Ogre (TV Movie 2008) Poster

(2008 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
45 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Ogre on the loose
Wuchakk12 March 2014
These ultra-low reviews are hilarious. What were these people expecting, "Citizen Kane"? An award-winning film? Look at the DVD cover and the name of the film "Ogre." Why would anyone even waste their time on a flick like this if they didn't at least embrace them as guilty pleasures?

Directed by Steven Monroe and written by Chuck Reeves, 2008's "Ogre" is a low-budget TV monster flick in the manner of "It Waits," "Sasquatch Hunters" and countless other Syfy movies. These films are the modern counterpart to the low-budget creature features of decades ago like "Gargoyles" (1972), "Prophecy" (1979) and the Kolchak: The Night Stalker films/TV series. You either enjoy these types of pictures or you don't. I do. As reviewer John Patrick Fischner so perfectly puts it: "Imagination and legend is... about good and evil and the power of selfless courage against impossible odds. There is nothing more heroic than man against monster."

THE PLOT: Four youths hike into rural Pennsylvania looking for a legendary lost town and are amazed when they actually find it. The town's inhabitants are still stuck in the 19th century and living in dread of a hideous creature to whom they must sacrifice one of their own once a year. Adventure and horror ensue.

Most viewers will note that the story is a mishmash of numerous other films like "The Village (Widescreen Vista Series)," "Bay Cove" (i.e. "Bay Coven"), "The Blair Witch Project" and various other monster-in-the-woods flicks.

Although this is essentially a serious story the film naturally pokes fun at the whole notion of an ogre. The youths take it as a joke and so do the cops; my wife and I cracked up numerous times and so will you. It's just really hard to hear or say the word 'ogre' without giggling. Be that as it may, the joke stops when the creature literally starts ripping people's heads, legs, and arms off. Of course, some people may continue laughing, but that's all part of the enjoyment.

"Ogre" no doubt tried to capitalize on the surge in popularity of ogres with the success of the Shrek: The Whole Story Boxed Set (Shrek / Shrek 2 / Shrek the Third / Shrek Forever After) franchise. In fact, the beast in the film even resembles Shrek, albeit less cartooney and more malevolent-looking. Another comparison would be the cgi Hulk in Ang Lee's notorious 2003 Hulk (Widescreen 2-Disc Special Edition); the ogre here sorta looks like that Hulk's homely brother, if you can imagine that. Interestingly, unlike other monster flicks you'll fully see the creature right from the get-go. Although this destroys suspense it didn't personally bother me (as I don't like it when films play out the same way all the time).

Believe it or not, John Schneider of Dukes of Hazzard fame is on hand as one of the main characters and he does a fine job. He also looks great for being nigh 50 years-old. I don't get why people poke fun at him being in the film. So he played Bo Duke, so what?

Other cast highlights include Chelan Simmons who plays one of the two female protagonists. Chelan is one of the cutest freckled blonds you'll ever gaze your eyes upon next to Juliana Dever of "Sasquatch Hunters." Chelan also starred in "Chupacabra Terror." She has a very winsome disposition. Also on hand is Katharine Isabelle of "Ginger Snaps" fame. Both of these cuties have significant roles here.

Although the story takes place in Pennsylvania the film was shot in the sticks outside of Vancouver, BC. It's a good stand-in for PA except for one shot with a mountain in the background (the mountains of Pennsylvania are roundish ridges and look nothing like the mountains of the Great Northwest). Anyway, it's obvious the film was shot in the late Autumn; it has the cold/dreary Fall vibe throughout.

FINAL WORD: My wife and I had a fun time with this monster flick and so will you if it sounds like it'll trip your trigger.

GRADE: Borderline B- or C+
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Chock full of Skiffy Channel Cheezy Goodness!
JoeB13115 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Actually, not bad for a Sci-Fi channel movie.

Essentially, it's 1857, and a small town in Pennsylvania is beset by a plague, and makes a Faustian bargain with the town's magi to cure it. They all get to live forever, but they have to sacrifice one of their number every year to a bad CGI ogre and can never leave the town, lest they disintegrate. They never get cable.

Oddly, no one ever finds this town for 150 years, until four college kids find it. Two wander into town while two others release the Ogre early. Well, the Ogre goes on a rampage, and hilarity ensues.

But this is a little better than most of the 100 similar movies that Skiffy buys from the Direct to DVD discard bin. The performances are okay, and it's better than the usual "dead teenager" horror movie.

The weakest element is the ogre itself. It looks like it was made by some Warcraft Nerd on his computer.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Surprised, I was expecting much worse!
TheLittleSongbird26 April 2012
Ogre was not a good, let alone great, movie, but considering the uninspiring title that I was expecting schlock, I was pleasantly surprised. It does have a lot of flaws, starting with the terrible effects, sadly the Ogre is no exception. There is still the lame gore and cheesy dialogue, while the story is thin, predictable and at times tedious. On the other hand, it is one of the more tolerable movies I've seen on the SyFy channel, because while not mind-blowing the acting does look as though they are putting effort into their roles, John Schneider in particular is interesting to watch. Katherine Isaballe does at times overdo it with the shrillness though. The characters are not characters you remember for years, but they are not as irritating as other characters from the likes of the SyFy disaster movies for instance, and they are not as blatantly stereotypical either. Although the effects do cheapen the film, Ogre didn't look too bad to me, the editing was at least not slip-shod and there was attempts at an atmosphere. Again, the music is nothing extraordinary, but it has some haunting themes and it doesn't feel as though it is slowing the film down. All in all, not bad, not good, just scraping the average line. 5/10 Bethany Cox
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Ogre (2008)
A group of teens find themselves in ogre their heads. No? :( In order to save themselves from a plague, a small town in the 1800s decide to create a magical pact with a hungry ogre. Each year the town sacrifices one resident to save themselves from the plague, but they also never age, and can never leave the town. Now present day, a group of teens stumble across the town and accidentally unleash the ogre. This isn't exactly original entertainment, but it does include some above par acting, courtesy of the likes of Katherine Isabelle, famous for her stints in Ginger Snaps movies. The dialogue isn't cringe worthy either, which makes a change. The ogre itself actually looked pretty cool as far as I'm concerned. certainly not realistic, but it had a sense of vulnerability which meant it wasn't the usual complete human destroyer. This certainly makes me feel more comfortable approaching the rest of Stephen R. Monroe's work.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Black magic in a town kept alive by human sacrifice...
Doylenf31 May 2009
I only watched OGRE on the Sci-Fi channel because JOHN SCHNEIDER was in it and I hadn't seen any of his work in a long, long time. Always thought he was an interesting actor.

And he doesn't disappoint here. He's very good as the corrupt leader in a small town where each year a villager is sacrificed to keep the dreaded OGRE from killing them. To them, he is "that which must be fed." And feed he does, in a frenzy. But he's a CGI Shrek look-alike who is never too convincing. In addition, there are insufficient special effects and some bad acting by the younger members of the cast.

KATHARINE ISABELLE has to be singled out as the most offensive. She's a shrieking, whining and moronic girl who gets annoying after three minutes of screen time. Bad acting from a few others almost makes the film unwatchable in spots.

But through it all, JOHN SCHNEIDER takes his sinister role seriously and gives an eloquent performance that comes off as Shakespearean compared to some of the lesser players. A talented man, caught trapped in some bad material but doing his best to elevate it.

The backstory of a village threatened by a vicious ogre is interesting and it does get off to a good start with some fine atmospheric photography. But it soon becomes apparent that this is just another low-budget Sci-Fi Channel film that needed better dialog for its below-par cast of young thespians.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Your typical crappy Sci-Fi Channel 'Creature Feature'.
poolandrews13 June 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Ogre starts in the small (two buildings actually...) town of Ellensford in Pensylvania during the year 1859, there a terrible plague has spread through the town infecting & killing a lot of the population. Local mage Sir Barlett Henry (John Schneider) claims that by using his magic he can rid Ellensford of the deadly plague but at a price, with nowhere left to go & their friends & family dying all around them the townsfolk have no choice but to agree. Sir Henry uses a spell to manifest all the disease & evil in the town into a huge unfriendly flesh eating Ogre that demands a human sacrifice every year to appease it. Jump forward to the Present Day as four friends, Terry (Kyle Labine), Leah (Kimberly Warnat), Mike (Ryan Kennedy) & Jessica (Katharine Isabelle) find Ellensford while out camping in the woods. They discover the town is trapped in time & has been terrorised by the Ogre for over a Century, however the townspeople have had enough & decide to fight the Ogre & free themselves from the curse...

This American Canadian production was directed by Steven R. Monroe & originally premiered on the Sci-Fi Channel & to be brutally honest Ogre is crap. Yet another 'Creature Feature' with terrible CGI computer effects I think there's a factory somewhere which churn this type of film out for the Sci-Fi Channel, the Sci-Fi Channel sure likes it's generic lifeless 'Creature Features' & I have seen dozens of the things on there. The script by Chuck Reeves is a little bit more imaginative than usual although the end result is still the same, for a change the giant creature/insect/monster isn't a result of a genetic experiment gone wrong or the result of some experiment to create the ultimate weapon for the military which are the usual stand by explanations. No, here there's a small town stuck in a time warp that is a clear rip-off of The Village (2004) which is terrorised by a big Ogre that doesn't look too dissimilar to Shrek (2001) & then it spins the whole story around the old as mud plot about teenage kids becoming lost & then menaced by something evil that isn't a million miles off The Blair Witch Project (1999) or any number of teen slasher flicks. Unfortunately none of these elements come together to make a good film, Ogre is really slow going, it's boring, it makes no real sense (if the town is cut off from the real world where did they get supplies from like food, clothes, candles, bullets etc & how can this huge Ogre that usually roars & stomps his feet about generally making lots of noise sneak up on so many people without them noticing?) if you think about it & the special effects are far from special. The set-pieces revolving around the Ogre are poor, they lack energy or excitement & feel very flat. The character's are poor & I never felt for anyone who was killed, the dialogue is poor, the subplot about the evil mage Sir Henry goes nowhere & by the hour mark all I wanted was for it to finish.

Right lets talk special effects, the Ogre looks awful. The Ogre makes an appearance within the first ten minutes & it's an awful CGI computer effect, why didn't the makers keep him in the shadows until much later in the film? Why show such a bad special effect so early? It just ruins the films credibility straight away, it's hilarious to see the various character's try to act terrified around it when it just looks so poor. It never moves anything on the ground when it walks, it never leaves footprints despite being huge & it never really feels like it's there if you know what I mean, it just feels like a computer image on the screen that doesn't interact with anything else. The film has a really bland look & feel to it, the period costumes are alright but we never see more than two buildings at any one time & in my book that doesn't even equate to a street let alone anything approaching that could be described as a town. The gore is tame, there's a severed arm, a severed leg, a slashed open stomach, someones head is stepped on & crushed & the best bit involves someone getting their head bitten off by the Ogre & their headless body falling to the ground spurting blood from the neck stump, unfortunately we never do get to see the Ogre eat anyone.

If you take away the poor CGI computer generated Ogre then the film isn't too badly made but it doesn't have any style or substance. Shot on location in Vancouver in British Columbia in Canada. The acting isn't too bad to be fair, the kids are suitably attractive if nothing else.

Ogre is another poor Sci-Fi Channel 'Creature Feature' that tries to be a bit different but at the end of the day turns out exactly the same as any other except for the setting, Ogre isn't as bad as say Bone Eater (2007) (what is?) but it's still pretty bad all the same.
8 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
This is BAD
anthonylester0317 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I don't quite understand some of the previous comments about this being a decent film. It isn't.

The acting is absolutely terrible to the point of being unwatchable. OK the script doesn't help with some true bilge. But that doesn't mean they can't put some effort in making it less laughable. Like how everyone that dies just stands there doing a comedy scream before the ogre.

And don't get me started on the Ogre. Fair enough its low budget but i've seen poor 5yr old TV adverts with special effects far better. Its frankly unforgivable for a 2008 film.

Which brings us on to the plot *****spoiler alert**** Its frankly crap with holes larger than Mars and inconsistencies galore. It actually starts getting annoying that even though the Ogre crashes around, trembling the ground Jurassic Park style, he still manages to silently creep up on people from behind. They then slowly turn round and scream for 10 seconds whilst the Ogre flaps his arms about and then kills them. For something that moves so slow you find yourself shouting 'run you moron'.

*****spoiler alert**** Nor is the reasoning of the Magistrate adequately explained. If you are as powerful and power crazed as he is presumably supposed to be, why bother taking over such a crappy backwater? Why not a nice town? Or New York? And finally the ending. Or rather the lack of one. They may have won the day but what then? They just wonder off all smiles without any word on how they are going to explain the stolen policecar and their brutally murdered friends.

In short, don't bother watching this film.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Gingers snaps into a really bad movie
movieman_kev28 June 2009
Bo Duke is the leader of a small town that existed outside of time since the '50's (1850's to be exact). For the inhabitants of said town to continue to exist ageless and disease-free, the townspeople have to sacrifice one of their own to a horribly-CGI'd ogre. Cue a group of curious college students who are searching for the mythical town 150 years later and find more then they bargained for.

There was a time when John Schnieder was beloved by millions as one half of the Duke Brothers on the mega-hit show "the Dukes of Hazzard" & then the cult hit "Smallville", seeing that this film starred him piqued my interest. But the moment I saw the incredibly lame 'ogre', I realized that I'd be in for a fiasco. An emotionless, acted-by-the-numbers fiasco. No one really stands out besides Schneider (and even then only because of his past glory) thus making this film highly forgettable fluff. Catherine Isabelle of Ginger Snaps fame also has her talents wasted as the put-upon daughter of the town's leader.

My Grade: D

DVD Extras: Just trailers for this film, "Sharks in Venice", "Ba'al: the storm god", "Way of War", & "Contract Killers"
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Load that musket!
ctomvelu113 April 2010
Other than John Schneider starring as the village leader, there's not much to recommend OGRE. This TV movie looks like it was put together by the same people who worked on that incredibly bad Nazi Frankentein monster flick a few years ago. In fact, the monster here is virtually identical to that one. A group of teens stumbles across an 18th century village stuck in time. Once a year, a villager is offered up to the title character to keep it appeased. The teens accidentally let it loose and all hell breaks loose. The goofy plot is right out of M. Night's THE VILLAGE, which itself was pretty shabby. Katharine Isabelle of GINGER SNAPS fame plays one of the teens, and I wish the ogre had killed her first. She was that annoying. The CGI is atrocious as usual, which is par for the course with a SciFi Channel flick. The monster walks around with no sense of weight or mass, and most of its kills avoid combining the actors in the same shot with the creature, a sure sign of a very low budget. Sad.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Better than it should be
patsulli9912 August 2021
The ogre is quite possibly the worst effect I have ever seen in a film. Outside of that the script, acting and story are all genuinely investing and it's clear they're at least putting in the effort to make a good film. It's just unfortunate the effects department didn't get the budget or memo and it all gets brought down a peg by the catastrophically bad ogre.

Still, I found enjoyment here and the story is pretty good. Maybe give it a go.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Enjoyable
denise-fyfe-11 June 2008
We had free SuperChannel for a month so were watching everything under the sun. This movie sounded interesting, the first few minutes were good, so we kept going. All in all, we really enjoyed it. There were a few times that it made me think of The Village and I kept waiting for M. Night Shyamalan to pop into a scene, but other than that a really good movie. It was interesting, sometimes surprising, tense, and the non-Ogre parts of the movie were realistic, not cheap or cheesy, or painful dialogue. Even the graphics weren't all that bad. The acting was good all around too. What really surprised us was learning that it was a Canadian TV movie after we watched it. It didn't seem either Canadian OR TV at all; it could have been any really good straight-to-video release.
26 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Hated the special effects but liked the acting!
ruthie-3023 September 2009
As a fan of monster movies and not opposed to a little gratuitous gore, I was fascinated by the title and the brief synopsis in my programme guide, so decided to watch this movie. I confess that I missed the beginning so did not see what happened to the two teenagers who let the ogre out of his lair. I presume they were eaten but I didn't witness this. I started watching from when the other two were in jail along with the "chosen one" for the ogre's next dinner.

I particularly liked the acting of Katharine Isabelle who played Jessica, the female of the two teenagers. I thought she hammed up her lines a little but that she gave the plot a bit of realism and down to earth-edness that was missing from the whole surmise.

The programme guide listed this movie under "horror." I would think that is a bit strong for the mild violence and terror generated by this film, most of which could easily be bettered by an average computer game aimed at teenagers. The ogre himself is a bit of a joke to put it mildly. Extremely juvenile computer graphics, comic-book roars, (why do all dinosaurs and monsters have exactly the same roars, I wonder?) and slow enough plodding that left me wondering how he caught anyone that wasn't tied to a stake as a sacrifice. Anyone who wasn't actually in a wheelchair could have outrun him, I would have thought.

Then of course there is the ever-present disbelieving police. Where would a good monster movie (or even a bad one) be without a couple of coppers laughing their heads off at the idea that there's a monster in them thar woods? Despite all of this, and suspending disbelief whenever the star of the show appeared on screen to gouge and maim those unfortunate locals who stood still for the required ten minutes waiting for him to reach them, I found this film enjoyable, particularly due to Katharine's natural performance. Whoever did the CGI ought to be allowed early retirement, but otherwise it was an enjoyable romp...hardly horror though.
25 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A big pile of shite!
lastliberal29 March 2008
I seriously like unusual creatures and this beats watching Shrek any day.

The story was something out of Brigadoon or 2001 Maniacs. A village appears every so often and they have to make a sacrifice to the ogre to keep living. That's living? Some college kids are searching for the village and they unleash the ogre.

The rest of the film, for those that tuned out halfway, is some serious bloodletting as the ogre rips off heads or just smashes them with his big foot.

Chelan Simmons (Final Destination 3) is wasted as there are no tanning beds in this story.
10 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What a load of Shrek!
CelluloiDiva10 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This is a hateful little movie, confused about what it is, although it is perfectly clear why it was made. Give the folks at SciFi a half-baked idea, throw in some frat boys and stick girls, alcohol, sexual innuendo and a bad guy of some kind (space alien, psycho killer, genetically altered bat, shark, ogre) and - voila! - another cellu/digital monsterpiece is, er, born. And why is it always so obvious that these movies are filmed in either Canada or a former Soviet bloc country? Moving on...

The story begins in 1859 Ellensburg, Pennsylvania, a town that has magistrates and lords, an odd premise for a setting in post-Constitutional America where there are no magistrates OR lords and the term "sir" is not a formal title, as it apparently is here. Are these descendants of Crown loyalists or are the writers completely oblivious to their own history? The movie doesn't really tell us. All we know is that Bo Duke is a "magi" - who wheedles himself the job of "magi"strate (ha ha) - who can save their town from destruction by sacrificing one person per year to save the lives of all the others. "One life for all life" is apparently the town motto. How feeding one person per year to an ogre - and what's an ogre doing in Amish country, anyway? - will preserve the town is not quite explained, either, especially since no one in the town ages, marries, gives birth or changes clothes over the course of the next century and a half. Their numbers dwindling, they're still letting Magi Bo brand one poor sod a year to give up to the ogre.

In present day, four "kids" head out on a camping trip to the Pennsylvania woods, ostensibly to find the mysterious town of legend - Ellensburg. Doofus finds it, promptly breaks his ankle and then sets about opening the door to the ogre's lair. Fittingly, he is eaten within minutes of breaking his ankle, as is the screeching, shrewy girl along with him. The other pair, Scrawny and Second Shrew, go off in search of help, which, of course, leads them right into Ellensburg, the town that doesn't exist. One thing follows another, the CGI ogre - green and broody, the Hulk crossed with a sea turtle - rampages, roars and attacks, people are eaten, certain truths hinted at but not really revealed and no one changes clothes.

Ogres might work better in a European setting, considering that the lore - of which there is plenty - places them there. Ogres in America, it just doesn't play. It's like Dutch cowboys - who would believe it and why? What for? Even Bo Duke and his magic zappin' stick can't do anything with this one, not even as a laugher. Another major bonk for SciFi Channel Originals...now there's a shocker!
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
the town was stuck in the 1800's but so were the CGI
shkeeweek25 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
aside from the stupid name the plot was average and full of clichés. but the absolute worst thing about this movie is by far the CGI. i truly was amazed when i saw it was released in 2008. i've seen better CGI in movies from the 60's. i only watched it hoping for another Legend of Earthsea but unfortunately SciFi really messed this up. you want a good ogre movie? go watch Shrek...that's a good ogre movie. the actors were kinda' bored. at times the acting reminded me of good porn actors. and also the props were...let's say insulting. in the final "kill the ogre" scene the 1800's arrows are anything but straight and although they hit the ogre they somehow fail to be seen...so just a piece of warning: BEWARE this is a BAD movie!!!
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Predictable and unsatisfying
Filmcroaker12 April 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The computer graphics for the ogre himself weren't bad, but the costumes were closer to 1600's than mid-1800's.

The plot line was predictable and ridiculous, with many unexplained holes: why does opening the ogre's door allow him to freely attack the villagers? When two villagers are confronted in the woods, why do they stand and wait to be killed instead of running from the slow ogre (presumably in different directions)? Why does a shotgun blast fired one-handed with no visible recoil knock the ogre back several feet while three or four fired in quick succession barely phase him? Unlike Brigadoon, there's no suggestion that the village only appears infrequently -- in fact, there's a road leading to it -- so why is the local sheriff unaware of its existence? And why didn't he pursue his stolen police car? You can't convince me anyone watching didn't know that some idiot was going to extinguish a candle for no good reason and break a protective spell.

Sorry, unless you enjoy gore for its own sake -- and there's not much of that, considering the presumed carnage -- this movie has no redeeming value.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Let's go back and pad the film some more!!!
Aaron137513 January 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This film is one of those original movies by what is now called the SyFy channel. Yes, there are lots and lots of horror movies and science fiction classics from the 1950's through today, but instead of showing them they decide to make the most horrible monsters ever to grace the small screen. I can not believe these bad movies garner larger ratings than the classics, but then who would of thought that "Megashark versus giant octopus" would have been one of the top ten trailers of the year? This one has a setup that I can see what the makers of this film were going for. I kind of think they were sitting around a table and one of them said "let's make a version of the film the Village, but our monster is going to be real". And so they went with it and you the audience will probably not want to go there as the film plods along. The film features a town stuck in the past with the residents living out their days, immortal thanks to a spell put on the town. They will remain immortal as long as they sacrifice one person per year to the evil ogre. Well everything is going fine until a group of young people come across the town and proceed to do all the stupid stuff young people do in these movies. One of which left me rather flabbergasted, as two of them survive this nightmare and for some reason wish to go back. For what reasons I know not, I am guessing it is in fact to pad this film some, but wow what morons.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Cheesetastic CGI and reworked 'The Village' story
SnoopyStyle16 July 2014
Small town of Ellensford, Pennsylvania is suffering from a plague in 1859. Barlett Henry (John Schneider) is made the magistrate and his daughter Hope (Chelan Simmons) starts to suffer from the plague. He performs a spell to create an ogre from all the evil that has befallen the town which must be fed each year. In present time, four friends go searching for the town lost in time. Terry (Kyle Labine) is injured. Jessica (Katharine Isabelle) and Mike (Ryan Kennedy) go looking for help and find the town.

It's a TV movie for then Sci-Fi Channel and the special effects look TV cheesetastic. This is kind of like 'The Village' in look and story except there is a real ogre. At least, it's as real as a cheap computer can make it. There is some good cheese value to this and it generally works as a story. I do like most of the actors and they do a serious job. The ogre looks so ridiculous that the last half of the movie grinds down. The action looks horrible. It's bad and funny at the same time.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't waste your time.
mattpbates18 September 2008
This was an attempt at an M N Shayalaman type film and it just doesn't work for me. The acting was poor in most cases and the special effects were really not special. I've seen more convincing ogres given away with breakfast cereal! Someone commented that the fact you saw the Ogre almost straight away in the film, and continuously throughout was refreshing... well, I think the film would have been better if we hadn't seen the thing at all and kept some mystique around the creature. The story was as week as the rest of the film. Given a new script, mainly new cast, new director, new effects department, this film could have been decent... as it is, it's rubbish.
4 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Come eat me, you beast!
lastliberal-853-25370811 August 2012
I seriously like unusual creatures and this beats watching Shrek any day.

The story was something out of Brigadoon or 2001 Maniacs. A village appears every so often and they have to make a sacrifice to the ogre to keep living. That's living? Some college kids are searching for the village and they unleash the ogre.

The rest of the film, for those that tuned out halfway, is some serious bloodletting as the ogre rips off heads or just smashes them with his big foot.

Chelan Simmons (Final Destination 3) is wasted as there are no tanning beds in this story.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
great film
clairelouise-ridgway2 December 2008
I have just watched this on the scifi channel in the united kingdom and its gripping film some people who live in the 1800s fall victim the plague and want it to stop but the only way to make a pact. some 100 and odd years later some travellers come across the lost village but unbe known

to them stumble across the people and the curse that come with it the Orga who come once a year. I was very surprised it got onto uk sky channel to quickly as we over here have to wait months to see a film from the USA. but I would suggest if anyone has not seen the film to see it as it got me gripped..
8 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The title made me expect something MUCH worse
TheUnknown837-115 March 2008
When I first saw the previews for this new sci-fi flick, I had the impression I was going to see a film that was as technically and artistically lazy and un-creative as its very title. The film is simply called "ogre" and it's about, well, an ogre. And not a talking one like Shrek. Just a big, lumbering, clumsy green hunchback wearing an apron who roars and likes to tear people into pieces. It's more like a troll.

"Ogre" actually turned out to surprise me, for it was much better than I was expecting. The graphics were just as poor as I anticipated, but everything else, notably the acting, was a major improvement over some of its other brother flicks that keep popping up on and off on the Sci-Fi Channel. Performances by the entire cast were worth writing home about. Not to say they were uniformally magnificent, but they were done by actors and actresses who had a clue of what they were doing and actually stirred to make an effort. The plot of the film was also more interesting...for a low-budget flick.

I am not, however, praising "Ogre" enough to say that it's a good movie. I still have to give it a marginally negative review because of the fact that it did prove to be a little tedious and slow over its running time with not enough action. And there was also some inconsistency I have to point out. Such as some of the secondary characters have old-fashioned muskets and the leading actor carries a contemporary police shotgun. And yet in the scenes where they're shooting it out with the ogre, he's firing shot-after-shot from his shotgun without the slightest recoil and the ones with the muskets are flinching back or falling over from the recoil of older, less reactive weapons.

Bottom line, "Ogre" was not a major surprise, but it was definitely more than I was expecting given the style and results that its brother and sister films on the Sci-Fi Channel have given to me over the years. What it really has to show for itself is its acting and the good performances of the cast. Still, it was a little too slow for me, and thus, I don't highly recommend it.
43 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Could have been alright with a better plot and decent special effects
Hayden-860556 September 2021
Ogre isn't a horrific film, it's a bad film that's for sure but I have seen worse and the plot does have a genuinely good vibe to it, really reminded me of the Village (2004) which is an excellent film.

The places were the film fails are the special effects which are so poor it's difficult to take any of it seriously, the conclusion which feels unsatisfactory and a bit depressing and Sir Henry's character (the best one) has a really dull end overall.

3/10: Nearly a 4, very nearly a 4 it has some good features but I can't recommend it. It's very forgettable too overall apart from how I love its similarities to the Village.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The poor CGI held the movie back...
paul_haakonsen25 October 2022
Needless to say that with a movie like the 2008 fantasy horror movie "Ogre", then expectations weren't exactly running high. And the movie's cover was actually interesting enough, except for that lame tagline that read "No donkeys. No fairytales. Only terror.".

Still, I opted to watch this movie from writer Chuck Reeves and director Steven R. Monroe once again here late in 2022. I have watched it once before, probably around the time when it was newly released, but I have to be honest and say that I only remembered the title and nothing of the story at all.

Writer Chuck Reeves actually managed to put together a good and entertaining storyline, with some interesting concepts and ideas. And I have to say that I found the script rather enjoyable. It was just a shame that the movie was held back by some highly questionable CGI effects.

The cast in the movie was good, and there were some familiar faces on the cast list, with the likes of John Schneider, Katharine Isabelle and Brendan Fletcher. The cast put on good jobs in bringing the characters and story to life on the screen.

Visually then "Ogre" is a pretty terrible movie. The CGI animated monstrosity that is the ogre in the movie is just such an eyesore. It looks amazingly bad, somewhat reminiscent of the CGI graphics from a late 1990s computer game. It was a shame actually, because the poorly rendered CGI held the movie back.

If you can look past the questionable CGI effects in "Ogre", then you actually have a fairly decent enough movie here.

My rating of director Steven R. Monroe's movie "Ogre" lands on a five out of ten stars.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
No new surprises
jordondave-2808522 July 2023
(2008) Ogre HORROR

Straight-to-rental and low budget which the idea may have derived by watching the Hulk movie directed by Ang Lee since it contains similar capabilities, centers on young antique seekers looking for an old century town on a map, and stumble onto unlocking a deadly ogre created from an old magistrate who may or may cast the plague spell onto his villagers by citing from an old witchcraft book. All this is, is a gory version of the hulk because the ogre in question is CGI as well as some of the gory effects with bad acting and no new surprises. John Schneider (Dukes of Hazard) stars as the one who made a pact with the devil.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed