The Wild Beasts (1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
22 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
So insane it just works
rivertam263 April 2020
Somehow PCP gets into the water supply that ends up driving the animals to attack people in this mid 80s eurotrash creature feature. Although the movie is never as fun as its concept promises. It still manages to be so utterly absurd especially when it concerns killer ballet dancer kids it's just fun and wild. What's really impressive is the real animals they used and I wonder how it all came together. The training must have been insane and I'm sure the film had some fatalities.

3.25/5
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Don't drink the water.
morrison-dylan-fan31 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
With a poll coming up on IMDbs Classic Film board for the best titles of 1984,I decided to take a look at a DVD sellers page,where I spotted a listing for what sounded like a bonkers Italian Horror movie,which led to me getting ready to go on a safari with the wild beats.

View on the film:

Inspired by an article co-writer/(along with Antonio Accolla) director Franco Prosperi read about a large supply of cocaine being hidden in the sewers of Italy,the screenplay by Prosperi & Accolla leaves anything like subtlety & depth behind,the writers instead going for an all-out deranged smash and grab.

While the film does run out of steam during the "dialogue" scenes,the writers make sure that the insane gory set pieces come thick and fast,as the animal attacks go from a pack of rats ripping a young couple up, (how did Lucio Fulci not direct this?!) to a polar bear running down a school corridor,and a legendary cheetah chasing a car scene.

Originally planning to film in Zimbabwe,Prosperi had to change plans for Italy and South Africa,when terrorist groups started shooting his hotel.

Despite the filming troubles,Prosperi and cinematographer Guglielmo Mancori give the movie a vast scope,with the tower block giving the animals the perfect concrete jungle setting. Made on the cheap,Prosperi goes straight for the sleaze jugular,as the blood drenched animal attacks are matched by exposed female flesh and psychopathic children.

Whilst some of the animal attacks do look hilariously poor,Prosperi shows a bit too much glee in the animal on animal attacks,with a scene of a fur ball being covered in rats being a really uncomfortable, grisly scene,as the beasts go wild.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A hidden Italian horror gem
Doraemon3454215 August 2022
If you love Italian horror then you already know and have seen some of the best of the genre such as Suspiria, Deep Red, Demons, Cannibal Holocaust...

Well it turn out this one is a truly unknown hidden gem of Italian horror from the 1980's, starring Lorraine Desalle (Cannibal Ferox). No, it's not scary or that gory, but an entertaining and unintentionally hilarious animal attack movie, a perfect Italian B movie cheese. And it features real animals too instead of practical effects which is impressive.

So many cool scenes such as a jaguar chasing a jeep in the middle of a city, but the best scene is when tigers attacking passengers in a subway train. The scene is surprisingly suspenseful, this movie is cool check it out.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Can Nature Go Crazy?!"...
azathothpwiggins20 August 2020
WILD BEASTS is the tender, joy-filled tale of what happens when PCP is introduced to the drinking water of zoo animals, driving them berserk. Cuddly critters make their escape, dining on unwary human snacks, after an elephant destroys the cage locking system.

From the infamous "rat attack" and "elephant car stomping" scenes, to the all-out shred-a-thon of the big cats' feeding frenzy, this movie makes other such films appear timid by comparison!

Unfortunately, as with many Italian gore films of the era, animal cruelty is included, sending several real animals to their premature, unnecessary doom. Still, in spite of all of its ludicrous elements, WB does manage to be entertaining throughout. Some of the more memorable scenes show a cheetah, a polar bear, cattle, etc., on the move down city streets or school hallways!

Stars exploitation movie regular, Lorraine De Selle as Laura.

Warning: Nothing can prepare you for the "shock" finale!...
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wild Beasts - Terrible Film
Coventry19 June 2007
Brainless, senseless and – most of all – pointless Italian exploitation fodder that somewhat enjoys an infamous reputation because director Franco Prosperi supposedly sacrificed the lives of innocent & defenseless animals in order to make his film appear more realistic. I, for one, can't judge if this is wholly true, but you never know with these crazy Italian horror directors, right? Ruggero Deodato's crew also killed real animals during the production of "Cannibal Holocaust", but at least that film grew out to become a genre milestone, whereas "Wild Beasts" is obscure, hard to find and honestly not worth tracking down. The most fun you'll have whilst enduring this film is guessing which city the events take place in. The intro sequence only reveals it concerns a North European city, but if you have some language and/or geography knowledge, you can quickly figure out in what city the animals of the local zoo go on a gory murder spree. For reasons I still haven't figured out, the water supply at the zoo becomes poisoned and all the animals – big or small, friendly or dangerous – turn into aggressive and uncontrollable killers. It doesn't take to long before they escape the zoo limits and transform the whole of Hamburg (oops…) into their hunting territory. "Wild Beasts" is quite a bad film, with no tension or coherence. It basically is just animals killing people and vice versa, but there's no building up tension or atmosphere at all. There are some hilariously awkward scenes to enjoy, but I'm not entirely sure they were meant to be comical, like when the cheetah attacks a woman driving a beetle with the same colors as the animal itself. There's a lot of gore and sheer nastiness on screen, but whenever something really important happens, the photography is dark and unclear. Overall, a lame film and not really worth seeing. "Cannibal Ferox" and "House on the Edge of the Park" starlet Lorraine de Selle adds absolutely no value to the production, neither.
9 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Violent and controversial Italian horror flick.
HumanoidOfFlesh12 December 2004
Franco Prosperi's "The Wild Beasts" is a fairly routine Italian horror flick about nature gone nuts.The real animals were used in this movie and in many cases killed just for the sake of this Italian shocker.The animal attack scenes are very gory,but the photography by Franco Delli Colli is too murky.The use of animals in "The Wild Beasts" is quite stunning,unfortunately the acting is truly horrible.Still it's nice to see Lorraine De Selle of "Cannibal Ferox" and "House on the Edge of the Park" fame in the main role as a professor.There is also a really tense sequence where a cheetah chases a VW bug down the road and a scene where some rats are burned off a windshield in slow motion.So if you are a fan of Italian horror cinema give this one a look.7 out of 10.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A Fun Cheesy Italian Film
gavin694215 June 2017
The water supply for a large city zoo becomes contaminated with PCP, and the animals go crazy and get loose.

Director Prosperi began his career as an assistant director with Mario Bava and with whom he also wrote several screenplays. In 1966, he made his directorial debut, credited as Frank Shannon, with the thriller film, "Tecnica di un omicidio" and over the years he built a solid reputation as a director of crime-action films. He also occasionally directed comedies (with Lando Buzzanca or Alighiero Noschese) and, in the final stage of his career, at the beginning of the 1980s, several low-budget sword and sorcery films.

This is not among his best-known works, or at least it was not one of them until Severin picked it up. Quite possibly, it will become better known since they have put so much into their release. At the end of the day, it is a very average film, even by cheesy Italian horror standards, but it could find a cult following for those who are into the early 1980s horror scene 9which is a large group).
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lions and tigers and bears, oh my!
BA_Harrison27 October 2012
Dangerous zoo animals escape from their cages and run amok in the city after drinking water contaminated by PCP (a hallucinogenic drug also known as angel dust, busy bee, peace powder, zombie dust and jet fuel).

Technically speaking, Franco Propseri's Wild Beasts is far from a good film, with clumsy direction, terrible performances and diabolical dialogue throughout; that said, it sure is entertaining, a cheesy trash-fest full of unintentional laughs and OTT death scenes, and what has got to be the greatest 'cheetah chasing a car' scene in movie history (on account of there being no other contenders for the title).

The bloody death and destruction on offer includes stampeding cattle running down pedestrians, rats devouring a couple having sex in a car, a woman's head stomped by an elephant, a seeing-eye dog savaging his master (he didn't see that coming!), and a savage polar bear attack on a bunch of kids (who, having drunk some PCP themselves, also become killers!).

This being an early-80s Euro-horror, there is also some incredibly un-PC content which only adds to the bonkers exploitation vibe: not only does Prosperi deliver a gratuitous topless shot of obnoxious pubescent schoolgirl Suzy (Louisa Lloyd ) within the first few seconds, but there is enough real animal violence on display to give PETA supporters an instant coronary—animals were most definitely harmed during the making of this motion picture (sucks to be a rat in the European horror movie business).

6.5 out of 10, rounded up to 7 for IMDb.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Don't drink the water
Chase_Witherspoon2 May 2011
An inner-city zoo's electrical lock-down security fails, resulting in a number of predators (made rabid by a contaminated water supply) being released to wreak havoc on the local community. It's up to animal expert De Selle and companion Aldrich (a John Oates look-a-like) to warn potential meals and lure the most dangerous, back to the confines of the habitat. Sounds engrossing but the execution is less compelling than the concept. The animal wranglers in this film deliver the goods, with plenty of menace displayed through flashing teeth and aggressive posturing; even some of the attacks look realistic (my personal favourite being the elephant destroying a car in which a pair of cowering bystanders had taken refuge).

Aldrich starts off trying to lure De Selle into some animal husbandry of their own, but it seems there's some urgent taxidermy work to be done back at the lab. Meanwhile, De Selle (who survived Deodato's Cannibal Holocaust to appear in this film) is taunted by her precocious daughter, who narrowly escapes becoming a real little monster in the film's laughably devilish twist ending. Some truly innovative and in some cases comical methods are devised by which to cancel cast members (the rats attacking the bare-breasted woman shows that director Prosperi's sadomasochistic flair is on par with that of the Marquis de Sade) most of them transient, introduced solely for the purposes of being dispatched with grisly efficiency. By exception, veteran actor Ugo Bologna has a sizable supporting role as the concerned police inspector.

But while the violence committed against the cast members is obviously staged (yes, even the rats picking out the eyes of the car-seat canoodlers isn't as real as it appears), the animals are spared no such reprieve, many of them slaughtered in shameless exploitation, a grossly damning indictment on the trend in Italian horror movies of that era. Stepping off the soap box for just a moment, "Wild Beasts" while obscure, isn't without interest and should appeal to anyone with a penchant for the eco-horror genre.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Ultimate Propaganda Flick Against Drug Misuse. 1-2-Watch.
P3n-E-W1s316 September 2022
Greetings And Salutations, and welcome to my review of Wild Beasts; here's the breakdown of my ratings:

Story: 1.50 Direction: 1.50 Pace: 1.25 Acting: 1.25 Enjoyment: 1.50

TOTAL: 7.00 out of 10.00

I have to state that after watching this movie, I was more than considerably impressed. I can understand the saying, never work with animals and children, so I have great respect for the guys and gals in this flick as they had to cope with both. Moreover, they do it so well. Remember, they filmed this movie before CGI was a dream in Pixar's Luxor Jr's shining eye. These beasts are real - Real Claws - Real Teeth.

The story writer and director Franco Prosperi delivers to the audience is a logical and enjoyably lively succession of animal attacks. Everything appears normal at the unnamed European City's Zoo. (Leaving it unnamed was a great idea because it enforces the notion that these events could happen anywhere. Sadly, in the filming you'll see both the city's and zoo's names.) Franco introduces the audience to the principal characters in these opening sequences and displays the normality of zoo life. We see Professor Laura Schwarz and Rupert Berner, head-keeper and vet, making their rounds. They have to sedate and operate on a female tiger to stem the blood flow from her wounded nipples due to her cub's overanxious feeding. These unexpected moments and the busy workload keep Laura away from her daughter Suzy, who appears to be a latch-key kid of twelve or so - and there were quite a few back in the 80s. But that night, Rupert gets a call from the police because a pack of rats have turned ferine. Whilst at the scene of the fatal rodent attack, the animals in the zoo grow restless and start assailing the keepers. What's wrong with the city's creatures? Laura and Rupert are assigned the problem of solving the mystery. Will they be able to figure out the trouble, or will the incidents worsen? The characters are well written - though a few subtitle translations needed better revision as the dialogue is a tad unnatural. I loved Suzy; she's a tough, single-minded kid who isn't afraid to tell her mother that she needs more time with her than she's willing or able to give. I wish there had been more of her in the story. Another letdown of the story is the scope. I admired Franco's progression of the induced insanity - Rats to Zoo animals to pets to farm animals to humans. But once you learn the source of the infection, you begin to wonder why so few incidents had occurred. The scope needed to cover the entire city.

Franco, though he needed to polish the story a little more, didn't need to do anything with his cinematography. It's not perfect, and because of the imperfections, it works better. It possesses a grittier style that works splendidly with the subject matter. If you are squeamish, Wild Beast may not be your cup of tea. The opening sequence shows feeding time at the zoo. We open on a decapitated horse's head being cleaved in two. Yep, an actual equine noggin. Feeding time can be gross, but it aids in building the authenticity of the zoo. And Franco maintains the naturalness throughout the movie - well, almost. The polar bear at the ballet class was a little hard to swallow - it's all that fur; it gets stuck in your throat. He keeps the pictures' realism simply and effectively. He utilises real animals whenever he can. But will then substitute mock creatures for the kill scenes and more complex notions. In one sequence of a tiger attack, Franco films a stunt man wrestling a live tiger. Next, the tiger's been swapped out for a model big cat. Back to the real one. Then back to fake. Finally, when the big cats have defeated the man, we see two of them pulling their prey apart by the legs - a fake bloke. Franco keeps it tight and uses differing angles and quick cuts to make the whole segment appear realistic and ramp up the exciting tension. And for the most part, these work brilliantly; I especially liked the head-stomping elephant rampage. But there are times, like the polar bear and the jaguar attacks, where it doesn't work so wonderfully. The bear simply looked fake, and there's no genuine dread to the scene. But the Jaguar was okay until Franco decided the cat needed to tug off the shoes. The effects team bring in one of the worst-looking puppet Jaguar heads. Its jaws are solid, and they have trouble removing the footwear. It may have been better to have the actual cat remove the shoes from a false leg. These scenes display Franco's resourceful filmmaking. However, for most of the remainder of the movie, Franco adopts a routine filming style. Happily, he possesses a talent for composition and using light and shade effectively to create tense and dread-filled atmospheres. The subway sequence will keep you glued to the screen. There's one brilliantly thought-out death scene. We see a hand and arm slap down onto the counter in the zoo's control room. Heavy shadows enshroud the room. The fingers move as if they're walking the arm down the countertop towards the phone. They stop short of the dial. A man jolts upward from behind the desk - so it's not a supernatural severed limb - then falls back down - Dead! It's quick and straightforward, but I found it massively entertaining.

The cast isn't half-bad either, though they all could've done with a smidgen more pizazz in their performances. Antonio Di Leo as Rupert Berner needed more forcefulness in some of his scenes. I liked the character, but there are moments when he's too wishy-washy. And these instances come in the heat of the action when he should be more authoritative. The actress who does an excellent job is the young Louisa Lloyd as Suzy Schwarz. She has the pizazz the others are missing.

I loved this creature feature and admired the use of actual animals in most segments. Though I'm unsure if any got hurt or killed - it is an 80s Italian flick. That said, the story is entertaining and well structured with okay characters. But the situations will entertain the viewers most - there's a cheetah running through the city streets chasing a VW Bug. So, if you like your Animals Strike Back movies, I suggest you give Wild Beasts a look-see. I'd also recommend it for a Friday Night Is Fright Night movie-fest whilst cuddled up in your loved ones' arms on a cold winter night.

Okay, Mister Polar Bear, practice your pirouettes while I check out his IMDb lists - Absolute Horror and Monstrous to see where he rated Wild Beasts.

Take Care & Stay Well.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fun animal scenes, boring human stuff.
HorrorDisasterGuy-9061721 October 2023
I found this movie to be a mixed bag for the most part. The story is interesting with Phencyclidine that contaminated the water that cause the animals to attack. I like how there's different types of animals to be found in this movie and the way they attack. Things get crazy when the animals cause car and airplane crashes in the movie. Unfortunately, the stuff with the humans are rather boring with them trying to figure out why the animals are attacking. The movie entertainment value is durning the scenes with the animals because it is pretty fun to see how different animals attack someone. I didn't like how the movie ends because it doesn't make sense and is abrupt.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"She's not crazy! She's being chased by a cheetah!"
Hey_Sweden18 March 2017
Gloriously insane "Nature Strikes Back" cinema from director Franco Prosperi, the "Godfather of Mondo", who delivers action and violence in very high doses, and has a body count...well, to die for. Much like many entries in this genre, the animal rampage is the result of human screw up. High levels of PCP contaminate the water supply of a zoo in a major European city. As a result, all the animals - including tigers, bears, and elephants - go crazy, bust out of the zoo, and terrorize the unlucky citizens of this city. The hero on the case is zoo employee Rupert "Rip" Berner (John Aldrich, in his only feature film appearance), and his leading lady is journalist Laura Schwarz (French beauty Lorraine De Selle, "Cannibal Ferox").

Prosperi decides early on, to Hell with good taste and common sense, and gives us a messed up horror film to cherish. Among our colorful characters are a daughter (Louisa Lloyd) who mocks and disrespects her mother, and a police inspector (Ugo Bologna, "Nightmare City") who obviously really likes to snack. The animal action is definitely first rate, and the various set pieces are comprised of actual animal attacks choreographed and supervised by circus trainers, and special effects. The delightful highlights include a cheetah attempting to run down a potential victim who's driving away, and elephants suffocating one person with a trunk, and stomping another chumps' head flat. (There really is some first rate gore here, as witness the after effects of a massacre by rats.) Prosperi wastes very little time in getting to the good stuff, and there's an amusing subplot late in the game involving that contaminated water.

Aldrich is a cheesy looking but entertaining guy, De Selle makes for a pretty decent heroine, young Lloyd is a definite hoot, and Bologna is a treat to watch.

If you love this genre, and haven't seen this one yet, I recommend you see it as soon as possible.

Eight out of 10.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
quite an Umberto Lenzi feel here
christopher-underwood19 December 2020
This is only okay but it has a very good start and if it had only gone a little bit further could have ad a sensational finish. The rats (mice?) and the lovemaking couple in the car is really well done to get things off to a scary, horrible and ultimately very gory beginning but although there is some fun to be had with elephants breaking out of the zoo and a cheetah chases a car down a high street (Frankfurt?) ir is not too horrific. Elephant foot on the face is not too pretty, I must say, though. Most interesting thing here is that the director is he of the Mondo Cane films and aside from the documentary style, Uncle Tom is his first dramatic feature. There is also quite an Umberto Lenzi feel here both with those constant zoomed close-ups of gory detail and the presence of Lorraine De Salle who also stared in cannibal Ferox and Ugo Bologna, here the police chief but also featured in Nightmare City. Interesting rather than gripping film and I can only imagine that to end when the children have begun to appear so menacing might have been in hope of a follow-up.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great creature movie
atinder18 July 2015
The water supply for a large city zoo becomes contaminated with PCP, and the animals go crazy and get loose.

I can't believe I never even heard of this movie before this week, these creature feature was great.

We had Tigers, Bears, Elephants , Bulls , Dogs , Cats all going crazy And killing.

There were some really good gory moments in this.

I really like how the movie came to end, as the story kind of took a turn and that I found really intense.

Loved this movie, I can not believe I have not seen it before!

9 out of 10
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
PCP an excuse for zoochosis.
Fella_shibby3 May 2019
Zoo animals go crazy after drinking contaminated water n they get loose n attack people. Out of all the animal attacks, the creepiest n nastiest one is of the rats. Before devouring a couple, they attack a cat as if a lizard getting attacked by an army of ants. They bite everything from eyes to the tits. We do have attack scenes of lions n tigers but shot in dark. Ther is also a dog attacking scene. We do have elephants wreaking havoc on road, one fella's face gets smashed by an elephant's leg n another fella strangled by the trunk. One gets burnt alive, a very badly shot scene of a bear. The film does gets monotonous n slow. We have repeated scenes of jus a lady staring, lousy background music n the worst is the lack of tension. A cheetah chasing a car turns into a wasted opportunity. I found the director to be a pervert. There was no need to show a child naked. Victor Salva did the same heinous act in Clownhouse. First saw this in the early 90s on a vhs. Revisited it recently.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A generally fun creature-on-the-loose effort
kannibalcorpsegrinder24 June 2022
In a northern European city, the staff at a major zoo find that the recent surge in unusual antics by their animals is related to a strange deposit of PCP into the water supply and infected the animals causing them to run wild throughout the area, forcing them to defend the city against the creatures.

Overall, this was a generally fun nature-run-amok genre effort. Among the more likable features here is the rather fun and cheesy setup to getting the creatures unleashed on the city, which is quite well-handled here. The concept of the drug supply getting into the water supply and contaminating it to allow the infected animals to get loose is a rather goofy premise that's rather sloppy in concept but is given enough here to justify the later rampage. Given that this is accomplished with the scenes of the random animals going crazy and attacking before getting to the zoo escape part of the rampage with the eventual discovery of this late in the film, everything comes together and features a lot to like about it. This chaos and confusion about everything feature a lot to like, much like the somewhat intriguing bit of science required to figure out what's happening With this in place, there's a lot to like with the unrelenting chaos of the animals being freed and sent on the loose. The opening shot of the elephants breaking free from the zoo walls and sending the herd of tigers out to kill the workers at the zoo creates quite a fun starting point to the eventual chaos on the city streets with the animals getting freed and causing all sorts of havoc. The rat attack on the couple in the car, the tiger ambush on the police officers investigating the zoo outbreak, the elephants just generally rampaging through the area, the cheetah chasing the n in the car, and the broken-down train being attacked are some of the fun scenes here that are made all the more impressive by utilizing the real on-set animals in the situations which is all part of the fun. The creatures actively being involved in the scene make for a more intense and suspenseful time here with the spectacle of the concept giving this all a highly enjoyable time here. These, combined with the cheesy gore effects integrated into the action, give this one plenty of likable features. There isn't a whole lot to dislike here but it does have some issues. One of the biggest issues here is the film's use of real animals makes for some highly un-politically correct scenes that make for a generally uncomfortable experience at times. Seeing the inserts of the rats being blasted with the flamethrowers and them running around on fire while squealing in pain really don't need to be there as the idea would've been clear without seeing the clear view of the poor creatures trying to put the fire out. Likewise, the sequence of the wild animals attacking a slaughterhouse that features the killer cats and hyenas attacking cows and pigs with the obvious shots of the creatures in distress and pain feels rather unnecessary and sleazy for no purpose as we already know they're wild and out-of-control which makes this something that could've been taken out. As well, there's also the somewhat confusing and underwhelming finale which is slightly confusing and feels somewhat rushed here, making for a few flaws that hold it back.

Rated Unrated/R: Graphic Violence, extreme violence-against-animals, Brief Nudity, and Graphic Language.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wild Beasts (1984)
stevencraigvankooten13 April 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Contains a little blood, one angry polar bear. The animals at a zoo start going crazy and it soon leads to all out mayhem once rats, cats, bears, and other beasts start attacking people all over the city. - - - Actually, this isn't a bad time at all! While there are some hurdles to get over with the dub job, this is a good example of to the point Italian horror. All of the characters are thrust into the plot immediately and have to do all of their explanation on the run, there's always a threat in every second of "Wild Beasts." The plot is conventional, but the sheer variety and number of animal attacks, running, screaming, and violence barely leaves any time for boring stuff like talking... or characterization. Not only is the movie enjoyable, but the cause of all the brouhaha is knee slapping hilarious. This isn't high art, but we can't expect every filmmaker to be Joe D'Amato can we?

* * 1/2 out of 4
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Something tells me all the animals are whacked out on PCP at the zoo
Woodyanders27 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Various dangerous animals in a zoo are whipped up into a psychotic rage after their drinking water gets contaminated with PCP. Serious problems ensue when said animals escape and embark on a homicidal rampage.

Writer/director Franco Prosperi keeps the delightfully outrageous story zipping along at a snappy pace, stages the astounding animal attack set pieces with rip-snorting gusto, builds plenty of tension, delivers oodles of deliciously over-the-top gore, and astutely captures a delirious sense of escalating frenzy. Among the gloriously insane moments to be relished herein are a horny couple being attacked and eaten by rats (gratuitous bare boobs alert!), a cheetah chasing a speeding car down a street, an elephant crushing a woman's head, a tiger running rampant on a subway train, and a polar bear terrorizing a school full of obnoxious screaming kids. Guglielmo Mancori's glossy cinematography provides a neat polished look. Daniele Patucchi's funky-throbbing score hits the right-on groovy spot. Amazing lunacy.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not so wild movie
Wheatpenny28 August 1999
Franco Prosperi must really get off on killing animals, between this and all the shockumentaries he's done. This one's got some great sequences (shot in Frankfurt-am-Main) but never lives up to its great premise. Filmed entirely at night, the direction is clumsy and only rarely suspenseful. It's never boring or predictable but not terribly exciting or original, either. Though if you've waited all your life to see a naked woman get eaten by rats, here's your chance.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mixed up mishmash of horror and social message
lor_13 March 2023
My review was written in June 1986 after watching the movie on Lightning video cassette.

"Wild Beasts" is an Italian horror feature that underscores the current dilemma between fantasy and realism in the shriek genre. Filmmaker Franco Prosperi applies his experience in the "Mondo Cane" school of shock tactics to a science fiction theme with technically good results but an audience turnoff and counter-productive to the film's socially conscious theme. Pic was made in West Germany in 1982 tith alternate title "Savage Beasts" and has been released domestically to the home video trade.

Premise is that PCP (angel dust) has seeped into the water supply of a German city as a result of industrial waste, with the immediate result that animals in the local zoo freak out, break out (aided by a power outage) and go on the rampage. Along with a horde of sewer rats the revenge of abused Mother Nature in the form of zoo beasts quickly turns into a disaster film mode. Zoo scientist Rupert Berner (John Aldrich), police inspector Nat (Ugo Bologna) and reporter Laura (Lorainne de Selle) lead the fight to save humanity.

Prosperi's talented special effects and animal experts crew provide the utmost realism to even absurd stagings, such as a polar bear attacking the dance class that Laura's daughter Suzy (Louisa Lloyd) attends. Some footage, such as flamethrowers applied to the horde of rats, looks real rather than faked. Mixed with the usual overdone makeup effects of gorily mangled human victims, the thrills are gruesome rather than entertaining. Just as in so many Italian-made cannibal films, the message alerting us to stop raping the environment gets lost in the urge to maximize the titiallation value of the horror scenes..
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lame Italian Cash-In
Michael_Elliott12 May 2016
Wild Beasts (1984)

* 1/2 (out of 4)

PCP gets mixed in with a water supply, which just happens to lead into the local zoo, which causes the animals to go crazy. After an elephant crashes through the wall all of the animals are on the loose and attacking humans.

Films like THE FOOD OF THE GODS, FROGS and DAY OF THE ANIMALS were just a few of the "nature attack" films that were popular in America during the 1970s. These types of movies continued to be produced and of course Italy would jump on the bandwagon and the result is this rather bad film that manages to be incredibly boring as well as stupid. As someone who really enjoys these nature movies, this one here was a major disappointment.

The biggest problem with this film is that the characters are just so stupid and so annoying that you really want to see them eaten by the animals. Rooting against your lead characters is never a good thing but even with the bad characters couldn't you enjoy the animal attacks? I wish you could but sadly the film is shot so dark that more times than not it's hard to see what's going on. Even worse is the fact that the animal attacks really weren't that believable and it was obvious the animals weren't really attacking.

Another problem I had with the film is that even at just 91 minutes the film really dragged at times. The only reason to watch this is if you're a fan of actress Lorraine De Selle who most will remember from HOUSE ON THE EDGE OF THE PARK and CANNIBAL FEROX. It's always fun seeing regular faces in these movies but even she can't save this turkey.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed