Deadtime Stories: Volume 1 (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Decent ideas, horrible presentation
Sportsman7315 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Deadtime Stories 2 has a few highlight moments, but the presentation has a 'made in my high school film class' feel to it. I'd recommend this to someone who has run out of horror movies to watch, but otherwise it's a pass.

In the first story, I really liked the idea they presented. It's genuine and creepy, and is something that if done properly is quite terrifying. However, the presentation was way to simple, visually it looks like a spoof film or some amateur attempt. The scene with the bat is just laughable, and not in a good way. One thing that really stands out in these short movies is how much time and money they spent just on the gore effects. The effects are not very realistic, but unsettling nonetheless.

The second story was by far the most terrifying. I don't understand the strong motives for the girl to kill herself, seemed like an unrealistic jump, but it made for some spooky/scary reveals in the classroom. I had a good time watching this one.

The third story was a failure. Bad story (mars dust that cures cancer? what?) which inevitable turns into a zombie movie at the end. Not great and I'm not a big fan of throwing sex/nudity in there just to spice up an otherwise useless movie.

Overall I rated 4/10. Worth the first 2 stories if you've seen everything else already.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This is a below average addition to the genre but not a waste of time completely
kevin_robbins29 April 2022
George A. Romero Presents Deadtime Stories Volume 1 (2009) is currently available on Amazon Prime. This picture is comprised of three short stories that are presented and concluded with narration by legend George A. Romero. The three short stories are about headhunters, mermaids and werewolves.

Each segment in this film has a different director - Michael Fischa (Death Spa), Jeff Monahan (Corpsing) and Tom Savini (Night of the Living Dead, 1990). This picture stars Marty Schiff (Dawn of the Dead), Antone Pagán (Stripes), Kristin Slaysman (Skincare), Bingo O'Malley (Out of the Furnace) and Nick Mancuso (Under Siege).

These three short films are all fairly mediocre but they do get better as the film progresses. The head hunter story was fairly straight forward with some cool special effects but bad CGI. The mermaid film was entertaining and fun to watch unfold. They did a good job creating the mermaids. The werewolf film was probably the best with a smart storyline and great ending.

Overall this is a below average addition to the genre but not a waste of time completely. I would score this a 4/10 but recommend seeing it once.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Horrible
BandSAboutMovies29 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I characterize George Romero's post-Creepshow output the same way that I do Lucio Fulci's post Manhattan Baby output, except that, you know, I actually like some of what Fulci did. His films feel like a man struggling for relevance, falling back on outdated tropes and the same old, same old one more time.

But man, as rough as Fulci's life got, he never started a middling anthology film off with absolutely dreadful dialogue like ""Now I lay me down to rest, but there's a goblin upon my chest. He's grey and ugly and very gory and he wants to tell me a deadtime story."

For shame.

The first film has three stories: Valley of the Shadow, in which a woman takes people into the jungle on a cursed trip to find her missing husband); Wet, the story of digging up a mermaid and Housecall, which has a doctor visit a boy who claims to be a vampire.

At least Tom Savini directed the last story and tried. The rest of this, put together by Michael Fischa (My Mom's A Werewolf) and Jeff Monhahan, who appeared in Romero's films Two Evil Eyes and Bruiser, made me question just how bad movies can be and I just spent a week watching every Bruno Mattei film I could get my hands on.

I really hope that Romero at least got some money for these films, because I see no reason that he should be involved in these pictures. I struggled to get through these. Don't make the same error that I did.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better than the first
tawlite1 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
IMDb have both movies very mixed up, with episodes from number 2 and cast listed in vol 1 and vice versa. Anyway these three little offerings are slightly better than the first vol, although again the pace is slow on all three. Out of them all I thought the first one was best. This anthology has upped the gore a bit, so you're going see chewed up bodies and loose eyeballs. The gore is also quite effective. Performances all round are a bit wooden and the second story for me is the most boring with an ineffectual plot concerning a dull professor and his lover student, she gets pregnant and commits suicide, because said Professor's university syllabus and lesson plans are more important than his pregnant lover he's a stickler that all students attend his classes no matter what...so yeah predictable.

The first story is possibly the best, about a trio that get stuck in a cave after a rock wall, splendid gore and interesting story. The final offering has shades of Romero Zombie movie about dust from Mars that not only heals for a short time but also turns the cured into raving nymphomaniacs as well as other things!!! ;)
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed