The Angry Red Planet (1959) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
103 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Why all the irony?
gridoon15 August 2002
How come there are so many negative reviews about this one? It actually holds up better than many other sci-fi films of that period (wasn't "Teenagers From Outer Space" also made in 1959?), and if it's clunky at times, its clunkiness is part of its innocent charm. The effects and the matte drawings may not be perfect, but they're sure colorful and entertaining, and the movie's restrained approach (at least more restrained that the title indicates) is most welcome. The presence of a woman scientist is also worth noting; although her treatment by the ship's captain is often sexist, ultimately she proves to be quite intelligent and competent. (**1/2)
62 out of 71 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average Sci-Fi film
vtcavuoto10 January 2007
Warning: Spoilers
I remember seeing this when I was 8 years old on a Saturday afternoon. I didn't see it again until a few years back. It's not a great movie but is still fun. Get a load of the rat-bat-spider-crab monster! It is pretty lame but still has a low-budget special effects charm to it. The scenes on Mars would have better if the sky and ground were orange instead of everything. The process used made the actors look like they dove face first into pancake make-up. OK, now for the positives: the acting is good and features some "B" movie vets in Gerald Mohr, Les Tremayne and Jack Kruschen. The spaceship and interior are for the most part convincing(given this was made in 1960). The film moves at a good pace. Direction was pretty good despite the fact that this was made in 9 days. Worth a look for fans of 1950s and 1960s Sci-Fi films.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Campy but enjoyable early sci-fi
planktonrules10 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The film begins with people on Earth discovering that their rocket to Mars had not been lost but was just drifting out in Space near out planet. When it's retrieved, one of the crew members is ill, one is alive and the other two are missing. What happened to them is told through a flashback by the surviving member.

While on Mars, the crew was apparently attacked by a whole host of very silly bug-eyed monsters. Oddly, while the sets were pretty good, the monsters were among the silliest I have seen on film. Plus, in an odd attempt at realism, the production used a process called "Cinemagic". Unfortunately, this wonderful innovation just made the film look pretty cheap when they were on the surface of Mars AND the intensity of the redness practically made my eyes bleed--it was THAT bad!! Despite all the cheese, the film did have a somewhat interesting plot as well as a good message about space travel. For lovers of the genre, it's well worth seeing. For others, you may just find the whole thing rather silly--see for yourself and decide.

While by today's standards this isn't an especially good sci-fi film, compared with the films being made at the time, it stacks up pretty well.

PS--When you watch the film, pay careful attention to Dr. Tremayne. He looks like the spitting image of Dr. Quest from the "Jonny Quest" cartoon! Plus, he sounds and acts a lot like him, too.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Fun B-Movie
Sargebri18 March 2003
This is definitely one movie I grew up watching when I was a kid. The acting may be bad and the science may be convoluted, but it is still a fun ride. You know you are going to have a good B movie when Les Tremayne, who was in so many B's during the 60's, is one of the stars. Also, did you ever notice that the mail crew members were in wing tips? At least they flew in space in style. Also, the character of Dr. Ryan is supposed to have earned respect with her degree, but she is constantly referred to as the girl, but then again, this was the early sixties and what good b-flick doesn't have a female scientist that is all business until she's in peril and then she becomes the typical damsel in distress. This film isn't great, but it definitely is fun.
31 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mysterious planet is home to gruesome monsters.
michaelRokeefe13 August 2001
This sci-fi adventure is not the best and by no means the worst. I agree with the statement that bad sci-fi is comical. Bizarre pink tinting and unusual special effects make this a favorite for the late, late, late show viewers. Space explorers on the planet Mars fight off strange giant amoeba-like monsters and other strange creatures. Pretty cool.

The cast includes Les Tremayne, Naura Hayden, Gerald Mohr and Jack Kruschen. Get comfy and enjoy. Don't feel bad if you nod off for a moment. I agree with adding this to the list of cult classics to not miss.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
along came a spider-rat
lee_eisenberg16 July 2005
"The Angry Red Planet" will be a treat for anyone who admires sci-fi flicks from the '50s and early '60s. Basically, a group of astronauts travels to Mars looking for life. They find an over-sized being which appears to be a cross between a rat and a spider. And the Munchkin mayor from "The Wizard of Oz".

I guess that there's nothing particularly unique about this movie; that era yielded many movies about people finding things in outer space. But like I said, if you have a special affinity for old-fashioned B-movies, then this is the movie for you. Watching the DVD with Spanish subtitles makes it even more interesting.
21 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Don't Anger Mars; it May Send a Giant Amoeba
Bogmeister15 January 2006
A spaceship returns from Mars; about a couple of months earlier, a 4-person expedition had been sent to the red planet. Most of the picture is a flashback to what transpired over there. The picture is saddled by inane, melodramatic dialog, typical of many sci-fi efforts of the fifties & sixties. Note, for example, how the ship's commander (Mohr) tells another crew member to 'stay there' for no reason; as if moving to another spot inside the ship will cause a problem. Later, the commander orders two of the crew to remain in the ship while he and another go outside. The two he ordered to stay say 'no way' and follow out; I didn't have high hopes for the expedition's success by this point. There's much talk of 'ears twitching' and hugging a freeze-ray gun named 'Cleo' (short for Cleopatra, of course). It would at least be pretty funny, unintentionally, if the story didn't drag.

There's a very slow pace to the whole thing; the astronauts spend as much time looking out the ship's window portals (which change color from red to blue), commenting on what they see, as they do outside actually exploring. The martian landscape, advertised as filmed in 'Cinemagic,' usually resembles animation cut-outs, or drawings, shot through an orange-red filter to give the illusion of interacting with the actors, who do take on an odd surrealistic appearance due to the process. But I don't think it fools anyone over 10 years old. The one clever mention I did notice was that the memories of the surviving astronaut would be tinged with unreality, so that would explain the unreal nature of the martian vista. Oh, okay...

I was amused by some of the astronauts' actions as they begin to explore; right off the bat, they test their freeze gun on a plant, killing it, just for the hell of it. Then the female member hacks with a machete at what she thinks is a tree but turns out to be the leg of the spider-rat monster. Nice going, lady. Look up next time. No wonder the 'intelligence' on Mars gets upset and doesn't mind that one of the lower lifeforms, a giant amoeba, attacks the explorers. The acting isn't too impressive. Mohr especially, had a very annoying technique, saying a line and then abruptly erupting into a huge grin which always creeped me out - reminded me of It! the Terror From Beyond Space. The ending is fairly anti-climactic; don't expect any huge revelations beyond the 'no more expeditions' with freeze guns named Cleo.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"The Angry Red Planet" is classic "B" movie Sci-fi film
chuck-reilly23 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
MGM still made movies on the cheap in the early 1960's and "The Angry Red Planet" (costing less than $200,000) is a prime example. Despite the low budget and some dubious special effects, the film is highly enjoyable and fun to watch. Gerald Mohr stars as the rugged and unpretentious Colonel O'Bannon, leader of the first manned space exploration to Mars. With him on board is good-looking redhead Naura Hayden (as Dr. Iris Ryan) and gentlemanly Les Tremayne (as Professor Geddell). After landing their craft in the middle of the red-atmosphere of this ominous planet, things slowly but surely begin to unravel for the crew. It seems as though the planet itself is very "angry" about their arrival and is intent on destroying them as quickly as possible. Some very weird creatures then start popping up all over the place and Ms. Hayden does her best Fay Wray screams right on cue. Mohr remains calm throughout the proceedings and viewers are assured that he's the right man for this job.

Directed by Ib Melchior, the original creator of the concept for the "Lost in Space" TV show, "The Angry Red Planet" is a few steps ahead of the usual late 1950's and early 1960's Science Fiction "B" movie. I remember seeing it in the theater as a young kid (the 25 cent Saturday matinée) and was duly impressed. It didn't give me nightmares but it did help to dissuade me from a career as an astronaut. Gerald Mohr, a prolific TV and film character actor with an uncanny resemblance to Humphrey Bogart, is the best thing about the movie. During his long and productive career, he could play either heroes or villains effectively without ever missing a beat. One of his more memorable TV roles was as Doc Holliday on "Maverick." The beautiful Ms. Hayden also contributes to the scenery; her red hair blends right in with the eerie Martian atmosphere. As for director Ib Melchior, he's still around and as active as ever. I spoke to him at a Book Publisher's convention in Los Angeles a few years ago and he looked healthy and fit. Unfortunately, Mr. Mohr passed away at the relatively young age of 54 in 1968, leaving behind a volume of very watchable work.
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fever Dream of a Ten-Year Old Kid in 1959
DD-93120 December 2001
First off, I'd like to say that the user comments alone left me with tears in my eyes from laughing. One comment that bad SF movies become good comedies is right on the mark. MST3000 made it's living off that.

If you look at THE ANGRY RED PLANET as the fever dream of a 10 year old comic book reader from 1959, you'll have the handle on this sucker. All the elements are there: the pseudoscience, occasionally logical, more often hilariously infantile. The adolescent boy attitude toward sex, with the "gigolo" captain (good call on that one, guys!) making eyes at the buxom "scientist" with hair so red it's a wonder it doesn't set off the fire alarms. The ridiculous conception of Mars as a planet so alien that everything glows red, yet one alien monster has a mouse face, and the blob alien has an eye that rotates like a kid's toy. The comic relief, an overweight astronaut (!) who sounds like he never finished the 8th grade in Brooklyn and has a psychotic fixation on his ray gun. And of course, the mere fact that alien = dangerously evil. If these people had met E.T., they would have roasted him in two seconds flat! "OW" indeed!

Don't get me wrong. I rated this movie low. Still, it's never boring (except when the scientist tries to explain everything - only to make it all sound more and more ridiculous), and you have to admit, in your little kid core, it makes you jump a few times.

Okay, then don't admit it. I guess you were never 10.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
AIP In Space
gavin694229 January 2015
One of only two survivors from a Martian expedition is so traumatized she (Naura Hayden) does not remember the circumstances of the trip.

The film stars Gerald Mohr and is directed by American International Pictures regular Ib Melchior. Melchior was only given 10 days and a budget of $200,000 to make the film. All things considered, he did alright.

The New York Times wrote, "The Angry Red Planet solemnly warns its audiences not to go to Mars. Stubborn patrons who ignore the advice will discover that the planet looks like a cardboard illustration from Flash Gordon and is inhabited by carnivorous plants, a giant amoeba and a species resembling a three-eyed green ant." Well said.

Great film? No. Fun film? Yes.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
All the cliches.
13Funbags28 July 2018
This movie has it all. Terrible dialog, bad green screen, a person telling the story. Nothing original about the entire movie. I noticed that the characters are exactly the same as the Fantastic Four except they didn't get super powers. This movie does manage to have some bad edits that are funny. It's been a long time since I've seen something edited so poorly. The most interesting thing about this movie is that the monster from the cover of the Misfits record Walk Among Us is from it. It also had the best quote I have heard in awhile. The captain looks at the gauges and says " All the pins are glued to the top!". Classic stupidity. This is definitely worth watching once.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Scared spit-less
davehumphrey228 July 2006
This movie scared the be jeepers out of me.

Well, I saw the original release, and I was eight years old. But it scared me good. There was all the red. There were the scary actors who had really bad five word lines out of a comic book.

There was always something OUT THERE.

There were all the kids crying and running for the exit doors.

and then the nightmares. Took me at least three days to get over this one.

This movie was made for kids. Why are there so many comments up here about this grade D flick?

And some of you are watching this thing as adults?
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tale from a man called Ib
culwin7 October 2001
This movie is funny and painful at the same time. The "Cinemagic" almost gave me a seizure. Despite what they imply, "Cinemagic" is not some innovative technical procedure. It was "developed" as the result of an accident, and they used it because it disguised the fact that their "monsters" were so stupid-looking. I also don't think it's a coincidence that the writer is Sid "Pink".

This movie is good for a laugh, if you are really looking for a movie made in 9 days on 200,000 dollars. It is entertaining; at least I can say that about it. The bat/rat/spider is the highlight.

(edit 12/2021) I wrote this first review 20 years ago, and forgot about it until I saw the movie again, today! Well, I have to update my rating, because it's not really as bad as I thought back then. It still has entertainment value, which is better than plenty of movies I've seen.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Bizarre, Psychedelic Adventure
Flixer195723 August 2002
Warning: Spoilers
**Possible Spoilers Ahead**

Gerald Mohr, a busy B-movie actor during the Forties and Fifties, leads an expedition to Mars. Before we get to the Red Planet we're entertained by romantic patter between Mohr and scientist Nora Hayden; resident doofus Jack Kruschen; and the sight of Les Tremayne as another scientist sporting a billy-goat beard. The Martian exteriors feature fake backdrops and tints ranging from red to pink–-the "Cinemagic" process touted in the ads. Real cool monsters include a giant amoeba, a three-eyed insect creature, an oversized Venus Fly-Trap, and the unforgettable rat/bat/spider. The whole bizarre adventure is recalled by survivor Hayden under the influence of hypnotic drugs. THE ANGRY RED PLANET reportedly has quite a cult following, and it probably picked up most of its adherents during the psychedelic Sixties.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hard to believe only 8 years between this and "2001"
Uthman17 July 2004
I recently saw a nicely restored print of this film on the Showtime cable network. The color is not the best, but certainly very good, and the monaural sound is probably better than what one would have experienced in a typical 1960 theater.

A few visuals:

The mission clock on the spaceship bulkhead has a huge "BULOVA" on the face. The "day" numerals on the mission-elapsed time display look like they was made from black electrician's tape. They only show numbers of days that could be displayed with numerals that had no curved lines: "1", "17", and "47".

The female astronaut carries a stylish black purse on board.

There is a very large indicator on the spaceship bulkhead that says "Oxygen Consumption", with a green light indicating "Normal" and a red one indicating "Excessive".

The astronauts have oxygen cylinders on their backs while on EVA, but there is no glass on their helmet visors; their faces are completely open to the atmosphere.

The shots of the Martian exteriors are really pretty cool, quite innovative for the era and the limited budget. Not only is everything a monochromatic red, but there is an interesting solarization effect, which adds a bit of surrealism and makes the backdrops look less cheesy.

Memorable lines:

"You know, I can't say that I recommend spacesuits for beautiful young dolls. What happened to all your curves?"

and the classic,

"I know you think I acted like a hysterical female there back at the ship, but I can assure you I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself!"
39 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
ow.
grnhair200110 April 2014
Warning, Mars is red. I mean RED. Between that and the piercing whistle laser, this is a migraine-inducing film.

Standard B film sf plot of its era. Astronauts (old guy, chick, leader, and comic relief) go to Mars, there are monsters, they barely make it home. The best thing I can say about it is that they didn't suffer the cliché "meteor storm," just one meteor. About 50 minutes of actual story (lame as it is), padded by a totally superfluous framing device involving military talking heads.

Oh, and guys, two pickup lines to never use: 1) I'd like to take you into a dark alley and 2) When I use your name, you'll know it.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Classic drive-in "B" movie
ogmios13 November 1999
It's telling that as of the entry of this comment, NO females have submitted a vote of any kind for this movie. Not surprisingly, cheesy science fiction doesn't appeal to them quite as much... If you like a good "B" movie, and especially if you like to satirize them as you watch, you will like this. If you don't have fun watching bad movies, this one's not for you.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Murky Red Planet!
Greensleeves10 July 2006
Hopelessly inept and dull movie in which the characters stand around in rooms or a rocket ship and talk endlessly. You might think things would perk up when they explore Mars but these scenes are filmed through a heavy red/orange filter which makes everything very murky. The Martian landscape/vegetation consists mainly of drawings and the monsters are entirely unconvincing. There are echoes of 'Bride Of The Monster' when the heroine carefully winds the octopus like tentacle of a flesh eating plant around her before weakly thrashing about, the difference being that the Ed Wood film is a hundred times more entertaining. Better wear earplugs when watching otherwise the 'sci-fi' music score, repeated endlessly, will drive you insane. If you find yourself unable to sleep one night just slip this one into the VCR and your insomnia will be cured in no time.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Diverting, likeable nightmare tale about a courageous band of space explorers and their adventures on the forbidding and mysterious planet Mars. Despite some technical inadequacies and the static staginess
Morbius-1316 November 1999
THE ANGRY RED PLANET was theatrically released on July 1960 however this movie was actually filmed in September 1959 and was given its early preview screenings the following November. The film strongly embodies the 1950s sci-fi visual form and styling and is an important artifact of this colourful and sadly bygone era. Generally this project was a little too ambitious for the budget and resources allotted to it and much of the scenic effects involving views of the Martian landscape, environment and civilization are basically sketches courtesy of a talented comic book illustrator (and one-time son-in-law of Moe Howard of the The Three Stooges) Norman Maurer. But this artwork is so representative of the distinctive style native only to this particular decade that while its inclusion was probably considered embarrassingly amateurish and shoddy during this film's original release Maurer's illustrations can now be viewed with a more historical perspective and appreciation.

THE ANGRY RED PLANET was filmed in an experimental process developed by Norman Maurer referred to as Cinemagic and the intent behind this proposed technique was to give everything in the Mars sequences a uniform appearance so that when Maurer's drawings and sketches were employed for visual reference their insertion would not be apparent to the movie audience. Problems with the film processing lab developers arose from their lack of understanding how to properly utilize the special lenses and components supplied in connection with Cinemagic. The final result on film was a reddish and yellow tinting coupled with an irradiated glow effect to the planetary sequences and a complete failure to camouflage Mr. Maurer's interesting but obvious artwork.

Technical limitations not withstanding THE ANGRY RED PLANET achieves an uncomfortably tense and threatening mood during the spacecrew's tenure on the weird and alien world which is largely conveyed through the quartet's total isolation in their spacecraft surrounded by an apparently dead and motionless terrain devoid of even sound that seemingly inscrutably lies in wait for the earthlings to exit the comfort and security of their spaceship. Moments where the three-eyed Martian intelligence peers through the rocketship's large observation porthole (one of Maurer's drawings coupled with a superimposed ripple effect) and is seen only by the female crew member are genuinely startling and memorably haunting. The different life forms which make an appearance (the carnivorous plant, the bat-rat-spider-crab and the giant amoeba) while not the most convincing incarnations crafted are still inspiringly creative and original manifestations and help impart to this cinematic recreation of the red planet an appropriately nightmarish quality and the unearthliness of a frontier totally beyond human ken. Film composer Paul Dunlap's novel and engaging score which blends conventional musical instrumentation with electronic orchestrations suitably complements the varied moods and events of this most extraordinary adventure.

The strong focus placed upon the female biochemist crew member Iris as someone much more than a mere token figure or romantic interest is an impressive distinction for a sci-fi film of the period and worthy of attention. The events on Mars are revealed in flashback reconstructed from Iris's subsconscious recollections through drug-induced hypnosis (due to her suffering from a traumatized mental block and the inability of the other surviving crew member to be questioned). Upon liftoff from the inhospitable red planet, Iris has the thankless, unpleasant task of disposing of the elder Professor Gettell's body after he suffers a fatal heart seizure (presumably releasing it out the airlock into the vacuum of space) while also caring for the incapacitated Colonel O'Bannion. Later it is Iris who resourcefully comes up with the solution to the truly horrible amoebic growth on the mission commander's arm saving his life while her male colleagues at the space centre hospital remain ineffectually stumped and merely assist Iris in her anxious research for a remedy.

The denouement where the seemingly malevolent Martians (who have monitored the evolution of life on Earth since the dawn of time) permit the survivors of the Mars mission to return to Mother Earth with a taped message denouncing mankind's propensity toward violence and destruction, referring to the human race as "technological adults but spiritual and emotional infants" and flatly prohibiting any further visitations to their planet "unbidden" is a genuine revelation and remarkably mature for a decade where it was a foregone conclusion that man's destiny was in an unbridled exploration and conquest of the universe. THE ANGRY RED PLANET takes the stance that before mankind boldly and hastily ventures into this final frontier it would be prudent to be conscious of the possibility that we might be encroaching upon someone else's domain and what is taken for granted as an ordained right of trespass may well prove to be a granted privilege instead.

THE ANGRY RED PLANET while pockmarked with shortcomings and compromises in production is a unique and imaginative work whose strengths and virtues far outweigh its weaknesses. This film is really the kind of project that should have been handled by the major studios or by master craftsmen like George Pal or Ray Harryhausen but quite often some of the most interesting and inspired ideas were usually tackled by the smaller independent filmmakers without whose significant contribution and involvement sci-fi cinema in general would be much poorer.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
I saw this when it came out on the big screen...
bheadher3 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Okay, so I'm old, so what, heh heh...you have to remember that scifi movies never had a big budget back then, so the FX and quality usually suffered for it. There are a couple superb classics that overcame this restriction, but Angry Red isn't one of them, and I knew that at 11 years old.

Right from the start, the use of existing equipment made the movie clunky, the weird pink color of Mars is oogly of course, but as a kid who cared...it was the magic of space flight and visiting other planets that captured your heart. So you automatically allowed for the lousy filmography.

Don't knock this one, it's well worth a late night viewing, with a big bowl of pop corn, heh heh...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"Hey, three eyes! What a crazy peeping tom!"
Hey_Sweden21 August 2017
This one is wonderfully goofy, gimmick heavy fun, complete with a stylized, stifling atmosphere, hilariously ridiculous dialogue, and a couple of very distinctive monsters. The screenplay (by director / noted sci-fi writer Ib Melchior ,and Sid Pink, based on Pinks' story) tells a tale of a disastrous manned expedition to Mars. The spacecraft is brought back to Earth, and only two survivors remain. However, one of them is suffering a hideous-looking infection. It's up to scientist Iris Ryan (gorgeous, flame haired Nora Hayden) to dig into her memories in order for puzzled military officials to find out what went wrong.

"The Angry Red Planet" gets most of its entertainment value out of its visual approach. It combines sets, paintings, special effects, and the much ballyhooed "Cinemagic" process to create a memorable look. "Cinemagic" basically turns everything red for sequences set on the Martian landscape. It also has some weird and wonderful monsters, pulling out all the stops. We have a Venus flytrap type carnivorous plant, an enormous rat / bat / spider / crab (once you see this thing, you never forget it), and an even more vast one eyed amoeba. At about the 36 minute mark, when our heroes (Hayden, Gerald Mohr, Les Tremayne, Jack Kruschen) first set foot on the Martian landscape, that's when the fun really begins. Mohr is amusing because he's playing a rather cocky, smarmy guy who insists on calling the leading lady "Irish". Sci-fi icon Tremayne is solid as the obligatory professorial character, and excellent character actor Kruschen - an Oscar nominee two years later for "The Apartment" - supplies the generous comedy relief with his priceless lines.

Melchior gets right down to business: the action just starts immediately, with ALL of the credits, including the title, saved for the end. And those closing credits are supplemented by one of the grooviest tracks one might ever hear in this genre.

A most agreeable diversion for people who just want to put their brains in neutral for 84 well paced minutes.

Seven out of 10.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Mars Oughtta Be Angry!
carolynpaetow30 June 2009
Surely no Saturday morning TV kids' show was ever done this poorly. After all, those producers had to count on the audience coming back. Well, in this awful offering, they could at least count the money they saved on sets. The script could have been a reject from some long-forgotten space opera serial, with a few smarmy lines added for cool-dude Gerald Mohr to murmur to Naura Hayden. No director could have done anything decent with such a loony storyline, so the action just plods boringly along. The spaceship props are absurd--a Bulova wall clock and portable typewriter, for example--but the planet sets have got to be some of the worst in cinematic history. Most are crude drawings, and it's all bathed in an often misfocused red light. Even Mohr's bare hairy chest is used as a prop. And it's a bad one--as rib-thin as the plot. Any viewer who can make it to the end of this movie will hear a message from the Martians--and will probably agree completely!
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Maybe some things are better off unknown!
mark.waltz5 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
So says the female scientist aboard a risky flight to Mars of all places, 58 years later still pretty unknown in spite of all the things that have been discovered. I wish other scientists had that sentiment and left the fantasy of what is there to the movies, of which this is one of the better ones. It's not just the ethical sentiment that I share with the pretty redhead; it's just a darn good movie that instantly grabs you, setting the mood with all the right elements!

The story starts with the launching, and switches to the return of the rocket. As fast as it is back, the audience is back on the ship, and thanks to pretty Nora Hayden (the reddest of redheads), we learn what transpired. There's mystery, romance, humor, science, adventure and obviously danger, tightly mixed together in a very fast moving 85 minutes. It's a living nightmare for Hayden who must relive what she witnessed, and there's no fun loving, fast killing little green men going around to destroy the earth. Even with the humor, this is not a comedy, and not even unintentionally funny, although a few times I managed to suppress a few giggles, especially English speaking message from whatever inhabits the unseen elements of the angry red planet.

With Gerald Mohr as the dashing captain, Jack Kruschen as the comic book loving crew member and Les Tremayne as the brilliant professor on board, Hayden is surrounded by a too notch cast. The planet does indeed turn red when the earthlings explore it, a great effect they perfectly adds to the mood. Yes, the set often looks like a painted background, and there's an abundance of scary looking monsters and a futuristic city that looks like architecture of today. But I really got spooked by a flesh eating giant plant, a giant six legged creature that appears to be part arachnid/part rodent, and a giant sea creature the size of a steam-liner. They come out of nowhere, and it's better not to see stills of the film to build up suspense.

The dreamlike memories of what Hayden experienced gives this psychological brilliance in telling the story. Along with only a handful of others, this has to be one of the best written science fiction films, reminding me that on occasion, they could really be profound. Of course, some of the moments may seem silly to some, but they really got me surprised by the constant suspense. I've seen many of these films that left me either angry or red, but this is practically brilliant in every way.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
There's lots worse out there
bejwak21 November 2001
I saw this movie in the theater when I was 5 years old and it stayed in my memory all these years. By today's standards it comes up short, but I've seen movies with hundreds of times the budget that were a lot worse. Sure the acting is bad, but anything John Wayne did before 1939 could not be called good acting either. This movie does have some positives working for it. The female among the 4 astronauts is a biologist/zoologist and is not just window-dressing. The martian monsters and landscape/city are imaginative. They had some kind of 1g drive that allowed their rather capacious spacecraft to not need zero gravity effects, although they could have showed the turnover at the halfway point. All in all this is not the stinker some other viewers have labeled it. My score 6/10.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Only for serious sci-fi fans
MovieKen26 April 2002
I gave this movie a 2, and though I consider myself a science fiction fan, I found this movie very difficult to take seriously. It was on AMC one late night, and I'm glad I saw it for free. This movie is probably good for a few laughs, but not much more.

The special effects are about average for the time period - not awful, but not great, either. Of course we know more about Mars now than we did back then, but we really can't hold that against this film. The main reason I did not like this movie is because of the story.

There were several parts of this movie that I wish would have been explored in a little more detail - the astronaut's injury/condition, the city on Mars, the creature in the lake, etc. Overall, the movie is much like a lengthy episode of the 1960s version of The Outer Limits - complete with a cheesy ending.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed