Shock Patrol (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Honest account of unpopular and unnecessary war
adrianovasconcelos15 December 2020
I was born in 1957 so I have no idea what Vietnam was like by the time the French accepted defeat in 1954, but PATROUILLE DE CHOC strikes me as a very honest account of the Indochina War.

It opens with the French colonizers trying to win the hearts and minds of the local people whose traditions are completely different, and who obviously resent the foreign presence affecting the way of life they have enjoyed and nurtured for thousands of years.

You get to see a black soldier teaching French to Vietnamese children. You see the locals apparently accepting domination but in their deadpan or smiling faces you can detect treachery - after all, all is fair in war, and terrorist tactics are as good as any other. Pity that the Americans either did not watch or did not pay heed to this 1957 movie to know what they were getting into in Vietnam.

You see some truly great sequences in PATROUILLE: a military column passes by as an Indochinese civilian mourns a deceased relative in a coffin; you see children trying to find out the identity of the deceased that French soldiers are carrying in a blanket tied to a tree branch; you see a Budhist temple shot to pieces in the course of a French raid on Viet troops apparently praying in that temple; you see an Indochinese couple get married in the Catholic Church; you see a wonderful dragon display to welcome a French military commander visiting the area, only for an attack to be sprung on the fort in the next few nights.

You see the way the Viet play with the victims: they put their flag up on the barbed wire surrounding the fort to warn that they are coming. It is a warning that wears down the threatened, in the knowledge that it will definitely happen. The Viet know that their numbers are far greater and that they will prevail in the end. You see the mental disintegration of the colonial forces with each attack by the Viets.

The voiceover narration is effective and unsentimental, pointing out that the night is as much the enemy as the Viets. You feel the vulnerability of sentinels. The night is "the color of death." As in the jungle:, it is the ideal time for predators to attack.

And so you see two peoples, two wonderful cultures, killing each other. The film ends with a short written message: "Let this be a warning not to waste life unnecessarily in the future."

I have no idea how Director Aubert managed to get such realistic shots of the Indochinese countryside, French fortifications, local people. Indochina had ceased to exist after the defeat in the battle on the Dien Bien Phu valley in 1954 and I doubt that the Vietnameses wanted the French back, even just to do a film.

What is more, PATROUILLE was done on a shoestring budget. How Aubert managed to get all the countryside shots, the local people at work, French military vehicles, guns, cannons, and other ware is mind-boggling. Today, he would have had to resort to all manner of computer tricks and he would never have come up with anything near as authentic.

This is a completely credible, knowledgeable, gripping and honest account by someone who lived this unpopular and invidious war that was to cause massive loss of life, extensive environmental damage, and a very definite loss of Western prestige in that part of the planet. And it would go on for at least another decade once the USA became involved...
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The director's cut
dbdumonteil23 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
When the movie was theatrically released,it featured a different editing and ending ,and the title "Patrouille De Choc" (=super-efficient patrol )replaced the director's one which was much less glorious (and thus less commercial) "Patrouille Sans Espoir" (= hopeless patrol).

Now they screen the director's cut with its true title and its downright desperate conclusion: smoke,hiding destruction and death.

"Patrouille Sans Espoir" has no big names (in fact all the actors are unknown,which adds to the credibility of the story ),a small budget ,and it makes the best of it.

A voice -over(the lieutenant) tells us the tale:soldiers in a post in Indochina,harassed by the Vietminh fighters who send propaganda messages on the radio and plant their flag just outside the small fort.

Except for the last scenes ,it is a banal life we are told ,but the lieutenant's words bite: "men make business,women make love and children,and children make war ;my soldiers are kids ".When a mate is killed ,he comments during the funeral:" he will sleep next to us,we 've simply moved his bed .He taunts the schoolteacher ,still teaching " our ancestors ,the Gallics ".The French soldiers try to maintain a friendly Relationship with the villagers,but the officer is clever enough to guess that they are weathercocks ,who will change their tack when the wind changes .

In the fifties ,it was not a simple war movie,but a somber meditation on a war lost in advance .

Claude Bernard-Aubert began his career with strong war movies;but from 1966 onwards with one exception ("L'Affaire Dominici" ,thanks to Gabin) it's downhill :"Le Facteur S'en Va -T-En Guerre" (which sometimes looks like a very bad spoof on "Patrouille Sans Espoir"),poor thrillers such as "L'Ardoise" or hopelessly stupid flicks ("Les Filles Du Régiment").
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interesting
searchanddestroy-13 October 2014
Warning: Spoilers
A rare movie directed by an Indochina war vet, at least a sort of reporter who was here, as was Pierre Schoenderffer, who was more known and also a bit best than Claude Bernard Aubert. This movie was his first one, and some of his films spoke of this war: LE FACTEUR S'EN VA EN GUERRE, LES PORTES DE FEU, CHARLIE BRAVO. The other ones, dramas and crime flicks; the most known was L'AFFAIRE DOMINICI. The director finished his career as a nude industry yes man. Shame on him, he deserved far better than this. Back to this movie, it's rather long and a little boring, far from LA 317 ème SECTION, directed by the great Schoendoerffer, but it remains very interesting. The real life of troopers in this horrible war. Everything here sounds actual, written by a guy who knows what he talks about. For a first film, it remains effective, but, again, some lengths.

In resume, try to get it, if you seek for rare and realistic war gems.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed