"The Mentalist" Code Red (TV Episode 2010) Poster

(TV Series)

(2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
The Lethal Virus
claudio_carvalho21 December 2021
When a vial with a lethal and valuable virus is left open in the protect room of the scientist Alicia Seberg in a bio facility, she calls Patrick Jane and asks him to find who killed her. Lisbon and Patrick head to the facility, and Alicia explains that she will dies in a few hours since there is no antidote for the virus. The bureaucratic and arrogant CDC agent Dean Harken is in charge of the investigation but Patrick suspects of him. The only persons that have access to the room are Alicia's husband and three colleagues, all scientists that work with her. When Patrick finds a breach in the security system, all the employees of the facility become suspects. But Patrick Jane plots a bold plan to catch the killer.

"Code Red" is a great episode of "The Mentalist", and the storyline is a very current topic with the Covid-19 pandemics. The daring plan of Patrick Jane is very funny in the end. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Code Red"
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Glitch in this episode :)
Fred_Birkhoff13 January 2011
Warning: Spoilers
In The Mentalist season 2 episode 16 there are a number of glitches.

First, i believe that there was a simpler solution to the case. So the guy who released the virus must have used the antidote on himself first. What if they tested the five guys that were supposedly able to enter the room for having the antidote in their blood. Supposing that the antidote had some signature that they could find in the blood. And i believe that to be a reasonable theory given the fact that that chick said that if the antidote was to be used on a regular basis it would give adverse side effects that were "far too severe". Check for the side effects or whatever.

Second, if the killer entered the first room and then the second room and released the virus in the first room and then exited the first room, doesn't that mean that the virus must have spread into the second room and so on and so forth to the whole supposed radius ???
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Weak plot; strong emotion
yavermbizi29 October 2021
My overall rating of "The mentalist"'s Season 2: 4/10.

So pretty much every review and even many of the trivia items on this episode's page indicate that the episode is riddled with technical and factual errors that are impossible to excuse away. Jane's trick in this episode was not only next to impossible to pull off (they couldn't even edit the scenes believably), but also fraught with such ethical peril... Frankly, many episodes of "The mentalist" feel like they'd be "once in a lifetime" investigations that would receive 24-hour coverage for weeks and resonate for years, making everyone involved a (bigger) celebrity - this one, however, really goes overboard and presents a case that would immediately become international news and possibly torpedo cabinet-level officials, lead to nationwide protests etc. Most of it being because some clownish detective decided to play a trick. I sure do wonder how many people would be out for Jane's blood - Red John would have to hire an entire PMC to keep his archrival alive!..

However, I must say, I feel like the setup is just conductive to strong emotion - the scientist lady's death sure lends itself to some deep inquiry and you can't help but wonder what you would've done in this situation, how you would've acted. The same - possibly a stronger feeling still - goes for Jane's stunt, unmarred as it is by the scientist lady's daughter's inability to act. Lisbon is amazing in her scene, and her interactions with Cho and Jane are very evocative, as is the resolution of the situation. Really, Lisbon and Jane have particularly great performances in this one. Does it compensate for the story's stupidity? Weeeellll... I'd argue that it does, for the most part.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Outrageous episode of great series
cal_tabernik20 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
We like this series very much even though Jane is sometimes over the top. This episode, however, was too much: 1. Since the murdered girl knew that one of her coworkers was stealing the virus, don't you think she would have mentioned it in the hours it took her to die, which would have made the resolution pretty easy. 2. Jane's "ruse" made all those workers call their families and tell them they were going to die - little too extreme to catch the killer; what if one of the workers had decided to commit suicide. 3. One would think there was a way to determine who took the antidote. Even suggesting that the people take the test should have ferreted out the killer.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Thought For Sure It Must Be A Guest Writer!
oodelolly27 October 2010
Warning: Spoilers
This script was filled with bizarre comments. Harken says, "Okay, we're copacetic." That doesn't seem like something a bureaucratic would say after putting away a deadly virus. More like, "We're clear", or even just a sigh of relief. And when Jane said "Fig for procedure", I laughed out loud! Who talks like that!? Not even Jane would say something weird like that. "A fig for a care, a fig for a woe!" Oh wait, that was John Heywood back in the 1500s. The episode was filled with random stuff like that, and it jerked me out of the story, which was pretty grandiose to begin with.

I mean, the average episode of The Mentalist has always been quirky with Jane responsible for 99% of it, and that's part of why I love the show. But in Code Red, everyone's dialog was filled with oddities that I can only imagine made the actors' jobs extra difficult. How do you say, "Fig for procedure" with a straight face?

I was shocked to see that Bruno Heller was the writer. My wife suggests that Bruno's no-talent cousin ghost wrote the episode for him because Bruno was too busy with other stuff. I wouldn't be surprised if she's right.

P.S. Alicia Seberg(Amy Price-Francis)'s death performance was laughable. A little coughing up of stage blood might have been gratuitous, but at least it would perhaps have given some visible cause for the odd gasping act that she gave. During the episode my wife speculated that maybe the death was being staged prematurely as part of the plot as a ploy set up by Jane, which would explain the shoddy performance because a scientist would be a bad actor. Eek. That was actually her acting.
5 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Agree with the others
xbatgirl-300292 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I agree with many criticisms of this episode, especially that Jane's stunt is by far on of the wort, possibly the worst, stunt he ever pulls in the series. Usually he's cruel towards people who possibly deserve it in some way or can handle it, either he knows they are criminals, or corrupt, or have massive egos. Super interesting to find out the show's creator wrote this episode. It makes me wonder if he originally saw Jane as being this cruel and sociopathic. He is pretty irredeemable here, yet it's played off as being a lovable scamp. It's a huge misstep.

So, I'm giving a low score to this episode pretty much just for that. I do agree a lab consultant should have been hired to look over the script (or listened to) but really no science or medical show on tv is remotely accurate so I've learned to grade on a sliding scale.

Just want to add I thought Tony Curran did a great job - by which I mean I really his character was truly obnoxious and contemptible. This is very different from most of his other characters and he seems like a very nice guy in real life so I always assume that's a sign of good acting. No comment on certain others.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Ignorant treatment of a biohazard
hitch-118367 June 2020
The writers and designers of this episode should be jailed for criminal ignorance.. and laziness. First, there is no Biohazard Level 5. Second, their treatment of the facility, engineering and administrative controls were supernaturally absurd. Jeez, do a little homework. Or hire a lab consultant.
3 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed