"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" The Motive (TV Episode 1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The Motive
mackjay28 December 2010
In agreement with the other comment, this is a superior episode of AHP. Simply and perfectly titled, "The Motive" has so much in it that it seems longer than it is, but in a good way because it's so interesting.

The plot setup, while preposterous, is well handled and convincing. And the actors are well cast, giving energetic performances. Skip Homeier (Tommy) never achieved real stardom, but he made an impression every time he appeared on screen, in films such as "The Gunfighter" (where he plays a young gunslinger lacking common sense) and especially in "Tomorrow the World!" (in which he plays a former Hitler Youth, with chilling realism). TV stalwarts William Redfield and Carl Betz (soon to play Donna Reed's husband on her sitcom) bring plenty of life to their characters, and we even get Gary Clarke as a bellboy for one scene.

What makes this episode so memorable is the well-played, cold calculation of the characters, and the brilliant twist ending, which wraps things up, yet leaves the viewer thinking. "The Motive" is a like a good short story come to life. Is Rose Simon Kohn's original story comparable? It may be worth seeking out.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Is it possible to commit a crime that is absolutely foolproof?
planktonrules31 March 2021
Tommy (Skip Homeier) begins the episode by talking with his drunk friend about murders and how murderers are caught because their motivation is known to the police and those around them. However, Tommy insists if there is no motive (such as a randomly chosen victim) the police cannot possibly solve the crime. So, in a moment of madness, the pair decide to test Tommy's theory. And, as you'd expect in this series, there's an unexpected twist. And, fortunately, at the end, Hitchcock himself doesn't backpeddle and explain how the folks were somehow caught...something he often did to please the sponsors...but which ruined a few episodes. Well worth interesting and enjoyable....and very well written.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"I follow every case right to the bitter end."
classicsoncall12 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Watching these Hitchcock stories in order starting with the first season, I can reasonably say that this one was the best so far. It was cleverly written with a slick premise, though it does rely on an amateur criminologist willing to commit murder to prove a tenuous theory that a motiveless crime is rarely solved. This is one where you're not likely to see the twist coming, unlike so many of those in the series where the conclusion was more than obvious. Skip Homeier seemed to get a lot of these types of roles in which his character is somehow flawed; as Tommy Greer, he pursues a dubious challenge issued by his friend Richard (William Redfield) to commit the so called 'perfect crime'. He might have been successful too, if the trap that Richard set for him wasn't so diabolical. The villain of the piece here, besides Tommy, was the guy who not only had murder on his hands, but a revenge plan that might have qualified him for the perfect crime that seemed to be so elusive.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Just a Couple of Good Buddies
dougdoepke5 May 2010
Superior Hitchcock, featuring two of the quirkiest actors on TV—Redfield and Homeier. That opening scene of the two of them sloshing around while the girl is draped suggestively across the chair is pushing the envelope for 50's TV-- so is the premise, for that matter.

Homeier's "motiveless murder" is rather painstakingly set up in victim Betz's home, even though Homeier's cover story (a pollster) seems implausibly complicated. Nonetheless, the half-hour is smoothly directed with some nice touches, such as the amusing elevator scene.

Good, twist ending that I didn't see coming. I suspect that having justice served on screen instead of during Hitch's epilogue was to satisfy nervous censors. However, if you think about it, I don't think the scales of justice are quite balanced by that ending. See if you agree. Anyway, it's an intriguing and well-directed showcase for a couple of fine actors, one that also helped build the series reputation.
31 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Changing my tune
glitterrose23 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I remember the first time I watched this episode and I didn't like it to start with. I've seen both main actors in other AHP episodes so I knew they both knew how to act and just thought there was a breakdown because not a lot of people know how to act drunk.

For some reason I gave this episode another shot and came away with basically just enjoying the insanity of the whole episode. You got a man who has a hobby of keeping track of murders! It's not something as simple as reading a newspaper article or watching a news segment and that being all there is to it. He even has a chart that he can show off and talk about even when he's completely hammered! You come up with a crazy idea while being loaded and you'd think clearer minds would prevail when he's sobered up. Nope, he's got his mind set on committing this murder he came up with while being completely drunk.

It's what Tommy doesn't know. Richard's set him up and Richard wasn't even drunk at all. I particularly enjoy Richard's walk off in the final scene. It was as entertaining to me as the lady in 'Coming, Mama'. Just look at the smile on her face. That lady looked like Joan Crawford as she walks forward and saying they'll have to get some more medicine.

So yeah, you might cringe at the drunk acting but the episode really is worth a watch.

And I realize I might be talking to an empty room here but I truly wish the Alfred Hitchcock shows were on high quality dvd. I know AHP is on dvd but the reviews for the quality of the content has scared me off buying them. I don't want to buy something that people are already saying freezes up. And AHH isn't on dvd as far as I know. It's just a shame these quality series don't get the attention/respect they deserve.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Motiveless Crime??
kidboots8 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
From the ridiculous ("Sylvia") to the sublime ("The Motive"). Just imagine tuning into "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" in January 1958 - one week seeing "Sylvia" hands down the worst episode ever, then the next week one of the best in "The Motive". Like Hitchcock's feature "Rope" (itself based on the Loeb-Leopold thrill killings of the 1920s) - Tommy Greer (Skip Homeier) puts his hobby of crime study to the ultimate test. Drunk and spurred on by his buddy, Tommy plans the perfect murder, picking out a random name in the Chicago phone book (they are in L.A.), sober, only Tommy is keen to go ahead with it. Posing as a pollster, he visits his victim, Stanton (Carl Betz), one night for a survey. Back home Tommy is proud of his deed but Richard has a twist for him as the old motto is revised as "hell hath no fury like a man scorned"!!!

Skip Homeier, a child actor on Broadway and radio, had been brought to Hollywood to recreate his role as a child indoctrinated by the Hitler Youth Movement in "Tomorrow the World" but he was never given a chance to prove his versatility, always being cast as a brat. Alfred Hitchcock did give him a chance in the 1950s with two quirky roles in his weekly series - as Tommy Greer in "The Motive" and in "Momentum", a Cornell Woolrich story about a desperate man leaving a path of destruction all because of a $450 debt!!

Highly Recommended.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Theory of murder
TheLittleSongbird15 November 2022
Alfred Hitchcock Presents' is a very interesting and very well done, if not consistent, series that ran for seven seasons between 1955 and 1962. Every season had some truly fine episodes, and they all had some not so good episodes. Personally liked Season 3 on the whole, it did have misfires sure (such as the bizarre previous episode "Sylvia") but it also had a lot of hits and settled a lot quicker than the previous two seasons. "The Motive" had one of the season's most appealing if potentially nonsensical premises, that is very Hitchcockian with a 'Rope' influence.

That premise is more than lived up to in the execution. "The Motive" is a massive improvement over "Sylvia", not that that would have been too hard to achieve, and among the best episodes of Season 3. It is also to me one of Robert Stevens' best 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' episodes, and proof that when the series' most prolific director was on form (like with this and "The Glass Eye" as far as his Season 3 output goes) his episodes were truly great. And he is on form here.

Maybe it is a slight slow starter, but with everything else as good as they were that turned out to be pretty insignificant.

Production values are suitably moody and professional looking. Have always loved the series' theme tune, with Gounod's "Funeral March of a Marionette" being for me one of the best uses of pre-existing classical music on television as has been said more than once before by me (bravo to Bernard Hermann for suggesting it).

It is tautly scripted, not being too reliant on talk, and avoids being too melodramatic, which was a danger with this type of story. It also doesn't take itself too seriously. The story is crisply paced and there is enough going on without feeling too over-crowded, while also being suitably calculated. Lots is intriguing here and it doesn't become too preposterous. The atmosphere is suitably suspenseful and there is a lot of it. Stevens directs with a sure hand.

Do agree that the slow burning and chillingly cold character writing and how calculated they are and also the leaving one floored and extremely clever twist elevate "The Motive" to a greater level. It is very well acted by the whole cast, with quirky yet chilling work from Skip Homeier and William Redfield (with Homeier being particularly good). They have great chemistry.

Concluding, great episode. 9/10.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
BLAME IT ON HITCHCOCK IF YOU'RE IN JAIL?
tcchelsey5 October 2023
It's been said many times... prisons are filled with folks who were inspired by what they saw either on tv or in the movies?

Enter a guy in a bar, called Tommy (well played by Skip Homeier) who along with his drinking buddy (noneother than William Redfield) toss ideas about committing the perfect crime. As Tommy has it, the perfect murder could be committed when there is absolutely NO motive. So his plan is to basically kill a stranger, with no ties, nothing!

I totally agree with the last reviewer; Hitchcock's famous homicide movie, ROPE (1948), may have inspired this story with a tv slant. There are some stark similarities.

Catch William Redfield in this one, who is drunk at the start, but sobers up very nicely a la Hitchcock, without giving too much away.... Also in the cast is Carl Betz (DONNA REED SHOW), playing the innocent victim of this insane plot. Look for the old LEAVE IT BEAVER house and garage in the background. The house was next door to the home used in later episodes of MY THREE SONS.

Faithfully directed by Robert Stevens, who mastered 44 episodes for Hitch. Rose Simon Kohn wrote this gem, famous for the classic comedy, PILLOW TO POST, starring Ida Lupino and Sydney Greenstreet.

Skip Homeier began his career in the early 1940s as a child actor, best known for westerns. He's perfect for this role as you will see.

One for the crime books. From SEASON 3 remastered dvd box set. 5 dvds. 17 hrs. 2007 release.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Murder is my hobby
sol-kay22 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS** One of the strangest of all the some 300 "Alfred Hitchcock Presents" episodes that involves this armature criminologists Tommy Greer,Skip Homeier, who to prove his point goes out of his way,some 1,000 miles from New York to Chicago, to commit a murder of a person totally unknown to him. After getting good and drunk and bragging about his expertise in how to commit the perfect crime his equally drunk friend Richard, William Redfield, talks Tommy into proving that a murder without a motive is virtually impossible to solve by him committing one himself!

Picked out of the Chicago phone book, why Chicago?,by Richard as the lucky or unlucky guy to get it, murdered, is the friendly and hard working family man Jerome Stanton played actor Carl Betz who's soon to become, and it couldn't be soon enough, the TV husband of Donna Reed. Tommy who has by now lost all his humanity in proving his point that a murder without a motive is unsolvable has no trouble at all murdering the unsuspecting Stanton by making him think he's doing a TV survey on what show he watches,the Friday Night Fights, on the weekends.

***SPOILERS*** Thinking that he's home free since the police will never suspect him in Stanton's murder Tommy has a big surprise coming his way. And that surprise will end up sending him straight to the Illinois state electric chair! You see Tommy was so obsessed in proving that a murder without a motive is the perfect crime that he never bothered to check out the background of whom he was to murder family man Jerome Stanton! If he did he would have known that the total stranger he planned to and eventually did murder would lead to police straight to his door!
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Do Drunk People Really Talk That Way?
Hitchcoc26 June 2013
This episode is certainly fun. I had a hard time getting past the Foster Brooks version of drunkenness at the beginning. I've met many drunks in my life, but this is so laughable. At least they didn't hiccup when they talked. Once past this, it is an entertaining version of Hitchcock's "Rope." One of the men can't ignore the challenge of testing his theories. This leads to his seeking out and killing Donna Reed's husband, played by Carl Betz. He seems like a grand, pleasant fellow. The whole thing revolves around the ability to set the murder up and follow through. The whole business plays out awfully well, considering the guy has to go to Chicago to do his evil deed. There is the usual twist and we are relatively satisfied. The episode involves a couple of very good character actors from the fifties and fits with the codes of the time.
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed