I am watching this DVD now and the most remarkable thing is the lousy picture quality for a film that is only 10 years old. The quality is what you would expect for a low budget film 30 years old. The main problem is the picture is not sharp, it is a little blurry, not a lot, and would be OK, if again the film was 30 years old. So far, every thing was filmed outside, in the best lighting, and should produce the best picture. The picture quality was good enough to pass NetFlx standards.
As for the film, it is a decent time waster, and I can check it off my list in this genre, as watched.
As for the film, it is a decent time waster, and I can check it off my list in this genre, as watched.
