Brawler (2011) Poster

(2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Thank the lord it's only 84 minutes. You can find it at your local Dollar Tree or other dollar store, as we did, but the real question is, would you want to?
tarbosh2200029 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Charlie Fontaine (Grubbs) and Bobby Fontaine (Senter) are brothers who, in their spare time, enter into Punchfighting matches on New Orleans riverboats. The mob is involved in the form of Atwater (Rhodes), but Charlie has a high-quality trainer in the form of Rex Baker (Bowen). When Charlie catches Bobby engaging in "the ultimate betrayal" (to quote the back of the DVD box) with his wife Kat (James), it's clear that the only way to resolve this dispute is in the Punchfighting ring. So, eventually, the two brothers square off against each other. Who will be the ultimate BRAWLER?

Hey, look! It's another Punchfighter! Beloved reader, you can rest assured that as long as they keep making movies with shirtless men punching each other, we here at Comeuppance reviews will continue to watch them and review them. Curiously, filmmakers out there don't seem to realize that this sort of thing has been done before. A lot.

Brawler was writer/director Chris Sivertson's follow-up to his I Know Who Killed Me (2007), the Lindsay Lohan epic that seems to have been much maligned but is actually fairly entertaining. In that film, there are many, many stupid moments but they somehow add to the overall watchability factor. In Brawler, just the stupid remains. He seems to be going for drama and atmosphere over anything else - and that includes scenes of fighting. There are surprisingly few brawls in Brawler.

In I Know Who Killed Me, there are many colorful lighting schemes and some flashy editing to keep the viewer's eye glued to the screen. In Brawler, they forgot to turn on the lights at all. Yes, it's one of those. There are many scenes with low - or seemingly no - lights. Filmmakers should know that not turning on the lights doesn't help the viewer like your movie. It actually annoys us.

There are long sections with no fighting, and the movie takes itself way too seriously. Even with all the endless dialogue scenes, somehow the writers of Brawler forgot to include an antagonist. Something every story should have, especially a Punchfighter. There's no Brakus, Tong Po, or some such memorable villain that our heroes must face off against and work up towards.

The character of Bobby is very Zac Efron-like. In other words, a prissy millennial. He doesn't seem like your typical tough guy. The best character in the movie was Rex, played by Michael Bowen. Much like Sly Stallone in his TV show The Contender, he's a fight trainer who wears a fedora. Considering Brawler's limited resources, their best move would have been to increase the role of Rex if they wanted to improve things.

What would have been even better is if they had gotten one more character actor in there, perhaps someone for Bowen to play off of - someone like Lou Ferrigno, Christopher Lambert, Nick Mancuso, Vincent Spano - anybody! But no, it's just a bunch of fumbling around in the dark. Literally.

There's a scene early on where a group of frat bros comes to assault Bobby and he has to beat them all up. This shouldn't have been one scene - it should have been the basis for the plot. Brawler should have been: An evil fighter (the Brakus character) commands an army of frat bros. He has a secret lair and the bros do his bidding, whatever that may be. The baddie wants to take over the town so he sends the bros to trash businesses and cause mayhem.

The Fontaine brothers must fight through wave after wave of frat bros with backwards or sideways baseball caps until they make it to the final battle - the toughest battle of their lives - with the evil baddie. Now is that so freakin' hard? Rather than tease us with that one scene, that's what Brawler should have been in its entirety.

Probably the best example of a fight film that's more of a drama is Scorpion (2007). Probably the weakest is The Fight (2001). Brawler leans more to the latter. Thank the lord it's only 84 minutes. You can find it at your local Dollar Tree or other dollar store, as we did, but the real question is, would you want to?
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Secrets of Low Budget Film-Making
A_Different_Drummer30 June 2013
There is a lot of talk these days about how Hollywood has lost its edge, how it makes films by committee, using proved formulas (sequels) for world audiences. All this is true. But this does not mean you should go running to the nearest indie production and pretend that, just because it is indie, it is anti-Hollywood, and therefore worthy of praise. There is a reason indie is indie. Ninety nine times out of 100, it is horrible, wretched, and just plain wrong. Ninety nine times out of 100, indie should be second choice, as in, would you rather have a root canal or watch.... There are exceptions. Look at The Battery, not merely a great indie, but arguably one of the best films of the current decade. The brilliant Jeremy Gardner (talking about The Battery here, don't lose me) wrote a script so tight it squeaks, directed it so well that even the scenery is interesting, and plays the lead so well the film has already won several audience awards at festivals. The Battery is the 1 in 100 that breaks the mold. BRAWLER is the other 99%, rolled into one. Brawler typifies indie junk. Weak script, weak direction, and actors who -- you just know -- have a day job that probably involves making change. Brawler uses "film lipstick" wherever possible (loud noises, an overloud sound track, and fast cutting) to hide what it really is. But nothing can hide what it really is. It is indie. Ugh.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
You should avoid this movie at all costs.
sikkwolf17 May 2014
The thing about "Brawler" is this, it desperately wants to be an indie fight movie about two Irish brothers and MMA... But it fails. The actors aren't Irish, the chicks aren't that good looking and New Orleans doesn't make the same energetic backdrop that Boston or New York does in all the other movies that are ultimately just like it, but far superior in execution.

Out of the two lead actors you have nothing to like, one is a self righteous jerk that spends the first quarter of the film judging his unruly brother. Who by the way, is a skinny jean wearing pansy with a faux hawk. It's so hard to take any of what you're seeing seriously that by the time it does get to the fights you're drenched, marinated in the silliness of the experience and your jaded eyes can't help but see them for what they are, cinematic trash, just like the rest of the movie.

If you want to see a good fight movie about two brothers with "issues", check out Warrior, if you've already seen it, watch it again before you waste your time with this garbage. Just because something is "indie" doesn't mean it's great and defending it or acting like it's something it's not just makes you a fool with low standards.

These are of course just my opinions, if they smack to you as being overly critical then ignore them and torture yourself by sitting all the way through this pile of drek.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Listen to bobs advice!
BigDick36 August 2013
This film is absolutely awful! The production quality is really crappy, the acting is terrible, the dialogue is tedious. It is generally all round poor and there is nothing about it at all that should make you waste 1 second of your life watching this film. I gave up about 30 minutes in just because I wanted to give it a chance, I wanted to turn it off after 10.

However Bob Dobbs review is brilliant and his recommendation to watch The Battery is the only decent thing that Brawler has added to my life. The Battery is equally low budget and obviously isn't a blockbuster or high quality film. However it is really entertaining and interesting to watch. And compared to Brawler it is like a multi-Oscar winning film.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
When two brothers have a falling out
Woodyanders19 February 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Rough'n'tumble brawler Charlie Fontaine (a solid performance by Nathan Grubbs) catches his cocky and reckless younger brother Bobby (a sturdy portrayal by Marc Senter) cheating with his wife Kat (an appealing turn by Pell James) behind his back. Charlie decides to get revenge on Bobby by fighting him in a vicious underground fight club type match on a riverboat.

Writer/director Chris Sivertson relates the involving story at a constant pace, maintains a tough gritty tone throughout, offers a flavorsome evocation of both the New Orleans setting and the sordid criminal milieu, and takes time to develop the characters. Moreover, there are sound supporting contributions from Michael Bowen as hard-nosed trainer Rex Baker, Dane Rhodes as cagey promoter Bruce Atwater, Brian Stapf as the menacing Walter, and Bryan Batt as the flamboyant Fat Chucky. The heated conflict between the two radically contrasting siblings gives this film an extra potent emotional punch. The climatic fight is super brutal and intense. Zoran Popovic's lively cinematography provides an invigorating electric energy. Tim Rutili's rollicking score hits the rousing spot. Worth a watch.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Decent fight film
craigc-818-62426315 October 2013
This film is not in the same league as Warrior (2011), however if you like never back down, rocky or any JcVD film there is no reason that you will not enjoy this film.

People who are looking for an artistic film are looking in the wrong place, this is simply a fighting film so look else where.

Yes the acting isn't the best, however it really isn't as bad as some people make out.

The directing and camera work are very good and there should be no complaints

The fight scenes are pretty enjoyable and accurate, proper MMA quick and sharp movements.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ignore The Trolls, See This Film!
biz-270-6421676 October 2013
Clearly BigDick and Bobb are internet trolls that are wasting screen space, and they more than likely haven't even seen this film.

I'd suggest their "reviews" be reported, and their "opinions" ignored.

I'd also suggest seeing this film for the extremely impressive MMA fighting and stunts alone, which were in fact performed by the actors themselves. Quite a commitment to a role, I'd say.

Brian Batt makes a significant contribution to the film's already high talent base -- always great to see him.

In addition, the cinematography is outstanding, the acting solid (Marc Senter is actually brilliant, as usual), and you'll certainly never think of mint juleps in the same way again...
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Go watch it..that's my summary.
giffinkevin24 October 2011
All those involved, from the cast to the DP, director, producer, you name it...they all deserve applause and accolades. This movie tickles you, then pulls you in, then doesn't let you go. Hot fights, subtle undertones, worthy dialog and drama....I give it two thumbs up. There are nice long juicy moments that give the audience credit for having a brain. There are fast paced, hand held, fight scenes that will have you flinching involuntarily. There is brother to brother tension that explodes off the screen, and the girl in the middle...well, along with everyone else involved, she knocks it outta the park. If you liked "The Lost"...if you liked "Fight Club"....if you liked "Snatch"....if you like powerful cinema....you'll like this movie. Kevin Giffin
7 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed