"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Letter of Credit (TV Episode 1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
I could see where this was going but it's still pretty good.
planktonrules12 April 2021
A man claiming to be a writer arrives at a bank and meets with the president. He tells him that he's writing a story and investigating the case of Arnold Mathias...and that Mathias had been killed while trying to escape from prison. The president then recounts the story of Mathias and how he was accused of stealing $200,000 from the bank...though none of the money was ever recovered and Mathias proclaimed his innocence...and the case against him seemed unclear.

This is a rather uneven episode. It is a bit talky but it also suffers from a twist that is somewhat obvious early in the episode. Still, it is interesting, though a bit telegraphed.

By the way, the idea of stealing $200,000 also occurred in a different season five episode, "Not the Running Type"....though the writers of the two episodes were different.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lacks Clarity at Times
Hitchcoc3 May 2023
I was reasonable entertained by this episode. The sweating bank president sort of gave things away. The story begins with a big man in a suit, giving money to a stationmaster to let him know if a strange man shows up on the train. We then cut to the little town and to a bank. What transpires is a cat and mouse game being played. A former bank teller has died trying to escape. It is thought that he was jailed because of running off with 200,000 dollars. But the thief is tripped up when the back story is explained. This episode needed some tighter plotting with a degree of suspense and danger. It's just a bit lukewarm.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's the little thing that trips you up.
classicsoncall30 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
It's pretty easy to see where this story was going, as the Vice President (Bob Sweeney) of a bank is outed three years following a robbery of two hundred thousand dollars. And all it took was an enterprising prison guard to make his way to the town of Kirkland to interview the man while suggesting that he would like to open an account. The story is told in present day and flashback, with the bank executive, William Spengler (Sweeney) making the simple mistake of requesting a second phone call be made to the doctor treating his wife for a heart condition. On it's face, the tactic wouldn't have even been noticed, but the man convicted and sent to jail for the theft had plenty of time to examine the court transcript and find the daylight he needed to pin Spengler with the crime. Knowing that in hindsight, it didn't make sense that the convict Mathias attempted a prison break, because he was shot and killed for his trouble. And it's not like Henry Taylor (Robert Bray) would have profited from blackmail; the story closes with him dialing the police.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not So Much a Whodunnit as a Who-Okayed It?
jackbuckley-050491 March 2023
Hard to sit through this one, mainly because it's extremely talky & static. I didn't try to follow the dialogue too closely as it's labyrinthine & convoluted, making it difficult to follow, at least for me. Essentially an inside-job bank robbery scenario, related in a 2-person, flashback procedural way, making it quite tedious to stay focused. I know TV viewers had much longer attention spans back in that now vanished era but I found it painful & rather boring in this case. Interesting to me mainly just to see actor Bob Sweeney, whose increasing nervousness is fun to watch. Although an obscure actor, both then & now, he usually played high-strung, fidgety types, such as here, or charming, smooth-talking con-men, mostly in a lightly comical style. Despite Sweeney's amusing, watchable presence, this is one Hitchcock TV episode that easily can be skipped.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flat episode
searchanddestroy-122 August 2019
It is probably the less interesting episode of the whole series. Yes, the supposed twist ending is acually not one at all. We just discover something which we may not expect, I agree, but that remains flat to me. I won't spoil the story, but just wait for the next episode.
3 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed