'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' "Cheap is Cheap" (1959)
Opening thoughts: "Cheap is Cheap" is the second episode directed by Bretainge Windust, who only directed two episodes of 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents'. While far from great, actually had slightly above mixed feelings on it, his first episode "The Avon Emeralds" (also from Season 4) was decent. It was nice to have a non-regular director for a change, which the series did do a number of times with inconsistent success, and while a long way from one of the best directors for the series Windust didn't get enough of a chance.
Of his two episodes, "Cheap is Cheap" is the better one of the two. It is not great and has a few things wrong (similar to "The Avon Emeralds" but not as badly), but had a more interesting day and the tone was more focused. As well as having a more appealing premise that is executed quite well. As far as Season 4 goes, "Cheap is Cheap" is a long way from being one of the worst. It is also a long way from being one of the best, very solid middle with a lot of things done right.
Good things: The good things will be mentioned first. Dennis Day excels against type and carries the episode beautifully with full understanding of what his difficult role required. The rest of the acting is also fine, as is the chemistry between the two leads. Hitchcock's bookending is amusingly droll as usual.
Furthermore, the production values are slick and atmospheric, neither overblown or cheap. The theme music is still a classic. Enough of the story is intriguing and it does entertain. Really liked the tongue in cheek tone that never jarred with the premise, and the story is involving and not predictable, too silly or confusing. Windust's direction is a good deal more confident here too.
Bad things: What "The Avon Emeralds" did a lot better though was a much better ending. In that episode, it was the best thing about the story. Here it is the weak link, it just felt too abrupt and Hitchcock's epilogue for my tastes writing wise over-explains and wasn't necessary.
Pacing also isn't perfect, taking a little too long to get going.
Concluding thoughts: In conclusion, good effort.
7/10.
Opening thoughts: "Cheap is Cheap" is the second episode directed by Bretainge Windust, who only directed two episodes of 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents'. While far from great, actually had slightly above mixed feelings on it, his first episode "The Avon Emeralds" (also from Season 4) was decent. It was nice to have a non-regular director for a change, which the series did do a number of times with inconsistent success, and while a long way from one of the best directors for the series Windust didn't get enough of a chance.
Of his two episodes, "Cheap is Cheap" is the better one of the two. It is not great and has a few things wrong (similar to "The Avon Emeralds" but not as badly), but had a more interesting day and the tone was more focused. As well as having a more appealing premise that is executed quite well. As far as Season 4 goes, "Cheap is Cheap" is a long way from being one of the worst. It is also a long way from being one of the best, very solid middle with a lot of things done right.
Good things: The good things will be mentioned first. Dennis Day excels against type and carries the episode beautifully with full understanding of what his difficult role required. The rest of the acting is also fine, as is the chemistry between the two leads. Hitchcock's bookending is amusingly droll as usual.
Furthermore, the production values are slick and atmospheric, neither overblown or cheap. The theme music is still a classic. Enough of the story is intriguing and it does entertain. Really liked the tongue in cheek tone that never jarred with the premise, and the story is involving and not predictable, too silly or confusing. Windust's direction is a good deal more confident here too.
Bad things: What "The Avon Emeralds" did a lot better though was a much better ending. In that episode, it was the best thing about the story. Here it is the weak link, it just felt too abrupt and Hitchcock's epilogue for my tastes writing wise over-explains and wasn't necessary.
Pacing also isn't perfect, taking a little too long to get going.
Concluding thoughts: In conclusion, good effort.
7/10.