Armored (2009) Poster

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
129 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Cool B-movie badassery
dave-sturm5 December 2009
I'm not here to tell you "Armored" is Kubrickian, Hitchcockian or Fellini-esquire. Nope. Referenced directors are more like Don Siegel ("Charlie Varrick") and Walter Hill ("The Warriors"). Those two helmers didn't fool around with niceties like putting women in their movies. No skirts need apply. They unapologetically made guy movies. Guns, lots of guns. Men met violent death with a twitch of the jaw. Their movies were like a sap to the head. You want a friend? Get a dog.

"Armored" is so a guy movie. Dueling armored trucks? Bloody gunshot wounds? Exploding money? If that doesn't get the lizard part of your brain excited, then stay away.

At 88 minutes, "Armored" is all muscle without an ounce of fat. We meet six security guards who drive armored trucks, three per truck. The six, led by Matt Dillon, scheme up a fake hijack involving two trucks. Their mission one day is to deliver $42 million from the federal reserve (I think). The idea is to drive both trucks to a warehouse, stash the cash, then stage a hijack. Sure, the cops will suspect them, but if they stick together they'll get through it.

Trouble is, one of the six, played by Columbus Short, is a holdout. At first. But he faces eviction. And he's the guardian for his messed up younger brother. He needs cash bad.

Matt Dillon cajoles, pleads, persuades the holdout. No blood on anyone's hands. A clean getaway. All good, no bad. You'll be rich forever. Blue skies smiling at you ...

Right.

Everything goes to hell, of course. It's one damned thing after another and the stakes keep going up. And it almost all happens claustrophobically inside an abandoned warehouse somewhere in Los Angeles. In fact, the movie goes out of its way to project a backdrop of industrial urban decay. I happen to like industrial urban decay.

Kudos to Matt Dillon, who plays the top bad dog. He goes from charming to disappointed to frustrated to outraged to totally effing insane in the course of the movie. Love that guy.

Also, credit is due to the menacing, throbbing, blistering and totally sinister electronic soundtrack by John Murphy. I am guessing he's heard a few Tangerine Dream records.

Also, it's surprising that this is a PG-13 movie. I caught one — one! — f-bomb in this entire movie about violent tough-guy robbers. On some level, I like that. Take the kids.

The director is Nimrod Antal, a Hungarian who made a fine noir set in the Budapest subway system called "Kontroll." Screenwriter is an out-of-nowhere guy called James V. Simpson.

A lot of the people in this movie are just starting out. I am willing to bet the esteem given to this movie will rise as time goes on and these filmmakers advance in their careers.
114 out of 163 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good movie, surprisingly tense
sir-montag4 December 2009
Good, boring or bad? It's good. Worth your money? If you can spare it for a ticket, sure. Better than the trailer makes it seem? Yes, oddly.

There isn't much to the script - Guards working at armored truck company move vast amounts of cash. Guards see opportunity to retire as millionaires, one of them is too honest to go along with it all, and a well-laid plan goes to hell.

This could have been a poorly-executed Reservoir Dogs ripoff, but the skill of the cast and the director's ability to make just about anything tense pull it out of that realm and put it onto a solid footing.
79 out of 132 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
An action movie with dumb thugs
quinnox-17 December 2009
I was disappointed. I usually like heist movies but this one - "Armored" - was not smart, if you want a heist movie where they put together a great plan for the heist and there is tension to see if the plan will succeed and if they can get away with the money this is not that type of movie.

The heist plan in this film is one that was put together by dumb brutes and is not a focus of the movie. The movie is all about bloody action scenes with guns. Probably the biggest star in the movie is Laurence Fishburne, and he has put on a lot of weight and gotten fat, and none of the acting is all that good for any of the characters. But even as a dumb action movie it isn't anything special or worth seeing.
60 out of 107 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Entertaining little thriller
imdbbl5 January 2010
Armored tells the story of a few armored truck company workers who conjure a plan to steal 42 million dollars that they were suppose to transport. To pull this off, they need Ty, an Iraq war veteran who just joined the company. At first, Ty refuses to be a part of the scheme, but he desperately needs the money since he's in risk of loosing his house and his little brother might be taken away from him. Ty ends up agreeing with the all thing, but not before Mike, the leader of the guards, promise that no one will get hurt... Armored is a fast-moving heist film with a good amount of action and some unpredictable twists. Obviously, everyone can tell that things are not going to go smoothly but still, there are a few surprises and the film doesn't become predictable at any point. Looking at the cast of Armored, which is comprised by very well known actors like Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburn and Matt Dillon, one might expect a tremendous film given the quality of the actors, but that's not case. I'm not saying it's a bad film, it's not by any means but, it's not a film with depth either. If you're expecting something like that you'll be disappointed. This is a popcorn movie, there's not much to think about here, just turn your brain off and enjoy it. The acting was average with the exception of Matt Dillon who really stood out as the leader of the "bad guys". His character is a mean son of a bitch and Dillon played the role perfectly. The film fell a bit short in the third act though because the ending seemed a bit rushed. Bottom line is, Armored is entertaining and therefor a good watch, just make sure you know what kind film you're about to see.

6/10
40 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Basic but entertaining
Leofwine_draca10 October 2013
Sandwiched between his VACANCY and PREDATORS, ARMORED is director Nimrod Antal's best film, although to be fair that isn't saying much. It's one of those single-location action movies with a relatively low budget (by Hollywood standards), most of which has been spent on assembling an ensemble cast of tough-guy actors. Matt Dillon, Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne and Fred Ward, all of whom have appeared in great movies, are in supply here, albeit in supporting roles.

It's also a chance to find out what happened to SCREAM's Skeet Ulrich, if anybody cares these days. Sadly, there are two problems with ARMORED; the first is the no-name lead Columbus Short, a guy whose acting skills are pretty insipid, so you don't really care much about whether his character wins or loses. The second is the PG-13 rating, which eliminates the kind of hard-hitting violence of the early DIE HARDs that this film so desperately needs.

Saying that, it turns out to be a pretty entertaining little thriller. The storyline is basic in the extreme, but I'm a sucker for these single-location movies and in some ways the simplicity of the plot is more appealing than something in which the plotting is overdone, like MAN ON A LEDGE. The narrative is lean, pared-down and propelled by some good, surprising twists thrown into the mix. All of the big names give solid performances, and if it does get a little cheesy at times then that's par for the course. I'd rather a film be cheesy and entertaining than realistic and dull!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
a decent B-heist movie caught between film-noir and action
Quinoa19849 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
In Armored, we get a story that could have just as easily been told this year as it could have been sixty years ago. Its central 'good-guy' figure, Ty (Columbus Short), is an Iraq war veteran who takes a job working as an armored-car delivery-man, who has the backup of other members on the crew who knew his father. They plan a heist so that Ty's house isn't foreclosed by the bank (and that his younger brother isn't taken away from him for being a delinquent), and a promise is made to him by his friends that no harm will come to anyone during the heist. This, of course, isn't true, as a vagrant is in the warehouse where the armored car thieves attempt to stash the millions, and then it turns into a ticking-clock scenario where Ty has to find a way out before the other members fully turn on him in real-time (the cars have to be back in an hour, you see, or the whole plan is a bust).

Replace Germany with Iraq and you could have a similar scenario play out, and one can even see certain actors filling in shoes played by actors of today (maybe Farley Granger for Columbus Short- certainly they're both bland enough- and a heavy like Lionel Stander in Laurence Fishburne's role or Kirk Douglas in Matt Dillon's part). I kept thinking of this during Armored, perhaps as a way to amuse myself while the story kept chugging away on its somewhat-predictable gears. Somewhat in that there are a couple of twists that one doesn't expect (one involving a crew-member's suicide), and that there is some heavy action a couple of times, handled competently by director Nimrod Antal.

It's never too poorly acted, save for Short as I mentioned, and its story moves along at a quick enough pace to cover over the fact that it's characters with only so much personality to get them through the picture (i.e. Fishburne's a drunk and violent, which suits him fine as he appears to have rolled right out of bed before some shots). But mentioning film-noir in this context should, I hope, be meant as a compliment. Antal works in a style that is indebt to the far away past of crime thrillers as much as more modern fare that ask for action over character development. It's nice to see an action flick without CGI, and the actors are game for the film aiming for simple, meat-and-potatoes B-movie roots. It can work just as well seeing it in a theater, or on video, or late night on cable (the latter sounds about right really), and seeing it once, it's not a disappointment. That it's also kind of forgettable is also a little sad.
16 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
So that's the plan, huh. Just drive the truck into a building.
thesubstream8 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
At the heart of almost every truly great crime thriller is a carefully considered, methodically planned-out high stakes super-crime, which 9 times out of 10 is committed by a bunch of likable, grey-scale morality underdogs for who life isn't fair, for whom getting back at the man is, well, something worth cheering for. First-time screenwriter James V. Simpson's script for Armored gets this half right. He made extra-double-sure that we've got nothing but sympathy for the recently orphaned, Iraq war veteran Ty Hackett (Stomp the Yard's Columbus Short), who's about to have his house taken away by an evil bank (brother, I've been there). And he gave Ty a good family friend in Mike (Matt Dillon) who is super nice and gets him a job at the armored car company that he works at with Baines (Lawrence Fishbourne) and some weird French dude (Jean Reno). These guys like to have fun and play pranks, but they are also serious armored car guys too, so that means they carry guns and are tough.

After a short while, as one theoretically watches Armored, one might start to think as I did, that maybe - just maybe - this is going to be some kind of awesome, tongue-in-cheek, cornball heist movie with some on-the-nose characterizations that move the story along its natural course, cranking up the personal stakes of all involved in hopes of unveiling a really, really clever plan with lots of potential 'holy sh*t' moments. I mean, the music alone is textbook heist-movie - gritty, edgy beats working overtime as we're treated to close-ups of characters who say things like "As a matter of fact I do," and "Are you crazy??" For 45 minutes or so, the movie had some serious genre-flick potential.

Then things start to really stink. These dudes, these idiots, have no plan. There's no "Ok, here's what we're gonna do..." scene, no blueprints, no explosives, no black van or ski-masks (despite their 'test-run', as can be seen in a trailer). No, these guys are going to steal $42 million dollars from their own trucks (which are only being tracked by HOURLY contact over the radio, despite being equipped with some fancy, big-deal 'GPS technology'), and they aren't even going to sit down and discuss it. Hell, Mike only tells Ty about the plan the night before, which is completely ridiculous. But of course, Ty's got his house to think about so as long as Mike promises that 'no one will get hurt,' he's on board. Guess what, though. Somebody gets hurt. Why? Because, besides driving the trucks into an abandoned factory to hide the money, they have no plan. That was it. That was how far they thought things out. So, naturally, things start to unravel. These cats deserve everything they get for being so unprepared.

This script, frankly, feels like it's like the product of some bad improv game: "Armored Car, robbed by its own guards...GO!" Despite some half-decent buildup that could have maybe taken the film in a few interesting directions, the story just completely falls apart, and pretty soon, NOTHING makes sense, or is even remotely plausible.

When filmmakers don't have a cool "hook" for their heist, their characters seem stupid, and bungling. And when characters are stupid, and bungling, it's hard for an audience to invest in them, and their story. And when that happens, any suspense drains out the bottom of the movie, leaving a laughable, hollow husk.

Skip it. 3/10
60 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Inside job
jotix10029 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
A newly employed security guard, Ty Hackett, is not prepared for what his new colleagues are up to. Ty, an Iraq war veteran, has seen danger during his stint as a soldier. As an initiation rite, Ty is given the scare of his life, when the armored truck in which he is riding in the back, suddenly stops in an isolated area and some assailants come to rob the armored vehicle. Little does he know it is a practical joke, a sort of a hazing, and a welcome to the ranks.

Mike Cochrone, a leading figure among the guards, decides to let him on a secret: the guys have planned to steal forty-two million dollars from one of the banks. According to Mike, they have the perfect plan. Ty, who is having financial problems of his own, is the sole supporter of his small brother. The house in which they live will be repossessed if Ty cannot come up with the money he owes. Mike's offer seems tempting, but Ty is basically an honest man, who is not at all convinced to join ranks with the others.

This action packed crime story, directed by Nimrod Antal, takes a different path to others of the same genre. Written for the screen by James V. Simpson, it show how a perfect, and well planned heist goes wrong because Ty's decision not to cooperate. The men will do anything in their power to eliminate, but his experience in Iraq comes handy in fighting his fellow workers.

Matt Dillon, at his most sinister, plays Mike, the leader of the bad security guards. Laurence Fishburne, Jean Reno, Skeet Ulrich, and Amaury Nolasco are part of the gang. Columbus Short made an impression with his take on Ty Hackett.

Although not one of the best movies of this genre, "Armored" will not disappoint fans of this action packed thriller.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Armored
Siamois8 January 2010
I had been amazed by director Antal's Kontroll back in 2003. His first American project, Vacancy, was less impressive but a decent start. Armored is his second feature and while the visual signature is recognizable, the film never rises above the level of a B movie.

It's a shame because the main premise has all the ingredients for twists and turns and the ensemble cast featuring many quality actors should be able to deliver. Antal could have made a great heist film but instead goes for an action flick. Then again he could have shot a cool action flick but it doesn't really deliver in that department either.

What you are left with is one implausible situation after another, a group of poorly sketched characters bicker and fight over a sum of money. If you look past the sharp cinematography, cast and the tight music score, you're left with what could have been a below average direct-to-video featuring Van Damme or Seagal.

This was probably the most disappointing movie for me in quite some time.
63 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An Almost Perfect Plan
claudio_carvalho17 March 2010
The war veteran Ty Hackett (Columbus Short) is hired to work as security guard by the Eagle Shield Security where his old friend Mike Cochroone (Matt Dyllon) works. Ty is having financial difficulties after the death of his father and is raising his brother Jimmy (Andre Jamal Kinney) alone. He teams up with Mike's brother-in-law Baines (Laurence Fishburne) and their coworkers Quinn (Jean Reno), Palmer (Amaury Nolasco) and Dobbs (Skeet Ulrich). One night, Mike invites Ty to robber the two armored trucks that will transport forty-two million dollars. The reluctant Ty accepts after the promise of Mike that nobody would be hurt in the heist. They bring the trucks to an old mill and hide the money in a hole; however their operation is witnessed by a tramp. Baines shots the man with his shotgun and Ty decides to help him; but when Mike executes the homeless man, Ty locks himself inside a truck with half the amount.

"Armored" is an action movie about an almost perfect plan to heist two armored trucks by the security guards that should protect the transported money. The key character is the ambiguous Ty, a man that is facing financial difficulties in his private life that accept to participate in the heist but betrays his friends. Therefore, the hero of "Armored" is actually a traitor that is rewarded in the end. This unlikable character should have been better developed in the screenplay to give a better explanation for his despicable attitude (the betrayal). On the other hand, the naiveness of the five experienced men inviting a newcomer on the eve of the scheduled date of a heist sounds very unreasonable. It is impressive how fat Laurence Fishburne is. My vote is six.

Title (Brazil): "Assalto ao Carro Blindado" ("Heist of the Armored Car")
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Come on, really?
ronanmiskimmin20 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
What a bad movie, the premise was all there, the actors were all there. And yet a believable plot, good dialogue, characters to relate to were somewhat missing.

Typical heist gone wrong premise set against a backdrop of everyman being shafted by the system. The lead character Tye and his little brother have been having no luck and their house is going to be repossessed, along comes godfather Matt Dillon (Who does not look much older than Tye so not exactly sure how that happened)to the rescue with a plan to steal money from an armoured van which they work on as security guards. Tye has a brief flirtation with a conscience but decides to go along with it. And thus begins a truly awful hole ridden 30 minutes of unbelievable trash. I will not list all the ways in which this movie was unrealistic but let me point out the major ones:

Because of Tye deciding to be a good guy because a homeless guy became collateral damage, all of his close friends including his godfather die. His godfather who is supposedly family and the man who brought him into the caper at the last minute to help him out dies because of Tye. Tye in the process of thwarting his friends and godfather destroys all the money. The money came from the same bank that was repossessing his house. And yet he chose it over the supposed family of Matt Dillon.

There are many more, needless to say that this film was tripe and I earnestly hope nobody else goes to see it.
16 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Decent movie, short and sweet
tom11115 December 2009
This is a decent movie. Although little bit short in time for me, it packs a lot of action, grit, commonsense and emotions in that time frame. Matt Dillon and the other main character does a great job in this movie. The emotions and intensity were convincing and tense throughout the movie. It is not typical fancy expensive Hollywood CGI action movie, but it was a very satisfying movie indeed for the price. My evening was great because of this movie. This movie is straight traditional action movie with great acting, story and directing. I would recommend this movie. The character development of the characters were good and makes you believe that were are actually seeing a real event taking place. Because this movie I believe was made with cheaper budget, the acting and quality were much higher.
23 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Boys Gone Bad
ccthemovieman-129 March 2010
This is one of those films (and there are too many of them) in which if you looked back over the things you saw, you'd find a million holes. I'm not sure I'd watch it again, but I'm not sorry I rented it, either. It was good escapism for an hour-and-a-half. It's no award-winner but it is not as bad as many people here portray it. It entertains.

Wow, did this movie get intense. It took awhile but when the heist began, and something went wrong, the rest of the film began to get incredibly suspenseful. A homeless man witnesses these men stashing the loot, the self-professed "good guys" (who are stealing $42 million) panic and shoot the man. Now one of the men in the heist turns on the others because he doesn't like this murder business. He did not sign up for this and, in fact, was reluctant about being part of the robbery, anyway.

The rest of the movie is the battle between that guy - "Ty Hackett" (Columbus Short) - and the rest of his gang of security men-gone bad. It reminded me of the brutal 1992 movie "Trespass" where a long intense battle scene was waged in a abandoned building. This turned out to be "Trespass 2." The cast was good in here and had some big names like Matt Dillon, Laurence Fishburne, Jean Reno and one of my favorites from years' past: Fred Ward, yet only Dillon made much of an impact.

This is a guy's movie; no women and a lot of violence, tough people and some blood-and-guts. It ain't "Tinker Bell." It definitely was entertaining and decently-photographed but had a "B" feel to it, which shouldn't have happened. As I said, it's worth a rental, and that's it.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
I was let down with this one!
bushman11329 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I am so angry to the point i normally down make reviews with spoilers but in this case I'll make an exception.The first scenes of this movies are weak and then when they get to the meat and potatoes of the movie it sucks. This is one movie were i rooted for the bad guys because the captain-save-the-day was unbelievable and there was no connection to him or nothing to make you like him. The lead actor gave the weakest performance and Laurence Fishburne or Matt Dillon couldn't even save this movie. Sometime there are eye openers or great moments in a film that may not be that great..this movie has none. If you are looking for a movie to see in the meantime while nothing peeked your interest...don't choose this one..save your money.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good heist movie
dcrosswaite7 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I rented this movie thinking that it would be a mindless action movie but I thought it had a pretty good plot with some good acting. The movie's about some armored car drivers that decide to rob one of the cars they drive. I thought Columbus Short did a good job playing the main guy and Matt Dillon played a good bad guy. I thought Laurence Fishburne did a pretty good job as the slightly psychotic guy in the group. I haven't cared much for him lately in CSI. I wonder if this might have been a more interesting movie if Ty had gone along with the robbery and then felt guilty afterward. All in all I thought this was a movie with a good plot and plenty of action too.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
way too far-fetched
lvslezak9 December 2009
I went to see this movie today, with hopes that it would involve an at least half-intelligent story. I was extremely disappointed, as it did not. The plot, and the decisions by the main character, were so far-fetched. I was hoping for a "Dog Day Afternoon"-type movie, but instead got something totally unacceptable. I actually found myself totally hoping for the "hero" to be knocked off, and I nearly walked out of the theater on several occasions when this should have happened but didn't. Heist movies are notmeant to be feel-good flicks, and this one tried to be just that. Every couple of minutes during the second half of the movie, I found myself saying, "no way". Without giving the whole story away, it revolved around an armored car guard who was financially down and out, and whose house was going into foreclosure. He was invited in on a heist, and accepted, only to back down once the action began. Weak.
46 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
a real sense of conviction makes this better than expected
Buddy-5124 August 2010
Something of a pleasant surprise, "Armored" is an action movie heist yarn that is a bit lighter on the action and a bit heavier on the characterization than the majority of films in that particular genre.

Ty Hackett (Columbus Short) is the newest member of a team of armored-vehicle guards - a team that includes such familiar faces as Matt Dillon, Laurence Fishburne and Jean Reno - who plan to stage a robbery of several of their trucks, then keep the cash (42 million big ones) for themselves. A veteran of the Iraq war, Ty is a young man who's struggling to pay two mortgages while raising his troubled young brother following the death of their parents. Highly principled by nature, Ty is at first reluctant to join his compatriots in their illegal scheme, but his dire financial circumstances ultimately make the lure of easy money damn-near-impossible to resist. But when the job, rather predictably, doesn't go off quite as planned, the men, Ty included, are suddenly confronted with having to cross over that fine ethical line that separates the petty (or not-so-petty) crook from the cold-blooded killer.

Though the post-robbery scenes do feel a bit more trite and conventional than the pre-robbery ones, the movie, as a whole, is a sincere and well-played drama that does the best it can with its obviously limited resources and budget. This includes providing some sharp and well-written dialogue (by first-time screenwriter James V. Simpson) for characters who refuse to become walking stereotypes in a storyline that nicely sidesteps any number of potential heist-movie clichés. Similarly, director Nimrod Antal makes his minimalist action scenes count by reminding us that such sequences can still be exciting when we actually care about what happens to the people involved in them - and when they have a powerful dramatic dynamic operating at their core.

The performances are all first-rate, but special recognition must go to Short and Dillon who both use restraint and understatement to make their respective characters believable and genuine.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This was a total waste of time...
oniinesupport28 February 2010
I have to admit that I am disappointed after seeing this movie. I had expected so much more from the trailers. The movie was absolutely horrible. It lacked a real story line and the acting was not exactly the best. Don't waste your time. The movie is not what the trailers lead you to think it is. I would have to say that I don't usually write anything about movies on IMDb (in fact this is my first one) but this movie was such a disappointment that I registered just to let people know not to waste their time or money. The story line is that of a heist that is to happen and it looks like it had potential to be good but the things that happen in the movie are a little far fetched to be believable. Watch another movie instead, maybe the inside man???
31 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Armored
Scarecrow-8830 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Ty(Columbus Short) is up against it. He's haunted by the war in Iraq, having returned a veteran decorated for his heroism, tormented by the many deaths he witnessed during his tour. His parents dead, two mortgages with banks demanding payment, and not enough shifts at work available to make ends meet. But all of this is a drop in the bucket compared to what happens when his fellow workers, including godfather Mike Cochrane(Matt Dillon), decide to heist $42 million, their jobs as armored truck drivers carrying the motherlode affording them the opportunity to set up a scam where they can claim to have been robbed while in the act of transporting the loot. No one was supposed to get hurt.

In a moment of weakness, Ty decides to go along with Mike and company's plan, until a hobo is shot dead thanks to Baines(Laurence Fishburne)who gets trigger happy with his shotgun. The others who take part in this plan include Quinn(Jean Reno), Palmer(Amaury Nolasco), and Dobbs(Skeet Ulrich, who looks and acts like a nervy junkie). When Ty tries to walk the shot-in-the-back hobo to a hospital, Mike shoots the poor guy in the head..Ty responds in kind by hiding inside one of the armored trucks, almost able to flee the warehouse where a lot of the money is removed and hidden(the truck Ty "confiscates" also has money inside)before Mike drives him into a crash which halts such an almost successfully orchestrated operation.

Things go from bad to worse when Mike informs his colleagues that they'd kill Ty(as he listens on in shame and disappointment)and allow him to be the hero who died while protecting them. So they will try their damnedest to break into the truck to get Ty, but have only 40 minutes until they must call headquarters to communicate to their boss, Duncan Ashcroft(Fred Ward), about the load being stolen..its important that the drivers call in every so often to establish how things are going.

Like we often see in movies, when money and greed take hold, friendship and loyalty go out the window and all that matters is the green. Ty retains his integrity and dignity while watching his mentor, Mike, metamorphose into this evil monster(the cold look in Dillon's eyes as he acknowledges his betrayal to Ty is plenty disturbing). We see that Fishburne is always capable of shooting someone as he holds his shotgun in his hands just looking for an excuse to kill. Milo Ventimiglia is a cop, Jake Eckehart, who stumbles upon Mike and his men, gut shot by Baines, and rescued while bleeding profusely by Ty. What I think works for the film is the question of how Ty would be able to keep himself from harm as everyone he once trusted plan to murder him. Of course one way to possibly get him to surrender would be to kidnap his brother, Jimmy(Andre Kinney), threatening the teenager's life if he doesn't give himself up.

I'm glad Fishburne currently has his gig on CSI because it allows him to flesh out a character he isn't able to in movies like ARMORED & PREDATORS which consist of unsavory sorts who have limited participation..Fishburne seems to be in these films for his name recognition. ARMORED is the case where a whole cast of interesting names can do little to enhance a rather simple, short action thriller. Most of the film is set within the warehouse as the numbers dwindle thanks to Ty's smarts and level-headedness, able to think during crisis as his fate seems ominous to say the least. Because Dobbs isn't like the others, he does try to help Ty when he appeals to the young man for assistance, paying the price, while Palmer, who clings to his bible yet fails God when the lure of moohla draws him to the dark side, yields to his guilt when he commits murder. Dillon, as the ringleader, is on a mission to retrieve a big payday, no matter who he has to eliminate in order to do so. ARMORED, ultimately, has as predictable an outcome as you'd expect, a straightforward plot which ends with the bad guys getting their just desserts. The motivation behind the plot to steal the money comes from a heist which involved Ashcroft who took two bullets to the back which crippled him..it's believed that the heist was pulled off by actual armored truck drivers not criminals. The plot doesn't have a lot of meat, and there's not much to the movie besides the group trying to get their hands on Ty as he tosses a wrench in their supposed fool-proof plan..what you see is what you get. Strong central performance from Columbus Short(whose name is down in the credits, funnily enough)does provide the film with an anchor. The running time might be an asset, at only 82 minutes it doesn't overstay its welcome.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
a classic heist movie with a twist.....it's your precious time they steal!
onefivethreefish5 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
this movie is sooooo bad that it forced me to create an account with IMDb just to warn others about it.

i have been using IMDb for a long time, and many movies have come close to making me want to register to either praise or bash them, however none have ever been that worthy. Until now!

I am a huge Matt Dillon fan. all i could ask myself throughout this movie is "how did Dillon choose this script"? really. i mean there are holes in it larger than Vredefort.

i mean it is a modern day heist movie, not one set in the seventies. For crying out loud, even a child knows that armored trucks have gps tracking and the sort. makes you wonder what it takes to get a script produced in Hollywood.

i could go on for ages, but i wont. believe me when i say this. save yourself the time and give this a skip.

Sorry Matt, I'm still a fan, but this movie sucked.
18 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Sort of like "Reservoir Dogs"
kezopster30 June 2010
Just sort of like "Reservoir Dogs." I mean, it's a heist film and things have gone wrong. Namely, one of the people end up getting cold feet when things start to go wrong. Unfortunately, how do you back out of a heist when you're already in the middle of it? Watching one of the special features, one of the people talked about how the movie is like a freight train, starting off slow and building steam until it's rocking and rolling along. Good analogy. The problem is, the first thirty minutes are about as exciting as watching a big, heavy freight train leaving... slow and plodding. There's only character development for two main characters with a little bit extra thrown in for a minor (though pivotal) character.

If anything, the movie delivers the goods a bit too late. But if you stick with it, I think it's a rewarding film.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
In Between Good and very good film and needs improvement, more tension and a few other things
nims-197527 October 2018
Armoured is an in between good and very good film and definitely needs improvement and a quite a few more other things. The cast was a quite a good cast but not an excellent cast. Matt Dillon is an excellent actor, but to play Mike Cochrane they should have used a more tougher actor such as Paul Walker or Scott Adkins. Mike Cochrane should have been a bit more of a tougher character and if they used strong men such as Paul Walker or Scott Adkins to be a bit more physical using his strength when not happy it would have been a lot better. Matt Dillons acting as Mike Cochrane was very good but they should have used somebody else. I know the film was about Officers making bad choices, but this film just wasn't tense enough. There were some small fight scenes and Laurence Fishburne was excellent in a fight scene, but they should have also used Michael Jai White to use his very powerful fighting skills and there should have been some more action such as shoot outs etc. This film was rated 12, but if there was better action, fight scenes and tension and was rated 15 or 18, the film would have been a lot better. The acting by Matt Dillon, Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne, Amaury Nolasco, Fred Ward, Columbus Short, Skeet Ulrich and Milo Ventimiglia was very good. Amaury Nolasco (who acted in 2 Fast 2 Furious) was not that good in Armoured. His character Palmer wasn't tough enough and if they used the powerful Michael Jai White instead ,the film would have been a lot better. Michael Jai White as Palmer would have been better, Michael Jai Whites acting is absolutely brilliant and he would have portrayed his verbal frustration and thoughts about Hackett much more more better than Amaury Nolasco and the film would have been a lot more better. This film Armoured is not a rubbish film, it is an in between good and very good film and I liked watching it, but it should have been a lot better.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just a bad movie all round that dosen't know what it wants to be.
blacklist-16 September 2010
Alas despite a top-notch cast of Jean Reno, Matt Dillon and the normally reliable Lawrence Fishburne can't save this supposed "Action flick" of becoming a tasteless turkey. A basic story where security guards for an armoured truck company decide to steal millions of dollars of money but a newbie panics and it's splits up the team leading to problems. The script is terrible and very clichéd and even though the movie for the first half hour tries for character development (as it tried to be a sort of drama but fails miserably as it isn't touching in the slightest) it just leads to pointless talk about inconsequential things and as a result you just get bored. The film was far to slow in getting started and the action, well there was little of as it became more and more far fetched and actors who couldn't act. I was quite disappointed with this film particularly with Lawrence Fishburne as he was outstanding as Morpheous in the Matrix, as Ray Langston in CSI and great in a small cameo role in the recent predators. Though he did try better than the other actors the script didn't help. This is a movie which is bad in all departments and in the end I didn't care about the characters and what happened to them. This was an hour and a half but it felt like three hours. A bad movie all round and one to avoid.
21 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Thrilling and attractive heist film with all-star-cast giving compelling performance
ma-cortes1 March 2023
Early morning, Ty Hackett (Columbus Short) is getting ready for work. He wakes up his younger brother, Jimmy (Andre Kinney), and tells him to get ready for high school. Both his parents recently died and left him with the mortgage and Jimmy to look out for. Ty is picked up by Mike Cochrane (Matt Dillon), and they carpool to work at the Eagle Shield Armored Truck Co. At work, the security team (Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne, Amaury Nolasco, Skeet Ulrich) meets for the morning briefing with Chief Ashcroft (Fred Ward). Then the newbie guard for an armored truck company is coerced by his veteran coworkers to steal a truck containing $42 million. But a wrinkle in their supposedly foolproof scheme divides the group, and things get worse , leading to a potentially deadly resolution. They have a plan that's going to catch everybody off-guard !. They Did everything to make the Plan go well, What went wrong?

This is an impressive little thriller with strong violence , twists , turns with killings and action-packed finale , filled with double-crosses, greed and lethal retribution. The plot is plain and simple , the typical heist carried out by a motley group to rob a highly armored truck in broad daylight , but it goes wrong , an ordinary theme we have already seen in other films , here with the novelty that the peculiar gang of criminals are corrupt security guards . It results to be a bitter meditation on deceiving , defeat , treason , disenchantment and justice . Nimrod Atal's special achievement , giving a memorable work , attempting to incorporate his own personal obsessions into the steely violent events . A more professional and competent work than his early works , this one shows , set piece by set piece, the breakdown of the criminal codes with a team of corrupt roles whose activities little by little get worse . Dealing with an outlandish heist , that's ingeniously planned and meticulously filmed, but things go awry . Stars Columbus Short as a honest war hero, having earned the Silver Star in Iraq who becomes involved into a twisted hold-up . The film includes star-studded with great main and support cast giving competent interpretations , formed by popular and successful faces , including the following ones : Matt Dillon, Jean Reno, Laurence Fishburne, Amaury Nolasco, Fred Ward , Milo Ventimiglia , Skeet Ulrich and a teen Andre Jamal.

It contains an exciting and well-adjusted to the action musical score by composer John Murphy . As well as adequate and functional cinematography by cameraman Andrzej Sekula who also has directed a few films . The motion picture was well directed by Nimród Antal. He is best known for writing and directing the Hungarian-language film Kontroll (2003), which won numerous awards, including the Award of the Youth at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival and the Golden Hugo at the Chicago International Film Festival, as well as a European Film Award nomination for Best film . Antal's first American feature movie , Vacancy (2007), starring Kate Beckinsale and Luke Wilson, was released on April 20, 2007 getting sucess enough. His second American film, Armored (2009), was released in December 2009 and with American star-studded cast. Nimród Antal was hired for ¨Armored¨because producers enjoyed Antal's earlier films ¨Kontroll¨ and ¨Vacancy¨ and subsequenly filming a nice sequel : ¨Predators¨. This remarkable and decent action film will appeal to thriller buffs and fans of the big stars appearing here and there. Well worth watching. So it's worth seeing , specially for the robbery sequences.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Screenplay
jfvezina-22-4855678 April 2011
The idea (in an deserted industrial location, thieves working for a security company trying to force their way into an armored truck with a good guy inside) reminds me of a 1986 french Canadian thriller called "Pouvoir intime" (see reference below) :

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0091785/

This Quebec-made movie was co-written and directed by Emmy Award winner & nominee Yves Simoneau - Bury my heart at Wounded Knee (2007).

Maybe the makers of "Armored" never heard of this movie, but I just thought it would be fair to mention that this idea has been explored before.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed