"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Malice Domestic (TV Episode 1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
And the dog?
Archbishop_Laud20 July 2013
This episode is the bread and butter of what the series is about. There are more creative episodes, but this is what people tuned in to see.

It's the tale of an well-to-do artist couple, and I have to say, they aren't convincing as artists. Ralph Meeker is the husband, his first appearance since the opener of Season 1, and he looks like he should be coaching college lacrosse. The wife is Phyllis Thaxter, a regular as well. She's working on a stunning green vase; alas, we can't see the color.

The husband becomes ill a couple of times and the suspicion turns to poisoning. The bulk of the episode plays off of this. Without getting into the details, it works.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I took a big chance baby, but it worked!"
classicsoncall20 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
This episode does an excellent job of misdirection, so good in fact that you think the ending would be a slam dunk for Annette Borden (Phyllis Thaxter) poisoning her husband Carl (Ralph Meeker). All the elements are there, from Carl collapsing a couple of times from debilitating stomach cramps, to Annette's mid-day lunches with friend Perry Harrison (Ralph Clanton). Those little get togethers all seemed to be made in somewhat hushed asides, lending an air of credibility to a slow and predictable murder. Carl's threatening of his personal doctor (Vinton Hayworth) was just an added touch to keep the viewer off balance until the real murderer is revealed in that final frame. If only Hitchcock himself hadn't come on after the story was told to state that the big dog Cassandra had turned Carl in at the next town the new pair of lovers were heading to, it could have been the perfect crime. What's that about man's best friend?
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bait and Switch
Hitchcoc19 February 2010
This is the prototypical Hitchcock episode. It involves the setting up of a series of red herrings designed to take us off the scent. We are treated to the deterioration of a man, seemingly through arsenic poisoning. It's about a dog and a triangle and some pretty tricky moves. Of course, we are treated to the "Alfred Hitchcock" ending. There are some pretty convincing performances which lead us to several wrong conclusions. When I saw this I hadn't watched a Hitchcock show for quite a while, so I was taken in. By the way, watch the way the man strokes the collar of the great Dane. That's what really distracted me. The other serious thing has to do with the wife's profession and her outside contacts. Well done.
33 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Man's Best Friend!!!
kidboots19 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Years ago, before I was familiar with "Alfred Hitchcock Presents", I had this episode in a video pack (the others were "The Long Shot" from Season 1 and "No Pain" with Brian Keith as a wronged husband forced to live in an iron lung and how he gets his revenge, both of the shows equally good). Could Ralph Meeker and Phyllis Thaxter be the perfect Hitchcock couple - he of the "who me?" and "I can't believe this is happening" expression and she with her "Mrs. Average America" look which is usually hiding an undercurrent of emotions and feelings.

They are at a party to farewell their good friend Lorna Jenkins who is moving to San Francisco but is leaving them Cassandra, her Great Dane because, as she says "she simply won't fit into my new apartment". From the start Carl and Cassie get on like a house on fire (Meeker seemed to have such an affinity with the dog my husband thought he must be the real owner). Annette is forever in the background, often with a dismayed look on her face. Cassandra doesn't take to her and you know what they say about dogs being able to sense things. Actually the camaraderie between Carl and Cassie is a clue to the whole mystery.

One night after dinner Carl collapses with stomach pains and after it happens again their family doctor makes some tests. He finds Carl is being poisoned but while Carl is completely unconvinced and puts it down to rich food, the doctor happens to come across Annette and best friend, Percy Harrison, in a tete- a-tete and when he offers to drive Annette home she is very reluctant to leave.

This is a terrific episode - there is nothing to suggest this is not just a straightforward "will she get away with murdering her husband" story. The scenes involving Annette show her as a person with something to hide, even when she admits the secret of her new green glaze (she is a potter) is a special blend of arsenic - and Carl's shattered face is priceless. Having a story written by noted short story writer Phillip MacDonald (other than the usual "house" writer) may have something to do with the high standard - as well as having two sterling stalwarts, Ralph Meeker and Phyllis Thaxter in the leads.
27 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Me, Love My Dog
dougdoepke17 March 2010
Husband Carl (Meeker) keeps having stomach pains and it isn't Gas-Ex. Suspicion falls on wife Annette (Thaxter) who may have more than pottery on her mind. Maybe it's because he pays more attention to the Great Dane than he does to the wife.

Reviewer Hitchcoc is right—this is the sort of entry that won the series a loyal following and classic status. It's not exceptional, but is very well done in all departments. Note how subtly the screenplay hints at an extra-marital attraction between the silver-haired Perry and wife Annette, supplying her with needed motivation. Note also the effective way director Lucas uses blended close-ups of Meeker to stage the final scene, underscored with a lightly humorous touch—perfect for the Hitchcock style.

The athletic, muscular Meeker would seem an odd casting choice for a stay-at-home writer, but I guess it makes sense when you think about it. Thaxter was an early Hitchcock favorite, being so good at suggesting inner conflict. But it's really Lily Kardell's Lorna that I watched. She's a terrible actress but has the kind of dimples a guy could get lost in.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the best Alfred Hitchcock Presents episodes
jeffws27 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILER ALERT! This is a superb example of the great Alfred Hitchcock Presents television series of the 1950s. Don't continue reading if you haven't already seen this episode. Without going into detail, I am impressed by the great O. Henry style "twist" ending that this episode has, typical of the series. The "Hays Code" and television censors' limitations on moving pictures released in the US placed restrictions on movies and TV series released to the public, especially on television. This episode is an example of one of the Hays code requirements: crime cannot pay. The bad guys can't get away with crime. Hitchcock was very canny in utilizing his personally filmed intros and, more specifically, "outtros," to allow otherwise questionable endings to fit the code. In other words, the "play" can end with the protagonist "getting away" with crime, as it does splendidly in this case. Then Mr. Hitchcock comes on and explains how the protagonist was eventually caught and forced to pay by going to prison. I prefer to end episodes like this the way that I am sure Mr. Hitchcock (and the screenwriter) really wanted it to end but was unable due to code restrictions and, of course, sponsor and network interference. Absolutely fine episode. One of Hitch's best.
20 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Two Scenes Significantly Weaken This Episode
FlushingCaps22 July 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Other reviewers have aptly summed up the story here. With a big spoiler alert, I will go to my complaint. It's impossible to write about this without spoiling it for people soon to view it.

After Carl is told that someone is trying to poison him with arsenic, there is a scene where he looks around his wife's art studio and finds a box of arsenic. He seems stunned. Next comes Annette offering him some orange juice. He looks rather scared, asks her if she loves him and when she gives a good, positive reply, he downs the juice.

These two scenes do not fit in at all with the ending. If he knows she isn't poisoning him-which he does, as the closing scene makes clear-why on earth is he looking around her studio to see if there's any arsenic. He knew where the arsenic was coming from. And there's no reason for him, when alone with his wife, to seem afraid to drink the juice. Maybe if the doctor was watching, he'd want to continue to fool him, but otherwise...

Those two scenes seem to be put into the show simply to mislead the viewer into thinking Carl has reason to worry about his wife. In other words, given the ending scene, these scenes were inserted solely to mislead the viewer because the lead character would not behave that way, given the rest of the script. There are lots of good mystery stories where the guilty person acts up in front of a group to try to lead them away from suspecting him/her. But they don't behave as though innocent when they are all alone.

Otherwise it's a good story and I enjoyed it, but those two scenes really weaken it.
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Poisonous malice
TheLittleSongbird15 June 2022
John Meredyth Lucas directed two 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes prior to "Malice Domestic". The first was the very underrated "Jonathan", one of the fairly lowly rated episodes this reviewer actually liked. The other was the underwhelming "Crackpot", saved from total mediocrity from one truly great performance despite having one of the season's most preposterous stories. "Malice Domestic", his third and last episode for the series, sounded like it would be a very good episode.

And it was. To me, "Malice Domestic" to me is the best of Lucas' three 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes, even better than "Jonathan" and leagues better than "Crackpot". Is it a series high point? No. Is it a season high point? Again no. Is it worth watching. Absolutely yes and actually in my view as far as this up and down season goes "Malice Domestic", even when not being perfect itself, is one of the better episodes while not being a high point (although it actually almost was).

It is only let down a little by having a little too much padding, will agree that the art studio and orange juice scenes were irrelevant and felt like padding.

Otherwise, "Malice Domestic" is very good. It really is enlivened by the acting, with scorching performances from Ralph Meeker and Phyllis Thaxter that have a lot of intensity without veering into melodrama. Their characters were ones that would have been easy to overact in lesser hands, but the two have the right amount of intensity and vulnerability. The character interaction similarly is intense. Even with the padding, the story still manages to be very suspenseful and not too typical. It really kept me guessing throughout and for me the ending was a big surprise. Despite not being directed by Hitchcock, it was a story and premise worthy of him and actually wasn't too far off his level when he is not quite on top form but with plenty of what made him so great.

Lucas gives his most assured direction of his three outings here and does really well at keeping the tension afloat, to me despite "Crackpot" being disappointing he did show signs of having potential of being a more regular director for the series but wasn't given a chance (or at least enough of one). It's slickly made with some nice atmospheric shots. The audio is suitably ominous and will never stop raving about the haunting use of "Funeral March of a Marionette" for the series' main theme. Hitchcock's bookending is typically droll in writing and delivery.

"Malice Domestic" is thoughtfully written without being talky or too melodramatic as well.

Concluding, very good episode. 8/10.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Filled with irrelevant details.
planktonrules21 February 2021
"Malice Domestic" is an episode where the story idea seemed a lot better than the actual episode. One of the biggest problems is the whole dog angle...one that just seemed irrelevant.

Ralph Meeker and Phyllis Thaxter play Carl and Annette, two married folks who seem quite happy. However, Carl begins having awful stomach pains and they are so bad they contact a doctor. After some tests, the doctor is convinced that Carl is being poisoned with arsenic! But Carl won't believe it and laughs off the doctor's suggestion. What's next?

This is a decent enough story but it also is one that left me feeling that it was just okay. The dog was cute...not sure why it was included in the episode...regardless who the owner was.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great episode
karaperrio11 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Yes a fine episode , but 1 point, another reviewer thought the scene with Limoge green in her studio ruining the story by his startled reaction to her having arsenic in her studio. I am sure he easily got Arsenic from another source it was widely available in many products, rat poison etc, so when he saw the Limoge green had arsenic in it he knew his plan was going to work even better, she had a ready supply in her studio. He never even knew Limoge green had arsenic in it, he started the plot with his own arsenic but it worked to divert attention off him, good writing i feel.

Nice little story and the obvious jealousy towards the dogs love of him and perhaps his over devotion to the female of the species offered more fuel to the lady's possible guilt.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
SLICK STUFF FROM THE MASTER...
tcchelsey9 September 2023
Credit John Meredyth Lucas for directing this intriguing tale. Lucas later turned to cop shows, such as MANNIX, and was the stepson of legendary director Michael Curtiz. Like father, like son.

Ralph Meeker returns to the series as does Phyllis Thaxter, playing husband (Carl) and wife (Annette) who seem to have a happy life together --until he starts getting sick. The doc is called in, only to discover Carl is slowly being poisoned? How can that be?

If you are a true Hitchcock fan, you wouldn't want it any other way... Outstanding writing by Victor Wolfson, who penned many mysteries for the early tv show SUSPENSE. This was perhaps a re-working of one of his stories. Beautifully done.

I agree with the last reviewer; there was (and still is) a CODE on tv where a murderer is NOT supposed to get away with a crime.... and Hitch does conclude at the end the killer got their just reward! That's all we'll tell you.

Only debit: it's kind of strange to see two-fisted Meeker playing an artist? Meeker would have been more convincing as an athlete, like a high school or college coach. He's a tough guy, so it would take a lot of poison to knock him down.

A classic mystery for a late night. I would rate this a 10 plus as, again, I could never have guessed the ending. From SEASON 2 remastered Universal dvd box set. 2006.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed