Pimpin' Pee Wee (2009) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Why does this exist
BandSAboutMovies24 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Porky's was a big deal in the 80s, a time before easy access to pornography. Because while that movie is set in the 50s, it delivers on what it promises: female nudity and plenty of it.

And sure, in 1994 it seemed like it took ten minutes to download a photo online, but the hose of non-stop pulchritude that was able to be beamed directly into your home had already started to trickle.

And that's when Lontano Investments purchased all the rights to Porky's.

Seven years later, they still hadn't made a movie.

That's when they signed a deal with Mola Entertainment, who promised to make the movie for the price of 1.5% of the movie's budget and option fees, as well as the opportunity to make a sequel as long as they made a movie within five years. Legal wrangled ensured and years went by with no movie, as the big stumbling block was that Lontano Investments demanded that the new Porky's must have a $10 million dollar budget.

So eight years later, Mola decided to spend a million to make an ashcan - a film made just to satisfy the contract and retain their rights so that they could make the sequel and then make money there, which seems like a wild plan - by making Porky's Pimpin' Pee Wee.

And that's when they brought on Brian Trenchard-Smith.

Yes, the same man who made Stunt Rock, Turkey Shoot and The Man from Hong Kong.

"I call it Young Republicans in Love. Think about it. These characters are all pretty vile. Sex-obsessed, narcissistic young people," the director explained to Moviefone.

Yeah, that's the same Brian Trenchard-Smith.

Hired four weeks before filming - which took place over 15 days on location in Canyon Country and at a studio in Simi Valley - the movie got made. But was it enough?

No one's really sure.

Mola believed that they had fulfilled their obligations and retained rights to make another sequel. However, Lontano claimed that the film required that $10 million dollar budget.

In 2002, Howard Stern acquired the remake rights. 11 years later, the parties reached a confidential settlement and agreed to dismiss a claim and counterclaim with prejudice. The terms of the settlement remain confidential.

And we still don't have a $10 million dollar budget version of Porky's...even if we don't need one.

Somehow, the movie we got is supposed to be a sequel to the original trilogy despite the fact that the last time we saw Pee Wee, Meat and Tommy was in 1954 and they haven't aged a day in the last 55 years. Did they walk through a gap in the space-time continuum? Are they clones? Perhaps robots? The movie never tells us.

However, the movie - with one lone exception we'll get into - this movie is the most sex-positive teen sex comedy I've seen in a long time as well as one of the filthiest. There's not much outright copulation, but plenty of sex toys, filthy talk and even male genitals being shown in outline and grabbed, something that rarely happens in these films.

Also, the story revolves around Porky's daughter breaking away from her father's house of the rising sun and making her own modern brothel thanks to the three male characters, who need to make money after a party destroys a vase.

That's right. A Risky Business by way of 80s sitcom plot for a movie that has deep throat incurred puking.

This is also a movie where no one is truly exploited and all of the sex work in bright and cheery and you know, more of that please. It truly does not judge anyone for their kinks or their needs or their ability to make money from their bodies until the end, when one of the "what happened to these characters" moments reveals that one got the clap - maybe this is the 50s - and points an arrow at who gave it to him, shaming a woman in the midst of so many characters that went through this guilt-free.

Anyways, this movie is much more interesting for the story of how it came to be than what it is. But I think you figured that out by now.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A OK movie with lots of nudity.
treakle_197827 March 2020
Im A huge fan of this franchise but this movie tried being the original porkys movie. They should've used there own character name's instead of using 3 originals from the trilogy. Movie was to short. It's not the worst movie I've ever seen but this movie could been much better.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A flick for horny teens!
cekadah9 April 2016
The Porky's series is back with Pee Wee, Meat and Tommy. All looking and scheming to get 'it' any possible way.

Pee Wee is paid by his uncle to watch over his ever-so fancy house while he goes on a trip. Pee Wee, Meat and Tommy grasp this as a great opportunity to PARTY DOWN. They do and in order to repair the house after the party they decide to open a cat-house to earn quick cash. Porky finds out and trouble follows. Pee Wee, Meat and Tommy discover that maybe they have bitten off more than they can chew.

This is strictly a teen movie of silly nonsense but it actually has some funny moments! It's not much to be said about the story or the acting. Lots of young girls showing their fine bodies and goofy boys making fools of themselves in front of them hoping to get 'it'.

That's the movie!
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How dare they.
CriticsVoiceVideo11 February 2021
Some terrible reboot/remake. Nothing else really to say.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The guys aged well.
tnear15 February 2020
Maybe they forgot, Porky's was set in the 50's. Maybe it's their grandsons.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It is what it is
itsabacus200911 January 2020
I know, they only made the movie because they wanted mountain the legal rights and whatever. Had they gotten their 10 million desperately needed for this movie, it probably would have been alot better. But with only 1 million to deal with? Well, it's slightly below average (even for a porky's movie) which is saying something! Could it had been alot better even with the low budget? Sure. But in order to break even, they got the ex porn stars to appear in it.Doesn't always work. And clearly, just needs to be forgotten altogether.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good for some laughs!
DarylJGittings28 October 2023
I just watched "Porky's: Pimpin' Pee-wee* and it was better than I expected.

Pee-wee, Tommy and Meat are back during summer break from college. Pee-wee is watching his uncle's house while he's gone on a trip. Tommy decides that it's the perfect place and time to party.

One evening the guys go to Porky's for a good time. Tommy befriends Porky's daughter. She and some of her friends party and hangout with Tommy, Pee-Wee, and Meat.

When some of Pee-wee's uncle's antiques are damaged, Porky's daughter, Shelley comes up with a way for Pee-wee to make enough money to pay for the damaged items. See, Shelley has some ideas on how to run Porky's, but Porky ignores her ideas, so she decides to put them into play at Pee-wee's uncle's house.

I actually laughed quite a bit watching this. I enjoy raunchy, juvenile humor.

One thing I couldn't help but notice is that the film takes place in modern times. Did they forget that the original Porky's trilogy was set in the 1950s?

Anyway despite the low ratings, I enjoyed this flick and think it's worth viewing at least once.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrible
brownds-8330411 May 2024
Horrible. Ive waited years for either a remake of Porky's or just the next one in line but this was an awful movie. The only decent actor was the kid who played Tommy. The storyline didn't make much sense because it's supposed to be the same Porky's bar but in a new building and under new management yet all the main characters have the same names as the characters in the original films. The shower scene in the original had attractive supposed high school girls, who were somewhat believable , but this one had girls who look as though they've been rode hard and put up wet, then had multiple kids, then rode hard and put up wet again before being beaten with an ugly stick. The only attractive females in this film were the two main girls who were just so so at best. The acting was horrible and I mean really bad. The originals had a fan base that could have made this film a hit had it had the budget to have been cast ,directed, and produced correctly. This was as disappointing as the Ghostbusters Melissa McCartney was in and the only way it could have been worse is if you cast her as one of the characters with nude scenes . Should have waited to make this film until the money was there and a decent script was available.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed