Stigma (TV Short 1977) Poster

(1977 TV Short)

User Reviews

Review this title
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
What lies beneath?
Prof-Hieronymos-Grost8 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The Delgado family Katherine, Peter and their daughter Verity, have just moved into a new country home very close to some Neolithic stones. As it would happen their plans for their lawn are on hold as there is a large stone blocking the area. Efforts to try and move it are proving futile, some local men using a JCB manage to budge it a little, but as Katherine watches on, a large breathtaking gust of wind emanates from beneath the stone, Katherine begins to act oddly as if in a stupor, this feeling passes quickly though and Katherine feels herself again. However while making dinner, she suddenly finds blood on her hand, she checks but she is not cut, then there is blood on her blouse, panicking she rushes upstairs to the bathroom and finds blood all over her torso, again though there is no wound? Katherine keeps these events to herself, but that night Peter awakes in their bed to the sound of dripping, Katherine and Verity both appear to be asleep, he hears murmurs and moans from downstairs, he goes and checks but finds nothing, although some objects do appear to have moved by themselves, Peter is bemused and returns to bed. The next morning the men are back with a large crane to remove the stone, beneath it they find skeletal remains, there are ceremonial daggers everywhere, the person appears to have been murdered. . Verity watches the men digging and comments that this kind of burial was one given to witches. Peter awakens to find Katherine in a large pool of blood, he panics, the local doctor is none the wiser, they both carry Katherine to the car and head to the hospital....

Stigma was the last time Clark directed in the Ghost Story for Christmas series of films, despite the fact that for the first time the traditional period setting for a ghost story has been abandoned, its still retains the Clark look we are used to, the quiet countryside still has that misty landscape painting look, it still seems to have a life of its own which adds to the overall atmosphere. Its no use saying the modern setting helps though, i'm a traditionalist and there really isn't any reason this story couldn't have had a period setting, its a pity it wasn't, maybe it was down to a budgetary restraint? Stigma like other films in the series, hints at ancient rites, primordial times and of things unknown, if you're looking for a film with a vacuous fully explained ending this is certainly not for you, this series of films gets the viewer thinking, they resonate in your head long after you have seen them, as the merest of plot points explodes in your imagination. Stigma will always suffer when compared to other Clark films, on its own though its a nice slice of British horror.

6/10
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A respectable enough swansong for Lawrence Gordon Clark
dr_clarke_26 September 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Stigma, the penultimate episode of the original series of A Ghost Story for Christmas, marked a turning point, as it the first based on an original screenplay and the last directed by Lawrence Gordon Clark. Written by Clive Exton, it is set in the present day and feels notably different in tone from its predecessors.

The story sees a family moving to the countryside and unleashing a curse when they decide to move an ancient stone monolith - part of a nearby stone circle - from the garden of their new home. From the moment the stone is first dislodged, wife and mother Katherine starts bleeding, initially from her hands and later from her torso, even though she has no visible wound. When the monolith is finally lifted free, the skeleton of a witch pierced by blades corresponding to the sites of Katherine's bleeding is revealed; the inevitable dark ending makes it clear that Katherine has paid the price for disturbing the family disturbing the witch's rest.

The modern day setting immediately makes Stigma stand apart from the M. R. James and Charles Dickens adaptations of the previous years, although its folk horror themes hardly divorce it from them entirely. The main problem with the episode is that it simply isn't as creepy as the rest of the series. Nevertheless, it isn't bad by any means, even if it is usually seen as the point at which A Ghost Story for Christmas lost its way. Kate Binchy gives a convincing performance as Katharine, who becomes increasingly frantic as she desperately examines her body for the source of the blood. So too does the great Peter Bowles as Peter, especially when he panics after finding his unresponsive wife in a pool of blood. Despite the short run time, the two main characters work well enough, although Maxine Gordon's vaguely rebellious teenager Verity remains undeveloped.

Importantly, it also benefits from Clark's flair for directing, one final time. As usual, he makes great use of starkly beautiful location filming (including the stone circle Avebury), and provides some memorable visuals: the shot of the picture cracking and the close-up of the fly all work really well. In Clark's hands, even a raw onion can seem strangely unnerving. The effect used to create the wind unleashed when the stone is lifted is coupled with haunting music and sound effects to eerie effect; the juxtaposition with the Rolling Stones' "Mother's Little Helper" is quite striking.

Stigma might not entirely capture the same atmosphere as the rest of A Ghost Story for Christmas, but its tale of unstoppable forces unleashed by those who dare to meddle in the English countryside and its dark ending mean it certainly sits alongside them fairly comfortably. It is also a respectable enough swansong for Lawrence Gordon Clark, whose work on the program is undoubtedly one of the main reasons both for its success and its enduring appeal. The following - and final - episode of the nineteen-seventies would see another director take over the reins, and the difference would prove to be immediately and painfully obvious.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A GHOST STORY: STIGMA {TV; Short} (Lawrence Gordon Clark, 1977) **1/2
Bunuel19769 October 2013
The removal of a large stone outside her country-house seems to have a mysterious and life-threatening influence on a woman. Not an ineffective, yet rather muddled, depiction of ancient evil reawakened; one of only two entries from the annual BBC-TV series to adopt a modern setting. While this particular teleplay features no well-known actors unlike its predecessors, it is undeniably still acted with conviction – especially Kate Binchy in the difficult lead role, which has her bleeding inexplicably and with more profusion as time goes by until she eventually expires in her bed! On the other hand, this particular episode – which was until recently only available to view via a battered, time coded copy – boasts distinguished credits in writer Clive Exton and the ubiquitous director who was also behind most of the best-remembered horror tales on British TV of the 1970s, including the 1979 version of CASTING THE RUNES.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well-Paced Supernatural Thriller
JamesHitchcock21 April 2022
Between 1971 and 1978 the BBC used to dramatise a ghost story every year under the title "A Ghost Story for Christmas". The first five entries in the series were all based upon tales by that great master of the genre, M. R. James, the sixth was an adaptation of Charles Dickens's "The Signalman", and the seventh and eighth were original stories. "Stigma", first broadcast in 1977, was the first of these. The first six Ghost Stories for Christmas all had a period setting; "The Ash Tree" was set in the mid eighteenth century, "A Warning to the Curious" in the 1930s and the other four in the Victorian era. "Stigma" was the first to have a modern setting, but it nevertheless preserves the Jamesian theme of an ancient artifact which releases dark forces when disturbed.

The Delgado family- father Peter, mother Katherine and teenage daughter Verity- move into a cottage in the countryside. There is just one problem with their new home cottage. An ancient megalithic stone circle is situated in the adjacent field, and one of the stones is actually lying in their garden, right in the middle of the lawn. They call in some workmen to have it moved. Bad idea. In the first place, tampering with an ancient monument without the consent of the Secretary of State is a crime under British law. The Delgados, however, find that they have unleashed powers more ancient and more dangerous than any Secretary of State. Later that evening, Katherine begins to bleed uncontrollably, even though she has no visible wound. No definite explanation is given, but when the stone is eventually moved a skeleton is found beneath it, suggesting that the family may have fallen victim to an ancient curse.

I must say that I was somewhat apprehensive when I saw in the opening credits the words "Written by Clive Exton", as Exton was previously best known to me as the scriptwriter for the so-bad-it's-funny "Red Sonja", one of the worst films of the eighties, and as the author of the so-bad-it's-incomprehensible "The Rainbirds", one of the BBC's weakest "Plays for Today". "Stigma", however, is considerably better than either of those two disasters. It is not the best of the Ghost Stories for Christmas, lacking the depth of "A Warning to the Curious" or "Lost Hearts" and does not have any acting performances to compare with those from Peter Vaughan in "A Warning...", Robert Hardy in "The Stalls of Barchester" or Joseph O'Connor in "Lost Hearts". It is, however, a well-made, well-paced supernatural thriller which retains its power to shock. 7/10.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stigma
Gary-16129 January 2005
An atypical contemporary story (well, at the time) for A Ghost Story For Christmas, set in the country where a middle class family are setting up home. They are in the midst of moving an unwieldy stone from their cottage garden which appears to be part of a circle. Basically, this has been cribbed off the previous entries to the series, to the point of parody. The explanation is banal, leaving you scratching your head as to quite what was the point.

Stone circles are lazy. How many times have they been exploited?

Stigma is gruesome and disturbing. Little more than a warning to the curious.
9 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very 1970s
torrascotia23 December 2023
This isn't a full length movie more of a short it came in at around 45 mins when shown on Talking Pictures TV. This is a quite atmospheric British ghost story which moves along pretty fast towards it's conclusion. The story concerns a family who move into a remote country house and have tasked local workmen with removing a huge bolder from their garden. The workers eventually do but have obviously unleashed something in the process of doing so. The remainder of the film concerns the inevitable haunting of the family so no spoilers here. The acting is fine with some known faces from British TV and it's a very British story so no German/American poltergeists. It's a story firmly rooted in English folklore. There's a surprising amount of nudity in this one so it's obviously not for kids. It has a very 1970s ending however so may not be to everyone's taste. But fans of Tales of The Unexpected or Inside No.9 will enjoy this. I can see Matt Berry being a fan.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Chilling folk horror
Leofwine_draca9 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
STIGMA is the last of the BBC Ghost Story for Christmas series directed by Lawrence Gordon Clark. This time it's a modern-day tale, not based on a story by M.R. James but rather an original screenplay by Clive Exton, the hard-working screenwriter of 10 RILLINGTON PLACE among others. At half an hour in length this is a perfectly conjured-up story about how the decision to move an ancient stone in her garden proves ultimately fatal for a mother living in an old rural cottage. This TV movie is full of creepy atmosphere and subtle chills, and although there's much more blood and nudity than you normally see in this kind of thing, it has a reason for existing and is all part of the story. Kate Binchy gives an excellent and harrowing performance of an ordinary woman beset by nameless evil in the form of a psychic vampire or witch. STIGMA fits perfectly in the folk horror genre and sits alongside other classics of the genre such as BLOOD ON SATAN'S CLAW as one of the best of its kind.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
They should have buried this one under that stone.
Sleepin_Dragon17 December 2017
The first three entries could all be loosely classed as historical gothic dramas. Stigma is set in modern day (as was) and somehow fails to capture the vibe of the first three installments.

The subtlety of horror from the earlier entries is not present here at all, instead we get a drama which could have been part of the Hammer house of Horror TV series, plenty of blood, and sadly little of anything else. Nudity also strikes of desperation here, there's little story so it seems like they tried to mask the void with blood and mild nudity. Being a Ghost story for Christmas, there is one glaring omission, a lack of Ghosts.

So many ghost stories from the seventies featured Stone circles, often generating plenty of interest, a shame there wasn't much sign of that here, this sadly, was a very poor offering.

5/10.
8 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Unnervingly unforgettable!
jearnott23 December 2023
This unsettling short horror story still remains etched on my memory almost 45 years after it was shown.

Part of the BBC's annual Series of Ghost stories at Christmas and the only one set in contemporary times, the story begins with the removal of one of the Avebury Stones which inconveniently lies in the garden of its new owners, Peter and Katherine, unleashing a supernatural force which affects Katherine, who starts to bleed uncontrollably.

It's a slow burner with a lot of nudity for the time, as Katherine tries to find the source of the bleeding and to stop it, which initially she seems to succeed.

Later the following morning, the stone is removed to reveal a skeleton hidden below, surrounded by daggers and a blade in the rib, roughly in the area of Katherine's bleeding, but by then it is too late. There is no reason given for the bleeding, other than retribution from the dead, as it is later revealed that the skeleton may be that of a witch, but enigmas are sometimes the best way to end a tale.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Home sweet home, not a sweet film sadly though Warning: Spoilers
"Stigma" is an English short film from 1977, so this one has its 40th anniversary this year. It was a small screen release and if you read the name of director Lawrence Gordon Clark, you possibly know already that this is another of his career-defining ghost stories for the Christmas holidays. These usually live more through quit subtle horror than big effects and even with another writer than usual working on this one (Clive Exton), the recipe stays the same. The makers as well as the cast (haven't heard of any of these actors) are all British of course and this is the story of what happens when a family moves to a new place and has some of the huge stone fragments being removed there. Apparently they disturb the peace of some ancient creature and consequences are pretty drastic. But while the non-gore approach is the one I usually prefer in horror films, I cannot say that this movie really ended up impressing me. It's one of the lesser known from the series for sure and I would say that it's okay because this one is not as good as the others. But honestly, the entire series did not make an impact on me at all. This is why I give this one, just like all the others I have seen (I think), a thumbs-down and I don't recommend checking it out. Unless you have seen and liked some of the installments from other years I say skip this one. Slightly over half an hour not worth seeing.
2 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Atypical entry in the 'Ghost Story for Christmas' series but one of the best
Red-Barracuda4 July 2022
A bit of a detour for the BBC 'Ghost Story for Christmas' strand, as this one is set in contemporary times and doesn't feature ghosts. The lack of the gothic setting seems to have made this a more divisive entry in this series for some but I have to say that I found it to be one of the very best. Its about a family who move to a cottage in the countryside located right next to a Neolithic stone circle. The family arrange to move one of the massive stones, which is in their garden - bad move!

This one may have dropped the gothic horror aspect but it has gained a lot from the addition of folk horror - strange curses, stigmata effects and scary things buried in the earth are the order of the day here, and its all rather good. Also, like all the best entries in this BBC series, this one has a great sense of location, with the ancient Avebury stone circle a really effective setting.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of the best.
rocknrelics5 January 2021
For me this is one of the best in the whole 'Ghost Stories For Christmas' cannon, even though there's nothing christmassy about it.

The thing is, unlike some in the series, it really entertains, and it's one of the tales I find myself coming back to.

Short, sweet and to the point, there isn't a minute wasted.

I also think I have a soft spot for it as it's the first one I remember watching on its first broadcast in '77.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Oh nooooo!
begob13 December 2021
A woman develops mysterious bleeding while preparing the family dinner.

Documentary about the all too common phenomenon in rural kitchens of the meat and veg taking their revenge on the person who chopped them up. Remarkably, the film makers managed to capture the ignorant hysteria among the country folk, who blamed it all on outsiders meddling with the graves of ancient witches. Our knowledge of the world has greatly expanded, but this remains a worthwhile snapshot of those simpler days, when superstition held sway over plain common sense.
1 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Stigma
lesleynicholson5 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Between the 60s and 70s it was fashionable to adapt the best of the horror and ghost writers to TV, something to get your teeth into during the festive season. like The Ferryman, it depicts a couple in modern-day society living in a seemingly normal, everyday setting. from their rural, and very isolated, cottage home they hire a labour force to excavate and remove one of a number of lay stones from their garden. Buried beneath they discover some iron age burial site, containing a body and knives. soon strange things begin to affect their lives. Is it a haunting or just imagination running riot? This one scared the pants off of me as a kid, as the Ferryman and the Signalman had, and all those M R James' stories by the BBC did. I found that most of the series from that era has been unavailable in commercial form, this one, could only be viewed by a version containing a time lapse coded transmission. But have recently discovered a cleaned up version on the ghost stories for Christmas boxed set by BFI. No matter how old they are there's no comparison with current TV and film which lend heavily from these marvellous classics. Stigma keeps the mystery going throughout and keeps you cuddling up on the sofa, biting the snuggle blanket or your partner's shoulder with the suspense. I particularly like the female home owner when a patch of her skin haemorrhages slowly through the tiny pores like sweat. And she goes through the episode looking like an ashen faced zombie for the duration. worth a watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A creepy tale in which terrible things happen to nice people for no good reason other than lifting the wrong stone in their garden.
mwilson197626 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A short (30 minutes) film made for the BBC's A Ghost Story For Christmas series, Stigma is one of three non MR James adaptations and the first of two that broke with the tradition of adapting a classic ghostly tale. Instead we get an original slice of horror penned by screenwriter Clive Exton (who would later spend a period in Hollywood where he wrote Red Sonja), who turns in a passably creepy tale of a middle class family moving into a country cottage next door to an ancient stone circle (Avebury in Wiltshire, also used as the location in the ITV kids series Children of the Stones). When workmen attempt to move one of the stones located in their garden, an ancient curse is unleashed which causes the mother of the family to bleed uncontrollably before her body re-enacts the ritual execution of a witch , who was buried under the stone centuries earlier. Stigma tries hard to be an MR James story, but Exton's script is full of blood and nudity which at times make it feel like a David Cronenberg body horror rather than a subtle chiller. The whole affair is also let down by some poor acting, with lots of wooden performances and only Peter Bowles (a versatile actor better known as a mainstray of British television comedy) putting a decent shift in. You'll never look at an unpeeled onion in the same way again.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Inadequate offering
frukuk15 December 2021
I don't know if this was considered an adequate offering back in 1977, but judged against the TV of 2021, it is ridiculously poor. It's all over, after 32 minutes, before anything much has actually happened. A sort of very rough sketch of a story, barely a skeleton even, that lies there limply. Definitely best avoided.
0 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Confusing British horror short
szweda-1855524 December 2023
I too watched this on Talking Pictures who are emulating the BBC Ghost Stories for Xmas this December and good for them.

Doubt I saw this one back then but I'd remembered the moodier MR James ones which for the most part stuck in my mind except for The Ash Tree which I found repellent.

This one is, as others have said a "no ghost" story, there is terror evident but most of the cast remain confused and puzzled throughout as did I.

It is of course quite dated in appearance, not least the flared jeans! So it is of its time but I too doubt it should have been included in this supposed "Ghost Story" series... it should be reiterated that there is gratuitous nudity again (as per Ash Tree) but no smoking, profanity or violence really... it is more subtle but doesn't really work for me.

One last thing, the title: "Stigma" - did someone want to call it "Stigmata" which is sort of more appropriate because otherwise the word did not convey anything contextually useful to me.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Stigma
Prismark1021 December 2021
Katherine has moved into a cottage with stone circles.

As workmen move the stones. Something odd begins to happen with Katherine.

She starts to bleed uncontrollably. The workmen find an ancient skeleton on the site.

It seems this was once a burial ground for witches. Maybe Katherine is cursed.

There are elements of folk horror in this modern set ghost story.

The story only gets going once Katherine starts to bleed. She desperately tries to clean herself up but the blood will not stop.

The nudity seems odd and superfluous for the BBC 1970s Ghost Stories.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed