Made by Draculina magazine publisher Hugh Gallagher's it's his first flick in some kind of trilogy, the other being Gorotica(1993) and Gore Whore(1994). Somehow those flicks are searched by collectors. Still not having an official release you have to search the bootleg world to get your hands on.
Gorgasm being his first attempt and it shows, just watch the credits, looks like it is done with a Commodore C64. Not only that, a lot of hiss on the sound and filmed on VHS I guess. But the flicks are know for the nudity although Gorgasm doesn't has full frontal like his others.
A detective, Chase, sitting too long behind his desk can finally go out to stick his nose in a killing, a man being tied up and murdered. We actually do see the killing done by a voluptuous girl stripping before her victim. Once the stripping's over she slices the man. It never becomes gory, the only thing done is the sound of the knife going in and a bit of blood running down of the victim. The sequence stops when she's licking the bloody knife. quickly the detective find his way into the world of SM and porn.
As I said, it shows that it is a low budget. The acting and locations (the police office) are laughable.. Just look towards the 'Sarge'. Doesn't look like a cop and even her clothes aren't for real. And the way she says her lines, looks like she's reading it from something.
Yep, a videotaped exploitation very cheapie made with extreme bad acting but it delivers on the nudity and blood. Only Rick Billock (Chase) has made it further into the horror scene already coming out of Flesheater (1988) as a farmer and is still in the scene.
If it was shot better it could have been a rather good flick. You can see that the director knows what he wanted only didn't had any money. Some scene's do take a bit too long, like when Chase is visiting a porn shop it takes ages while the camera is filming all VHS available. For porn addicts it's interesting because it's the real stuff and some will recognize some labels or 'actors'.The graphic nudity really comes from that shop or the office of a porn director. The camera showing the posters does reveal all. Even a full-frontal transsexual. In fact while Chase is watching porn VHS we can watch it too and it's there that it becomes explicit.
Further is slow and boring sometimes. And still interesting for the latter reasons.
Gore 0,5/5 Nudity 1,5/5 Effects 1/5 Story 1,5/5 Comedy 0/5
Gorgasm being his first attempt and it shows, just watch the credits, looks like it is done with a Commodore C64. Not only that, a lot of hiss on the sound and filmed on VHS I guess. But the flicks are know for the nudity although Gorgasm doesn't has full frontal like his others.
A detective, Chase, sitting too long behind his desk can finally go out to stick his nose in a killing, a man being tied up and murdered. We actually do see the killing done by a voluptuous girl stripping before her victim. Once the stripping's over she slices the man. It never becomes gory, the only thing done is the sound of the knife going in and a bit of blood running down of the victim. The sequence stops when she's licking the bloody knife. quickly the detective find his way into the world of SM and porn.
As I said, it shows that it is a low budget. The acting and locations (the police office) are laughable.. Just look towards the 'Sarge'. Doesn't look like a cop and even her clothes aren't for real. And the way she says her lines, looks like she's reading it from something.
Yep, a videotaped exploitation very cheapie made with extreme bad acting but it delivers on the nudity and blood. Only Rick Billock (Chase) has made it further into the horror scene already coming out of Flesheater (1988) as a farmer and is still in the scene.
If it was shot better it could have been a rather good flick. You can see that the director knows what he wanted only didn't had any money. Some scene's do take a bit too long, like when Chase is visiting a porn shop it takes ages while the camera is filming all VHS available. For porn addicts it's interesting because it's the real stuff and some will recognize some labels or 'actors'.The graphic nudity really comes from that shop or the office of a porn director. The camera showing the posters does reveal all. Even a full-frontal transsexual. In fact while Chase is watching porn VHS we can watch it too and it's there that it becomes explicit.
Further is slow and boring sometimes. And still interesting for the latter reasons.
Gore 0,5/5 Nudity 1,5/5 Effects 1/5 Story 1,5/5 Comedy 0/5
