The Monster of Piedras Blancas (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
48 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good Monster Fun From the 50s
ksj8707 July 2009
A generally underrated monster flick from 1959, The Monster of Piedras Blancas is often compared to the undeniably similar Creature From the Black Lagoon, with this film invariably coming out second best. Certainly, Creature From the Black Lagoon is a true classic and The Monster of Piedras Blancas rarely equals its more famous cousin, but nonetheless this is a very good little film with a lot going for it on its own terms. The Monster, of course, is the star of the show, and the suit designed for him is impressive and scary, and must have seemed even more so in the 50s. As is typical of this sort of film, screen shots of the Monster are limited up until the climax, when he runs wild in all his visceral glory. The Monster's killings are quite brutal and rather bloody for the conservative 50s, and there are several decapitations in his wake. The coastal setting, where folk tales of the alleged Monster are whispered in the shadows, is evocative and the director uses the location to maximum effect. Acting is for the most part competent if unexceptional, highlighted by the dazzling Jeanne Carmen as the lovely Lucy, upon whom the Monster inevitably turns a ravenous gaze. Ms. Carmen is a luscious damsel in distress, and it's a shame she didn't do more sci-fi. Don Sullivan plays Lucy's boyfriend, Fred, and veteran b-movie actor Les Tremayne is a local doctor. John Harmon turns in a surprisingly effective performance as Lucy's father Sturges, the local lighthouse keeper, a man with many secrets and who knows more about the Monster than anyone suspects. The townsfolk of Piedras Blancas are developed with some attention to detail, and it means something when one of them dies. The only real weaknesses of the film are its obvious low budget and a somewhat lagging pace that does make the movie feel a bit longer than its short run time of 71 minutes. But overall, this is a pretty good monster movie that meets most of the genre requirements. Unfortunately, this is a difficult movie to find, but if you can track it down, the Monster From Piedras Blancas is a surprisingly effective chiller.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
fun exploitation/horror flick
funkyfry3 April 2003
I had never heard of this movie until I met the object of aforesaid Monster at a fan convention here in the bay area a few years ago... she told me about it, perhaps somehow sensing my affinity for rubber-suited monsters. I told her I hadn't seen it, but I'd sure love to, and she said the guy who worked on "Creature from the Black Lagoon" had also done the monster suit for this movie. Now I had to see it, but I didn't really get a chance until last Thursday at the Parkway in Oakland.

Strangely enough, the producer of the film's daughter had shown up for the showing (I'd give you her name if I remembered it), which also coupled as a birthday celebration for bay area horror host "Dr. Ghoulfinger". Even stranger, she had shown up not to seize the print or anything vulgar of that nature, but rather to lend her support and enjoy the rare public viewing of her father's film. When asked about her father's career after "Monster from Piedras Blancas", she said he moved into other types of film, to which a vocal part of the audience shouted "PORN!!!"

OK, the film itself is a somewhat better than average exploitation horror flick. The monster suit, which allows for a great deal of animation and motion, is a wonder -- it easily blows away everything else in the movie, including the much cheaper gore type effects such as decapitated heads. Of course, depending on your own inclinations, Jeanne Carmen also steals the show with her luscious bod, appearing as a brunette (anyone know what Jeanne Carmen's natural hair color is, anyway?) showing more character than most victims of 50s rubber monsters. Her acting is not great, but adequate for the film's demands.

No one else in the cast really stands out, but the effort in general is solid, not slowing down too much like many of its kind do in the middle. The film's makers seem to have known they must show something worth seeing every reel or risk losing the audience. A lot of the stuff in the movie seems pretty goofy, and I doubt that anyone involved took the film too seriously; it almost comes off as a comedy, kind of like but not as much so as some of Corman's movies from the time (most notably "Not of This Earth").

All in all, a good show
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not terrible...despite the genre.
planktonrules23 March 2019
In the 1950s and 60s, there were a bazillion cheap and shlocky monster films. They featured silly monsters in silly costumes and were mildly entertaining...but rather stupid. I thought "The Monster of Piedras Blancas" was one of these films but it turned out to be a touch better. Now I am not saying it's brilliant...but the story isn't bad and the monster costume isn't particularly dopey.

The film is set on the California coast. Someone or something is beheading folks and eventually people realize they have a monster on their hands...and it's up to them to defeat it. Oddly, after the killing spree began, no one ever thought to contact the state police or other authorities about the problem...even when a group of folks saw it was a monster!

So, the plot isn't perfect...but it is enjoyable and the monster costume is reasonably scary looking. A good film for afficianados of the genre.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Highly entertaining
JWyrozumski8 March 2002
Very entertaining movie,gives you a real feel for the time it was made.Was one of Don Sullivan's best and makes you wonder, if Steve McQueen could advance from " Blob " what ever happened to Don Sullivan? My friends and I first saw this movie late on night while camping out in the backyard with an extension cord stretched to an old b/w and the scene where the monster comes out with the head scared us to death!
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Decent retread of that creature from some black lagoon.
mark.waltz7 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
There are some genuine frights in what could basically be called a rip off of that famous Universal sci-fi classic. A mysterious creature haunts an ocean front town, resulting in some extremely horrific deaths where victims are decapitated and their blood literally sucked out of the remains of their body. The local doctor and sheriff can't quite figure out where it came from, and only an old, crotchety light house worker seems to be aware of the truth, but he isn't saying anything. A Gothic feel aids in making this more intriguing than the usual low-budget drive-in fare, with some great character performances including Les Tremayne as the doctor and John Harmon as the light house keeper. A slight romantic subplot doesn't get in the way, keeping the focus on the mystery of what the creature is and how the authorities deal with it.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Meat at your doorstep will attract crocodiles
yonhope15 October 2017
Don Sullivan should be the star. He is the young handsome monster fighter. Others were better known at that time, perhaps. This is a good, but not great sci-fi B movie. It is entertaining and an obvious low budget quickie that might make back the investor's gamble. The monster is not totally ridiculous and the story is OK. The acting is better than most low budget films. Any of the main cast members, including the child actors could handle a Hollywood production. Camera work is better than adequate. This is not boring but sometimes it slips into comedy that is unintended.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A likable low budget monster movie with limited ambitions
christopouloschris-583883 November 2019
"The Monster of Piedras Blancas" was an independent production from Jack Kevan who was former makeup artist at Universal and was responsible for designing and building the Gill Man suit in "Creature from the Black Lagoon", as well as the alien Xenomorph from "It Came from Outer Space", and the Metaluna Mutant of "This Island, Earth".

The suit for the film's "diplovertebron" monster consisted of existing molds for the feet that were cast from those of the Metaluna Mutant from "This Island, Earth" along with over-sized hands originally designed for "The Mole People".

There's no mistaking the fact that the "Monster of Piedras Blancas," is somewhat of a knock-off of the "Creature from the Black Lagoon".

It is obvious that some thought had gone into the plot which was fairly consistent and had some logic to it such as the monster's origins and the reasons behind its murderous rampage. The theme of loneliness and of being an outcast and the kind of desperation it can produce are touched on quite nicely as well.

A couple of quite gruesome scenes for the time included the monster bursting in on the scene carrying a bloody severed human head and a shot of the same head with a crab crawling across the face. Even cute pooches and little girls are not spared from the murderous wrath of the monster!

The film was shot not at the actual Point Piedras Blancas, which is north of San Simeon on the California coast. The lighthouse locations were shot at the Point Conception lighthouse near Lompoc, and the film's "town" was in fact the seaside city of Cayucos, about 30 miles south of the real Piedras Blancas.

Don Sullivan who plays Fred we remember from his role as Chase in "The Giant Gila Monster". In this film, however we can breathe a sigh of relief as he refrains from singing! His girlfriend Lucy is played by pin-up girl Jeanne Carmen who is certainly easy on the eye in just a simple floral dress or blouse and skirt and sensible flat shoes. No need for clown make-up, outfits that leave nothing to the imagination or stiletto posture torturers!

To conclude, I must admit that I geared myself up to hate this movie. I really, really wanted to hate this movie but I found that I just couldn't, no matter how much I tried! I'm really not sure why? I even mildly enjoyed watching this low-budget affair. The acting was pretty ordinary but at least the actors were earnest enough and the pace of the story was OK right up to and including the thrilling and at the same time, quite funny climax.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Truly Memorable Monstrosity
ferbs5413 January 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It is truly remarkable how a cinematic image can make a lasting imprint on a young and impressionable mind. Take, for example, the 3-year-old me, who witnessed, in a movie theatre, the image of a man falling on a dynamite plunger and causing a bridge to blow up, resulting in a devastating train wreck. It is an image that I have never forgotten, despite all these intervening decades; one of the final scenes, of course, from the great David Lean film "The Bridge on the River Kwai" (1957), which I have since verified my folks did take me to see, although why my parents deemed a 2 ½-hour war movie appropriate fare for such a young child is another matter. Flash forward five years or so, and we have another lasting cinematic image from my childhood, this one of a bit more grisly nature: a hideous monster advancing toward the camera, clutching in its mitt the dangling head of its latest victim. For an 8-year-old kid, such a proceeding might be truly unforgettable, as it would indeed turn out to be for me and all my fellow baby boomers who thrilled to the film in question, the 1959 wonder known as "The Monster of Piedras Blancas." Back in the early to mid-'60s, this film was shown quite often here in NYC on the wonderful program known as "Chiller Theatre," although it would eventually become virtually impossible to see. But the memory of it has persisted over the decades for this viewer - at least, that one scene has, as well as the memory of a lighthouse of some kind - and I have wanted to refresh my memory of it ever since. Happily, in this modern digital era, the movie is now a snap to experience, thanks to Olive Films' fine-looking DVDs of it, in both standard and Blu-ray editions. Originally released in April 1959 as part of a double bill, along with the long-forgotten "Okefenokee," the film reveals itself to be, all these decades later, a surprisingly decent entertainment, if with some problematic elements. Still, I had a blast watching it for the first time in 50-something years, just the other night.



In the film, a rash of killings has broken out in the quaint California coastal town of Piedras Blancas. Two fishermen, the Rinaldi brothers, have been found, their necks ripped apart, and the local grocer, Kochek (Frank Arvidson), blames the murders on the legend of a local monster. The town's lighthouse keeper, Sturges (John Harmon, an actor whose name you might not recognize despite his 287 IMDb credits!), pooh-poohs such claims, despite the fact that we viewers have already seen him suspiciously leaving dishes of fish near the coastal caves for ... something. When Kockek himself is found dead, his head completely torn off, the town's doctor, Sam Jorgenson (Les Tremayne, perhaps the biggest "name" in this film, who had previously appeared in 1953's "The War of the Worlds" and 1957's "The Monolith Monsters," and who would go on to appear in 1963's, uh, "The Slime People"), and the local constable, George Matson (Forrest Lewis, who had just appeared in 1958's "The Thing That Couldn't Die"), do a little sleuthing around, and find the scale of a strange whatzit in the grocer's store. Aided by young Fred, a budding scientist (and played by Don Sullivan, who that same year would appear in "The Giant Gila Monster" AND "Teenage Zombies"), the team discovers that the scale belongs to a creature known as a "diplovertebron," a prehistoric amphibious reptile that had supposedly gone extinct over 300 million years ago! As the killings continue, including the murder of a little girl, the town's crisis comes to a head, until the monster itself appears to the viewer, a full 50+ minutes into this scant 71-minute affair, when Sturges' daughter Lucy, who has recently been dating Fred (and played by Jeanne Carmen, a former model, pin-up girl, trick-shot golfer, and, supposedly, best friend of Marilyn Monroe), opens the door of her lighthouse home and sees the horrible creature goggling at her in the rubbery flesh....



Though only produced with a budget of under $30,000, "The Monster of Piedras Blancas" looks just fine, and makes good use of its outdoor seaside locales, well shot here in B&W by cinematographer Philip Lathrop. Strangely enough, the town of Cayucos, CA stood in for the town of Piedras Blancas here, and the Point Conception Lighthouse was used in the film, not the Piedras Blancas Light Station itself; don't ask me why. Director Irvin Berwick and producer Jack Kevan, both of whom had worked at Universal Studios, make every dollar pay off here in this, their self-made first of two independent efforts. As for the creature costume itself, reportedly, Kevan salvaged the feet of the Metalunan mutant from the sci-fi wonder "This Island Earth" (1955), as well as the never-used hands for "The Mole People" (1956). The net result is a monster that is somewhat suggestive of Millicent Patrick's legendary Creature From the Black Lagoon, as well as the monstrosities in "The She-Creature" (1956), "It! The Terror From Beyond Space" (1958) and "The Hideous Sun Demon" (1959). The fearsome mug of the Piedras Blancas monster is indeed a nasty one, although the head part of its costume looks somewhat detached from its body ... appropriately enough, I suppose, considering that all of its victims soon wind up in a similar state! Pete Dunn, the man in the monster costume here, lumbers about and beats his chest in ferocious gorilla fashion, making for still another great '50s sci-fi creation.



"The Monster of Piedras Blancas" features a number of truly gripping scenes, including the one in which Lucy opens that door and sees our creature in close-up, with seawater gurgling from its gaping maw, and the one in which Sturges combats the monster high up in the lighthouse. The film offers up some pleasing bits of grossness (at least, they seemed gross when I was a kiddy), including that unforgettable shot of the dangling head, and that same head found in a cave later on, a crab scurrying about on top of it. And it gives us one of the enduring tropes of '50s sci-fi: the sequence in which the monster carries away a screaming young woman (Lucy, in this case), although what it intends to do with her is anybody's guess. The film is, surprisingly, decently acted by its small cast, moves along briskly, and keeps its moments of unintentional risibility to a minimum. It even manages to throw in an homage of sorts to the great 1953 classic "From Here to Eternity," as Fred and Lucy lay in the surf and make out as the waves crash over them. And speaking of Lucy, it is interesting that Jeanne Carmen, who was such a glamour girl in the '50s, is presented in this film as a realistically average-looking character. Lucy is an attractive woman, yes, but her outfits here are surely nothing to draw special notice, and the character strikes the viewer as something of a plain Jane. Yes, she is shown stripping down to do a little nighttime skinny-dipping in the surf, and is later seen standing at her window wearing a brassiere, but for a sexpot performer of Carmen's fame, her character here is surprisingly tame. Carmen, by the way, has a very interesting history/biography that I urge you to look into, and her online comments vis-à-vis Marilyn Monroe and the Kennedys, and her exploits with them, will surely fascinate. Anyway, so yes, the film does have many positive aspects that might surprise a modern-day viewer. Still, as might be expected, there remain some problems to be had.



For one thing, the film's script, by one H. Haile Chace, is a lazy one, and fails to explain just where the monster originated to begin with, and why the monster in question loves to rip the heads off of its victims. Okay, the monster has been draining away the blood from its kills, but still, the head ripping strikes one as being a bit ... gratuitous. For that matter, why does the monster not eat its victims whole, as it has been shown to have a liking for the fish and meat scraps that Sturges had been feeding it, sight unseen, over the years? And then there is that conclusion to the film. Can we assume that the monster has been killed or not? And oh ... it appears that the diploverterbron is an actual extinct species, but one that only existed in the swamps of what is now the Czech Republic in central Europe. So how did this one wind up in central California, of all places? But these are minor matters, of course. "The Monster of Piedras Blancas" still remains a nice little entertainment - one of the capper films coming at the tail end of a classic decade for science fiction on the big screen - and one that is of course perfect fare to watch with your favorite 8-year-old. He or she might be grossed out a little by the proceedings therein, but trust me, if my experience with the film is any indication, your little one will never forget it!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
If he can think were in real trouble
sol12182 September 2005
**SPOILERS** There's this blood sucking monster on the loose in and around the Piedras Blancas by the old lighthouse outside of the little sea front town of Windswept.

The monster living in the caves was minding it's own business for years until the lighthouse keeper Sturges, who discovered the monsters's hiding place. Sturges weaned it over the years on scraps of meat that turned the monster from a fish to a meat-eater. Later when old man was unable to get the monster meat from the towns grocery store owner Kochek ,who stopped giving him free scraps , it just went out looking and hunting the townspeople for it's next meal.

The usual 1950's black & white monster movie with a lot more "meat" to it then you would have expected. Lopping off it's victims heads and then sucking out their blood the monster turns the little sleepy town of Windswept into a ghost town. With everyone there too scared to wander out in fear that the monster would get them. Sturges becomes paranoid when his young daughter Lucy comes home to the lighthouse to spend her summer vacation there from college.

It's doesn't take that long when Lucy, skinny dipping outside the Pledros Blancus caves, is spotted by the monster who develops a strong liking for her or was it Lucy's underclothes. It's then that the monster starts feasting on the people in town by first grabbing the two Ranoldi brothers, out on the "point" fishing, and having them for dinner.

By the time the movie is over the monster had already finished off a half dozen or so other townspeople including the guilt-ridden lighthouse keeper Sturges. Sturges was also critical of Lucy getting involved with young oceanographer Fred and planing to marry him. Since he felt that Fred wasn't good enough for her as well as him getting close to finding out the connection he has with the monster.

The monster, called Eddie in the movies credits, was pretty scary looking but his movements on land were so slow and clumsy that it was a miracle that he could catch anyone, including himself; as he stumbled and bumbled around the rocks and sand outside his home in the Pledras Blancas. Some of the scenes in the film were a bit shocking, back then in 1959. With the monster in one scene nonchalantly walking out of a store with the head of the store clerk dangling from him claw-like hand and then leaving it in it's cave to be eaten by sea crabs.

The ending of the movie was a bit too unbelievable with the monster chasing Lucy to the top of the lighthouse. Then, what seemed like, waiting for the entire town to come over and watch the show as it fights it out in a life and death struggle with Fred. This happens as everyone at the bottom of the lighthouse,all armed and dangerous, just stand there and watch! Doing nothing to help as the monster takes it's final swan dive after bursting out with what had to be it's, the movies, theme song.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"He lives in a world all of his own"
hwg1957-102-26570413 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
A rather charming B-movie from 1959 with a decent looking monster terrorising a small town by the sea. It's not a classic but has interesting characters and reasonable dialogue. The locations are well chosen particularly the lighthouse where the grizzled keeper knows more than he lets on. The acting is good enough from reliable Les Tremayne as the doctor to cute Jeanne Carmen as Lucille' her swimming scene arousing the romantic interest of the monster who also has an interest in severed heads. The cinematography is not spectacular though I saw it in a good clear print which enhanced the atmosphere, especially the scenes by the sea. The director of photography Philip Lathrop went on to much bigger assignments. A better film than I expected certainly.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Low budget, but fairly entertaining monster-on-the-loose flick.
scsu197516 November 2022
The story opens with the bodies of the Rinaldi brothers washing ashore. Both have been decapitated. In Jersey, this would not be a big deal. The town doctor, played by Les Tremayne, informs Constable Forrest Lewis that it was a clean job, and the bodies were drained of blood. This is what happens when you mess with the Internal Revenue Service. The town grocer, played by Frank Arvidson, immediately suspects it's the work of a monster - the Monster of Piedras Blancas. Arvidson blabs his theory to lighthouse keeper John Harmon, who is annoyed because Arvidson is out of meat scraps. Arvidson is so irritating you hope he will become a victim. Good things come to those who wait.

Harmon's daughter, played by 1950s pinup queen Jeanne Carmen, is dating Don Sullivan, who plays some kind of marine biologist. Carmen and Sullivan sneak off for some kissy face by the water, and later, Carmen goes for a moonlight swim au naturel (but it's too dark to see anything). When she returns to shore, she hears heavy breathing (it was probably the camera crew). Her father is miffed that she swam alone; she admits she felt like someone was watching her (it was probably the camera crew).

Meanwhile, the monster develops an appetite, strolls into town, and removes Arvidson's head. Those are cheers you hear from the audience. The only clue is some kind of fishy scale found at the scene. Tremayne and Sullivan test it, and claim it is similar to some extinct species I can't pronounce. Later, they surprise the creature in Arvidson's icebox. Lewis is slashed across the chest, bleeds profusely, but miraculously recovers completely by the next scene. A few more bodies pile up before the authorities decide to act. In the climax, Sullivan, Harmon, Carmen, Monster, et al meet up at the lighthouse.

This film could have stunk badly, but it is rescued by the good character actors, a creepy-looking monster (imagine Porky Pig on steroids), and a gratuituous shot of Carmen in her underwear. Sullivan was always an easy-going actor in a short-lived career, starring in silly crap like "The Giant Gila Monster" and "Teenage Zombies." He should have had a better career. Carmen acts adequately, but who cares. The opening credits are the real oddity, as the actors are listed along with the parts they play; e.g., Don Sullivan as "The Boy," and Jeanne Carmen as "The Girl."
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A forgotten 50's classic
Alan-4228 November 2003
One of my favorite 50's monster movies! For some reason this priceless little gem is always overlooked in the lists of B-movie monster faves of the 1950s. You have one of the better amphibious creature costumes designed by Jack Kevan (No zipper!!), a great sea coast location, decapitations and gore, some very decent acting by A-list party girl and pin-up queen Jeanne Carmen, and last but not least, Les Tremayne - He is only in 85% of all classic B-horror/sci-fi films of the 1950s! What's a film without him?! All right guys, I know its formula, but this obscure little tale holds a special place in my heart since I was 9-years old! The film has drama, subtext, coastal atmosphere, sex, and about 5 or 6 headless corpses lying about! John Harmon as Sturges, the crusty lighthouse keeper who feeds the hungry cave-dwelling beast meat scraps from the local deli, does a credible job here as a man who has closed off all emotions to the world, including those of his fetching daughter Lucy (Carmen), in exchange for companionship with the hungry creature. Jeanne Carmen is a natural beauty equal to the Mara Cordays' and Allison Hayes' of her decade. Too bad the studios didn't use her a little more proficiently. Psuedo-teen heartthrob Don Sullivan is thrown in for some romantic interest and all that biology jazz and the musical score (which is never credited) is rich, layered and 'original.' So, sorry guys! The Monster of Piedras Blancas always wins with me!
28 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
B-Movie as Good as the Real Thing
gavin694221 March 2017
The monster, which looks like a nastier version of "The Creature from the Black Lagoon," invades a sleepy lighthouse town. The superstitious lighthouse keeper is worried for the safety of his beautiful teenage daughter, so he leaves food for the monster, who dwells in a nearby cave.

As stated, this was clearly inspired at least in part by the Creature. And, as I understand it, there was some overlap in the makeup and costume department, so that is not altogether shocking. But the interesting part is that this "knock off" is at least as good.

In fact, the entire film is just as good. Though not a celebrated classic, it is no worse than any other film of its era that is now considered a cult film. This really needs a new audience. Olive Films has released it, but only in a bare bones fashion... where is the love?
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The Creature From The Piedras Blancas
karljhickey1425 October 2020
Little known monster flick set in a small , seaside town where people start turning up minus their heads . A creepy lighthouse keeper , his attractive daughter , her boyfriend , useless sheriff , know it all doctor , a local legend , and a missing dog - what more do you want ? Like many of these films , it takes a while to get going . Our first sign of the monster is him stealing the leading lady's underwear , but when we do see him , it's not that bad . We don't see any of the kills till way in , and then we get a nice headshot ! Plus we get the obligatory monster carrying girl scene . Typical b - movie production values - the whole thing is shot on location , mostly amateur acting , day for night shots etc . , but there is one shot of people running that is obviously speeded up . The funniest bit is when two locals bring the corpses into the local store on a wheelbarrow , and the storekeeper says to put them in the freezer ! The lighthouse keeper storms off , and one of them says "What's up with him ? " The daughter also seems to think it would okay to leave the lighthouse light off for one night - what's the worst that could happen ? Oh , and what is a diploveradon ?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dull, But it Has its Moments
H Lime-29 August 1999
This is one of those films that used to be shown on Creature Features on Saturday mornings. Its a rather dull film about a Black Lagoon-type creature who goes around killing people. Despite its dullness, it has a couple of the scariest scenes of any film made during this era. The first, when the monster comes bursting out of a door is a moment of shock and horror equal to the similar scene in "The Thing". And the second, at the lighthouse at the end of the film, is extremely terrifying and gave me recurrent nightmares as a child. Both scenes are still frightening to me as an adult. One also has to appreciate the amount of thought that went into the plot. The origins of the monster and the reasons he starts to kill are convoluted but, if you follow along carefully, everything is explained in a logical manner and there are no inconsistencies in the plot. In "Keep Watching the Skies", Bill Warren criticized the film as lacking a logical plot and explanation for the monster, but he is wrong! However dull, a lot of thought went into the plotting of this film and, had the script been better, this could have been a scare classic.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Grade: C.
rmax30482318 August 2014
Warning: Spoilers
It's kind of interesting to see which members of the cast can act and which can't. The two young leads aren't bad, as a matter of fact. Jeanne Carman, the hefty, young college girl, is passable. She went on to become a kind of groupie of Sinatra's Rat Pack. Her sex life must have been beyond imagining.

John Harmon, as her suitor and (maybe) an oceanographer -- the plot doesn't make it clear -- gives probably the best performance in the movie, right up there with Les Tremayne as the local doctor who is puzzled over the mutilated bodies that turn up at the beach from time to time. You can tell Tremayne is an experienced actor because his sonorous, seasoned voice, "speaking lines", marks him as one. Harmon, on the other hand, sounds almost believable, and doesn't look like a dork either but rather some kind of uncanny triangulation involving Mark Stevens, David Schwimmer, and Peter Gallagher.

It's a small seaside town on the California coast, Piedras Blancas, with a nice lighthouse run by the heroine's embittered and mysterious father. The actual light house is at Point Conception, where the coast takes a sudden eastern bend, and at the time of filming would have been run by the U. S. Coast Guard.

In any case, the whole area around Estero Bay is scenic and the weather benign, and Morro Bay has a splendid pizzeria. You don't get to see much of the town: one church, one house, one store front. Nearby California Polytechnic Institute is a magnificent institute of higher learning. I applaud Cal Poly because it has one of my books in its library, plus a raw manuscript of an article. If you want to see Morro Bay in excelsis, see "Personal Best."

I know. It's a divagation. But it many ways it's at least as interesting as the movie. So Carman, Harmon, and Tremayne can act. And who can't? Well -- nobody else, really. But the standout is Frank Arvidson as Kolchek, the store keeper and rumor monger. We have to presume he's Slavic, yet when he shouts his lines they come across as Swedish. Fortunately, about at the half way point, he winds up as a decerebrate preparation.

The story makes little sense. The monster looks like a close relative of the creature from the Black Lagoon only more ridiculous. The movie isn't really worth commenting on any further. Some of these 50s science-fiction movies are entertaining and some are unspeakable garbage. This one is somewhere in the gray area between, barely tolerable.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Srange Goings on at the Lighthouse
chris_gaskin12330 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I recently obtained a VHS copy of The Monster Of Pidras Blancas off E-Bay and was pleased I did, I had been after this movie for several years but could not get it anywhere.

After several headless bodies are found washed up on the shore of Pidras Blancas, locals are baffled by these horrible deaths. There turn out to be the responsibility of a legendary monster, which lives in a nearby cave and is fed by the local lighthouse keeper. After the monster kills more people, there is a confrontation on top of the lighthouse at the end...

The cast includes 50's sci-fi regular Les Tremayne (The War Of The Worlds, The Monolith Monsters), Forrest Lewis and John Harmon.

The monster in this movie looks very similar to the Gill Man from Creature From The Black Lagoon.

Although a little slow moving in parts, I certainly enjoyed The Monster Of Pidras Blancas and is rather creepy at times too. Quite good.

Rating: 3 stars out of 5.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Piedras Blancas
ebiros227 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This story takes place in Piedras Blancas, a point located along the California coast.

Killing by unknown assailant starts to happen in the town near the light house of Piedras Blancas. The victim is decapitated and the blood from their bodies are missing. Little do the people of the town know, the cause of this incident started when the owner of the butcher shop refused the sale of scrap meat to the light house attendant. The light house attendant is keeping a secret that the whole town will soon find out.

Piedras Blancas exists in California coast along the part of Pacific Coast Highway, called Cabrillo Highway about 60 miles north west of San Luis Obispo, and 90 miles south of Monterey Peninsula. It's a picturesque part of the state where you can see endless expanse of the Pacific ocean, and sparsely forested hills of California. There's an actual light house there where presumably this movie was shot. There's no town as such that's depicted in this movie near this point.

There is a monster in this movie as the title suggests. It looks very much like the creature that appeared on the movie "It ! The Terror from Outer Space" with some modifications. The story is rather thin, but because the monster has a good presence, this movie is entertaining.

At just over an hour, the movie is short, but it's just the right length to tell this story. Not a big budget movie, but it has decent story and good acting.

Recommended for '50s sci-fi movie fans.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Undistinguished, but fun.
Hey_Sweden12 October 2016
In this obvious "Creature from the Black Lagoon" cash-in, the title beast terrorizes a small seaside community. The local lighthouse keeper, Mr. Sturges (John Harmon, "Malibu High"), makes a habit of leaving morsels of meat for It to eat, but soon it's clear that these morsels just aren't enough. So citizens are then found both decapitated and drained of blood. It's up to locals such as doctor / scientist / minister Sam Jorgenson (Les Tremayne, "The War of the Worlds"), his young associate Fred (Don Sullivan, "The Giant Gila Monster"), and grumpy town constable George Matson (Forrest Lewis, "The Todd Killings") to devise a means of neutralizing their nemesis.

This marked the directing debut for Irvin Berwick, a former employee of Universal-International who'd just started a production company with his partner, producer Jack Kevan. While it may do the trick for people who just can't get enough of 1950s creature features, it's mostly on the dull side. The screenplay by H. Haile Chace is overly talky, and doesn't have enough good Monster action. (The action is largely confined to the final dozen minutes.) The cast, also showcasing a young beauty named Jeanne Carmen ("Untamed Youth") as Sturges' daughter / Freds' girlfriend, is on the amateurish side. One notable exception is reliable Tremayne, a busy genre actor during this time. The movie does get some points for being willing to kill children and animals, and there's one great, show stopping moment when the Monster swaggers out of an ice room holding the severed head of one of its victims. The Monster is played by Pete Dunn ('Cimarron City'), who has a second role as townsman Eddie. It's a rather low rent creature suit (designed by Kevan), but it serves its purpose.

Although it makes good use of locations, and is gorgeously shot by future Oscar nominee Philip H. Lathrop, it just doesn't have a lot of atmosphere. A climactic confrontation is interestingly shot from overhead, but the ending is too abrupt and falls short of real satisfaction.

Six out of 10.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The Monster of Piedras Blancas
Scarecrow-8813 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Idyllic coastal setting, and I'm a sucker for lighthouses, is the setting for this "monster on the beach" outing that owes a bit to Creature from the Black Lagoon (the monster is basically a stripped down Gillman without the distinctive detail to the costume that made it so memorable and special). California coastal community of Piedras Blancas is suffering a string of beheadings to the locals (it literally goes for the jugular), and it's possible the lighthouse keeper (John Harmon) has known about its existence, living in a cavern nearby, and kept it secret. Forrest Lewis is the constable out to find the killer and stop it, and Lee Tremayne is the doctor/scientist lending his expertise to help identify what it is. Jeanne Carmen is Harmon's daughter, and Don Sullivan is Carmen's beau. Sullivan is studying with Tremayne in a mentor/pupil dynamic. Not enough monster, some rough acting (clear indication some of the actors were struggling with their lines, and the long dialogues seemed to be a chore for some of them to endure), and pacing issues hinder the entertainment value. There is some dead space that just seems to devour the running time. Even at 71 minutes, it feels long. Severed heads (including one scene where the Reptiliman is carrying a bloody head, another where there's a crab crawling on a discarded head in the cavernous home of the monster) add shock value, some description of the monster's handiwork is grisly even if not shown, and there's a haunting scene where the father of a victim carries his child with the locals behind him as he marches up a sidewalk to the constable. I guess I would have boosted my rating had we seen some extra skin from Carmen, but what we do have is rather a slog that kind of drags and energy in the direction is lacking. The face of the monster, when revealed, is disappointing, to say the least. The right move was ending the film using the lighthouse. I think what is definitely missing is a key B-movie actor, like a Denning, Marshall Thompson, or Carlson, to anchor the film as far as a charismatic presence. At their best, the cast is serviceable, if no one is exactly extraordinary. This kind of film was begging for a Universal Studios budget and a helmer like Jack Arnold to move the plot along more effectively. As a creature feature, this is no better or worse than those cheesy Corman/Blaisdel efforts (which had some fun casts and a sense of humor).
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Enjoyable Horror Flick
rak-2700310 August 2022
Another b&w sci fi horror movie. This one was an ultra-low B movie made at a cost of only $30K. This movie departed from giant killer animals that we can relate to, to some sort of anthropomorphic killer reptilian monster, ala the 1954 "Creature from the Black Lagoon". In fact, the film was heavily influenced by the "Creature from the Black Lagoon".

Not a bad movie at all. Initially I rated it as a 5.0, but over several days it grew on me, and I now recognize it as a 6.0; which is the highest I have yet to award a movie of this horror subgenre. On IMDB it is currently rated 5.3.

In a small California seaside town, the lighthouse keeper (excellently portrayed by John Harmon), has for ten years kept a dangerous secret. For ten years, he has been leaving meat scraps for a monster who lives in a shoreline cliff cave. Concerned for the safety of his only daughter, he had sent her off to boarding school for ten years. She is now 19 and back living in the lighthouse with her widower dad. Her boyfriend is a young marine scientist. The monster soon takes to the taste of human blood, starting a series of unexplained gruesome deaths. The townsfolk decide to take matters in their own hands. I won't spoil the movie for those who wish to watch it on YouTube.

This time around atomic radiation is not blamed for the monsters existence. He just appears. But, as in most of these movies, one sexy woman and a young handsome scientist are there to save the world. It's amazing how the scientist hero with the help of a microscope and a few chemicals, discovers what's going on and how to stop it, in a matter of hours.

One major flaw in the storyline is that the frightened residents of the town never call on State authorities after they actually see the monster and start mourning their dead.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Run of the mill monster movie
jamesrupert20149 March 2020
Someone or something is messily killing people near a lighthouse by the titular Californian point (although that is not where the film was shot) and the cranky lighthouse-keeper is clearly concealing a dark secret. Typical of the genre, the film attempts to build suspense by cranking up the sense of menace and offering teasing glimpses of the monster until the 'big reveal' leading up to the inevitable climatic showdown. There are a couple of 'shock shots' involving decapitated heads (the scene with the crab is pretty good) but for the most part, the film is just slow moving and dull. The monster suit, designed by Jack Kevan, who had worked on "The Creature from the Black Lagoon' (1954) and 'The Mole People' (1956), is neither convincingly amphibious-looking (unlike the iconic CBL 'gill man') nor particularly creepy. Inexplicably, victims are decapitated with almost surgical precision, which is unlikely given the monster's clumsy-looking clawed hands (recycled from mole-people suits) and there is detailed description about how they were systematically drained of blood, which makes no sense when the creature finally appears. Like many of its ilk, there is no consideration about how there can only be one survivor from prehistoric times (also typical, there is an associated 'legend' suggesting the beast has been around for a while). The script and acting are typical for a B-genre film although the 'big-word pseudo-science' used to explain what the townies are dealing with is slightly better than the usual nonsense (such as that in CBL and its sequels). For fans of 1950's quasi-science fiction 'boo movies' only.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Monster Suit, formula 50's horror-but still fun.
Chris J.16 November 1998
Mediocre acting. Great Man in a monster suit. A scaler version of the Creature from the Lost Lagoon. And some surprising for '59 gore featuring some.... yep decapitations with a little blood! In black and white.

Light house keeper puts out food for legendary monster. Most people thinks he's crazy and of course ignore his warnings. Then some surfers wind up losing their heads.

No real surprises. But if you're in the mood and want to see a pretty good man in a monster suit movie, this will fit the bill.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Surprisingly good flick!
kaitiura9 May 2021
For a B Movie, this is a pretty good watch. Good acting and a few recognizable actors from the time. Andy Griffith Show fans might recognize that Dr. Jorgenson (well known announcer and narrator Les Tremayne) played the jewel thief in the episode "Andy and Barney in the Big City".

There's an incorrect location reference listed for the cemetery scene. The given address, 152 N Ocean Agree, is actually on the opposite end of the town from the actual location, Cayucos Morro Bay Cemetery.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dragged down by sluggish pace
Stevieboy66622 April 2019
A lighthouse keeper has been secretly feeding a humanoid, sea creature. However, the meat supply runs out and the monster starts decapitating locals and draining them of their blood. This is a very routine sci-fi/horror movie, typical of this period. The monster is played by a man in a 7 foot rubber suit, and looks very similar to the Creature from the Black Lagoon. Some of the acting is very wooden, in particular the guy who plays the storekeeper. We do get to see a few decapitated heads, so some gore (it is in b&w). But what really lets the film down is its slow pace. Had it been shorter, less talky, them I am sure that it would have made better viewing.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed