The Return of Dracula (1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
58 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Eternity awaits you now
sol-kay6 October 2007
Warning: Spoilers
**SPOILERS***With the communist takeover of his home country Transylvania Dracula, Francis Leader, is both out of luck with him not being a member of the communist party and victims after almost sucking the blood out of the entire population ,for some three hundred years, that he checks out of the country making his way to the little town of Carleton Calif.

Getting his fellow train passenger artist and fleeing from communist tyranny landsman Bellac Gordal,Norbert Shiller,alone in his train compartment Dracula murders him as well as takes over his identity, after throwing Gordal overboard, as kindly and sensitive Uncle Bellec back in the states. Showing up in Carleton Bellac/Dracula is a immediate hit with everyone there except his niece's, Rachael Mayberry, jealous boyfriend Tim Hanson, Ray Stricklyn, who smelled a rat as soon as he laid on the dapper cultured and refined man from Transylvania. Tim was also very mad at Uncle Bellac for stealing his girl Rachael, Norma Eberhardt, who was just crazy about the guy.

Not wasting any time Dracula gets to work first finding a place to sleep during the day, a local abandoned mine shaft,and later setting his sights on Rachael whom he want to recruit into his army of walking dead. Dracula in fact gets sick and blind Jennie Blake, Virgina Vincent, to be his first victim. Virgina then goes out into the woods, after she died and was buried, to do her masters Dracula's dirty work. Virginia turns into a wild dog attacking and killing Immigration Agent Wade Bryant, Charles Tanner, who was investigating Dracula to see if he in fact is Uncle Bellack Gordal. It was reported that someone fitting Gordal description badly mangled body was recovered back in Transylvania by the local police authorities.

With a number of people dying under mysterious circumstances, with for the most part their blood being drained from their bodies, Prof.Meiermann, John Wergraf, a friend of the late Wade Bryant gets into the act convincing the local police and health authorities that this "Uncle Bellec" is really old "Drac" himself. Setting up a trap for Dracula the police get to his fellow vampire the now dead but really alive, yet still dead, Virgina Blake piling a stake through her heart putting the poor girl both out of her misery and at the same time saving her eternal soul.

Drac now knowing that the gig is up takes off to his hiding place, the abandoned mine shaft, with a hypnotized Rachael trying to get her to join his club, the walking dead, and start up his new movement of vampires that he's planning for not just for the little town of Carleton but the entire United States of America. It was Tim, together with a Christian Cross, that finally put an end to Ol' Drac's dreams by having him back up in fear, with the cross stuck in his face, and fall to his ultimate death down the shaft landing on top of a jagged wooden spike, that went right through him, leaving him dead forever.

P.S Unusul Dracula movie in that the actor portraying Dracula Francis Leader actually, like the fabled Vampire himself,lived through three centuries, 1899-2000, but only in parts not, like Dracula, all of them.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Dracula Leading the Blind
BaronBl00d5 August 2008
Not a bad Dracula updated adaptation as a man readying for a journey in Romania is killed and his identity stolen(seems to have been a problem even then). He moves in with his "family' only to start wreaking havoc in a small Californian town. The small town atmosphere is carried off fairly nicely in large part to the small town characterizations from the cast - most of whom were either character actors or unknowns at the time. Exception is Francis Lederer as the vampire with a very thick accent, but actually he gives some credibility to the role of the brooding, oft charming, malignant force cast into the lives of these newly found innocents. John Wengraf plays the Van Helsing type and is interesting when on screen yet the part is way too underdeveloped. There is not much for plot here to be honest and the story quickly wraps up in the last third, but director Paul Landres has competence(and a whole television episode list as his resume)and creates some effective scenes. The scene where Rachel is "dreaming" of seeing the vampire in her boudoir and then is wakened quickly by her brother even gave me a bit of a jolt. The acting is okay but pedestrian, and there is not much here in terms of great sets or effects. Nonetheless The Return of Dracula is a nice little film with a different twist to Dracula lore that I found interestingly conceived.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I have come to bring you Death."
bensonmum211 September 2007
Posing as a foreign relative, Count Dracula moves to an idyllic 1950s American town to look for a fresh batch of victims. Other than the odd hours he tends to keep, the family he's moved in with doesn't suspect anything out of the ordinary. They explain away his eccentricities to either being tired or his European heritage. But a couple of unusual deaths in the small town catch the eye and attention of an investigator hot on Dracula's trail. Can he track down Dracula before anyone else dies?

I've got to agree with several of the other comments on IMDb - The Return of Dracula is one spooky and fun little movie. It's also a real under-seen gem from the 50s that deserves a much wider audience. The movie's got a lot more atmosphere going for it than most of the other, cheaply made, b-type films of the period. Francis Lederer is suave and creepy enough to pull off the role of Bellac Gordal aka Dracula. There were at least two instances where I nearly jumped out of my skin as the camera panned to find Lederer. The score is another contributing factor to the eeriness of the movie. It hits all the right notes (pun intended). But my favorite moment in The Return of Dracula has to be the staking scene. It may go by quickly, but it's awesome. I won't spoil for those who haven't seen it, so I'll just say that it's one of those unexpected moments that make discovering these oddball 50s movies such a blast.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An effective and atmospheric chiller.
patrick_w3510 January 2001
I first saw this film when it was originally released in 1958 and it literally scared the hell out of me. Once I got significantly older and happened to see it available on video, I purchased it for old times sake. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it had lost not one iota of it's power! The casting of the suave Francis Lederer in the title role was a master stroke. It indeed does bring back memories of the superb "Shadow of a Doubt". Although a low budget entry, it still causes uneasiness to its viewers. Gerald Fried's eerie score is a plus too. It was largely overshadowed in 1958 by the "Horror of Dracula" (also a fine film as any Draculaphile would agree) but it deserves to be recognized as the fine chiller it is. i heartily recommend it to any fan of good thrillers.
32 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Francis Lederer makes a suave Dracula...
Doylenf5 October 2007
With Dracula coming to live with a nice normal family in a small town in California, there's a trace of "Shadow of a Doubt" in the design of the story. He arrives by train (a la Joseph Cotten) in the person of FRANCIS LEDERER who has fled from Europe.

He's given a cordial welcome from the family and then the fun begins. The daughter seems to have the Teresa Wright role as the cousin who admires her uncle but senses something strange about him. Dracula keeps his distance from her. When invited to a Halloween party, he declares: "I have no social graces for large gatherings." Nevertheless, suspense builds as a series of incidents arise behind which we know he has played a part.

Lederer plays the part with such sinister glances that it's a wonder nobody in the household suspects anything except the girl's cynical boyfriend. The ending in the cave makes for a suitable climax to the story.

Summing up: Not quite as chilling as any of the Dracula films with Bela Lugosi, but still above average low-budget thriller.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Francis Lederer This Time.
AaronCapenBanner30 October 2013
Paul Landres directed this better-than-expected updating of the Dracula legend. Francis Lederer(quite good) plays Count Dracula, who flees his native land when vampire-hunters threaten him. He kills a Czech artist on a train, and assumes his identity as "Cousin Bellac", who visits the man's family in America, where he stays. Young Rachel Mayberry(played by Norma Eberhardt) becomes infatuated with her "cousin", who is both suave and mysterious, which makes her boyfriend jealous. Meanwhile, Dracula proceeds to seduce a local blind girl named Jenny, with tragic consequences, which climaxes with a pursuit in a spooky cave... Good horror tale cleverly uses the premise of "Shadow Of A Doubt" to fine effect, resulting in an atmospheric Halloween-setting, with a good score. Not a classic, but better than the title would suggest.

Trivia note: Lederer would "return" as Dracula in a fine episode of the "Night Gallery" TV series called 'The Devil Is Not Mocked'.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Two years after the death of Hollywood's greatest "Dracula", he gets a surprising honor.
mark.waltz3 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The death of Bela Lugosi in 1956 didn't instantly create a legend. That took time. But shortly after his death, an independent film honored him (sort of) by naming a character in this "Dracula" film "Bellac", obviously influenced by the forgotten old man of horror who had died in obscurity. Certainly, he had unreleased films ("Plan Nine From Outer Space"), but Bela Lugosi had slipped so far into obscurity that the only films he could get were so down the line of poverty row that they made his Monogram films look as if they had come from MGM. "Dracula" here is Francis Lederer, a grand old villain of the silver screen, once a romantic lead, but later cast in a variety of sinister roles, and now cast as the infamous Hungarian count. Somehow brought back from the dead after being killed in various ways under the acting chops of Lugosi, Lon Chaney Jr., and John Carradine, Dracula made a major comeback in the late 1950's. Not only was there Lederer in this enjoyable but predictable programmer, but Christopher Lee, who would create another legend in a series of Hammer films where he took over the role of the count, playing him more times on screen than any other actor.

Lederer's dashing older count has immigrated from Hungary to the United States, pretending to be "Bellac", a cousin of the Mayberry family (no relation to Andy Taylor's Mayberry). Strange occurrences begin to happen, including the sudden death of their cousin (Virginia Vincent), and when pretty Norma Eberhardt meets Lederer, she becomes disturbingly fascinated with him, even though she's involved with Ray Stricklyn. It's apparent that something involving Vincent's death is tied in with Lederer, and it is ironically on Halloween (during a stereotypical local party) that Eberhardt's obsession comes to its full power, following Lederer to an abandoned mine while a local priest and a European vampire hunter decide to check in on Vincent's casket.

Some amusing character performances includes a Margaret Hamilton like aunt who dresses as a witch, Eberhardt's younger brother (Jimmy Baird) who gets some really good lines (especially while in costume when asked where is costume is!), and John Wengraf as the visiting vampire hunter. This is a fine mixture of light comedy and gothic horror, with Lederer good in his one appearance as Mr. Toothy. Unfortunately, he is never seen exposing his fangs, so that does take away some of the horror element. I can see why this one has fallen into obscurity when compared to the Hammer series which took off right at the same time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
THE RETURN OF Dracula (Paul Landres, 1958) ***
Bunuel197614 October 2007
I had always been interested in this one due to a couple of stills from its climax (thus spoiling Dracula's come-uppance for me all those many years ago! – in retrospect, his eventual demise is beautifully set up early on in the cave sequence with the stranded kitten) and the carping about its unavailability on DVD by fans – particularly from one HTF member (you know who you are).

This is clearly a low-budget horror effort, but rather splendid overall: well-handled, commendably fast-paced, and with effective genre trappings (special effects depicting mist, Dracula's lack of reflection in a mirror, and his reverting to a skeleton at the end) and a nice, typically American small-town atmosphere. Francis Lederer is commanding as the Count, at once sinister and magnetic – even if his demeanor throughout seems merely to alternate between arrogance and contempt (unexpectedly, he changes into a wolf dog for one attack)!; I had previously been impressed by the actor when he played the ambitious and malevolent manservant in Jean Renoir's THE DIARY OF A CHAMBERMAID (1946).

Being a film from the late 1950s, it comes as no surprise to find that the heroes are a teenage couple: still, Dracula's interest in the girl is understandable and creates some compelling tension – she is just as stuck on him in her own way, since he's posing as a visiting uncle from a far-away country with a sophisticated/artistic bent! – in a relationship that's comparable to the one between Joseph Cotten and Teresa Wright in Alfred Hitchcock's favorite among his own films, SHADOW OF A DOUBT (1943). However, this also means that the young couple are the ones to dispatch Lederer – rather than the vampire hunter who followed him all the way from his homeland! The latter gets saddled with the next best thing, though – the staking of the Count's blind(!) vampire bride, which employs a striking color insert as the blood starts spurting from her wound (incidentally, the woman's hysterical first death scene also constitutes one of the film's highlights). By the way, the religious overtones in the script are rather unusual for the time – with Dracula offering the heroine the opportunity to "be reborn in me"!

The film has other interesting credentials to its name: independent producers Arthur Gardner and Jules V. Levy, composer Gerald Fried (PATHS OF GLORY [1957] – even if the soundtrack makes particularly inspired use throughout of the brooding medieval hymn "Dies Irae"), cinematographer Jack MacKenzie (ISLE OF THE DEAD [1945]) and assistant director Bernard McEveety (THE BROTHERHOOD OF Satan [1971]). Incidentally, the silly British title given to the film – THE FANTASTIC DISAPPEARING MAN – makes the whole sound like a Harry Houdini biopic(!)...though the change is certainly understandable, in view of its potentially being mistaken for a follow-up to the current Hammer remake of Dracula (1958).

Disappointingly, no extras at all are included on the MGM/Fox DVD; still, THE RETURN OF Dracula has been ideally paired with the same film-makers' previous (and even more radical) bloodsucking effort – called, simply, THE VAMPIRE (1957).
17 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Drac's Back
tsf-196230 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This was the last film in Universal's Dracula series, a franchise that began way back in 1931 with Bela Lugosi. Here, it's Francis Lederer, and though often maligned it's really not that bad. The California desert location had a suitably eerie atmosphere, and the black-and-white photography was good. It was an interesting plot device to have Dracula posing as a refugee from the Iron Curtain visiting his American relatives. Keep in mind this was two years after the abortive Hungarian revolution of 1956, and the idea of an Eastern European émigré artist popping up out of nowhere was by no means impossible. Certainly Cold War tensions made a good background for horror, as classics like "The Invasion of the Body Snatchers" demonstrate. This one isn't nearly that good, but it has its moments.
5 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good little movie with a great lead.
Hey_Sweden27 February 2012
Count Dracula (Francis Lederer) flees the forces of vampire hunter Meierman (John Wengraf), a modern day Van Helsing, and murders a local named Bellac (Norbert Schiller) who's headed for America to visit his cousins, assuming the other mans' identity. The American branch of the family is a little perplexed by his odd behaviour, but not enough to actively question it until Meierman turns up determined to finish what he started.

"The Return of Dracula" was another collaboration for screenwriter Pat Fielder and director Paul Landres, who'd previously done another genre film, "The Vampire". As such, it's basically a routine B movie, but not badly done at all. In fact, Landres and crew do give this movie a respectable amount of atmosphere; the scenes with Dracula are always the best. The sharp featured Lederer is a fine choice for the role, as he has an undeniable intensity and presence. The opening credits sequence is nice and creepy as it plays out over a shot of the Count where only his eyes are lit. Anytime the Count is out to seduce his "cousin" Rachel (beautiful Norma Eberhardt), or her pretty, appealing friend Jennie (Virginia Vincent), or emerging from his coffin, the movie is fun in the true old school tradition, with a music score by Gerald Fried that uses the classic "Dies Irae" theme. The cave is a fine location, where Dracula can put his coffin, and in which to stage the climax. It's always cool when the camera pans to show Dracula is present in a scene, although the filmmakers would have done better to refrain from obvious musical stings when this happens.

The capable acting from the supporting cast helps, with Wengraf an earnest vampire hunter, Greta Granstedt as Rachels' unknowing mother Cora, Ray Stricklyn as Rachels' would be boyfriend Tim, Gage Clarke as the Reverend Doctor Whitfield, Robert Lynn as Dr. Paul Beecher, and Charles Tannen as Bryant, the man from Immigration.

One of the best overall elements to enjoy in "The Return of Dracula" is that for a movie almost entirely shot in black & white, the brief burst of red when blood seeps out of a staked victim is a real visual treat. It's an effectively tight and trim little movie with an amusing, somewhat unpredictable ending, and is worth a look.

Seven out of 10.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A rather limp, unconvincing and dull little vampire film
planktonrules7 October 2007
A dissident is leaving Communist Eastern Europe but on the way out, he's killed by Dracula. Then, inexplicably, Drac arrives at Smalltown, USA and assumes the role of this dissident as he moves in with extended family. Why he did this is really never explained--especially since moving in with this family seems to only complicate things for the vampire.

As strange as it may sound, I had a hard time staying awake during this very dull little horror film. Despite the tantalizing title, the film features very few chills as well as the strangest incarnation of Dracula I have ever seen--complete with curly hair reminiscent of an aging Don Juan. And, instead of thrills, not a whole lot happens in this film--only two people die and oddly, the blind one, is able to see when she is reborn as a vampire. It's obvious that this was designed for the drive-in movie crowd (which was usually young, frisky and willing to sit through even the dullest of movies in order to smooch). As I watched it all alone (my wife/smooching partner was busy working), I was bored to tears!
4 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Underrated, scary vampire thriller
preppy-322 January 2001
Warning: Spoilers
Dracula (Francis Lederer) kills a passenger on a train and takes over his identity. He becomes the cousin of an all-American family and stays with them. He's becomes very attracted to his young (17) female cousin and wants her to become his bride...

An atmospheric, beautifully directed vampire movie. I saw it many times of TV growing up...it scared me silly! I had nightmares over this one. It still works on me now as an adult.

Francis Lederer does a fangtastic job as Dracula. Lederer hated this movie--he claimed it was rushed into production and he was forced to do it. Nonetheless he turns out a great performance. There's no fangs and (except for a brief color insert) no blood, but it still scares. Well worth seeing.

SPOILER ALERT!!! Be warned--in original prints there is a brief color insert at the end when a vampire is staked. On TV it was in black & white but restored in the VHS that came out in the 1980s and on the DVD released in 2016. It's not a big deal, but that splash of blood in color really jolts you. Try to see it that way.
33 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well done low budget Hitchcock homage
LeoB-221 September 2008
This well made and nicely restored vampire film takes the basic set-up of Hitchcock's Shadow of a Doubt (1943)--sinister relative comes to visit wholesome family in small town, where young girl of family has an unspoken affinity with him--and reveals the vampire subtext of Hitchcock's more psychologically oriented film. Without excessive blood and gore and teeth, it manages to create an eerie atmosphere that many more expensive horror films never quite achieve. Francis Lederer, in one of his last roles before he retired from movies to live prosperously from his real estate investments, does a great job. For fans of Hollywood locations, Dracula's crypt is set in Bronson Caves, more usually a setting for low-budget westerns.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hit The Road Drac, And Don't You Come Back, No More No More No More.............
bkoganbing5 October 2007
In a better film such as the kind Universal put out in the Thirties and Forties, Francis Lederer might have made an interesting Count Dracula. He certainly had the old world manners of the no account count from Transylvania.

But in The Return of Dracula where the world's most famous vampire has gone to seek the blood of the new world, Lederer looks extremely uncomfortable trying to make sense of the crummy dialog he has to mouth.

Lederer also has police inspector John Weingraf from Interpol on his trail. The old count's got a taste for young teenage girls as he goes after blind Virginia Vincent and tries to put the bite on Christina Eberhardt, to the chagrin of boyfriend Ray Stricklyn.

He's in southern California, he must like them there wishing they all could be California girls.

I'd go out and hang 10 rather than sit home and watch Dracula return.
4 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hitchcock Meets Dracula
csdietrich29 December 2002
Indeed this is a vampiric version of SHADOW OF A DOUBT. Nonetheless it is a fun romp and a tremendous performance by Francis Lederer as Count Dracula who has assumed the identity of Belloq Gordal, a Hungarian visiting his Southern California family. There is a wonderful "Dies Irae" score by Gerald Fried and excellent performances and atmosphere throughout. There is a color insert shot of the staking of a vampire woman that is also fun. This film is another in the Fifties canon of cult horror which deserves classic status of sorts. One can almost imagine Joseph Cotten in the titular role, though. The comparison between this film and SHADOW will be obvious, but who cares?
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"You seem so distant somehow"
hwg1957-102-2657043 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Dracula comes to small town America. This movie has a lot going for it. There is skilful black and white cinematography by Jack MacKenzie, an appropriate music score by Gerald Fried and atmospheric direction by Paul Landres that makes plausible a vampire in a contemporary milieu. It is surprisingly creepy on a low budget. It is also helped by smooth and sinister Francis Lederer as Dracula and sweet and sassy Norma Eberhardt as Rachel. Their scenes together are the best in the movie.

It was originally called 'The Return of Dracula. but was re-titled poorly as 'The Fantastic Disappearing Man' which makes it sound more like a science fiction story. Whatever it's called it is a fine film and well worth watching.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Last Black and White Dracula Film is Worthwhile
snicewanger12 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Very well done vampire film with a strong performance by Francis Lederer as the undead nobleman and Norma Eberhardt as the object of his carnal desire.The Count has become not just a blood thirsty monster but a political enemy of the state in his native Romania and has to flee for his...er ..ah .. "life" so to speak. He kills and assume he identity of an artist traveling to America to connect with a cousin. The Count finds the small northern California town she lives in much to his liking. The woman's daughter is both attracted and suspicious of her new"cousin". and he is very attracted to her. His usual living habits and almost hypnotic charm raise some red flags, however, particularly with the young lady's jealous boyfriend. A vampire hunter arrives in the town to investigate the strange circumstances of the artists immigration to the United States. It becomes a taunt and tense race against time. As other review's have pointed out, this basically a remake of Hitchcock's "Shadow of a Doubt" and there is nothing wrong with that. Giving the story a supernatural element gives a different slant and makes it very watchable. Lederer has said was not happy playing Dracula but he was certainly effective .His characterization is spot on. It came out about the same time as Horror of Dracula and somehow got lost in the shuffle. Perhaps because it was shot in black and white. Return of Dracula is and entertaining and effective vampire thriller.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Original but weak
Bored_Dragon4 July 2017
Mediocre low-budget vampire movie, interesting only because of its originality compared to its predecessors. While Dracula movies so far were placed in past centuries, this story takes place in "present", in a small American town in the fifties of the 20th century, and main characters are a teenage couple, local priest/doctor and some town aunts. Pretty much unusual for Dracula movie. Still, story and characters are undeveloped, the plot is simple, and everything happens fast and easy, like in short cartoons. The movie is two-dimensional and fails to involve us enough, so there's no dramatic tension. Teenage romance won't fill you with emotions, nor will horror elements scare you. Overall, interesting idea, technically well done for its time and budget, but not elaborated enough, so movie fails to build an atmosphere that could leave a strong impression. You won't get bored, but you'll forget all about it soon enough.

5,5/10
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Good Dracula Film
Rainey-Dawn11 January 2016
Count Dracula murders a man and poses as him: Bellac Gordal. Bellac/Dracula moves in with his American cousins and begins to wreak havoc in his new home. -- A simple but effective story.

This film was released in 1958 not long before Christopher Lee's portrayal of Dracula in 'Horror of Dracula (1958)'. Lee's movie over shadowed this film with it's vivid color and a towering, menacing Dracula (Lee). BUT that is not to say that 'The Return of Dracula (1958)' is a bad film - it's actually a good vampire movie.

If you like vampire movies then I do recommend 'Return of Dracula ('58)'. It's not like the Universal Dracula ('31) nor is it like the Dracula Hammer Horror film series - it's a Dracula film all on it's own.

7/10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
No match for the other Dracula movie of '58.
BA_Harrison25 October 2017
The same year that British studio Hammer gave us their classic version of Dracula, America produced this far more tepid and forgettable contemporary affair, in which the infamous Count (Francis Lederer) kills European artist Bellac Gordal (Norbert Schiller), assumes his identity, and travels to a small town in California to stay with the dead man's relatives, the Mayberrys. Once there, Dracula proceeds to take a bite out of the family cat, has a suck on sickly blind girl Jennie (Virginia Vincent) and tries to 'turn' Rachel Mayberry (Norma Eberhardt). Meanwhile, European cop/vampire hunter John Merriman (John Wengraf) arrives in town, stakes at the ready.

A cheap B-grade drive-in flick, The Return of Dracula is more apple pie and white picket fences than blood red fangs and storm lashed castles, much of the action revolving around Rachel's wholesome relationship with boyfriend Tim (Ray Stricklyn) and her part time job at the Parish Home looking after the elderly and the infirm. Dracula's antics are fairly limited, the Count's only human victim being poor Jennie, who in turn puts the bite on immigration investigator Mack Bryant (Charles Tannen). For most of the time, Drac is hidden away in his room, or in his coffin, which is stowed away in a disused mine (don't ask how he got it there).

The film's most effective moments are when Dracula enters Jennie's room in mist form (Rachel having thoughtfully opened the window and removed the poor girl's cross pendant), and a brief moment in colour: the bloody staking of Jennie in her coffin. Unfortunately, the film's shortcomings easily outweigh its positives: a scare-free script; a vampire without fangs (we never see his protruding canines and he leaves no bite marks, leaving us to wonder exactly how he drains his victim's blood); humdrum performances; and a sudden accidental demise for the vampire, clumsy old Drac falling down a pit while backing away from a cross. Doh!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable twist on the Dracula legend
vtcavuoto9 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
"The Return of Dracula" is a good film that updates the story from the late 1890s to present day(for the release of the film)1958. Dracula poses as an artist who comes to America to be free from Communism(a real blow to freedom for Eastern Europe after WW2). He seems distant and reclusive toward his American relatives. He starts by killing a blind girl and then sets his sights on his younger cousin. She slowly falls under his influence but at the end he is destroyed by falling into a pit filled with jagged wood pieces. He has been hiding in a cave where he can be safe. The acting, music score and direction are very good for this type of low budget movie. A nice variation on the vampire films from the 1930s and 40s. If you're a fan of vampire movies, check out this little gem.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terrible film...
jc1b77 October 2007
One of the worst Dracula films I have ever seen. No fangs,no turning into a bat, he walked in the sunlight and he was not intimidating looking at all. Poor acting throughout the film. Jenny tiptoes into the morgue and not only opens the crypt and coffin ,gets in it and somehow lifts and raises it back into the wall. Amazing !! The inspector from Europe just happens to know Old Drac is hiding in Carleton, California. Carleton, California, I would have looked there first too !!! Absolutely fabulous.Bad film.The ending isn't TOO predictable. Watch this on a rainy do-nothing day , otherwise, pass. Also, the credits have Hope Sommers of Andy Griffith fame( Claar) as annoying Cornelia, but in truth is hag Belle Mitchell.
2 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprisingly effective and stylish low-budget horror
pearceduncan15 January 2001
I picked up The Return of Dracula on a whim for $5 at The Warehouse, expecting it to be a silly old B-movie. What a surprise I got.

I usually can't stand vampire movies (George Romero's Martin is my idea of a really good one), but this is one of the best I've seen. Visually, it's stylish and atmospheric. The script is above average. The music is effective, if a little pompous and overbearing at times. What makes the movie really click, though, is Francis Lederer as Dracula. His portrayal of fangface is as good as any I've ever seen.

The rest of the cast are competent, which makes them well above average for this sort of thing. The famed colour insert was present in my cheapo copy, which made up for the somewhat dodgy sound quality. Some of the scare scenes hold up quite well even 40+ years on. I'd recommend Return of Dracula highly to anyone who enjoys classy old B&W horror.
34 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of the Best Vampire Movies?
retrorocketx24 November 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a real gem of a vampire movie - an intense, tight, brilliant, and satisfying movie set 1950s small town America. As other reviewers have noted, the story is essentially identical to Alfred Hitchcock's Shadow of a Doubt, but with the added twist of vampirism.

The Gothic angle is absent, which might turn off some traditionalists. In its place is a setting featuring two cultural icons of late 1950s movies - idyllic small town/suburbia threatened by outside forces; and teenagers taking control in times of crisis and mastering challenges. (It is fun to see the youth movement and rebellion of the 1960s foreshadowed in the late 1950s).

The vampire, played expertly by Frances Lederer, is charming and sophisticated, but in each sentence he utters, there are suspicious undertones. There is a creepy feeling every moment this guy is on the screen. Lederer gives a brilliant vampire performance, one might even argue he is one of the best vampires ever. The young woman threatened by this vampire also gives an excellent performance. Her character has to move from schoolgirlish, to suspicious and finally to terror. She is quite convincing. The other actors do a fine job in support.

The movie is well filmed, and there are several fun little moments of surprise and terror. The dialog is good, and there are some fun bits of vampire cosmology tossed in here and there, with lines like, "If my behavior seems different, perhaps it is because it serves a higher purpose than to find acceptance in this dull and useless world." For some reason, crosses are extremely important and powerful in this movie. A cross is an instant vampire-stopper. In contrast, a vampire's most powerful weapon in this movie is his hypnotic power. Therefore, a constant battle of hypnotism verses cross is present from start to finish, with the climactic confrontation scene featuring a final duel.

This ending scene was a bit unsatisfying to me, it must be a tough one to film - how do you capture hypnotism verses willpower and make it visually dramatic? However, in spite of a slightly weak ending, this is a heck of a vampire movie. If you like vampires, this movie belongs in your collection.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A Nasty Little Film
jromanbaker1 November 2020
I have a fondness for 1950's Sci-Fi and horror films. But there are a few like ' Fiend Without a Face ', ' The Horrors of the Black Museum ' and this one called ' The Fantastic Disappearing Man ' in the UK which I dislike. A friend chose this for Halloween 2020 and I found it deeply unpleasant. It was cut in the UK but I had the uncut American copy, ' The Return of Dracula '. Why did I find it unpleasant ? There is a horrifying concentration on the blindness of a young woman and what happens to her. It is sickening and could have been avoided. There is nothing of the pleasing Gothic in this film, but set in the then modern setting of a Californian town. Some reviewers have compared this to Hitchcock's ' Shadow of a Doubt .' The Hitchcock film is grim but this pushes further and the way it is filmed is realistic, and the chilling use of the ' Dies Irae ' adds to the overall morbidity. This morbidity is so omnipresent that it could overwhelm some viewers. Despite my total dislike Francis Lederer is excellent, and so is the supporting past. The colour sequence and its context is also directed for disgust and exploitation. There is no fun at all in this film unlike many other horror films of the period. If children were allowed to see this in the US when it came out I feel sorry for their psychological health, and it is certainly even now to be avoided by those who are afraid either of blindness or a fear of death.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed