Dai Nippon teikoku (1982) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Fantastic, exploitative war movie from Masuda
darthsmythe113812 September 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is sort of a sequel/sister film to Port Arthur(1980) with much the same cast and crew, director Toshio Masuda and effects director Teruyoshi Nakano. The story is told from 3 perspectives in 3 parts. You have Minister of War Hideki Tojo, played masterfully by one of my absolute favorites Tetsuro Tamba, who gives a very sympathetic performance as it shows Tojo as a family man in addition to being the minister of war. Second is Kokichi Kobayashi, who gets married right before war begins and must stay with his wife throughout. I found this to be my favorite of the three stories presented. And then there's Goichi Odajima, who plays a young Japanese Christian drafted into war. The twist presented in this one is interesting.

The film is filled with bloody violence and quite a bit of nudity from a couple female characters. It makes the film feel like an exploitation flick in addition to the serious stuff. It doesn't detract from the film in any way, just thought it'd be an interesting point to bring up.

Special effects are handled by effects master Teruyoshi Nakano, who integrates the actors quite well with the effects footage via green screen that is barely noticeable. The miniatures all look nice and a bit of stock footage is used from Pearl Harbor film Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970).

The film's third act deals with something rarely shown in Japanese film; the war crimes trial Japanese troops underwent. The acting from all sides is great here, and you may find yourself tearing up at points like I did.

Masuda does something very brazen and has Emperor Hirohito portrayed with his face shown by a master actor. Masuda had little respect for military authority, and was actually expelled from the kamikaze for being a liberal. I can't help but wonder how Japanese censors reacted to this.

Overall a fantastic film, not to be missed for fan of World War II movies or Japanese cinema fans in general!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very well done by those who experienced the war
umberto-0600811 August 2021
I totally reject the intro given: "Favorable portrayal of Japanese Prime Minister Hideki Tojo, who approved of the bombardment of Pearl Harbor, as a patriot. The film is a jingoistic defense of Japanese imperialism."

First off, the film spends very little time on Pearl Harbor as it focuses on the latter years when Japan is exhausted and on the verge of devastating defeats across the Pacific. Second, the film does not defend Japanese imperialism or even the war itself, but portrays how every war involves all sorts of human drama and moral struggles soldiers face. Frankly, jingoism is depicted in most war movies where one side is so virtuous and devoid of almost any shortcomings, both as the victorious force and as human beings - this film is not one of them, and it goes beyond what Oliver Stone's Platoon does.

Released in 1982, this type of film could not have been made without those who actually fought in WWII, and that includes actors such as Tanba and members of the crew.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avoidable...
searchanddestroy-126 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I am deceived by this Japanese war movie. It's a mix up between newsreel stuff and usual topic of a soldier who has to go to fight against his wife's will. The usual tale, but badly done, badly acted, with a terrible editing. Nothing to do with the previous Japanese flick I commented several days ago, starring great actors and with a powerful story, gripping at the most.

But for anyone who knows anything about WW2, it's OK.

I won't argue about the propaganda talk which wants to tell us that US government pushed Japan into the war, that president Roosevelt was responsible of Pearl Harbor tragedy... As I told before about another movie, I am not historian enough to go further on that question, even if I have my own opinion. But IMDb is not the place to talk about this...

You can live without it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed