28 minuti per 3 milioni di dollari (1967) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I like a good 60s-era Euro-heist film.
bensonmum221 January 2018
Jacques (Richard Harrison) is hired to steal a diamond worth $3 million. He puts together a crew - you know, an electronics expert, a safe guy, etc - the usual assortment of characters you'd put together to steal a heavily guarded, valuable diamond. Through all of their planning, Jacques and the others determine that once inside, they'll have 28 minutes (hence the title) to get the diamond and get out. Can they do it?

I like a good 60s-era Euro-heist film. 28 Minutes for 3 Million Dollars, while nowhere near as good as something like Grand Slam or some others I've seen, is a decent enough example of the genre. The plan to steal the diamond isn't as elaborate or as "serious" as some other heist films I"ve seen, but there's enough here to make it enjoyable. Taking a nod no doubt from the granddaddy of heist films, Rififi, much of the actual heist is carried out in complete silence. A nice touch. A little more drama from an inquisitive guard, for example, would have created some additional badly needed tension and a better overall film. The ending is a bit silly, but what do you expect? These guys never get away with it.

Over the past few years, I've really come to enjoy Richard Harrison, When you get him away from Sword and Sandal films, he's got a flair about him that works in the more modern settings. He's in good form here and is easily the star of the movie. The rest of the cast is workmanlike at best with no one really standing out.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
And ninety minutes of good entertainment
searchanddestroy-119 August 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I expected worse from this unknown Italian heist movie from the sixties. Yes folks, it is a typically 60's product, set at first on the french Riviera, where a billionaire hires a professional thief to rob the great Mogol jewel diamond, in Rome, where it is heavily guarded.

The almost entire movie focuses on the preparation and heist itself. We of course think of two Jules Dassin's masterpieces: RIFIFI and TOPKAPI. When we see our thieves testing the alarm system on a safe, the same kind of the one they will have to deal with further in the story. And during the robbery itself, there is no talk at all between our leads. Like in RIFIFI, remember... It is not a noir feature as RIFIFI, but with a little lightness and humor. Like the sequence where the robbers, when leaving the safe room they cracked, answer to a phone ringing where a guard asks to one of his colleagues - he thinks on his duty and not tie up by the hoods - to help him with his crosswords enigma: how many words for those who are as silent as cats where they get away, in seven words. The thief who takes the phone and answers to the question, impersonating the guard tied up, says: ROBBERS. Ah Ah Ah Ah. Very funny isn't it?

The very ending is exquisite, in the perfect mood for this era.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed