"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Martha Mason, Movie Star (TV Episode 1957) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
How to make self absorbed work
TheLittleSongbird3 August 2022
Was honestly not expecting to like "Martha Mason Movie Star" let alone love it so much. There have been episodes of 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' where the lead character is so awful to such an irritating degree or their character flaws are so overdone that it unbalances the story and makes it difficult to enjoy. Judging from what was read online prior to watching, with even those that liked the episode acknowledging that, "Martha Mason Movie Star" honestly sounded like one of those episodes.

Even with such an awful character, "Martha Mason Movie Star" to me actually worked though it is totally understandable if it doesn't for others. Namely because it is so well acted, suspenseful and because the character manages to be interesting in a compelling scenario, other 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes to have characters so detestable don't have those which is the difference. It is one of the best and most interesting episodes that Justus Addiss directed for 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' and much better than the rating here suggests.

"Martha Mason Movie Star" runs out of gas towards the end a little when the self-absorbed personality gets a bit too much.

Perhaps a bit of a slow starter.

However, a lot is good here. It is incredibly well acted for one thing. Judith Evelyn relishes her role to a wonderfully bat out of hell degree and it is quite thrilling to watch and she succeeds in making her psychologically fascinating and not over-cartoonish. While she does dominate the episode, there are so many other elements that are great that there isn't any unbalancing. Robert Ermhardt also does a great job against type and did feel for him. They are electric together.

Also standing out is the absolutely delicious and really quite ingenious ending, one of my favourites of Season 2 (which had some great endings but also some severely underwhelming ones). Not only a complete surprise but also a relief. Hitchcock's bookending is wonderfully dry humoured and Addiss' direction is some of his most inspired. The script isn't too talky and the story absorbs and doesn't feel predictable or over-stretched. There is also suspense in what would happen to Evelyn's character and how far the self absorbing (usually hate this character trait intensely) would go. The production values are slick and "Funeral March of the Marionettes" is still wonderfully devillish.

Very good episode and surprisingly so. 8/10.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"I killed him, and now I'm free! Free! Free!"
classicsoncall27 August 2021
Warning: Spoilers
We never do meet actress Martha Mason in this one, but her delusional fan Mabel McKay (Judith Evelyn) thinks she's the spitting image. I couldn't get over how casually she asked her husband Henry (Robert Emhardt) for a divorce, just like any old conversation she might be having with someone else. But gee whiz, the 'other woman' revealed at the end of this little tale (Karen Norris) looked like she could have been an Olympic power lifter. Was she wearing shoulder pads, or what? Anyway, Ms. Mabel got all caught up in her own little fantasy world much to her surprise, but maintained enough composure to do one of those Martha Mason swoons to close out the episode. She would have made a great audition.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I'm shocked that Henry put up with her as long as he did!
planktonrules1 March 2021
When the story begins, you soon notice that Mabel is a pretty awful person. She's vain, foolish and rather unpleasant towards her husband...and she seems to contribute little to the marriage. She also hates her husband and wants a divorce because she finds him boring...though I think he's one of the few people who would put up with such an unpleasant woman, so she should consider herself lucky! Regardless, this awful woman decides that since he won't divorce her, she'll just have to kill him and bury him in the garden he's dug...so she does! Can she manage to get away with it or will it come back to haunt her...one way or another?

Because Mabel is nearly 100% awful, the audience really wants to see her punished! It's not like some murderers, where you can empathize somewhat with her. Nope....she's simply terrible...and a bit stupid. The writers and Judith Evelyn did a good job here making you dislike her so much! Now the twist is not great but seeing Mabel get hers...well that makes this one so worth seeing!
15 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Queen of the Fan Mags
dougdoepke28 April 2009
Pity poor husband Henry. He's middle-age, over-weight, and not very attractive, but what did he do to deserve wife Mabel. She's so deluded about her plain, average looks, she thinks she resembles movie glamour girl Martha Mason. And when not in one of her dramatic poses or fishing for compliments, she treats poor Henry with arrogant disdain even though he works hard at his office job. No wonder he looks forward every week to Wednesday night at his lodge meetings or to his afternoons gardening in the flower bed. Together, they're really just an average middle-age couple if only she would give up her extravagant illusion.

In my book, it's a really delicious twist ending, fully deserving of the Hitchcock brand name. Also, the episode provides the great Robert Emhardt one of his few sympathetic roles showing the considerable range of his talent-- no wonder he was a Hitchcock favorite. Judith Evelyn also excels as the vain, silly wife, all meaningful pauses and dramatic poses. I wouldn't be surprised writer Mason based her on a real life character who sat through too many Joan Crawford matinées. Anyway, I didn't see that ending coming and I bet others won't either. It's really a fitting lesson in manic self-absorption.
37 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A wannabe actress creates her fiction.
rileynewman23 September 2023
I love the opening. The 1950s space race era pop culture depiction of space travel always had a special place in my heart.

Henry was the stereotypical 1950s husband just short of being a wife beater. He said he doesn't approve of divorce and his wife most obey. This 1950s view on marriage definitely made the episode a interesting time piece. I don't see how the reviewers see henry as sympathetic. But the wife being so full of herself was hilarious. Her fake letter almost made me laugh out loud. Overall It was still pretty decent despite how dated it was compared to other timeless episodes. The twist ending was definitely a well set up and wrapped everything up nicely.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Needed a part 2
glitterrose10 July 2022
I thoroughly enjoyed this episode as well.

I'm somebody that likes a few celebrities (practically everybody I like is either old, dead or has beens). I innocencently like the celebs I enjoy. It hasn't turned into an obsession. I find 'stans' to be quite creepy tbh. I think our leading actress deserves major credit for turning this into a comedic piece instead of making the viewer think her character is just pathetic.

Mabel is a drama queen tuned up all the way. She's absolutely obsessed with the actress Martha Mason and thinks she looks just like her and she thinks others thinks she looks like Martha as well.

Martha's married to Henry. He puts up better with the Martha obsession better than a lot of people would imo. Henry's into gardening. Too bad Mabel doesn't realize that just like a movie star is her whole life, Henry has some hobbies that it'd be nice if she said something positive about instead of acting in disdain over.

Henry's done it now. He tells Mabel that she looks as much like Martha Mason as he does. Mabel slams him over the head with a shovel and buries him in the garden. I should mention this all taking place outside in broad daylight. Good thing nobody came out to check the mail or heading to the car to run errands, eh? Anyway, Mabel's got him buried. Time to craft up a story to explain Henry's disappearance. Mabel comes up with a story involving Henry running off with another woman. Mabel's on the phone drama queening with Henry's boss and she's 'reading' a blank piece of paper that's supposed to be the letter Henry left behind. Mabel can't help herself. Even writing a letter from Henry's point of view she can't help to mention Martha Mason and Henry's boss is even confused by that tidbit. What's he going on about? Anyway, Henry's boss says he'll say he sent Henry on a business trip to explain his absence and so they won't be the talk of the town. Henry's boss clearly doesn't know Mabel that well because no doubt she's been drama queening it up all over town and telling everybody Henry left her for another woman.

Mabel's called down to the police station and she's clearly been putting on airs around town with how she's dressed. Mabel's about to get a shocker. Henry DID have another woman and she's also in the police station saying Henry wouldn't leave without her. The cops tell Mabel they saw how well Henry's flowers were growing and they they found Henry. Mabel drama queens it up to the very last minute.

I meant what I said in the header. I would've loved to have seen Mabel's behavior in court and even prison. Perhaps even have a scene with Martha Mason as she's seen filing a restraining order against Mabel.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good enough that I watched it twice laughing.
gerrywalton-162138 June 2022
It was so funny when She out in Public looking at poster of Martha Mason while She is eating popcorn. The 2 ladies walked up with their judgemental smirks. She jus laughs them away. The reason I wanted to do this review is, watching the layout within their house. It is like I am standing in the 1st Cleaver House. From "Leave It To Beaver" I recall the 1st house then they moved once more. It jus seems to look like inside of the Beavers house.
12 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
The Patience of Job
Hitchcoc17 June 2013
I won't spoil the ending, other than to say that until I got there I was pretty tired of this episode. Hitchcock's portrayal of shrew-like women is pretty consistent and this is no exception. History has shown us that he was a bit of a misogynist, especially in his movies (Marnie, The Birds, etc.). The long suffering husband has been portrayed ad- infinitum. As I've tried to catch up on these episodes, I've run across so many abused men. Most recently it was the man who murdered his wife and locked her in the trunk of his car, only to be foiled by a highway patrolman. Anyway, this one is so self centered that she can't see what a nice life she has. She is enamored with some film star and truly believes that they are alike in appearance and talent. When she strikes, we know the wrong person has paid the price. Enjoy this one. It has a payoff.
20 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Review: Martha Mason, Movie Star
neiljbd23 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
My review: Alfred Hitchcock presents: and Martha Mason, Movie Star written by: Neil Leslie Gilbert

Me wondered about personality of movie actress character. Thoughts about dysfunctional acquintance's and citizens I've privately witnessed, who've enacted scenes from popular movie's or show's as there response (view a & b below)

Wouldn't accept motive for homicide of movie actress character. Me would think: Movie actress character was unable to acknowledge or accept her behaviour as dysfunctional. (As she's an actress).

Me experiences of dysfunctional behaviour include a) subjection and b) witness.

A) I've received complaints about alleged behavioural account's filed by third parties via medical examiner (via unknown formalities e.g. Third parties written or verbal account's) Usually biased investigations were processed ( as complaints are deemed: true). Therefore me is perceived as 'lied' . Therefore medical team's prognosis is: delusional, psychotic, paranoid, Autistic. As I'm unable to provide reference or witness's . Me requested hearing and eye tests I.e. Should me pass hearing test and eye test, my screening/ tests my recollection of sound and vision would be reliable. Response was continue with treatment. ( perhaps medical team's felt threatened, undermined or professionally challenged?

B) Alfred Hitchcock presents: Martha Mason, Movie Star triggered thoughts about actual citizens and acquintance's previously using enactment's from screenplay, dialogue, song and reference from news bulletin's and stage whispers (which me witnessed during scheduled viewing & scheduled listening).

Me literacy referred to me opinions iterated in literature due to Alfred Hitchcock presents: As Martha Mason, Movie Star's production (definitively defined as each of three definitions for Production) was productively produced.

All footage with audio was brilliant. Realised stabilization from unstable mental state.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed