Earth vs. the Flying Saucers (1956) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
153 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Terrific sci-fi movie. Like wine, gets better with age.
m-fan21 January 2003
This is a terrific older sci-fi movie. It has all the elements to make it a sold movie; a good variety of characters, an interesting plot, and a solid script. The great special effects are just icing on the cake. Much of the movie is told in documentary style with a voice-over of someone, which adds to the realism.

You can feel connected with the main characters and what goes on in the movie. Even most of the characters that don't have much of a role seem realistic, not two-dimensional (like some in Spider-man). The plot has many viable twists and the movie comes to a exciting and feasible conclusion (un-like Independence Day). Many/most people will find it more entertaining than the "classic" sci-fi invasion movie War of the Worlds.

This movie, even though it was a relatively mid-budget movie made in the 1950's, should serve as a message to modern day Hollywood. It shows how a movie if made with a lot of thought and heart, as opposed to just violence and/or sensualism, can produce a real winner.
48 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great special effects buoy up otherwise underwhelming story
jamesrupert201415 July 2019
The title pretty much sums up the story. Malevolent aliens in the titular vehicles try to intimidate Earth into surrendering before launching an all-out attack. Unusual for the genre, we 'fired first', (although the aliens were likely up to no good from the beginning, having shot down all of our satellites). The typical B-movie story finds scientist Russel Marvin (Hugh Marlowe) (and his pretty wife Carol (Joan Taylor)) constantly in the thick of things as the heroic boffin whips up a last minute miracle weapon. The script and acting are pretty trite, and other than Ray Harryhausen's stop-action work, the production values are weak (notably in the use of excessive and sometimes poorly matched stock footage). Some of the matte footage (such as the heroes running through the fire) is amateurish, and there are a number of irritating inconsistencies in the plot, especially with respect to the alien's capabilities. Of course, what makes the film a must see for genre fans are Harryhausen's iconic stop-action flying saucers. The design is classic, the model work excellent, the saucers are well integrated into the live action footage, and the film was one of the first to include the now de rigueur 'alien invasion' motif of trashing national monuments. Typical of Harryhausen projects, if the rest of the movie had been as good as the special effects, it would have been a classic.
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
an underrated gem
dfnanderson24 August 2002
While "War of the Worlds" is probably the most heralded of the 1950s alien invasion films, this one is a lot more fun. There are none of the heavy-anded quasi-religious sub-texts that weighed down WOTW. There are no pretensions of any kind. "Earth" gets right down to the business at hand...aliens coming to Earth with the sole purpose of kicking our asses. Throw in the always fun Harryhausen effects, in which real life monuments are destroyed (later incorporated in the equally dumb and equally fun "ID4"), and what's not to like?
60 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great 50's Sci-Fi
BaronBl00d27 January 2000
Ray Harryhausen developed the flying saucers for this film, and they are worth seeing to be sure. The story is about how a space creature has contacted a professor on Earth, played nicely by Hugh Marlowe, and wants him to talk to his leaders. When there is a communication problem, the aliens destroy a rocket base. In short time, the aliens let the Earth and its people know that their intent is to take over the planet. Marlowe, working in conjunction with the military, develops a machine which renders the space ships incapable of straight flight. The film is a prime example of what good science fiction is all about. It has tension, extraterrestrials, fast pacing, and good special effects for its day. This film is very suspenseful and well worth a look.
51 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better-than-average '50's saucer flick
WilliamTelevision24 February 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Ray Harryhausen should have received top billing in this film, since his superb stop-action animation is the real star here. None of this nonsense about wise and benevolent aliens a la "The Day the Earth Stood Still"! Here, the aliens are nasty and mean business. The mass saucer attack on Washington is a classic scene; swiped by everything from "Independence Day" to a TV commercial for a nationwide chain of fast-food restaurants. Although the saucer's "magnetic propulsion" is scientific balderdash (Earth's magnetic field is just about strong enough to swing a compass needle.); still it's thrilling to see the military and the scientists racing around D.C. in 1-and-a-half ton trucks with diesel generators and "magnetic disruptor's" mounted on the truck beds. (They look a bit like an out-sized Maxim machine gun.) When these are fired at an alien ship, it starts to wobble wildly until it falls and crashes. At one point, a saucer lands on the White House lawn in an attempt to kill or capture the President (Eisenhower) (gasp!) The aliens step out clad in silver spacesuits that act as powered exoskeletons that enable them to walk while under Earth's gravity. Fortunately, these are magnetically powered like their ships and Hugh Marlowe (who played Patricia Neal's lunkhead boyfriend in "The Day the Earth Stood Still") arrives on the scene with one of those disruptor's and drives them off.

There is an interesting scene earlier in the film where an alien is subdued and the helmet wrenched off of his suit. Before crumbling to dust in our atmosphere, you can see out-sized black eyes, no nose, and a slit-like mouth set in a light-bulb shaped head. I didn't think this idea of an alien occurred to anybody until the 1970's.

Despite perfunctory acting and scientific howlers, this movie is still endearing, not only for the fine special effects (CGI is a bit too slick for me.), but also for an innocence that would soon be lost. For the following year after this film was made, the Soviet Union would shock America by launching the first artificial satellite (Sputnik I) into Earth orbit using the first ICBM. This meant that the Soviets could launch a nuclear warhead at the United States. From then until the Cuban Missile Crisis persuaded both sides to back down from hair-trigger postures, fears of nuclear war would put possible interplanetary war very much in the shade.
54 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Excellent B-movie and intro to '50s SF
pwoods11 August 2005
As has been pointed out by most reviewers on IMDb, this film has all the perceived elements of cold war-period American cinema. However, what also should be considered is the influence it has had on contemporary SF movies and TV.

Hugh Marlowe, Joan Taylor and, especially, Morris Ankrum are well-known B-movie actors: they appeared in everything from Westerns to SF, with lots of stops in between. Thus, this film (complete with all the other stalwarts of '50s and '60s "Bs" who appear therein) can be seen as a progenitor of later low-budget productions which rely on a cheap yet capable cast.

At the time it was released (1956), Ray Harryhausen was proving his expertise with stop-motion special effects, later to be given much larger budgets in '60s colour productions. "Gumby" and similar TV items owe much to this man, as does Aardman Productions and, possibly, Dreamworks.

It has already been indicated (by others) that "Mars Attacks" owes its saucers to this film. So, too, "ID4" has a debt, as does "Dr Who"! (Specifically the outfits worn by the aliens - that leaden 'dome' on top of their environment suits belongs to a famous adversary of the good doctor - check out a couple of Tom Baker serials!) Be that as it may, Fred F. Sears does an acceptable job as director; Curt Siodmak supplies a clever screenplay based on Don Keyhoe's book (Keyhoe also wrote 'non-fiction' accounts of UFOs); and some of the dialogue is definitely quotable! IMDb has some ripper examples.

Watch it and enjoy it. Strip some of our contemporary SF of CGI and they really do lack substance in comparison with this entertaining and funny movie. OK. You won't gasp and ooooh. If you have a love of '50s B-movies however, this one is a 'corker'!
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Earth Vs. The Flying Saucers (Fred F. Sears, 1956) ***
Bunuel19768 March 2007
Above-average sci-fi which I had missed on its solitary TV broadcast years ago and one that I had been eyeing as a possible DVD purchase for what seems like forever; I'm overjoyed, therefore, that I managed to get my hands on it at long last.

The film is basically an amalgam of THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL (1951) – with Hugh Marlowe convincingly making the leap from despicable villain to intelligent hero here – and WAR OF THE WORLDS (1953): even if its outlook is a naïve one (while also displaying something of an obsession with technology) and the plot rather contrived, it is nonetheless generally absorbing and tremendously entertaining along the way. The special effects (by Ray Harryhausen) must have looked spectacular back then but come off as pretty shaky nowadays; still, this takes nothing away from his achievement and doesn't affect one's enjoyment – or involvement – in the film in any way (the design of the aliens' metallic suits and the briefly glimpsed creatures themselves is also quite impressive).

This is actually the first black-and-white Harryhausen film I've watched, and also the only one which doesn't have to do with prehistoric or mythological monsters of some kind; as such, it's not as juvenile as his other work and makes me look forward to the effects wizard's other sci-fi outings – IT CAME FROM BENEATH THE SEA (1955), TWENTY MILLION MILES TO EARTH (1957) and FIRST MEN IN THE MOON (1964). The Columbia DVD includes, among other things, an engaging 9-minute featurette on the making of EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS where Harryhausen is interviewed by genre enthusiast Joe Dante (who recalls first watching the film on a double-bill with the obscure THE 27TH DAY [1956]).
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Restrained but still an effective piece of sci-fi pie.
hitchcockthelegend24 April 2008
Reports of flying saucers start coming in thick and fast until sure enough alien invaders begin to attack the Earth. Focal point of their attack is the U.S. Space Programe, can hero in waiting Russel Marvin conjure up a defence weapon to save the day?

Obviously a template for many an alien invader film since its release, Earth Vs The Flying Saucers never quite reaches the heights that perhaps it should have. Bogged down by maudlin scripting and restricted by its budget, it often hints at what a great picture it could have been. The lead cast are poor and this hurts the film even more, Hugh Marlowe as Russell Marvin bores us with the scientific speak when really he should be fascinating us, whilst scream queen duties fall to poor Joan Greenwood who forgets that she is actually supposed to emit some sort of terror when the alien hordes attack! However, on the plus side the aliens themselves are certainly creepy enough to grab your notice, and Ray Harryhausen's flying saucers animation is of course top dollar for its time, whilst the final battle across Washington DC is classic gold, an all buzzing assault with splurges of death rays at every turn.

An important film in the pantheon of the genre for sure, but it's just a tad too restrained for its own good. 6/10
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
My favorite movie
mice-1311 April 2013
My sister took me to this movie in 1956 when I was 8. It shocked me. For two weeks I was afraid to go to sleep at night for fear of nightmares. Some years ago I bought a 16mm print and studied it. It has all the right elements for a nerdy kid with glasses: Beautiful Joan Taylor and serious Hugh Marlowe work well together. The lonely laboratory at night is a wonderful location, frightening when attacked. Dr. Russell A. Marvin removing the helmet from the alien is particularly creepy. We know so much more now about outer space, so to appreciate this you have to suspend disbelief and travel back in time when comic books were 10¢. Soon after seeing this movie I was bitten by the movie bug which resulted in a lifelong passion for films and animation, which I have to credit to the intense effect that Earth Vs the Flying Saucers had on my young mind. I still watch this film several times a year and never get tired of seeing it.
39 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not Cape Canaveral. . .Launch Site is in New Mexico
dwachenschwanz31 July 2005
Operation Skyhook's (an actual military operation, although the real one dealt with high altitude balloon research) location was at White Sands, New Mexico. Someone here mentioned the aliens "blew up Cape Canaveral" which may be a fun fantasy but the truth be its New Mexico.

I've always liked this movie, maybe because there are so many "flubs" in it. The special effects are really great for the time period, when digital didn't exist and all they had were screen mattes and stop-action photography.

I really get a kick out of the scene where they've just abandoned their laboratory with the new fangled sound weapon. They are running through the woods, in front of a rear projected screen to provide a sense of movement, but they are running at the wrong pace in reference to the projected image.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good Special Effects Effort Undone By Budget
Bob-4517 October 2000
A model of restrained, professional film making, EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS would be one of the best 50s sci-fi efforts had Columbia studios provided more of a budget. Hugh Malowe plays a scientist attempting to launch earth satellites. After repeated failures, he discovers that flying saucers are destroying his satellites. After the destruction of Cape Canaveral by the "saucermen," Marlowe discovers a method of "toppling" the anti-gravity saucers.

From there the story pretty much unravels. The "saucermen" give Marlowe and his team plenty of time to develop a weapon capable of defeating them. Worse, the final assault on Washington is as senseless and ineffectual as the typical US Presidential debate. The aliens pick virtually no targets of tactical or strategic importance. Ray Harryhausen's flying saucers, the alien's "exoskeletons" and sound effects in this movie are especially standout.
27 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good representative of B-movie 50's sci-fi
johno-2122 March 2006
This is a great example of 1950's sci-fi movies and the flying saucer scare craze that was sweeping the nation and of course parallels the cold war threat and the resilience and ingenuity of American science and military might. Retired Major Donald E. Keyhoe was the author of a series of non-fiction books of the era outlining his belief in the reality of flying saucers and this film draws from his book Flying Saucers From Outer Space. Veteran monster movie writer Curt Siodmak adapted a story based on the book for this film and veteran monster movie screenwriter George Worthing Yates wrote the screenplay. Special effects legend Ray Harryhausen supervised the effects and Josh Westmoreland, a sound veteran of westerns and monster movies, provided the sound. B-movie director Fred F. Sears and B-movie cinematographer Fred Jackman Jr. put it all together on the screen. In what would be a foreboding of things to come on 9/11 American monuments are under attack and destroyed. Aliens from a dying planet come to earth to claim it as their own but earth fights back. Hugh Marlow and Joan Taylor star. It's campy but it's still a good flick and a good representative of it's era and genre and I would give it an 8.0 out of 10.
23 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Scheduled For Fifteen Rounds
sol121830 June 2005
(Some Spoilers) One of the best Sci-Fi movies coming out of post WWII Hollywood "Earth vs. the Flfying Saucers" still holds up today just like it did back in 1956 some fifty years after it was released. Traveling vast distances in space a fleet of alien spaceships reach earth and plan to take over the planet but want to avoid any conflict with earths inhabitants in order not to destroy it.

With their own planet slowly dying the earth is the perfect place for the aliens to live in and they plan to first use persuasion not force but force if necessary if the earthlings dare to resist them. Trying to get in touch with one of the brightest of those on earth to get his government, the US, as well as the rest of the world community of nations to give up peacefully the aliens chose the brilliant Dr. Russell Marvin,Hugh Marlowe, as the person to give their message to.

It later turns out that Dr. Marvin isn't as bright as the aliens at first thought that he was. Dr. Marvin couldn't figure out that they were trying to contact him even when their space-craft , that was the size of a battleship, was practically on top of his car as he and his newlywed bride Carol, Joan Taylor, were driving in the wide-open California Desert. Marvin finally gets the message from a audio tape-recording that Carol made, by accident, of he incident with the flying saucer.

Trying to get in touch with the earth's governments the aliens who even after destroying the secret US military installation Skyhook, that Dr. Marvin was in charge off,still couldn't convince the US government, and Dr. Marvin, that the earth was under attack from aliens from outer space. Those in charge thought that it, the Skyhook disaster, was some kind of unexplained phenomena.

Dr. Marvin finally realizing at last what was going on, after about a half dozen alien attempts to get his attention, has a secret meeting arranged with the aliens at night by the seashore off Chesapeake Bay. The alien take Dr. Marvin and is wife Carol US Army Maj. Huglin, Donald Curtis as well as motorcycle cop Larry Blake, who just happened to tag along, in their space-craft and give a message to bring back to their leaders: Surrender or Die.

On the space-craft the earth visitors hear and finally meet Carol's father Brig. Gen. John Hanley, Morris Ankrum,who the aliens captured during their attack on Skyhook. It turned out that Gen. Hanley had been lobotomized by the aliens with his brain being stored in the flying saucer as an information data-bank. Hanley just walks around aimlessly with a brainless and zombie-like stare and later together with highway policeman Blake, who also was lobotomized by the aliens, is thrown out the space-craft in mid-flight as if they were yesterday's garbage.

Making their stand in the US capital, Washingtn D.C, against the fleet of alien flying saucers the US military, with the help of Dr. Marvin,found the aliens weak-point. With the use of ultra-high frequency sounds the US military knocked out the entire alien fleet of flying saucers but only after the city of Washington was destroyed by them.

One of special-effect expert Ray Harryhausens best work with the footage of the movie used in dozens of Sci-fi films all throughout the 1950's and 60's. Remade in 1996 as "Inependance Day" but the original is still far better even though it didn't have the spectacular computer generated special effects that it's remake had.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"They expect to terrify us with a display of power!"
classicsoncall16 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
If 1950's schlock sci-fi is your cup of tea, you won't be disappointed here. This is what fans like myself live for and have to wait to see until they're aired in places like Turner Classics or in my case, Antenna TV this morning. Had to set the alarm for a 5:00 AM start too, so that has to tell you something.

I don't know if Ray Harryhausen was proud of his special effects work in this; everything is still pretty primitive but for 1956 you probably won't find better up close and personal flying saucer work. Obviously the picture's use of the term 'Air Intelligence Command' can be considered an oxymoron today, but then again, it was explained that the scientists back on Earth hadn't been able to track any of the observation rockets sent into space to set up twelve 'moons' because they blew up and fell back down to terra firma. I don't think I'd want to be admitting that if I was in charge of the space program.

Lots of goofy stuff here, one of the first instances was when Dr. Russell Marvin (Hugh Marlowe) and his wife Carol (Joan Taylor) perused the horizon for traces of alien activity and you had both day and night time sky at the same time! Flying saucer continuity took a hit as well, as depending on the scene, weapon fire either disintegrated it's target or blew it to smithereens. And even though they seemed invincible when attacking Washington, D.C., they were rather easily shot down by military rockets on their way there. Similarly, the alien life forms inside were impervious to harm when they weren't otherwise being knocked out by innocuous rifle fire!?!?

Well look, you either go for this stuff or you don't. Hard to believe there were some intelligent sci-fi flicks coming out around the same time like "War of the Worlds" and "The Day The Earth Stood Still" that puts pictures like this to shame, but you can have a lot more fun with the silly stuff. For a double header treat, try catching this one back to back with "Teenagers From Outer Space". You'll never be the same again.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My favorite Si Fi, for obvious reasons
ramarvin5 February 2001
I always wondered how they managed to pick the name of the main character in this movie (Dr. Russell A. Marvin). That is my name, and it is very uncommon. When I saw the credits in the IMDB, I realized the answer. The inspiration for this movie was a book by Donald E. Keyhoe, who was consulted on this film. In 1956, Keyhoe started an organization called NICAP (National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena). In 1956, I was a real flying saucer enthusiast, and was one of the very first people to join NICAP. I believe that they picked my name off of Keyhoe's membership list. I was 14 years old at the time. Anyway, it's a good flick with some great special effects (done the old fashioned way) by the legendary Ray Harryhausen.
72 out of 85 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty Intelligent For Its Genre, But Lacks Excitement
ccthemovieman-130 May 2006
This was fairly interesting and nicely low-key for a 1950s sci-fi flick....which usually means one thing: hysterical women shrieking and screaming. Well, there's none of that nonsense here. Ray Harryhausen's special-effects were lauded and justifiably so for his era, but you can imagine how they look today 50 years later! They look pretty primitive.

The acting is respectable considering the three stars - Hugh Marlow, Joan Taylor and Donald Curtis - are anything but "stars." I do think the story could have used a bit of humor to spice it up a bit, but you can't always get everything.

At least this one was one "flying saucer movie" that had some intelligence. It might have had too much, because it had very little excitement.
26 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Entertaining Nonsense
Theo Robertson18 April 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The last time I saw this movie was April the first 1982 which was the day before my younger brother was born . Maybe this is the reason why this movie stuck out in my mind and I certainly remember enjoying EARTH VS THE FLYING SAUCERS ( I've always been a fan of this type of cheesy movie ) though I did recall their being some unlikely occurrences like the hero leaving a tape recorder running which sets up the plot for the movie .

!!!! SLIGHT SPOILERS !!!!

After seeing the movie again for the first time since 1982 I was struck as to how ridiculous everything about it is now . The aliens land at a secret rocket base . Fair enough , and I have to point out that the reason the troops at the base open fire without asking about the aliens intention ( as one fellow reviewer was confused by this ) is to do with the cold war paranoia at the time , aliens in 1950s movies with a few notable exceptions ( The QUATERMASS trilogy for example ) are surrogate communists so it's entirely logical for American troops to blast away at flying saucers . What is entirely unlikely is that the aliens are able to destroy the rocket base and kill absolutely everyone who isn't connected to the plot ie Washington is entirely unconvinced that the base was destroyed by saucer men due to the lack of eyewitness accounts . What ? The flying saucers didn't show up on radar etc . It's also ridiculous that if the flying saucers have powerful ray guns the aliens needed to land in the first place . Like I said this is not an entirely plausible movie . In fact it's a very silly one

Despite this EVTFS still remains a very enjoyable movie as long as you take it for what it it - A 1950s B movie . There's an over reliance of stock film footage , plot holes galore , not very good acting and special effects that don't really stand up to the test of time , but it does contain some entertaining moments like the stranded alien stalking humans in a woodland and the final invasion , and despite some of the technical flaws the sound editing and sound effects are very good . If you also want to be pretentious you could point out the phallic symbolism of the aliens weapons but I wouldn't bother
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The definition of fun
Leofwine_draca9 July 2016
A classic '50s sci-fi B-movie, this early film stands as a template on which later science fiction movies were to be based. Despite working on a low budget, the cast and crew manage to make this one a roaring success. Forget friendly aliens, while these extraterrestrials firstly appear to be nice, they soon reveal their evil plan to colonise earth and destroy mankind! The cast go through the expected motions - there's the typical bunch of tough military guys who just want to blast the aliens away, plus the compassionate scientist hero and his young girlfriend (the age difference is very noticeable between this pair, it always amuses me how middle-aged/old men supposedly appeal to young girls). Marlowe and Taylor may look good as the leads, but they inject little charisma into their roles.

Everybody involved knows that the real stars of the film are the aliens themselves, and pretty good they are too. While looking like 'Greys' inside their costumes, on the outside they have a full suit of protective body armour, which makes them look like wandering automatons. They also shoot a ray from their hands which makes their enemies disappear into thin air, like the Martian rays from WAR OF THE WORLDS (an obvious influence). This effect may be a little cheesy but it's all good fifties fun.

However, the really impressive special effects take the form of the flying saucers, portrayed in wondrous stop-motion animation by that king of the genre, Ray Harryhausen. While this was only Harryhausen's second film, the SFX work of the flying saucers is brilliant, and they steal every moment they're on screen. Your eyes won't leave them. Events in the film climax to an excellent battle between Earth and the flying saucers, with rockets having no effect on the alien technology. Still, aside from the exciting finale, there are plenty of other moments to savour. Aliens mercilessly dropping captives from high up in the air, countless explosions, the hero's trip inside the flying saucer itself, the clever way that the aliens live in-between the seconds of our time. EARTH VS. THE FLYING SAUCERS is everything a sci-fi B-movie should be, and it does its job admirably.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stretches believability as it goes along
hollywoodshack24 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
It's kind of depressing to see, hey, the earth creatures are winning when they develop magnetic rays to shoot the saucers down so that they destroy the Washington Monument and the Capitol building, plus almost every other landmark in Washington, DC. It just seems they're really battling against themselves. Then Hugh and Carol (Joan Taylor) are celebrating this "victory" on the beach with almost the entire nation destroyed. It's kind of obvious the script was written for using the special effects more often than logical cohesion. The reason for attacking the earth wasn't too clear, oh, the satellites orbiting were a sign of the earth creatures invading a galaxy millions of miles away, sure. I just missed hearing some kind of moral statement used in other films like it, i.e The Day the Earth Stood Still, War of the Worlds, etc. The main characters were a bit witty and unsympathetic.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Exceptional 50s sci-fi flick
planktonrules16 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
While this isn't as good as INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS or THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, it is one of the better sci-fi movies of the 1950s. Even by today's standards, the Ray Harryhausen special effects are pretty good (except in a few spots) and it's great fun watching the city of Washinton, DC being destroyed by these evil aliens. Scenes of the UFOs crashing into the Washington Monument are really memorable and take this film to a higher level of interest. Plus, once the pathetic humans figure out a way to fight these aliens, it's a lot of fun to watch. Yes the aliens are ONCE AGAIN evil and bent on destroying mankind, but the way the film is intelligently written and executed make this a worthwhile picture. For the 1950s, it was a heck of a film and still holds up well today.

By the way, at the half hour mark, there is a scene supposedly along the Chesapeake Bay. I grew up just a few miles from there and was surprised to see all the mountains! Obviously this was shot in California and it looked almost nothing like the Bay.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"People of Earth, attention!"
richardchatten29 May 2022
If you like the title you'll love the film, this was the movie that provided the template for Tim Burton's 'Mars Attacks!' ", and it's influence can be seen in much later sci-fi from 'Captain Scarlet' to 'Planet of the Apes'.

When you've seen Ray Harryhausen's flying saucers laying waste to Washington you'll agree that his subsequent work exclusively creating mythical creatures was a grievous loss to science fiction.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
ok sci-fi movie was a strong cast
LetsReviewThat263 May 2022
I feel this film has aged well. The spaceship and aliens still hold up and are pretty well made. Plot itself is a little bland but the cast make up for it with good porformances. Its like a black and white indepenance day mixed with dr who. A good watch if you like sci-fi but still felt it was missing something.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"They Have Their Weaknesses"
bkoganbing4 October 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Although this science fiction film is out of the paranoid school so popular in the Fifties, the end message is far from watch out for invaders of all kind. The world, although we don't see it from other than an American point of view actually comes together to help fight off an invasion from a dying race of aliens.

As is usual in these kinds of films the aliens have been monitoring us pretty closely, but it also turns out that they're as paranoid as the earth people. They shoot down rockets carrying satellite probes into space, man's first step in that direction. Then they contact Hugh Marlowe, the scientist in charge of the project and want a face to face. Transmission's kind of difficult as they move at a speed far greater than human. This same gambit was used in a famous Star Trek episode.

It's a race against time even though the aliens give us two months to decide on surrender which we use in the greatest crash science program of all time. Hugh Marlowe, wife Joan Taylor and scientists around the world discover the weaknesses of the invaders.

I think the real star of this film is special effects guru Ray Harryhausen. When the attack begins and it occupies the last twenty minutes or so of Earth vs. The Flying Saucers, Harryhausen steps in and takes the film away from the human cast members. The animated sequences showing the attack on Washington, DC with some familiar landmarks being damaged and destroyed are the highlight of the film.

One thing about the film did bother me. I wish they had given the aliens some kind of generic name, Krell, Klingon, whatever. Other than that Earth vs. The Flying Saucers is one of the better science fiction films from the Fifties.
23 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Look to your Sun for a warning.
Hey_Sweden6 May 2018
Studly Hugh Marlowe ("The Day the Earth Stood Still") is the egghead hero of this classic example of alien invasion sci-fi. He plays scientist Russell Marvin, one of the first few humans to witness extraterrestrial craft in our own atmosphere. It turns out, the creatures are here to colonize our planet - hopefully with our consent, but it's no skin off their "noses" if we don't go with the program. They have advanced weaponry to use against mankind, but they didn't count on Russells' ingenuity.

"Earth vs. the Flying Saucers" is pretty good for a movie of this nature. As was often the case with movies of its ilk, it features a narrator who gives the proceedings a documentary type of approach. It's a reasonably intelligent story (scripted by Bernard Gordon and George Worthing Yates), with an array of engaging characters. Less patient viewers could make the point that it's often more plot and dialogue-based than action-oriented, but it does work its steady way towards some effective scenes of destruction and annihilation. The special effects are fine, but it's the "technical effects" devised by stop-motion legend Ray Harryhausen that do ultimately take centre stage. Fred F. Sears, whose other B credits during this era include "The Giant Claw" and "The Werewolf", capably occupies the directors' chair.

Marlowe, and the very pretty Joan Taylor (also the leading lady in "20 Million Miles to Earth"), are a hero and heroine for whom we can easily root; he possesses a Richard Carlson-like air of sincerity. Donald Curtis ("It Came from Beneath the Sea") is the efficient Major Huglin. Of course, you can't go wrong with character actor Morris Ankrum ("Rocketship X-M") in a key supporting role; he was on hand for a number of these 50s sci-fi flicks, and was always excellent value. John Zaremba ('The Time Tunnel'), Thomas Browne Henry ("Beginning of the End"), Grandon Rhodes ("Detective Story"), Larry J. Blake ("Creature with the Atom Brain"), Clark Howat ("Billy Jack"), and Harry Lauter ("Escape from the Planet of the Apes") co-star, and the great Paul Frees - actor, author, composer, songwriter, and prolific voice-over artist - performs the voice of the alien intelligence.

Good fun, and essential for anybody who enjoys this sort of entertainment; subsequent blockbusters like "Independence Day" may outdo it for sheer spectacle, but this movie isn't nearly as stupid as that one.

Seven out of 10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
three reasons to watch this film
bobc-518 October 2000
I really don't understand most of the praise being given to this movie. True, it is better than most of the low budget alien invasion movies of the 1950s. The special effects are pretty good in places and all other aspects of the movie manage to avoid dropping below some reasonable minimum acceptable level of craftsmanship. But it isn't particularly high praise when the best thing you can say about a movie is that it isn't too terribly awful. Nevertheless, here are 3 good reasons to view this film.

First of all, this is the film which gave us the definitive visualization of flying saucers. It was a major influence on "Mars Attacks", which includes a particularly humorous homage scene. It also has a delightful camp feeling about it while still being quite watchable.

Second, I must guiltily admit to having gotten a kick out watching the destruction of Washington, DC. The demolition of the grand monuments and neoclassical facades of the city created a much greater impression on me then the typical views of tumbling skyscrapers which you see in most other films. Maybe this is just because I'm a lifelong resident of the area, but I think it's something that anyone can enjoy.

Finally, this presents a fascinating study of 1950s sexual repression, cold war paranoia, primitive technology worship rituals, and deference to authority. In the very opening scene, we see a newlywed couple having their marriage consummated by a flying saucer circling their car. The husband is a scientist, so I guess that is supposed to explain it.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed