"Screen Directors Playhouse" Claire (TV Episode 1956) Poster

(TV Series)

(1956)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
That Darn Cat
dougdoepke20 January 2011
The 30-minutes plays much like a Hitchcock Presents episode. Second wife Vera (Lansbury) lives with doctor husband (Montgomery) in a lakeside home, where she's menaced by Claire, the first wife's pet cat. So what's up with the odd feline behavior. Vera seems like a nice, if uncertain, wife in an ordinary household. There's some suspense here since we can't be sure where the story is going or what the payoff will be.

I'm used to seeing either an aging, matronly Lansbury or the rather coarse blonde of her early movie career. Here, however, she's almost glamorous, all prettied-up in typical 50's fashion. Hubby Montgomery has traded his usual six-guns and Stetson for a doctor's stethoscope and a good guy role, which he does well. My only reservation is with Claire whose acting abilities don't get beyond that of a normal cat, instead of an unnatural force she's supposed to be. Then again, maybe director Tuttle is not used to working with 4-footed performers. All in all, an interesting, well acted half-hour.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not great...
planktonrules22 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Recently on Turner Classic Movies, they showed a bunch of episodes of "Screen Directors Playhouse" and I copied them. Now I am sitting down to finally see them all. Each show featured a major Hollywood director and one or more famous actors or actresses.

While this particular episode was not the worst they showed on TCM, this is certainly one of the lesser ones. In many ways, the show is like a reworking of "Rebecca" but the part of the crazed housekeeper is now played by a cat. And, instead of a rather naive and dopey Rebecca in the lead, Angela Landsbury play a woman who seems nuts...and later is revealed to also be quite evil.

The show begins with a man bringing home his new bride (Lansbury). It seems his last wife drowned and the new wife witnessed it. The new wife seems pretty neurotic and ill-fitting in this new role...and insists that the house cat hates her. And it continues like this for some time--Lansbury acting neurotic and goofy and the cat just standing about as she yells at it and insists it hates her. Frankly, it all seemed incredibly histrionic and dull--but at least it ended well. Sadly, it is NOT one of Miss Lansbury's best roles--and the way the part was written it didn't show the true abilities of this fine actress. As a result, it's barely watchable and silly.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Weak Entry in the Series
Michael_Elliott16 February 2011
Screen Directors Playhouse: Claire (1956)

** (out of 4)

A doctor (George Montgomery) marries his second wife (Angela Lansbury) who just happens to have witness his first wife drown to death. Once the two are married and living in the first wives old house the new wife begins to think that the cat Claire hates her and wants her out of the way. This is a rather strange short as it seems like a weak version of a Poe story or at least a reject from the Alfred Hitchcock series. I'm sure there's a good story to be found somewhere but sadly none of it is brought to life and in the end we're pretty much left with a bland story without too much energy. It appears both Lansbury and Montgomery were sleepwalking as neither one breathes any life into the film. It really did appear as if both actors were just in a little rehearsal as it's hard to see that either one of them are interested in what's going on. Lansbury really hurts the film because her character is suffering some psychological problems and the actress just can't get this out. Another problem is that the entire thing just looks incredibly cheap and it appears as if no one involved knew what type of movie they were wanting to make. Just take a look at the final sequence and the bit with the cat and the outcome. The scene is so poorly shot and edited that you can't help but feel what impact might have been there is just lost.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed