1969) as cowboys once again take on prehistoric dinosaurs!
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What A Great Idea!
teuthis15 January 2006
Mix Guy Madison, at the peak of his popularity, a genuine western with a great villain, a fair-to-middling fight, a cattle stampede, a comely heroine torn between love and obligation, an unintentionally obnoxious little Mexican boy, a mysterious, deadly creature lurking in a vast- well maybe- swamp, and you have a terrific science fiction oater that for some reason seems irresistible for me. I remember this film from childhood, and it has been so rare over the years. I cannot even find it on DVD. It is appearing on cable now and I do not miss an opportunity to watch.

As low budget as the film was, I think the monster moves quite well; especially when it is running. And I love that tongue! Once the beast appears, the film ramps up the action and never stops until the end.

This is somehow a spellbinding film. Go figure! You can laugh at its low budget antics, you can enjoy the romance, you can hiss at the villain, or just enjoy the monster. This film is really entertaining; a tribute to the attracting power that Guy Madison always had on film. Get yourself a good beer, some gummy dinosaurs, lean back and have fun!
30 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I remembered it from by childhood, and loved seeing it again
CarlNaamanBrown30 June 2013
Back in the 1950s, the big family weekend outing would be the drive-in movies. "It came from beneath the Sea", "The Alligator People", "Earth vs the Flyimg Saucers", "1984", "The Dam Busters", "The Four Skulls of Jonathan Drake", "Love Slaves of the Amazons", etc. and (when I was 8 or 9) "The Beast from Hollow Mountain". I finally caught it again on DVR on TCM Thur 27 Jun 2013. For what is billed as the first Cinemascope and Color dinosaur movie, "Beast" has rough goodness.

And it is better than I remember. Surprised me. The dinosaur effects are some what better than "Dinosaurus!" 1960 (apparently the reviewers panning the FX have not seen "Dinosaurus!"), but it is not as good as what Willis O'Brien and Ray Harryhausen did together in Irwin Allen's "Animal World" 1956. I think the "Beast..." FX were billed as RegiScope animation in depth.

I have read that Willis O'Brien's "cowboys and dinosaurs" idea had been kicking around since before his "Mighty Joe Young" another movie where O'Brien and Harryhausen worked together. And after O'Brien's death, Harryhausen decided to make his mentor's unmade pet project as "The Valley of Gwangi".

The dinosaur in "Beast..." appears late and the conflict between the gringo rancher Ryan from Texas and the Mexican rancher Enrique, and the growing romance between Ryan and Sarita, Enrique's betrothed, occupies the first two thirds or three fourths of the movie. Mysterious deaths of cattle are attributed to rustlers and the ranchers' rivalry. But after the steer-chomping Beast makes his appearance, he has lotsa screen time in the last part of the film. (OK, I concede the tongue gets to be a bit much in some scenes. Looks to me like the tongue was rotoscoped onto the sequences shot with replacement animation.)

What has stayed with me from seeing this film over fifty years ago, is the scene where Sarita and the kid Panchito are besieged in a cabin by the Beast. That was scary then, and is still is a moment (or that may be my nostalgia acting up again).
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cowboys vs. Kaiju
a_chinn29 June 2017
Did you think the genre mash-up "Cowboys vs. Aliens" was original and clever? Well about 40 years earlier there was this fun Cowboys vs. Monster flick. Actually it's a story about a bunch of vaqueros who find themselves face-to-face with an allosaurus who's been killing their herd. The allosaurus doesn't actually show up until near the end of the film and a lot of time is spent on the vaqueros trying to figure out what's happening to their herd. That part of the film isn't all that compelling, but once the stop motion allosaurus shows up, this film is a whole heck of a lot of fun! Filmed in Regiscope! and was followed up with "The Valley of Gwangi" by Ray Harryhausen.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting story line, great monster for that time period, I really enjoyed this movie.
aprilalfa116 August 2001
I first saw this movie as part of a group of summer matinees offered for children. Later, I remembered it when it came on TV as part of a Cable TV Monstervision. This movie has some very interesting scenes, it is good family entertainment. I will try to contact the Cable TV Networks to please air this movie so others can enjoy it. IF ANYONE KNOWS WHERE I CAN GET A COPY OF THIS MOVIE, PLEASE E-MAIL ME.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This Beast Keeps Audiences Waiting...
mikhail08028 May 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Here's a strange hybrid of a fifties sci-fi movie with a story by old-timer Willis O'Brien who fashions a plot like something out of a Roy Rogers programmer. Only he throws a dinosaur into the mix! I actually wondered after the first half hour or so, as to the possibility that I had DVR'ed the wrong movie, since this didn't conform to any of the horror/sci-fi conventions. It totally plays as a straight-up Western for at least the first hour, except for maybe a few seconds of mysterious background music. Both an American director and a Mexican director worked on the movie, and share the directing credit, which I thought interesting and pretty unusual.

Set in Mexico and shot in glorious color, The Beast of Hollow Mountain looks fantastic, but fails to deliver much in the way of frights. The handsome hero Guy Madison only wants to run his ranch with his Mexican partner Carlos Rivas, but soon becomes entangled in a love triangle with a local woman and her powerful fiancée. And who knew that a tyrannosaurus rex lurked in the hills? And why did it wait till the last twenty minutes to make itself known? Stereotypical characters and some uninteresting dialog somewhat dampen the proceedings, but some nifty action sequences including a cattle stampede add enough excitement to make it enjoyable. And Patricia Medina as the local Mexican beauty seems a tad too mature to play such an innocent and virginal character. Today she'd be cast as the girl's mother, although she certainly is age-appropriate to be in a relationship with Madison.

The climax delivers some real fun, and the athletic Madison gets to show off some gymnastics in the final encounter with the title character. The FX are in line with O'Brien's work on King Kong and there's lots to recommend here, but the film doesn't quite rise to the level of a classic.

** out of *****
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Playing cowboys... and dinosaurs.
lost-in-limbo2 November 2008
Cowboys and dinosaurs?! Now why don't we have this more often. This unique combination of fantasy, sci-fi, western and horror would show up again only once after 'The Beast of Hollow Mountain' in the vastly superior 'Valley of Gwangi (1969)'. As a kid I loved watching cowboy movies and constantly reading about dinosaurs. Well this was made for me… well surely back then I might have dug it, but this was my first viewing of 'Beast of Hollow Mountain' and it was a largely a lightweight disappointment. The problem here was that the western side of the story (feuding cowboys, cow herding and a mischievous Mexican kid) is lacklustre, systematic and takes up most of the framework and time. The pacing is ultimately slow and languishes within this period. The projected dino action (and this when it virtually appears too) doesn't come in to play until the hour mark and the film runs for just 80 minutes. This is when it picks up the energy levels and riveting suspense, but this all depends on if you have bothered to last the distance. Even with the ambitions, it never entirely gels and satisfies. The variable stop motion animation is less than imitating, but well achieved nonetheless. The direction is colourless (ironically it's filmed in colour) and typical, as the heavy-handed score and atmospheric sound FX gets out much more life. Doesn't make it any better though. The acting is acceptable, with a perfectly able lead performance by Guy Madison and the location photography is admirably framed.

Not terrible, but a plain, unremarkable hybrid b-film.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sucked in by the TiVo description!
Rina99993 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I was perusing my Tivo recommendations and this description jumped out at me:

"A Mexican cattleman's beef with a rancher is settled by a tyrannosaur from the local swamp."

How could I pass up a gem like this? The "special effects" are MST3K worthy, particularly a scene where the drunk father is dragged by a horse, rather, where a dummy that's supposed to be the drunk father is dragged by a horse. Awesome! When they showed a close-up of the "feet" of the dinosaur I howled! I know it was the fifties, but still! The acting was better than I was expecting, though I could have done without the kid, just annoying.

Certainly no classic, but I was entertained from start to finish.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cowboys and Dinosaurs
gavin69426 January 2014
An American cowboy living in Mexico (Guy Madison) discovers his cattle is being eaten by a giant prehistoric dinosaur.

What is most strange about this film is that the dinosaur aspect -- which is played up with the poster, title and such -- really is not all that important. The bulk of the film is not about missing cattle but Jimmy's relationship with a woman who is engaged to another man.

The story could be good enough just like that -- a love triangle, with some multicultural stress thrown in. Jimmy is apparently the only American in the film, making him something of a stranger -- he is encroaching on Mexican soil and trying to "steal" a Mexican woman. Much could be said about American opinion of Mexican immigration and how it is reversed here, but I will not go there.

The film ultimately comes up mediocre because it does not blend its fantasy and western aspects as smoothly as it could. Fantasy fans will be bored for much of the film. Western fans may enjoy it a bit more, seeing as it never strays from the genre until much later on.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Trash at his highest
stewiec856 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I was just getting into the story and out of nowhere the dinosaur shows up and kills the only comedic character. I swear it's funny and stupid to the point no one know what they're doing here. If you need a laughably bad movie to laugh l, this is it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mexican oater with tacked-on dinosaur action
Leofwine_draca23 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
One of two 'cowboys vs. dinosaurs' movies penned by Willis O'Brien, the other being the far more successful VALLEY OF GWANGI made in 1968. THE BEAST OF HOLLOW MOUNTAIN is something of an obscure film despite its mainstream status as an average '50s B-movie monster flick. For the most part, the film is flawed in numerous ways and fails to deliver on the entertainment stakes until the last twenty minutes. The film was made in Mexico on the cheap and it shows, with an entirely Hispanic cast aside from imported lead Guy Madison (AVENGER OF THE SEVEN SEAS). Perhaps these are the reasons for its lack of popularity. Another reason is that this film is far more of a routine oater than a monster movie; due to the budget (or lack thereof) we don't actually get to see the monster until the final twenty minutes of the movie.

Up to then, THE BEAST OF HOLLOW MOUNTAIN follows all the usual clichés of the western genre, filling the screen with a bunch of predictable characters: the noble, kindly newcomer; the damsel in distress; the jealous Mexican bad guy; the drunk; the annoying little kid who screams and cries a lot. There's a hell of a lot of smalltalk going on and far too much filler, especially during a never-ending street party in the latter half of the movie. At least its short and you can just about get by watching it without dozing off. There are one or two notable action sequences to enliven things, including a nicely-choreographed fist fight on the street and a cattle stampede from hell. There are a fair amount of real stunts involving horses which appear to be pretty dangerous and likewise a scene where villagers let off fireworks IN THEIR HANDS shows that in Mexico there are no health and safety measures to worry about.

Cast-wise there are few surprises to be had. Everybody fulfils their own role without really standing out from the crowd. Ten minutes after the film ended I couldn't really remember a face or character which may tell you something. Guy Madison does his best with the material and goes through his familiar motions, carrying off some great athletic work there too (the bit where he runs and jumps on a horse is very impressive). This was just before Madison set sail for Italy and pursued his career as a villain in an assortment of swashbucklers and peplum epics for the next ten years.

As for the Beast itself, it turns out to be a mouldy old dinosaur inexplicably living in the mountain for thousands of years without dying of old age. The stop motion effects used to animate the beast are usually poor; O'Brien should have been allowed to handle the effects himself instead of some amateur doing the job. At least the stop motion is better than the terrible rubber dinosaur feet used in the close-up shots. The last twenty minutes of the film is one long-running action scene with the dinosaur figuring heavily in the action stakes; although it may not look the best it is pretty well animated, especially when we see it running after a horse. The trap our hero sets for the Beast is the cleverest thing in the movie.

As a kid I was fortunate enough to catch this one on television and I loved it totally. Seeing it as an adult I am well aware of the flaws and faults but I still view it with a sentimental eye. Although the monster looks cheap, at least it gets to eat a few cows and kill a couple guys, and the ending will impress all but the most spoilt kids. Hardly a classic movie but a winner on the nostalgia front. They don't make 'em like this anymore, that's for sure.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not quite Jurassic Park, even for it's time...
peterr-129 June 2022
While this movie won't set any imaginations on fire, the tongue on the T-rex is by far the best thing going in the animation sequences. It HAS to be the inspiration for Gene Simmons of KISS...long, independent movement with a mind of its own. It is hard to believe this was done in 1956 for the quality of the cinemascope color and resolution; which is quite good...the white-washing may have some modern day "activists" on their toes screaming for "justice" but remember, it's a product of it's time. Enjoy it for what it is. A B-movie monster flick with the genuinely unique idea of crossing two genres that were on fire at the time (westerns and stop motion animation fantasy/sci-fi) together like chocolate and peanut butter....unfortunately, it just didn't leave the same delicious after taste.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Incoherent ramblings
chow_hound27 January 2006
How can you not love a cowboys and dinosaurs film? I saw this on TV about 15 or 20 years ago so my memories are somewhat vague, but I do remember being enthralled by the story and finding the stop-motion effects fun, if not realistic. The color must have been pretty washed out, because I was surprised to discover here that this is in fact a color film! If you love westerns and you love dinosaurs, you can't help but love this film. Sadly, there's only this and Gwangi to choose from in this rather narrow genre. I was hoping this would be released on DVD to capitalize on the King Kong publicity, but no such luck apparently. Maybe someone will do a CGI remake of this or Gwangi, since remakes are all that Hollywood seems capable of lately.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Just good clean fun for everyone!
azcowboysingr29 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
While I have to agree with most of the reviewers about the amateurish stop-motion animation, the monster is not really all that bad, it seems that way compared to the movie magic that modern CGI (Jurassic Park) is capable of now. The acting is quite good, with Guy Madison proving that he had more than the ability to ride a horse with the best of them...he had genuine talent as an actor too. Patricia Medina is more than lovely...she is a dream in color. The plot is surprisingly well thought out, and the script is pure 1950's fun from start to finish. Once the action gets going, it is worth the wait...a tough fist fight, a couple of fast draws, and some horsemanship that is very impressive. Some people complained about how the monster meets its end, but I thought that it was quite a change from the usual manner in which the hero brings it down...actually something that might work if such a monster was to show up for real. In short, this is NOT Valley of Gwangi, or Jurassic Park, but it is just good clean fun for everyone in the family! Sit down with a big bowl of popcorn, a mug of Pepsi, a pack of smokes, turn out the lights, and enjoy an hour & a half of pure fun. Don't criticize it, just enjoy it.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Low Budget. Not the best.
maeander23 December 2021
King Kong was more alive than this beast. Gumby was more alive than this beast. This kind of movie lives and dies by the F/X. I have seen hand puppets more alive than this beast. It's interesting to watch, but you won't buy one minute of it. It's a curiosity. It's just not very good.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed