"Law & Order" Apocrypha (TV Episode 1993) Poster

(TV Series)

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Free Will in a Fundamentalist Cult?
Better_TV2 April 2018
Sam Robards is Daniel Hendricks, leader of a small church (or is it a cult?) who stands accused of leading a young woman to detonate a fertilizer bomb in a parking garage, where she also died. Law & Order episodes that feature deliciously evil villains tend to be some of my favorites, and this one is no exception. Dr. Olivet is brought in to help determine whether Hendricks is insane or not, another interesting wrinkle to the episode.

The prosecutor's office ultimately must prove that the victim, as well as others from the church, were brainwashed and did not have freedom of choice despite the fact that the church's doors were always open. "Religion and choice," Schiff muses. "Strange bedfellows for two thousands years."

The confrontation between devout Catholic EADA Ben Stone and obsessed fundamentalist Hendricks towards the end of the episode is worth the wait. Stay till the end credits, because this one has a third act twist even after the verdict is delivered.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Hidden meanings
TheLittleSongbird9 September 2020
The subject matter sounded incredibly creepy, though cult (or similar)-related stories can potentially fall into the traps of being too over the top and bizarre. When done right though, these kind of stories do send chills up the spine. The 'Law and Order' franchise were often extremely good at exploring a wide range of heavy and difficult subjects and pulling no punches when doing so. The early seasons of the original 'Law and Order' and the early ones of 'Special Victims Unit' were especially good at this.

"Apocrypha" has one of Season 4's most difficult to pull off and most controversial subjects perhaps, with it being one where the execution as said above can go either way. It mostly handles it very well, leaning thankfully towards being creepy and thought-provoking more than it it being over-the-top and bizarre. "Apocrypha" is not one of the best episodes of 'Law and Order's' Season 4 or of the show, but neither are disgraced in any way.

Personally did find that the police investigation was not as interesting as the legal scenes, it was when the legal stuff kicked in where the episode became incredibly compelling, picked up the pace and really made me think. Whereas the investigative elements were well acted and does a lot right but in comparison that side of the story is slightly routine. Briscoe and his chemistry with Logan aren't without issue, but they shone a lot more in other episodes before and since.

Some of the dialogue is a touch on the heavy-handed side.

Most of it however is very tight and provokes a lot of thought, never less than engaging. Which has always been great for this show and for the franchise where all the episodes are dialogue heavy (especially in the legal scenes). The story is a bit on the routine side to begin with but picks up significantly not long after, the subject is handled with edge but also without falling into camp and also handled tactfully. A good deal of interesting questions are raised and an admirable effort is made in not taking sides, the moral dilemmas of the case and the characters are very insightfully written. The case is never too obvious, even including an unexpected twist at the end, and doesn't get too complicated.

Furthermore, the characters are interesting. Stone has always been a juicy character and Kincaid and Van Buren have settled remarkably well for so early on in their tenure. Hendricks is a real creep but without being too caricaturish. The production values are slick and the camera work is suitably intimate without feeling too rushed. The music is only used when needed and doesn't overbear when it is. The climactic confrontation between Stone and the defendant is reason alone to see "Apocrypha". As ever, the episode is very well acted. Especially Michael Moriarty and Sam Robards.

In summary, very good episode. 8/10
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Church or cult?
bkoganbing14 July 2019
A bomb goes off in a parking garage and the woman who was planting the bomb gets blown up herself. Jerry Orbach and Chris Noth determine that she was a member of an extreme fundamentalist Christian church.

Church or as some would put it a cult? A question that philosophy classes debate endlessly today. So do the courts.

Michael Moriarty and Jill Hennessy are all for charging cult leader Sam Robards as providing the marching orders. Did the late bomber have any real choice in the thrall of a charismatic leader?

It's a knotty issue revolving around freedom of religion and her free will to leave the cult. Robards is quite the good choice for this role.

This is an episode that will have you thinking.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What is a cult?
rmax3048235 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
A young woman explodes a home made bomb in a financial building and dies in the process. The detectives discover from her parents, who haven't heard from her in a long time, that she was a member of a small religious organization based on fundamentalist Christian beliefs and run by the charismatic and avuncular but stern leader, Sam Robards.

The DA's office charges him with murder, arguing that his flock merely carries out his orders because he's brainwashed them. He's convicted and his followers, some of them with sympathetic characters, commit mass suicide.

Once again the series tackles a challenging issue, and this time without slanting in unnecessarily it favor of the law. Robards isn't ugly or nuts, despite Dr. Olivet's offhand diagnosis of manic-depressive. (Where she got that from is anybody's guess.) He genuinely believes the apocryphal nonsense with which he's imbued his followers. And in turn they worship him as if he represents the Second Coming.

The whiffs of Jonestown and the Manson Family are obvious, but the more relevant incident involved the Hale-Bopp or Heaven's Gate cult, thirty-nine suicides in San Diego which followed the airing of this program by a few years.

The defense raises an absorbing question. Why should we call this organization a "cult"? Doesn't every church have a leader of some sort? And doesn't every religion preach a gospel that, in a sense, "brainwashes" it's followers? Beyond that -- an issue not raised in this program -- doesn't every organization, whether business or government, try to impart a set of values to its members? In other words, and to put it simply, isn't every religion a "cult"? Sociologists have wrestled with this problem -- cult members, apocryphal beliefs, brainwashing -- for years and the answer they've come up with is a simple one: "We don't know." Pundits appear after every morally offensive act by one of these groups and explain their actions intuitively -- child abuse, drugs, or whatever -- without any evidence. The "dysfunctional family" explanation is not only unjustified but painful to the parents and siblings of the victim. I happened to know one of the members of the Hale-Bopp group since she was a child and no accusation could be more wrong.

The fundamentalist beliefs are seeing a resurgence in the political arena these days. We see terms like "Anti-Christ" aimed at the president of the United States. Christian precepts are being turned into law. Politicians announce that God has told them to support some particular policy, usually against the disenfranchised, the agnostic, or one or another non-Christian religion. A Republican candidate for president is suspected of being a "cult" member because he belongs to the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints instead of being, say, a Methodist, Baptist, or Presbyterian.

What is a "cult"? And how do you define "brainwashing"?
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tragic end
safenoe26 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The ending of Apocrypha, from season four of Law and Order, was very tragic and was based on the Jim Jones horrific tragedy in Guyana. I never expected it, and Apocrypha really went full on with the headlines ripped from the front pages when people read actual newspapers. Anyway, Apocrypha draws upon various real-life events and all within the 45 or so minutes in the episode.

Anyway, this episode draws upon religious freedom and young people drawn to cults from the mean streets of New York City based upon The French Connection and Serpico, and updates it to the early 90s but before the Neked Cowboy rode on to the scene.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed