Claws (1977) Poster

(1977)

User Reviews

Review this title
24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
The Moby Dick of Bear Flicks!
saraphin13 October 1998
Notable for it gratuitous use of flashbacks, even by 70's standards. This is a pure drive-in flick, the one your parents didn't want to stay awake for, so they drove home halfway through it. Right off the bat, you're introduced to bad stock footage, interesting color changes during scenes, and a so-called SATAN BEAR! Cheezy and vaguely energetic enough to be funny for awhile, halfway through it begins to lull the mind into a satisfying sleep. However, impressionable young minds might actually be frightened by this flick, since getting mauled by a rogue bear during a boy-scout outing is actually quite a plausable fear; as opposed to, say, getting mauled by Bigfoot...

But that's a different movie.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Undistinguished Alaskan-shot bear attack movie
Leofwine_draca6 May 2016
CLAWS is another grizzly bear attack horror film, packed with footage of a grizzly going on the rampage and butchering a number of innocent folk. It was recently shown on TV here in the UK to tie in to the cinema release of THE REVENANT, along with NIGHT OF THE GRIZZLY. This low budget effort is the worse film of the two, thanks to a very undistinguished execution. There's virtually no characterisation, no attempts at suspense, just a lot of repetitive scenes instead.

The whole film feels sluggish and rather dull despite the proliferation of outdoor nature footage (the movie was shot in Alaska). I appreciate that a real bear was used for many of the shots, but the whole thing is directed in such a matter-of-fact way that it gets rather boring very quickly. The one point at which things do get exciting is at the over-the-top climax, but by then it's too little, too late.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jason and the Devil Bear
Chase_Witherspoon6 April 2015
If "Grizzly" was the B-grade answer to "Jaws", then "Claws" in my opinion, is the next generation answer to "Grizzly". Despite a top- notch cast (Evers, Aames, Caruso, Young & Healey), "Claws" lacks the technical expertise William Girdler displayed in conjuring his spin-off, the bear attacks and aftermath here, a lot less bloody and realistic.

The acting of the veterans isn't bad at all, though Evers does at times seem more than a little self-righteous as he mentally deteriorates years after being attacked by what has now become the local folklore of "Devil Bear". Estranged from his wife & son due to his obsession with locating and killing "Devil Bear", Evers teeters on the brink of insanity, until, "Devil Bear" appears again to wreak havoc and give Evers the chance to avenge the livelihood he lost when his hand was crippled years before (he was a lumberjack by trade, until "Devil Bear" tossed him around like a rag doll).

Clichéd and overly intense, "Claws" reminds me of "Snowbeast" both in terms of tone and production quality, it's a very distant standard to Girdler's "Grizzly" despite the obvious homage. Both Aames and Caruso have reasonably good dialogue and deliver earnest, watchable performances - I couldn't really say the same for Layton nor Sipes who both look decidedly amateurish by comparison. As aforesaid, I'm not sure who's more dangerous, "Devil Bear" or Jason Evers' maniacal stare.

The slow-motion climax was a bit absurd and Evers' supposedly crippled hand seems to make a miraculous resurrection, but otherwise, it's what you'd expect in a film of this genre, but firmly on the C-scale.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
See "Grizzly" instead
lazarillo15 November 2004
A lot of people confuse this movie with "Grizzly". "Grizzly" has Christopher George AND Andrew Prine AND Richard Jaekl AND a female park ranger who decides to take time out from hunting an 18-foot killer grizzly bear to strip off all her clothes and take an impromptu shower in a waterfall (guess what happens?). "Claws" has none of these things, just a lot of travelogue footage of the Alaskan wilderness and some Native American nonsense about a "spirit bear". Neither movie is particularly scary. They both contain a lot shots of a disembodied bear paw flying through air, lopping off heads and limbs edited together with close-ups of the face of a real bear who looks only mildly annoyed. There is one pretty good scene where the bear menaces a boy scout camp, but it's only good because it's dark and you can't really see the bear. Actually, you can't see a lot of things in the very murky existing prints of this hard-to-find movie. It probably doesn't merit a DVD resurrection, however, because I have a feeling that what you can't see would still suck. "Grizzly" is so bad it's good; "Claws" is just bad.
9 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not so great
QueenoftheGoons23 March 2021
Grizzly from 1976 is the best of the best. But Dad talked about this movie the night before he died so i had to search it out. i found it on DVD on Amazon last summer. I like Jason Evers, and Myrton but it really wasn't that good. i love killer creature flicks, esp bears. But this one is not worth the trouble. i won't get rid of it, but it was really disappointing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Was this an Alaskan tourism promotional video or a blatant rip-off of Jaws (SPOILERS)
edeighton21 October 2021
Warning: Spoilers
My review of Claws (1977)

This movie was filmed in Juneau Alaska by Alaska Pictures Production Company. The Producer, Chuck D. Keen also wrote the script, was the chief cinematographer and also performed stunts in the film along with his brother Michael Keen. Keen lovingly shoots gorgeous images of the Alaskan wildlife and this part of the movie is on par with some of the classic 1960's Disney nature documentaries. Some of the footage of the bears fighting with each other had to be dangerous to capture as it appears that one of the bears banged into the cameraman during the fight. The rest of the film though is marred by a cast of mostly inexperienced amateurs. Some of the actors for the major roles would have been familiar to the 1977 audience as frequent one-shot actors for popular television shows. But, the only actor that was in anything relevant to me was Myron Healy who played the Sheriff in this movie and then about five years later played a minor character, anthropologist Arch Quinton, in the 1983 NBC mini-series "V".

Released just two years after the Steven Spielberg block-buster Jaws, the producers of Claws attempted to translate the man-meets-deadly-animal theme to Alaska. The names of the movies are not the only comparison to be made. Both movies feature scenes where college scientist come into town with fancy equipment and underestimate the danger of the wild beast. Both films feature anxious public officials trying to keep the panic level down in the face of sensational journalists. Both films feature animals that seem to have anthropomorphic intelligence and reactions to the heroes' attempts to hunt them down. While there are many more comparisons to be drawn, the one I found most striking was the way both the beasts in Jaws and Claws essentially blew themselves up after attacking inanimate objects containing highly flammable fuel that were then ignited by the heroes' gun shots. Shockingly, this was the second movie made by an independent production company that attempted to rip-off the Jaws formula with a killer bear. In 1976 the movie Grizzly became a $39 million dollar success with the tagline "The most dangerous jaws in the land". In fact, Claws was released in some countries as Grizzly 2, even though Claws was not a sequel to Grizzly. So Claws is an attempt to mimic Grizzly which was in and of itself a rip-off of Jaws.

This movie does do a little better job than Jaws explaining why this wild animal is so different. It's not just a bear but a malignant Indian spirit known as the "Quistica" or "Kustaka" or "Kooshdakhaaor" or in this movie simply called "Devil Bear"". There actually is a native Alaskan myth involving a a cross between a man and an otter ("Kustaka" = "land otter man") that is either helpful or preys on the lost; tricking them to their death . The writer of this movie, Chuck D. Keen, seems to have converted that myth into a bear man. Native Alaskan mysticism is further utilized in the script by the guide, Henry's, hallucinations. I wondered whether the images of the two rams butting heads was intentionally symbolic of Jason and Howard's competition for Christine's affection.

One of the major disappointments of this film was the inconsistent script. It is filled with weird plot holes and ineffective story devices. To name a few: * Howard is not really a bad guy. He tried to protect the boy scouts at the campfire from the bear. He seems to genuinely care about Christine and her young son, Buck, and have their best interests at heart. That is why it is so shocking when after he dies in the woods, Howard is never spoken of again for the rest of the movie and Christine quickly moves on to tongues swabbing Jason's mouth.

*Jason Evers makes such a big deal early in the film about how the bear maimed him and caused him to lose function in one of his arms (which has caused him issues with his logging business), yet later in the movie both arms seem fine and fully functional.

* I visited Alaska, so I know that prices there are expensive because everything is shipped there from the mainland, but still the prices quoted in this 1977 film seem awfully high. $5000 to shoot a bear? $15,000.00 for an old beaten up Truck?

* Are we supposed to believe that the Bear after attacking and killing the college scientists and the hunting guide managed to hang the dead black scientist upside down from the rafters of the cabin and prop the door partially open so that the dead black scientists' body would drop down booby trap-style when someone opens the door to the cabin?

* I thought the movie had way too many flashbacks. Immediately after Jason Evers is attacked by the bear, the picture cuts ahead five years, and shows us news wire service stories showing that the "Devil Bear" continues to kill. This clumsy time jump fragments the story and forces the writer to employ flashbacks to tell the backstories for the main characters. There has to be a better way to tell this story than to continuously flash back to years earlier.

* This movie appears to have been made with the intention of getting a PG rating, yet features one of the dirtiest bits of dialogue in any PG movie from the 1970's: Jason: "I don't owe you no favors, and I aint your son old man" Ben the Forest Commissioner: "No but you could have been, your old man and I came up to this country together. We jizz-balled all over hell and back" Does this mean that the old Ben banged Jason's Mom? Is that what he is trying to tell Jason?

*Chris could not manage to pull the trigger in the very slow motion climax. Somehow, Jason pulls himself up from the ledge (with one functional arm) and grabs the flare gun and ignites the gasoline soaked bear, all before the bear can kill Chris after he knocks her down.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Scared me as a kid
seandr28 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
When I was 9 years old our den leader took our cub scout troop to see this movie in the theater. I was pretty terrified by it, and I couldn't sleep alone for a couple of years afterward.

I can vividly recall some of the scary scenes. The bear dragging away a cub scout in a sleeping bag, his bloody hand sticking out of the back. Someone opens the door to a cabin and a bloody body falls down on them. The bear coming through a wall. The bear taking off a horses head. A man climbs a tree to escape the bear, but the bear knocks the tree down and gets him.

I'd really like to see this movie again as an adult given how it traumatized me as a kid.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Hey man I'm a rock singer, not Walt Disney!" - Capt. Nemo and his all girl band!
poolandrews29 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Claws is set in the Alaskan wilderness & opens to a red tinted shot of a Grizzly Bear walking around a bit, as the credits roll. Then we see two Grizzly Bears fighting each other as three big game hunters look on. They try to shoot one of the Bears but only succeed in wounding it, all three decide to split. Meanwhile, further down the road a logger named Jason Monroe (Jason Evers) & his wife Chris (Carla Layton) are heading back home in their truck when the radiator breaks. While attempting to walk back to town Jason is attacked by the wounded out-of-control Grizzly & although he survives the attack is badly injured. Claws then has a few paragraphs of text that appear "Admiralty, Alaska July 27. Local logger seriously mauled by rampaging Grizzly Bear near this community. Bear believed wounded by un-identified hunters." Then "September 2. State surveying party attacked by Grizzly Bear. Two killed one seriously injured. Reports confirmed after being wounded, giant Grizzly turns rogue killer" appears." Even more text flashes up on screen "November 14. two hikers killed by Devil Bear near this Alaskan community yesterday. Tracks of rogue killer disappear in fresh snow below Devils Paw mountain. Hunt called off." Finally "5 years later. Admiralty Alaska, again stunned by savage Bear attacks. Local logger says Satan Bear has returned to this community" appears & we can get on with the film proper! Jason Monroe still has nightmares about the day he was attacked, an attack that meant he could no longer continue his job, it also cost him his marriage & young son Buck (Buck Monroe, which means this kids real name is exactly the same as his characters!). Local scout leader Howard Lockhart (Glenn Sipes) is taking his teams of boys for a weekend of camping in the Alaskan forests. They are attacked by the Grizzly and Buck is badly mauled. The forest commissioner Ben Jones (Leon Ames) sets up a posse of men to try & track the Grizzly down, including Gil (Wayne Lonacre), Marshall (Bill Ratcliffe) & a guy named Virgil who was sadly left off the credits I'm afraid, who all think they can trap the Grizzly in a special cage. They fail & are killed by the Grizzly in the process. Since the Grizzly mauled his son Jason now feels even more anger, hate & bitterness towards the Grizzly & decides to go after it himself when all attempts to find it & stop it fail. Along with Ben who also feels responsible, Howard who funnily enough also has a grudge towards the Grizzly & an old Indian guy named Henry Chico (Anthony Caruso) who, yeah you guessed it, has personal reasons for going too, Jason sets out to kill the Grizzly killer once & for all (and make everyone's personal problems just disappear)! Directed by Richard Bansbach & R.E. Pierson Claws is a sorry excuse for a film. The script by cinematographer & producer Chuck D. Keen & Brian Russell is as boring, as clichéd & as padded out with unnecessary scenes as you would expect a cheap no-budget Jaws cash-in to contain. Claws has it's fair share of melodramatics between the dull characters & even relies on heavy flashbacks to expand upon these unnecessary sub-plots. The Grizzly Bear & it's potential victims are virtually never in the same shot, this makes for some very awkward looking attack sequences of which there aren't many anyway. And the dull as dishwater ending is mostly in slow-motion which becomes incredibly annoying. There's no blood or gore either so forget about that. On a technical level Claws is very poor, editing, lighting, continuity, acting, direction & production values throughout are certainly nothing to praise. One thing I will praise in Claws though is the cinematography by writer Chuck D. Keen it captures some of the beautiful untouched Alaskan wilderness extremely well, unfortunately this has the effect of the viewer thinking their watching some sort of nature programme rather than a horror film! Every other shot seems to be of an animal, tree or Alaskan landscape. Claws as a horror film fails to generate any atmosphere, scares, excitement, originality or memorable sequences. Definitely one to avoid unless you want to sit through 90 odd minutes of travelogue footage of Alaskan mountains & forests, which I most certainly don't!
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Eco/Emo-Horror
Coventry1 March 2009
Since William Girdler's "Grizzly" supposedly was a shameless rip-off of "Jaws" (at least according to a lot of reviewers disliking the movie), then I guess this is an even more shameless rip-off of an already shameless rip-off and thus the ultimate rip-off of "Jaws"? Whatever! Let them say what they want. I usually enjoy these typically 70's and enormously cheesy "animals revolting" movies very much and even found a handful of redeeming elements in "Claws"! That certainly wasn't an easy thing to do, as this film is really poor and amateurishly put together. Basically speaking, a killer animal flick doesn't need a brilliant or flawless scenario in order to be entertaining, but it looks as if the makers deliberately tried to sabotage their own film with their continuous and inappropriate use of pointless flashbacks, dreadful clichés and irrelevant vendettas between dull main characters. There's an ordinary grizzly bear – perhaps a little bit over-sized, but still a normal bear – on the rampage deep in the Alaskan woods, but for some reason the plot insists to convince us it's not just a bear but a malignant Indian spirit known as the "Quistica". Consequently one of the supportive characters is an old Indian mumbling inaudible stuff all the time and having kooky hallucinations, whereas the story should be focusing on savage grizzly bear attacks instead! During the fairly good and atmospherically shot opening sequences, we witness how a trio of hunters illegally wound a gigantic bear but fail to put him down completely. The raged animal promptly attacks woodchopper Jason Monroe and terrorizes the woods for the following five years. When the bear beastly interrupts a boy scout camping party attended by Jason's son and his ex-wife's new fiancée, he decides to put together a hunting party to destroy the bear once and for all. Although nobody is likely to care or even sympathize with any of the lead characters, the film obtrudes their love lives to us through insufferable flashbacks. Worst of all is that these flashbacks serve absolutely no purpose and merely just count as filler and to make us care for the familial situation of the characters. That is called Emo(tion)-TV and really doesn't mix well with horror. The hunter has flashbacks about how he fell in love with his wife and then lost her, the wife has a flashback how she left her husband, the new lover has a flashback how he gradually stole the wife's heart and the annoying kid has a flashback of the time his parents were still happily together. I swear, at a certain point I was afraid that even the bear would have a flashback about the times he was carelessly swooping fish out of the river, or something. During the second half of the film, the lousy flashbacks are slowly being replaced with lousy gibberish about Indian mythology and brotherhood speeches. The bear attacks are okay, but not as virulent and exploitative as in the aforementioned "Grizzly" and the wildlife tableaux are occasionally enchanting to look at. The climax is exciting but unfortunately not exciting enough to make you forget the overall dullness of the script and the atrocity of the dialogs. Furthermore, "Claws" also suffers from terrible performances and inept direction, so unless you have an incredibly high level of tolerance for 70's eco-horror/killer-animal flicks, you probably shouldn't search for this puppy.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not bad,if you enjoyed "Grizzly".
HumanoidOfFlesh27 October 2003
When a giant,killer grizzly bear terrorizes the countryside three men go on a dangerous hunting mission to bring it down."Claws" is not as good as "Grizzly"(1976)-in fact it's pretty dull at times.There is no gore to speak of and no suspense.The photography of Alaska wilderness is outstanding.The acting is pretty good and the climax is fairly exciting.Still the special effects are not too hot."Claws" is tough to find,but if you liked "Grizzly" give this one a look.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Claws
Scarecrow-8813 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A logger's life is turned upside down after encountering an enraged grizzly bear, wounded by big game hunters, leaving him with a bum arm and bad marriage. The bear continues a rampage attacking any human it comes in contact with, Jason(Jason Evers) remaining haunted by nightmares, unable, though, to leave the wilderness, a place that has always been his home. When his son, Buck, is viciously attacked by the "devil bear" while on a camping trip with mom's new boyfriend, Jason will brave the wilds of the Alaskan wilderness with one goal in mind and that is getting revenge. When an attempt to capture the bear fail(..the bear outsmarts two scientists and a hunter with tracking devices), Jason will be accompanied by Forest Commish Ben Jones(Leon Ames), old Indian pal Henry(Anthony Caruso), and his ex-wife's new boyfriend Howard(Glenn Sipes) on the grand trek through the woods and up mountains to seek out and destroy the bear once and for all. The movie shows how the bear seems wiser and more cunning than those hunting him, often surprising victims from behind, with them unable to defend themselves. Bullets upon bullets are fired into the bear and, despite it's size, those after it lose him multiple times. A good bulk of the film has the four hunters into the wilderness, and the pace drags quite a bit, not to mention, the attacks are few and far between. It's also really difficult shooting an effective scene where a man and bear are at war, because of the danger involved, while trying to prevent any harm to animals in the process..so many scenes where a bear and man are trying to find each other, they are heavily edited with repetitive images(..of the bear mostly)replayed over and over. There are some good jump scenes where a victim believes the bear is not nearby, only to be startled as it carries them off-screen. There's emphasis on the struggling relations between Jason and his wife Chris(Carla Layton)due to the overwhelming thundercloud of the bear's presence hanging over them. A little too overlong(..there's a decent 85 minute movie here, padded longer than need be)with little real action. Try GRIZZLY instead.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A interesting varient on Jaws
jongruner19 October 2003
Okay, this movie was only ever made to cash in on the huge hit Jaws, it's name alone makes this very clear. But for those who haven't seen this seventies rarity, I highly recommend it.

I was surprised to find that a similar Bear flick called Grizzly got a DVD release in the states and this did not, but who knows, with the absence of a decent DVD back cataloque worldwide, no doubt someone somewhere will by up the rights and put it on general release again.

If you can catch this on TV like I have may times, make sure you watch it, it's not scary, but very enjoyable!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This is one especially clawsome 1970s monster movie!
Weirdling_Wolf2 May 2022
A rampaging outsized Grizzly bear goes on a seemingly unstoppable kill frenzy in the vast unforgiving mountainous expanses of Alaska after skeevey opportunistic poachers fail to bring him down. While 'Claws' is not quite as monstrously great as William Girdler's 'Grizzly', the fun, cannily stock-footage-laden, fuzzy-headed 'Claws' is an amiable enough 'Jaws' cash-in, with the elephantine, blood-hungry bear soon being regarded as an altogether more malevolent entity, an ancient vengeful evil named 'Kush-Ta-Kah', and it will take likeable character actor Jason 'The Brain That Wouldn't Die' Evers enviable ability to charismatically channel Armand Assante and Sly Stallone at the same time in order to heroically slay the titanically toothsome terror which has caused him so much personal tragedy.

A mystically marauding bear with beady Baphomet eyes that eerily leaves no tracks, unless it wants to, can out-think hokey analogue tracking tech, and, to be fair, it also has a wickedly murderous knack for unleashing a supernaturally silent, super-deadly side tackle! On a more personal note, I would have appreciated a wee bit more of Myron Healey, being one of the enigmatic cinematic heavies, but full marks are due to music maestros Gene Kaver and Douglas lackey for their atmospheric, splendidly effective score! I could well be in the minority here, but, for me at least, this is one especially clawsome 1970s monster movie that unequivocally proves that bears do far more than just sheet in the woods! Grindhouse fans may care to note that 'Claws' co-director Robert E. Pearson was also the memorably majestic skeezer in Stu Segall's iconic slasher grunge-fest 'Drive-In Massacre'. Right on!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Claws
BandSAboutMovies6 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Just like Grizzly, Claws knows that it's Jaws and goes for it.

It was also released in Canada and Mexico as Grizzly 2, but it's not a sequel.

It was also called Fauces, which means Jaws, in Spain.

A bunch of poachers come to Alaska and decide that they want to hunt a grizzly bear. They should have killed it, but no, they just wound it instead. Now the bear wants revenge - yes, this time it's personal - and it goes all in on bear-on-human violence.

Only hunter Jason Monroe (Jason Evers) and an Alaskan named Henry (Anthony Caruso) can stop this wild beast. But do we want that? Humanity has it coming. Even if the bear once attacked Monroe, I'm always going to be on the side of the bear.

I mean, they call it the Satan Bear. I'm not sure I could love this bear any more than I do.

Jason has gone a little Ahab on this whole thing and his obsession with the bear has caused his wife Chris (Carla Layton) to leave him and start sleeping with their son Bucky's (Buck Monroe) Boy Scout leader Howard (Glenn Sipes), which is the ultimate slap in the face to a rugged outdoorsman like Jason. There are a ton of flashbacks to better days, but do we care? No. Would we rather watch the bear kill a sheriff and some scientists dumb enough to think their inventions could stop nature's perfect land-based predator? Yes.

By the end, Jason, Henry, Howard and forest commissioner Ben Chase (Leon Ames) are in the woods, putting their lives on the line and man, Jason has to be conflicted here, what with trying to kill the animal that has ruined his life and having to save the life of the man who is balls deep in his estranged wife when he's not galavanting through his woods.

This was directed by Richard Bansbach (who did the editing on the American opening of Terror of Mechagodzilla) and Robert E. Pearson with a script by Chuck D. Keen (who was also the cinematographer and he made a lot of outdoor bear-related movies such as Challenge to Be Free, The Timber Tramps and Joniko and the Kush Ta Ka) and Brian Russell (The Annihilators, Beyond Death's Door).

Honestly, it makes Grizzly look big budget, but I'm all for animal attack movies. It doesn't matter how much it costs, I'm here for the body count.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What kind of movie is this?
kita11723 July 2003
This movie is not a good killer grizzly movie. I just don't know why they also call it Devil Bear because it is not scary enough to be called that. The movie is very dark. Sometimes you can't see certain things and the sound in the movie is bad. Most of all, the movie is boring. 2.5 stars out of 5 for my rating.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Routine animals-attack 70's horror
Red-Barracuda25 October 2021
Its pretty obvious where this one got its inspiration from - Claws even sounds like Jaws. After Spielberg's big fish classic became one of the ultimate blockbusters, many films followed in its wake, with tales about animals going on the rampage. This is one of the ones involving a grizzly bear. In it, a massive bear is shot by illegal hunters, instead of going off to die it instead goes completely radge and becomes a local menace for several years. This leads to a group of hunters going out to track it down - you know the drill. This one is a bit scrappy in some ways but benefits quite a bit from its on-location shooting in the Alaskan wilds.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bear Hunt
kapelusznik184 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
*****SPOILERS*** Released a year after the very successful killer bear movie "Gizzly" the film "Claws" is about a wounded grizzly bear who's been terrorizing the Northern Alaskan territory for some five years killing and wounding dozes of people in the process as well as eating them. It's mountain man and professional hunter Jason Monroe, Jason Evers, who feels responsible for the bear's , who's been nicknamed Kushtaka by the local Indian tribes, actions since he was one of the hunters who five years ago wounded him and didn't bother to track him down and finish him off for good.

Now with the bear or "Devil Bear"" as he's now called in full rampage mode Jason takes it upon himself to correct the mistake, by not killing the bear, that he made five years ago. It was when the bear attacked a boy scout troop badly mauling Jason's 12 year old son that he decided to come out of retirement, due to injuries he suffered in a bear attack, and finally finish the "Devil Bear" off. Together with Forset Commissioner Ben Jones, Leon Ames, and both Indian scout Henry Chico, Anthony Caruso, and fellow hunter Holitzer Howard , Glenn Snips, Jason goes into the mountain regions of Alaska to find the "Devil Bear" and finally put an end to his reign of terror.

****SPOILERS**** Despite it's meager budget and production values the movie "Claws" makes the most of the striking Alaskan nature scenery as well as the very effective bear attacks, done in super slow motion, that makes it more then worth watching. The final sequence with Jason and his estrange wife Chris, Carla Layton, who left him after he ended up becoming a hermit after he developed a drinking problem, in failing to put down the "Devil Bear" and being mauled by it five years ago, is as exciting as well as effective as the endings in both the movies "Jaws" and "Grizzly". And like in the movie "Jaws" it was the "Devil Bear" himself who unwittingly, by getting himself doused in gasoline, who turned out be his own worst enemy.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Danger in the forest
chris_gaskin12319 August 2004
Although I haven't seen Claws for some time, I remember it rather well. I taped this from TV in the early hours on ITV, but unfortunately I taped over it after watching it and has not been on since.

In an Alaskan forest, some hunters wound a giant grizzly bear known as the Kustaka and it then goes round killing people, including a young boy who is camping with other children. An estranged couple then go out to look for it and kill it. The man does eventually track it down in a shed and then kills it successfully.

This movie is a remake of Grizzly, which was made the year before this in 1976. I have never seen that one.

I enjoyed watching this movie and hope it comes on TV again soon.

Rating: 3 and a half stars out of 5.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Borderline bad movie but fairly enjoyable
Stevieboy6667 November 2020
A huge grizzly bear is responsible for the deaths of several people in Alaska, a team of hunters set out to kill it. Nature strikes back movies were very popular in the 1970's and the title of this one is obviously a play on the cinematic masterpiece "Jaws" (1975), though Claws is certainly not of the same calibre. One of the best things going for it is the extensive Alaskan mountain scenery, spectacular. A lot of obvious stock footage of the wildlife is used, making it somewhat cheap looking however. For most part a real bear stands in as Claws, though some of the scenes did require a man in a bear suit but to be fair these aren't too bad. There is a supernatural element, one of the hunting party is a native American who sees visions, however these may just be in his imagination as opposed to real. Some of the acting is as wooden as the many trees and the editing is sometimes very jerky. Some gore but nothing extreme. Our hunters enter a small building, Claws had beaten them to it and killed the men inside. Somehow he had hung one of the corpses upside down, I'm not sure a grizzly would do that, but it was a jump scare that would become very common in 1980's slasher movies. The film features many flashback scenes and a lot of macho talk, for example "a few well paced slugs will turn him into a rug." This does date the film but personally that doesn't bother me. Claws does have some effective horror moments but I did find myself laughing too at some scenes. More fun than horrifying.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Hey, Man! Are You Unsnapped?!"...
azathothpwiggins1 June 2021
CLAWS features an enraged grizzly bear, out to avenge the loss of its fellow grizzly to some hunters. For years thereafter, it kills its way through the local population, until a group of men decide to track it down.

BEST SCENES: #1- When a group of yahoos decide to go after the bear, who is not impressed! #2- The sheriff having his skeleton rearranged! #3- The "experts" who use an array of technological gadgets in an attempt to take the bear alive! Unfortunately, the bear doesn't feel the same way about them!

Put out in order to cash in on the popularity of the JAWS imitation craze of the 1970's, it's mostly a forgotten artifact today. In spite of its low budget and inherent cheeeze factor, it is enjoyable to watch, and the fiery finale is definitely rewatchable!...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Why do people hate this movie?
little-blackbear13 January 2013
This is possibly the only good killer bear movie of its time. Most people who review appear never to have watched it all the way through, assuming it's just a watered down Grizzly. I mean, this isn't the best movie it could have been but it is still better. They used a real bear for most scenes instead of a lousy costume and the effects are just better. It's realistic to what bear attacks are like, and why one might start killing people. Heck, even the bear is a realistic height! Everything about this movie works (well, maybe not the trippy scenes with the old man...). It came out after Grizzly but improved on everything. There is no awesome man-on-bear fights in Grizzly, the end is stupid....I really hate that movie! It gets too much hype for what is just a bad Jaws rip-off. Try out Claws before Grizzly any day.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
GRIZZLY 2
eddy-2829 June 2000
Okay CLAWS in which in GRIZZLY (1976) says that was a subtitle for the film for GRIZZLY. CLAWS is not as intense as GRIZZLY but to most people through the 70's they still think CLAWS is a true sequel to GRIZZLY. CLAWS is way different and no it is not the same story line as GRIZZLY, CLAWS is about a few hunters who are attacked by a grizzly bear and years later the bear goes on a killing spere. CLAWS is no follow up to GRIZZLY however Jason Evers does metion one of the characters in GRIZZLY Which is to believed to be Christopher George. CLAWS also has Leon Armes that late actor who died a few years later. CLAWS is a good film but I do not know who the director is, I have never heard of him before. Edward L. Montoro (Producer of GRIZZLY) later filmed a film in 1984 called GRIZZLY II THE PREDATOR that is the real unknown sequel to GRIZZLY which had Charlie Sheen and George Clooney in their big roles however the film was not released untill 1986.
3 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bruin for trouble
Like "Jaws" for the ocean, "Claws" is for the open land. Dealing with a grizzly bear wounded by poachers. Goes on a rampage attack anything that it sees. From a logger, to boy scouts, to a sheriff. It does get its revenge on the hunter that wounded it. But one of the boy scouts was the son of the logger it attacked 5 years ago.

The injury he had suffered from causing him to go over the edge.

There's a lot of footage from nature attacks that's very common. It is like a nature document gone wrong.

It's a entertaining film, but I don't want the negative criticism from those who have seen it and don't give a positive answer.

I want to say that it's good for a late night romp.

2 out of 5 stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stick with Jaws or Grizzly
Michael_Elliott30 October 2011
Claws (1977)

1/2 (out of 4)

Even Alaska decided to jump in on the JAWS craze with this rip-off, which features a killer grizzly. Just the previous year director William Girdler made GRIZZLY and wouldn't you know it, this low-budget film would be released as GRIZZLY II in some parts just to try and cash in. The story is pretty simple as a couple hunters come across two large grizzly bears fighting. They decide they'll look good on their wall so they start firing but one of the bears is just hit and runs off. At the same time a logger is walking through the woods and gets attacked. Through a text on the screen we learn that in the next five years this bear attacks and kills countless people and becomes known as the devil bear. Then our film kicks back and we see a group of men going after the bear. I'm a major sucker for these "nature attack" movies but this one here is just downright horrible. This is an incredibly cheap production and it really doesn't help when the bear is never in the same frame of the actors. Yes, many low-budget movies used editing to fool the viewer but this film isn't fooling anyone and what's even worse is how dragged out everything is. Not much makes sense in this movie including the fact that the "events" take place five years after the opening. As I previous said, we're give some text to explain what the bear has been doing but why not just show this stuff and forget this incredibly stretched out sequences that we wind up getting? The majority of the 100-minute running time has a bunch of idiots in the wood trying to track down the bear with the help of a Native American magic man. All of the scenes in the woods are just way too long and you can't help but feel as if this thing was just meant to be some sort of travelogue for Alaska and at the last second they decided to add a killer bear. The attack scenes are extremely weak with the viewer really not getting to see much. Everything usually so dark that you can't see or they just have the actors fighting with a fake bear arm coming down on them. I guess the one highlight in the film is a rather silly sequence where the bear attacks some boy scouts out camping. The performances are all rather bland and forgettable but then again so is pretty much everything else in this film. Stick with GRIZZLY instead.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed