The Gallant Hours (1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
56 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Cagney as Halsey
tomsview9 December 2018
Except for a few shots of planes and ships, "The Gallant Hours" mostly takes place in fairly stark room sets, and feels a little like a photographed stage play.

The film overcomes any shortcomings with James Cagney's performance as William F. Halsey Jr., a leader who literally had the fate of a number of nations on his shoulders, including mine, Australia. Cagney not only looks like his subject, but also seems to be channelling him.

The film brings home that the United States victory over the Japanese in the Solomon Islands in 1942 was a close run thing. Although sometimes outnumbered, daring strategy, brilliant codebreaking and courage turned the tide. This was before the full mobilisation of America's industrial might and manpower had by 1945 virtually made the Pacific an American lake.

The director of "The Gallant Hours", Robert Montgomery started as an actor, but he was also a decorated naval officer in WW2. He was a strong character and once admonished John Ford on the set of "They Were Expendable" for belittling John Wayne in front of the cast for not enlisting during the war.

Maybe it was just as well Montgomery didn't include battle scenes in "The Gallant Hours" because they would have been either the bathtub model effects of that CGI-less era or would have incorporated documentary footage, which never integrated seamlessly.

The film has a memorable hymn-like theme sung a Capella by a male choir: "Away He Went". However even Miklos Rozsa may have been wary of using so much reverence so often in his score for "King of Kings".

The film reminds Australians and New Zealanders how much is owed to those Americans who put it on the line in the Solomon Islands in 1942. But now, in 2018, it seems another nation is following Imperial Japan's old path down through the South China Sea and into the Pacific, albeit with artificial islands and debt entrapment instead of torpedoes and 16-inch shells, but relentlessly nonetheless.

During a visit to New Zealand in 1954, the retired Halsey said something about those crucial battles in the Solomons that may seem more prescient now...

"I hope we never have to do anything like that again. But if we do, I hope we are all together again. We certainly formed a wonderful team that time, I'm sure we could do it again if we had to. And God help us if we ever have to do it again".
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Job well done. A must for war buffs.
michaelRokeefe20 October 2001
Robert Montgomery directs this brief, but informative study of Adm. William F. 'Bull' Halsey Jr. in the Pacific during WWII. James Cagney is super as the highly decorated and revered Fleet Commander. Stoic, stern, confident and compassionate...Cagney in one of his best film performances.

Supporting cast is a mix of veteran actors and younger stars: Walter Sande, Les Tremayne, Dennis Weaver, Richard Jaeckel, James Yagi, Robert Burton and Ward Costello.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Cagney as Contemplative.
rmax30482323 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Samuel Morison, the official U. S. Navy historian for World War II, disapproved of Admiral William F. Halsey, calling him "a sailor's admiral," whereas Halsey's superior, Ernest King, was "an admiral's admiral." This is probably because Morison was a Boston Brahmin and believed that salty language and flagrant self display should be avoided. Maybe it endeared you to the enlisted men but it was undignified. You should also be elegantly modest and not given to flashy pronouncements like "Attack -- repeat -- attack," and "Kill Japs. Kill more Japs." The story begins with Halsey's retirement in 1945, having a last cup of coffee, served by his loyal Fillipino steward, Manuel, whose name Cagney pronounces Manual, as in "Instructor's Manual." Cagney asks Manuel which campaign he thinks of most often. Manuel concentrates and finally replies, "Guadalcanal." WHAM. Into a flashback of Halsey's miseries and triumphs in Guadalcanal.

But if the viewer expects a lot of slam-bang combat and heroic trumpets, he doesn't get it. Instead we see a quiet black-and-white account of Cagney's playing the most famous American Admiral of the war, during the months of battle on the island and on the sea around it. Not a shot is fired. There is hardly a ship or an airplane in sight. All the combat is off screen. There are few outdoor shots. The director, Robert Montgomery, sticks close to Cagney, follows him from room to room as he is haunted by the decisions he must make, or as he tries to avoid the five hypodermics waiting for him in the doc's office. It's a straightforward story that adheres to its subject. There are no women's roles in the film, and we learn virtually nothing about Cagney's home life.

How does Cagney play it? Pretty well. It's his least mannered performance. He never shouts or jabs his forefinger at anyone. He wears glasses and looks dumpy. And he moves slowly, slightly bent, as if burdened with a responsibility that weighs him down like a stone. With his eyebrows darkened, he even LOOKS quite a bit like Halsey.

The script treats the character with respect, just as it treats the Japanese officers, of whom we see a little bit. Halsey is shown as thoughtful, a little skeptical of any good luck, generous with praise, practically flawless, in fact -- except for that business with the syringes, which he finally stands up to. The film was released ten years before "Patton" established a genre, or pseudo-genre, of heroes who had, as John Wayne once put it, "the Yuman feeta clay." Halsey is presented as a plain old hero, and the film more or less fills in the blanks about what KIND of hero he was. By the end, with the exception of having to make risky decisions that are forced upon him by circumstance, we are left to conclude that he was the kind of hero that might just as easily have been a contemplative monk. The movie is a little slow at times.

The traditional iron-hard heroic features are missing. At one point, Cagney even says that, since two people in a row have suggested "the admiral might change his mind," that maybe he actually SHOULD change his mind. But then he has to go and vitiate the point by adding, after a pause, that "you don't change your mind. You just go in a different direction." Oh, heck. And here I was, hoping we'd see a leader who was capable of admitting mistakes, adapting to circumstances, and actually changing his mind.

And, man, did Halsey have reasons for admitting mistakes. What a different movie it would have been if, at the beginning, Manuel had replied, not "Guadalcanal," but something like, "I always think about the typhoons, Admiral," or, "How about the battle of Leyte Gulf?" However, okay, the world was not ready, and if you must cover only one campaign out of the many that Halsey was involved in, it might as well be a victory.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Superb drama that is more about leadership than warfare.
AnthonyM-218 October 1999
This classic film is about Admiral Halsey's leadership of the US forces in the South Pacific during the early part of World War II. The film is more about leadership than warfare. Combat is not depicted on screen, so this film would not appeal to those who seek lots of action. I strongly recommend the film, especially to history buffs.
25 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Make that chorus shut up!!
planktonrules27 May 2010
Arrgghh!! Whether or not this is a good film, I am surprised that most of the reviewers don't mention the god-awful men's chorus that inappropriately drones on and one with even greater solemnity than a Biblical epic!! It's horrible and annoying--and undermines much of the film. Why this was chosen for the soundtrack I have no idea, as it grates on the nerves like no other soundtrack I can recall! Yes, it's that bad and after a while it sounds almost like bees swarming--I kid you not! Aside from the demoniacally-inspired chorus, the next thing you'll probably notice is the unusual style of the film. Instead of a typical bio-pic, this one is told in a semi-documentary style--with very serious narration punctuating various vignettes of a very small portion of Admiral Halsey's life. This small cross-section of his life consists of just five weeks!! So, it's hard to exactly call this a 'bio-pic' as it would seem to imply more than just a tiny portion of the subject's life.

The film is also surprisingly different from what you'd expect because the telling of the story is very straight-forward and without adornment. Simple and direct seem to be the motto for this film...and have a male chorus that sounds worse than cats begin tortured.

If you want a film version of all of Halsey's life or a warts-and-all film, this is not the movie for you. However, it is very competently made and worth seeing...even with the evil chorus from Hell--though I AM deducting two points for this!
42 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Watch Out For The Chorus
zardoz-1320 June 2007
Straightforward black and white World War II battlefield biography about U.S. Navy Admiral William F. 'Bull' Halsey with zero combat scenes makes it a rough going 116 minutes despite an outstanding James Cagney as Halsey. Dennis "Chester" Weaver—minus his limp from "Gunsmoke"--played his aide. Warning: if you watch this respectable war film, prepare yourself for a male chorus cooing behind the scenes in reverence. After the first 10 minutes, that cooing gets pretty thick. Director Robert Montgomery, who fought in World War II in the European Theater of Operations, reenacts everything in a semi-documentary style and adds to the film's overall sense of credibility. Nevertheless, this Hollywood epic ought to be a regular film on the History Channel because it doesn't deviate from the facts.
30 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Compelling subject matter well presented by Cagney and others
MikeLV7 July 2014
To my knowledge - I had not seen this movie before this weekend. I was doing some housekeeping, and accidentally changed to this movie for some background noise (was trying to get a news channel). The clarity of the broadcast image, the subject matter and the high-profile list of actors kept my attention and the housework suffered considerably as I was hooked after about 30 seconds! I found it a refreshing look at the basic facts (with some liberties), a compelling performance by Cagney, and an interesting study in set design and filmmaking.

The most interesting thing to me was that this was made only 15 years after the war was over. That is not a very long time (the Belin Wall has been down 25 years now) - and having WWII veterans involved in the production contributed to the air of realism that is present throughout the film. The "Chorus" was interesting the first few times it showed up, but eventually I was able to tune it out and enjoy the rest of the movie!

This film tells a compelling story and should be watched at least once by everyone, and seen more often on TV.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Strain Of Command
bkoganbing4 December 2007
Helped in fact by an astonishing physical resemblance to Admiral William F. Halsey that audiences today can't appreciate, James Cagney in his next to last film before retirement makes a very believable and strained Bull Halsey recollecting those harrowing weeks during the seesaw battle for Guadalcanal.

If one is looking for battle scenes and lots of blood and gore skip this film. If one however would like to see a study about the strain of command than this film is ideal. Cagney drops all of the mannerisms that we normally associate with him in playing Admiral Halsey. It's a restrained and mature performance.

The Gallant Hours is also a tribute to the men of our fighting forces in the Pacific who took and held on to the key island of Guadalcanal in the Solomons and halted the Japanese in the Southwest Pacific Theater of Operations.

Director Robert Montgomery did the film in documentary style and at times you feel like you're in the brain of Admiral Halsey, weighing each decision he makes with him. The familiar voice you hear narrating is that of Montgomery who was no longer acting and now was mostly concerned with production and with political work for the Republican National Committee.

The Gallant Hours is a fine character study of one of America's greatest naval heroes and should not be missed.
50 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Respectful look at Admiral Halsey in documentary style technique...
Doylenf23 January 2008
The decision not to show any battle scenes is what prevents THE GALLANT HOURS from really coming to life as a war drama. All of the scenes showing the men in command who have to make the big decisions are extremely well done, but when the film is over there's a feeling that something was lacking. At least at some point in the story, some footage of men during battle would have made the Halsey story more gripping.

It's presented almost like a history lesson. The factual account of events following the Japanese successful attack on Pearl Harbor and leading up to events at Guadalcanal, borders on being dry but is saved by the crisp performances of the male cast and especially JAMES CAGNEY as Admiral "Bull" Halsey. Cagney puts aside all his famed mannerisms and plays the role with feeling and intensity, getting across the notion that being a commander during wartime is an extremely harrowing experience when so many lives are at stake.

The cast is mostly unfamiliar to me, with RICHARD JAECKEL and DENNIS WEAVER being the sole exceptions. Jaeckel is highly effective in a brief role as a man who is losing his fighting spirit until he gets a pep talk from Halsey and Weaver is pleasantly cast as Halsey's pilot and aide.

A thinking man's war film, it's a bit overlong at one hour and 55 minutes and without any actual battle footage. It's directed in competent style by Robert Montgomery but the Roger Wagner chorale music is a bit overdone in an attempt to heighten the drama.
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Military Movie Classic
magneta19 July 2000
This is a surprisingly engaging war film, considering there are no action scenes. The movie is well-acted, although Dennis Weaver's "Chester" accent is a bit over-the-top. Cagney is superb as Admiral Halsey, in my opinion his best role ever. His understated pain in ordering only a 'routine' search for his missing son is beautiful, and the heart-to-heart with Roy Webb over the day's combat losses is a textbook lesson in the responsibilities of command. The use of the off-screen narrator in lieu of subtitles to present the Japanese side of the issue is tremendously effective; one wishes it had been used in other films as well. Although there are no combat scenes in the movie, the suspense is palpable as the command staff lives the battle through the air-to-air and ship-to-ship transmissions of men fighting for their lives.

For the war movie or history buff, or the die-hard Cagney fan, this is a fine movie!
42 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good even if it's not something I'd like to see again
utgard148 October 2017
Docudrama about Admiral William F. Halsey; specifically his experiences during World War II. It's directed and narrated by Robert Montgomery. James Cagney stars and does an excellent job with a quieter, more subtle type of performance than the ones he was known for. Negatives include a slow pace, lack of action, no subtitles when needed, an overuse of devices like narration and background chorus, and Dennis Weaver going full hick accent with his country boy role. Positives include the aforementioned Cagney turn and a sincerity that I can't help but respect. You can tell they (Montgomery, Cagney, et al.) really wanted to make a great film about a man they admired. It's not a movie that I will ever watch again, but I can certainly see the appeal for many others.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A leadership tutorial masterpiece!
lfarrington-122 April 2006
This film is a leadership tutorial masterpiece. As a substitute high school math and science teacher, I have run this to conduct leadership laboratories. Additionally, the theme composition that opens the film is marvelous. I have tried to reconstruct the lyrics (had trouble understanding last verse lyrics) so that I could present the composition for adoption by the U. S. Naval Academy Mens' Chorus. Any help along these lines would be appreciated. I have attempted to locate survivors of Ward Costello, its composer, without success...for any necessary permission.

The most memorable scene is between Halsey (Cagney) and the candidate of air group commander (Richard Jaekel), when Jaekel says, "I thought I was alone." Cagney replies, "You were and you always will be."
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not a typical war movie
donwords28 April 2017
A look at the senior officers in Halsey's fleet and under his command. However, it was strangely uninvolving, since we knew that the U.S. won the war, won the battle for Guadalcanal, and that Halsey survived the war and retired a four star admiral. What almost ruined the movie for me was the too reverent chorus that played throughout the movie, which would have more suitable in a movie about Jesus Christ or one of the saints. The wa wa chorus was actually intrusive at times and I found myself grimacing when it started up.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Good Movie, Bad History
jkemc26 October 2017
This movie, produced by Robert Montgomery, a navy veteran of WW2 who acted in the excellent film "They Were Expendable," is a fine story; but it just is not true. It conflates several battles into one, a not too terrible violation of the real history; but then moves the killing of Adm. Yamamoto six months earlier than it actually happened. I love Cagney, and he does well in this film, but it is all in the service of a lie. Watch this film for entertainment, and for the very effective voice-overs when new characters are introduced, describing their civilian careers and their ultimate end: dead, wounded, or survivor. The music is very good, too. STILL, THE MOVIE IS A LIE!!!!!!
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A good Cagney movie that could have been far better
burgbob97516 October 2002
An unexpected *little* film from James Cagney. No snappy dancing, no slapping dames and bartenders around, no grapefruit saying hello to your face, no weird little body dance with the hitching up of pants, hunching the shoulders or snapping of fingers. No strutting or shooting locomotive engineers, no `Made it, Ma! Top of the World!.' Not even a glimpse of the old and much loved Warner Brothers logo for that matter.

In The Gallant Hours, Cagney, normally a smorgasbord of tics, sideways delights, raw energy, menace, and American good-guyism, does the least expected thing: he strips himself of all his familiar trademarks and instead delivers the most restrained, internalized, uncagneylike performance we've ever seen. Too bad it's a one-dimensional misrepresentation of the man he's playing---the crusty, bushy-eyed Fleet Admiral William F. *Bull* Halsey. But more about that in a minute.

Shot in black and white in semi-documentary style, The Gallant Hours is a low-budget, bare-bones, *cameo* production that doesn't attempt either the wide scope or the heroics of such better-known war films as Flying Fortress, Wake Island or Bataan. Instead, the film tightly focuses on the series of crucial, life-and-death decisions made by Admiral Halsey as he directs the desperate struggle in 1942 for possession of Guadalcanal, after it was discovered that the Japanese were building an airfield there from which they could launch attacks on Australia.

Produced and directed by actor and former naval officer Robert Montgomery, the film is a melange of the good, the bad, and the indifferent. The Gallant Hours has its moments, beginning auspiciously with a memorable opening scene of a lone sailor standing high up on a ship's mast, the camera then slowly panning down to reveal the rest of the ship's company massed on deck behind Halsey, who's crisply reading out his retirement orders. This is followed by a touching and well-done scene between him and his filipino valet, the two of them recalling the bloody, extended battle for Guadalcanal, which the film then turns to in extended flashback.

In place of battle action---there is none---the movie pads itself with several lightweight scenes that are either frivolous or yawn-inducing, such as when Halsey's aides, gathered on the beach, are oohing and ahhing over the ageing Admiral's prowess in the water, and, after Halsey has rejoined them, all of them then indulgently observing Dennis Weaver (as Halsey's chief pilot, Lt. Commander Andrew Jefferson 'Andy' Lowe) romping with a group of adoring navy nurses who are all agog over Dennis's tactical maneuvers.

The picture would have benefitted from scrapping fluff like this and sticking to the business of waging war, but no, the scriptwriters instead assume we require *entertainment*---the more mindless the better---in the form of multiple scenes of Dennis Weaver pursuing tail, or---the running gag for the first third of the film---Halsey finding ways of avoiding the innoculation shots that his medical officer wants to give him. Very jolly.

The production as a whole is intensely stylized and displays a palpable mood of mournfulness and regret over the horrific sacrifice of life among the Americans and their allies, who were desperately attempting to roll back the powerful Japanese advance in the South Pacific. This atmosphere is maintained throughout the film by the use of a soaring hymn-like musical score which suggests that the war at sea was virtually a holy war by the Allied Forces to save the world from the rampaging Axis powers.

Montgomery's direction is uneven and occasionally downright lazy, as when he several times settles for using the same boring establishing shot of Halsey's flagship sitting like a stilllife in port. Maybe, just once, he could have tried something else to establish the scene? And the sight of Dennis Weaver---one of my favorite actors---made to endlessly pursue more-than-willing navy nurses for comic relief shortly becomes tedious. Deprived of the opportunity to show battle action, the scriptwriters frequently appear to be vamping, for want of anything better to do.

For anyone who's seen John Ford's magnificent, eligiac 1945 wartime drama, They Were Expendable, in which Montgomery and John Wayne had starred, it will be obvious that the concept for The Gallant Hours was strongly influenced by the earlier film. Given the chance to direct, Montgomery apparently believed that what Ford could do, *he* could do better. But where Ford had sown his film with subtle tones of sadness, defeat, and loss, Montgomery drenches The Gallant Hours with painted-on emotion, conveyed primarily by its endlessly repeated score and a narrator who crisply and regularly informs you about which onscreen marine will be dead or badly injured in battle forty-five minutes later. They Were Expendable, now recognized as one of Ford's finest films, was effective without having to repeatedly cue its audience, while The Gallant Hours finds it necessary to frequently poke us when it's time to feel sad again or to grieve over incidents that are never depicted.

None of the above, however, is as off-kilter as the picture's biggest disappointment---its highly *edited* depiction of Halsey. The scriptwriters did an outrageous disservice to the public memory of Halsey by sanitizing the admiral into a nearly flawless, one-dimensional cardboard cutout---nearly a saint. He wasn't. According to his biographers, *Bull* Halsey was a salty, aggressive, Ulysses S. Grant-type warrior who liked his liquor---at one point he was receiving a monthly ration of seventeen cases of Scotch and six of bourbon, both for himself and for the purposes of entertaining others---and whose hatred of the Japanese was legendary and who exalted in killing them in large numbers, often allowing them to drown in the sea rather than picking them up and taking them prisoner. This was a man who was famous in naval circles for once erecting a large billboard that said, `Kill Japs! Kill Japs! Kill more Japs!' This wasn't a guy who, like his Japanese counterpart, Admiral Yamamoto, spent quality time arranging flowers to look just right for snapping with his Leica. Unsurprisingly, he was capable of exhibiting a ferocious temper if provoked and had other colorful human failings as well. The men who served with and under him loved and respected him in part for his being altogether human, for being one of them.

The Gallant Hours may get away with failing to show battle action, but it rolls over and dies when it fashions an utterly false picture of this great American wartime figure as a benign plaster saint who was followed by heavenly music wherever he went. Halsey's business was killing the enemy, not serving the Host to them during the Eucharist.

As for the film's lead, admittedly it is simply not possible to watch Jimmy Cagney and not enjoy him. The guy doesn't know how *not* to be interesting. But I would much rather have seen him play one of America's greatest naval warriors with all of that individual's various human qualities intact. It would have made for a much more compelling film.
20 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Will Mainly Appeal to Sailors, Officers, War Film Buffs and Cagney Fans
verbusen6 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I'm going to buck the trend of giving this film 10 out of 10 stars. The Gallant Hours is a war film that surprisingly has few (or none) combat scenes in it. For most of its length, the film is inside Admiral "Bull" Halsey's stateroom and consists of the Admiral, played by James Cagney, discussing strategy with his staff officers and other flag officers along with some interaction between the Admiral and his Philippine enlisted personal aide. As a Navy veteran myself (enlisted, who served on a battle group staff in modern times as an enlisted aide to the officers), after watching this film I found it entertaining but also disappointing. I looked up the back-story to it and how it was made. It is from a joint production venture between Robert Montgomery (who served under Halsey in WWII but I'm not sure if on a staff level or just on one of the ships in his command) and James Cagney. Montgomery got the rights to Halsey's bio in the late 1950s with the promise that 10% of the film profits be sent to Halsey. There is a picture of Montgomery, Halsey and Cagney together from around 1959 while production was ongoing. Sadly, Admiral Halsey would pass away within a year before the film's release in 1960 (it probably helped it's box office). Information about the film online says this was a labor of love for Montgomery who knew Halsey and Cagney who looked a lot like Halsey. Here are the parts of the film I enjoyed. The Japanese officers are represented with respect and use their own language, something that was uncommon in that era of film making (though it had been done before, mainly with the German military in films). With the post war era and Japan an important ally in the Cold War, this was inevitable. I liked the attention to detail such as the Marine saluting inside the ship but not the sailors. From personal experience, that would make me wonder when I served with joint branches what I was supposed to do inside since I was in the Navy and we don't salute indoors like the Marines and Army do, I'd just salute to be on the safe side when dealing with other branches officers. There are bios of many of the characters adding to the realism that this was not fiction (although it is in part). I did like the opening of the sailors on the deck while the chorus sang the song "I knew a lad who went to sea and left the shore behind him; I knew him well; the lad was me and now I cannot find him." I joined the Navy at age 17 and was transformed after a six year enlistment that included going on two six-month long Westpac cruises. I'm sure the teenage sailors of WWII were transformed even more after being in combat. Cagney's performance was great and although the film is long, his performance made it interesting to watch scene by scene. The negatives I have for this film are its lack of actual combat dramatizations. I think this was a budgetary issue to save money, although Montgomery was known for unconventional film making (Lady in the Lake, first person viewpoint which I hated), the film could have used some actual battles in it. There is one scene showing wounded but no burials at sea, a standard scene in Navy war films and there were thousands of dead sailors and Marines during this time frame. Even without combat scenes, I think Cagney could have gotten out of that stateroom during the Battle of Savo Island and some shots of him in CIC would have helped a lot. Rather, we hear some radio chatter that seems it could be a recurring thought in his head then actual operations taking place. Despite the film being a stickler for accurate details I spotted some mistakes. At the end, Dennis Weaver's character is shown in 1945 after the war is over and he has not been promoted from the Lt. Cdr. rank he was in 1942, saluting Cagney and having no embellishments on his cap (scrambled eggs). For someone to have been in a staff position in 1942 and a fighter pilot for 3 years of war I find that hard to believe. Also, they compressed the time-line of events from 9 months to 5 weeks condensing the victory at Guadalcanal with the Yamamoto air mission which happened months after the battle was over. Some scenes of the ship Cagney is on seem to be a repair tender, not a warship. The chorus music can get repetitive as well. Also, since Montgomery considered Halsey a friend, he is portrayed statelier than in real life. They used Dennis Weaver's character to show a womanizer when it has been written that "Bull" Halsey got his nickname from his off ship exploits, not from combat, as well as him often using "salty" language on board ship like when he received the letter saying he was to take over command his actual response was, "Jesus Christ and General Jackson! This is the hottest potato they ever handed me!" Made as a tribute to Halsey during his elder years, it may have been a very different film if made after his passing. I liken watching this film to the 1976 film Midway had it been done with no combat scenes and mostly in Admiral Nimitz' (played by Henry Fonda) war planning room. Some may love it but I think it does a disservice to those who died there on the ships, sky and land, 6 of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I Knew A Lad Who Went To Sea!
nelliebell-111 March 2004
When in the days that pass this life that we live,if you happen to come upon this film keep it,view it,and know truly that this is what is meant by the golden age of Hollywood.This is not about the roaring twenties or the 1940s or in fact anything that you can touch.It is a film that involves a time when we in our resolve as a sovereignty were to be attacked by surprise and while unable to provide front line support sufficient to deter such unwarranted aggression we did what we could to figure out how to do what we had as yet been unable to do and that is stop the Japanese.Our military history will recognize that the defense of Guadalcanal will be recognized as a perimeter that was held and cleared at great cost.However,the ability of the Marine Corps to hold were aided by the very gallant efforts of our Navy and so many others that though Guadalcanal was the focus of our efforts,the reader might do well to look up Defense of the South Pacific.This was in fact when we started to take back what was a very high cost to relinquish.Names like battle of savo island,The straights of Iron Bottom Sound,the Solomons,The Tokyo Express,you will learn just how drama can unfold on the silver screen without running up a 300 million dollar tab.This film is about a ordinary man in Admiral William Halsey who at a very critical time in our efforts in the South Pacific took command of our defenses and in a matter of speaking light a fire and proceeded to defend and ultimately defeat the aggression of a dangerous and superior force in the Japanese.This film is not to go past when you come to it.I am personally pleased that where I was a youngster when I first viewed this very fine film, fortunately it has been made available through videotape(VHS)and maybe those that know better would know that these are the films we truly care for.This is in defense of the Gallant Hours, it would do well as a fine package in Digital Versatile Disc.I do not think you can do any better a movie than The Gallant Hours.I can not recommend a picture any more highly than I than this film.A moving tribute to a very ordinary man who said that he would get the credit for the work that was started by others.A worthy movie going experience.It might be well to know that there are subtle ways by which this movie becomes a picture worth saving and it is emphasized in the following words,"I knew a lad who went to sea and left the shore behind him,the lad was me and now I can not find him.Away,away,away he went and left the shore behind him."A do not miss.Sincerely
40 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Takes way more than one viewing to grasp the impact of everything happening.
mark.waltz5 October 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know if I'll ever get back to it for a second watch, but I grasped what I could in this profile of Fleet Adm. William F. Halsey Jr., played by James Cagney as he was preparing to retire himself. It's ironic that the opening scene has Halsey preparing to retreat to his cabin to change into civilian clothes. Soft spoken and attentive, he is beloved and gives talks to his men-in groups, one on one and treating everyone of them like they matter. This is Cagney at his most subtle, and at times, I wanted to reach through the screen to grab a hug: from the fictional version of the character, from the actor, and from the spirits of both men who gave so much of themselves. Since the real Halsey had died the previous year, there was a legend surrounding his life, so it makes sense that they cut out anything that would make him seem anything less than a perfect leader of the U.S. military.

One special moment comes in my memory of James Cagney when he was alive: being introduced for a profile in "A Night of 100 Stars". Cagney seemed to be in tears as he accepted this honor, not saying a word, but realizing the impact he made on the world of film. That honor is felt here for Halsey, whether getting bad news about his own son, submitting to shots reluctantly as part of a promise to his departing aide (Dennis Weaver), and sharing the harsh realities of war with an underling he hoped to raise in rank who blamed himself for the loss of nine planes. Cagney takes those nine planes on, adds on ships, submarines and land troops onto his own list of regretful losses.

The story surrounds his command of Guadalcanal, so there's plenty of detail to be dramatized and documented in two hours. Through the narration of director Robert Montgomery, dozens of other officials, both enemy and ally, are introduced. But as taxing as it is to remember them all, when the camera is on Cagney, there's an invisible halo shining on him with the haunting music that practically proclaims Halsey's sainthood, which from what I've read was a total contrast to how he is portrayed here. Cagney just makes all this hero worship tolerable, and I felt myself falling into the pattern of feeling like I was among the truly divine men I knew really nothing of. Maybe one day, we'll get the truth, but for how, this sanitized portrayal will have to do.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Lessons in Leadership
digger-58-69343919 July 2014
As a retired Marine Colonel, I have to say this movie contains one of the best lessons in leadership a movie could ever offer. Richard Jaeckel as (LCDR Webb) comes to ADM Halsey's (Cagney) state room to tell him he doesn't want command of his squadron because of the planes shot down that day and the men killed including its' commanding officer because he doesn't want the responsibility. Halsey explains as commander, he lost the same C.O. plus two destroyers and several hundred other men and he's not resigning. Along with the movie "Twelve O'Clock High" - "The Gallant Hours" is a great lesson in leadership because the commanders fore the men under their command to take stock of both the situation as well as their responsibilities.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good Study in Leadership w/ Cagney as Adm. Halsey
alfiefamily21 December 2006
Warning: Spoilers
"The Gallant Hours" despite being a film that takes place in and around the battles of Guadalcanal, is not a "war" movie. You hear the sounds of battle and the effects, but you are never taken into the battle field. The film becomes more of a lesson in leadership, and comradery. And while this is a very moving and thoughtful picture, it is also a film that is, at times, rather dull.

Cagney does a wonderful job as Admiral Halsey. He gives a very measured, thoughtful performance. But being so thoughtful and measured is not always very interesting. Still he does a great job of being the pictures focal point, and holding it together.

While the story is told in a semi-documentary style, I did not like the way that the narrative told you what each person was thinking, especially from the Japanese point of view. I would have found it more enjoyable to have subtitles, and hear the emotion from the Japanese perspective.

"The Gallant Hours" is not a great film, and it will not be for those that revel in the typical "blood and glory", John Ford type of film. And those who prefer to see a more mannered Cagney may have a hard time adjusting to his reserved performance here. Still, it is an interesting film and should be seen.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A study of the character of command
johnmcd712 February 2007
A war film without action makes this picture almost unique. The message is that wars are fought with character as much as gun fire. Cagney's performance is subtle and deeply felt. One scene in particular in the final half hour should be watched carefully: a 45-second shot of Cagney sitting at his desk with a cup of coffee as the consequences of his decision run through his mind in the form of off-screen battle sounds. The camera patiently draws in on his face, as his expression grown more grim. Cagney's expression and eyes have a power that burns through the screen like a magnificent still life summing up the enormous responsibility of command. Also, the choral music throughout adds a great weight and sense of secular reverence to the tone of the film. In a way, "Gallant Hours" is comparable to "Command Decision," in that it takes us, as one other viewer put it, behind the scenes of battle.
13 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
" When you're in command. . . Command "
thinker16912 March 2009
From the many stories of World War Two and from the archives of the Navy, comes this sentimental story of William Halsey. It purports to relay the finally months of the distinguished admiral. Told in semi-documentary style, the admiral recalls his most important memories of the war. Despite the fact that he dwells on the famous battle of Guadalcanal, it depicts how straining his command really was and the toll it took on him. However, the movie unfortunately centered on the admiral and not on the tremendous suffering of his men and his staff. True it mentioned their participation, but not on their combined loss. Further, the movie could have used it cinematic power to reveal the over all sacrifices the men made. The selection of James Cagney as Admiral William Halsey was a stroke of good fortune as were the selection of the other members of the cast. Here we have Dennis Weaver, Ward Costello and Richard Jaeckel as Commander Webb. Overall, this is a fine film, but reservation is made concerning the naval tribute given to Halsey, when such honor belongs to the departed. **
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Venit, Videt, Vincit
atlasmb28 June 2019
Admiral William "Bull" Halsey (James Cagney) assumes command of military operations in the South Pacific as Japanese forces threaten to take control of Guadalcanal and, consequently, all of the South Pacific. This film has a quasi-documentary style. Much of the background music is handled by a chorus, creating a tenor of reverence and solemnity, which is appropriate given the magnitude and significance of every decision made during the critical days of Halsey's new command.

Voice-overs provide background information for many of the historic actors in this real-life drama, both American and Japanese. By portraying the human sides of the conflict, it provides a behind-the-scenes look into the battle of wits and personalities that lay behind troop actions and the movements of warships and planes.

Halsey is demonstrated to be the right man at the right time, with his outside-the-box thinking that allows him to garner respect from the men under his command and to achieve results that beat the odds. His style, which can be seen as a version of "management by walking around", allows him insights with more depth than can be ascertained through official communications.

What this film does very well is to demonstrate the profound impact that individuals, psychological factors, and single events can have on outcomes. It is often said that a superior individual can sometimes achieve results superior to those of a syndicate or committee. In Halsey, we see the personification of that principle. It's a real joy to gain a glimpse into the psyches of the men who were involved in this critical conflict. Most war films are about battles and results, but this film helps one understand motivations and decision-making behind the actions.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
war movie without the action
SnoopyStyle27 August 2017
Fleet Adm. William F. Halsey Jr. (James Cagney) takes over as Guadalcanal heats up. He faces the Japanese forces at the height of their power under the command of Yamamoto.

The intriguing aspect of this war movie is the lack of action scenes. This is unique among big American war movies. There is plenty of military hardware but the whiz bang has been left off-screen. The Japanese characters speak without subtitles. There is a constant narration throughout the movie. The overall effect is an air of authenticity. There are some lighter moments which may be ill-advised. This movie does better concentrating on the details of the events and planning but it needs a consistent map showing the units involved. I like the general idea if not always the result.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Surely the most boring war movie of all time
How did this movie ever get made? Did somebody at a studio owe Robert Montgomery a favor? By 1960 Halsey's reputation had been under fire for more than a decade already. Did his death prompt somebody in the Navy to fund this whitewash? I've seen personal hygiene films that had more dramatic tension. Between the drone of engines and the drone of the male chorus, this movie could be prescribed by doctors as an insomnia cure.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed