"The Magician" Man on Fire (TV Episode 1973) Poster

(TV Series)

(1973)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
"Man on Fire" - Someone Give Me A Match!
Gislef12 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I'd rate this episode lower, but veteran Lloyd Bochner has one good scene near the end where he waggles his eyebrows and gives Tony a "Sure, I'll take that $5,000 you were going to pay off my accomplice with" bit with a roguish "Money? Why, I've never been known to refuse" line. Credit to Bochner, he sells the line in this otherwise weak-sauce episode.

A big part of the problem is that Brad David as Danny is way too old for the part. He plays this nerdy nebbish "kid" (David was 26 at the time), which might have worked if played by a child actor. Or even a teenager. But the script can't make up its mind, so David doesn't know what he's doing and it shows. David plays Danny as a geeky teenager who lives at home and is worried about disappointing his father. But Danny is... 26?

This whole mess reduces Tony to mostly a bystander in a show about him. He doesn't do magic, and instead of using some magic to distract Bochner's character and his thugs, Tony rigs some photo lights into strobe lights and then dodges the bad guys by climbing up a fire escape. Maybe if they called him "The MacGyver" instead of "The Magician"?

Even Keene Curtis doesn't get much to do, which is not a good sign. And the plot doesn't make much sense. Why does Carol burst into laughter when Paul Ryerson proposes to her? To provoke him into shoving her down the stairs? How does she know he'll shove her? People laugh at me, I don't shove them. Or come anywhere close to shoving her so she can fake a fall down the stairs, if that's what she did? How does Carol guarantee she doesn't break her neck for real? What if Paul knows enough first aid that he can tell she's faking her injury and, later, death? There's a couple of tossaway lines about industrial espionage, but we never see it so it has no impact whatsoever.

Although they do mention that Paul's company is developing a battery that can drive a car. Ah, the fuel-less 70s, which is an ironic precursor to the show's redrafting later due in part because of the '73 energy crisis.

I don't find the scenes of the Mission Inn as overused as the other reviewer here does. They go on just long enough for me, and make for some decent scenery. Yeah, they go on longer than necessary. But the whole episode is rather padded and it all goes on longer than necessary. I like the scene of them dredging up the trunk which goes on forever. Tony says "Nah, they won't find a body in the trunk", then does a complete 180 when they do! I'd rather see shots of the Inn than more of the plodding dialogue and so-so escape and fight scenes.

So overall, a mediocre episode in a run of mediocre or worst episodes. I don't remember this one from the original run, but maybe it's my brain fighting back to keep me from suffering trauma.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. What do you think?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Bad magic, bad writing, and bad direction make this one bad show! (and I don't mean good).
LarryBrownHouston4 February 2008
Larry-view: This is the weakest episode yet, watching them in order. The title "Man on Fire," seems to have nothing to do with the plot as there is no fire. Underutilization of the series' gimmicks reduces the flash factor: zero footage of the plane, zero of the car phone, and very little magic. Worse, most of the magic in this episode is performed by a nerd trainee of Tony's who even Tony admits has no talent. Worst of all? Mark Wilson and the writer murder Wilson's signature trick, the tried and true silk to egg. In the normal presentation of this trick the audience is supposedly shown how it is done and are then shocked to find they have been duped. However in this case Wilson doesn't bother to explain to the audience that it's done with a fake egg, so they have no reason to believe otherwise. Then there is no shock value when the egg is revealed to be real, because they assumed it was real all along. The presentation here only works if you have seen this trick before and know the egg is not real, but if you know that, then you already know the whole trick so the entire thing is pointless. On top of all that, the writer further murders it by making it seem as though the trick was bungled when the egg is broken, even though that is the climax of the trick and the nerd magician obviously intended to break the egg and show the audience it was real. This portion of the episode was badly mangled and must have been the product of a dysfunctional team with the writer fighting Wilson, or Wilson not there, or the writer's union refusing to allow Wilson to work with the writer.

So far none of the episodes have had much humor, but the little bit featured in previous episodes really helped spice up the show. This one has none. Similar to previous episodes, however, is the convoluted plot that is implausible and poorly motivated and explained.

Finally at the climax we get a self-indulgent director who is trying to double dip his time by filming an architectural documentary of the admittedly fabulous mission. We get endless long shots of every level from a variety of interesting angles. That's fine, but only draws more attention to the lack of dramatic content provided by the anemic story. To draw the camera through the levels, the girl plays hide-and-seek with Tony for no discernible reason.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed