Never Back Down 2: The Beatdown (Video 2011) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
44 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Generic and predictable...
paul_haakonsen9 January 2016
For an action movie then this was as predictable as they come. Yep, it is one of those movies where an underdog receives a short period of training in martial arts, then rises to the occasion and wins despite impossible odds against many other well-trained combatants.

Story-wise then "Never Back Down 2: The Beatdown" was rather generic and similar to many other similar movies before it. Actually it was almost a frame-by-frame copy of the first movie.

What makes the movie somewhat worthy watching is the fight during the actual Beatdown event, but it doesn't take place before well over an hour into the movie. The rest of the movie was just, sorry to say, a rather mundane story.

As for the acting, well I will say that it was adequate for the particular genre that it is. Just don't get your hopes up for academy award winning performances.

This sequel is a blatant and unnecessary remake of the first "Never Back Down" movie, to the point where it was embarrassing to bear witness to. It wasn't a continuation or anything, and sure it was with other characters, but the plot and storyline was a copy and paste job that was made so hastily.

"Never Back Down 2: The Beatdown" is a mediocre action movie experience, although it does show some impressive fighting skills from Michael Jai White. It might be worth a watch if you enjoy fighting movies that is driven by the action and a solid storyline is left far behind in its wake.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
middle of the road....
dangermous30 August 2011
hot chick or 2, fights were OK but not as good as the first film except for the fight where Michael Jai White is hand cuffed and fights off 4 or 5 police men showing his agility. there was some character development but not much, clumsy dialogue - not a lot of complete or realistic conversations, mildly entertaining though i wouldn't watch it twice like you can with some classic martial arts films. Some big plot holes like how a teenage boxer became a mix martial arts fighter with only a few weeks training....... hopefully kids out there don't think that's realistic! they all looked a bit young for MMA - kind of boyband MMA haha

the faults aside it was likable and i was entertained!
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unspectacular but enjoyable mixed martial arts action movie
Rosser9421 February 2012
I was a huge fan of the original "Never Back Down", therefore was looking forward to seeing this follow-up.

In terms of the plot, it is painfully similar to the original, however this is not necessarily a bad thing, as, surprisingly, the same, predictable story line is still entertaining second-time-round. In addition to this, the characters are very similar to those in the first film in many respects, just with a few fresh ideas being introduced.

The action itself is strong; combat is well-acted and every fight scene is relatively convincing, therefore the film succeeds in, arguably, its key area.

In addition to this, Jai White is brilliant and after being impressed by his performance in "Blood and Bone", I was pleasantly surprised to see that his ability has not halted. Furthermore, despite being unsure about his ability as a director, I was equally impressed.

Overall, fans of the original who desire a similar dose of mixed martial arts action, or those who want an enjoyable, solid, MMA-based drama and are not concerned about a lack of depth or originality, should probably give this movie a try, however I'd advise watching the original first, as it is undoubtedly superior.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Teenage Karate Tiger 2
joerg-nezmeskal27 August 2011
The first "Never Back Down" was a MTV inspired version of "Karate Tiger meets Beverly Hills 90210" with a lot of good looking kids (Amber Heard being one of them), some nice fight and training sequences and tons of bad acting and a cheesy script. Never Back Down 2 offers more of the same. Instead of suffering trough the "emotional journey" of one character, the focus is on 4 of them, everyone's motivations and storyline being a thin as the piece of paper, that one characters is hitting for 80 minutes (don't ask, watch it and you'll know). However the fights and training montages are great (especially the sequences with MJW, moving impressively fluid for a guy of his size, and the rad capoeira dances of Meraz) and MJW is as charismatic as ever in this underwritten role as a mentor with a troubled past. Overall the movie is enjoyable if you're not expecting too much and are a fan of MMA-related movies or of cheesy, "so bad that it's fun" 80's karate flicks.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A relatively good sequel, as sequels go, to the original. Perhaps better
JohnRayPeterson13 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The movie has more going for it than the previous one in 2008. The 'sensei', Case Walker, this time is none other than Michael Jai White, who also directed the movie. Sure, White is no Djimon Hounsou as acting goes, but he has much acting experience and far better credentials as martial artists than most who play such roles. He did quite well in his first time directing and I suspect will direct more movies in the future. These two factors coupled with the fact that he is well grounded, smart and a good role model in real life helps make the movie a good one, in the genre. His fighting scenes are excellent, his notably different character than that of Hounsou was a well calculated smart choice. By the way, he produced and starred in the 2009 Blood and Bone, a movie to watch if you like movies with good fight scenes.

This sequel has not one star student of Case, but four, for all of who, the movie provides a background, sub-plot and fairly equal play time. That again was an improvement over the initial movie. It was probably a good idea not to bring back the Tom Cruise look alike Sean Faris because that aspect invites unwanted criticism ( bad rap for Faris whose as good as Cruise was at that age.) The only character to be featured in both movies, 2008 Never Back Down and this 2001 sequel, is Max Cooperman played by Evan Peters. He looks a little older but his character retained his unhealthy passion for mixed martial arts fights.

There are annoying sub story lines repeated from the first movie; and that should have been avoided. Specifically, how the character of Mike is prone to fits of anger followed by fighting when any reference to his father is brought up. It was unnecessary and makes the movie appear to lack in originality. Other than that the viewers who like the occasional fight movie, will be satisfied.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Some things look better on paper.
chris198726 October 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I went in to this film expecting another great movie like the original.Well i was very disappointed.Michael Jai White is a decent actor and i enjoyed watching him in Universal Soldier:The Return.In this film he certainly is no Mr Miyagi.The other characters were not the best of actors to be honest.The fighting was decent enough though and i enjoyed all the M.M.A action.I enjoyed the story bringing in different characters and backgrounds in M.M.A.I would recommend only watching this if you are bored or pick it up in the bargain bin at your local video store.And the scene where they train one fighter by punching a piece of paper has got to be the worse scene in a movie ever.This should have never been made.I guess some things really do look better on paper.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bad Movie!
varunvurt1 June 2012
Much like the first movie this revolves around a bunch of guys trying to prove themselves, but unlike the first this is multi-starrer. But all the expectations can be kicked out within a few minutes into the movie. Bad acting by all of them (except for Michael White),no proper background to the characters, the characters aren't developed enough, lack of emotion and a few other traits add up to a very disappointing watch. You feel like you are just sitting there seeing a bunch of characters in scene after scene just stringed together. In some particular instances the movie makes no sense what so ever. The first movie was filled with emotions creating a reason for Jake Tyler(Sean Farris) to fight his way into the beatdown,but here it just a group of guys swearing at an alarming rate fighting each other. There are a few saving graces though, like the training sessions where you can see some insane work-out methods. All in all an average movie.
24 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Incredibly bad
grantss5 January 2020
Pretty basic fight-movie, i.e. craptacular. Plot is meaningless and unoriginal. Direction is paint-by-numbers. Performances are all over the place.

Avoid.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Not an emotional one, and not trying to be.
athena245 July 2012
Just an action movie, without trying to be melodramatic. Yes, it's about 5 guys (including the mentor) with personal problems that seek the answer in training and fighting. There's not much background on the characters - but it's not necessarily bad. Sometimes the director is forcefully trying to make us like some character by making him/her an orphan, or raised by only one parent, or evil step parents, and also having an ill sibling, and no money of course. Did I mention that other kids/people trying to step on them, beat them, or kill them perhaps ?

There is no much character development in the movie, maybe except of Justin, but there is character portrayal. It's not hard to understand what kind of person each (and here I think that Michael Jay White did a great job). They all have got problems, but it's not like their world is collapsing on them. At least their not showing it to us - and I think that's good, since the fighter in them becomes more believable that way.

I agree that the acting is slightly wooden. And it's irritating at first, though I did get accustomed to it. Surprisingly, it's not full of clichés (though there are some), and the dialogs are not stupid, because the characters don't say obvious things.

The fighting is satisfying enough. After all, this is the reason I've watched that movie.

I certainly disagree with those saying first Never Back Down was better. This movie has almost no plot, but the first one was just stupid. The director of the original tried to make me like Jack Tyler by the usual trick - making him miserable but struggling. And Cam Giganet's character is barely watchable. He's just not acting like a fighter. The other fighters look more like a clowns. Fight choreography in the original is nowhere near this one. And all unnecessary shots from smart-phone make me ask the question, why watching the first Never Back Down movie ?? For the action - it's not worth it. The drama - not interesting and nothing new.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Should only be viewed by mma fans
IveMasteredDodgingbullets17 February 2014
Never Back Down 2 is very much identical to the first movie, only with a much smaller budget and this time revolving around 4 main characters training under Case (Jai White). Considering that I'm a huge fan of mma, action-movies and Michael Jai White (as an actor), I hate to say that this movie was predictably annoying. I think casting a couple of Abercrombie models in a movie like this was somewhat cliché and a bit of an insult to the mma scene. The acting was noticeably lacking (with the exception of Jai White) and there were a few scenes including Case's troubles and Justin's troubles that seemed to be poorly executed and lacked realism. There were also a couple soft-core sex scenes that seemed out of place. It was interesting, however, to see Todd Duffee act as well as Lyoto.

The only credit I could give this movie was it's extremely low budget ($3 million) and the fact that it was shot in only 4 weeks. Other than that, I guess this is all I can come to expect. I knew I would have to watch this while the lady was away because I knew she wouldn't like it. Boy was I right. I bet she'll like Undisputed-II though.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
what can I say
Qwertzful4 March 2012
Seriously, gotta ask some of the reviewers if they even seen the movie because some look like they don't know what they're talking about and get stuff all mixed up or just make up things. Probably expected Undisputed 4 or some kind of movie with the quality of something like Lord of the Rings. Don't you just hate it when people do that?

About the movie itself.. If you expect some kind of blockbuster that should've been in cinema and and definitely belongs in every DVD collection then you should just walk away from this one. But if you just wanna enjoy a movie and liked the first one and the trailer for this one then this is something for you.

Inspite of what some people are saying here the acting for this movie was fine (nothing special, but good enough), the plot actually did make sense (and so did the fights) and there really was some character development (again, nothing great but it was enough for these kind of movies)

I give this 8 out of 10 for delivering exactly what I was hoping for after watching the first movie and seeing the trailer for this.

So if you liked the first movie and/or liked the trailer for this one and can enjoy a movie that's not some blockbuster thing, then go watch this.
14 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
odd movies make for hard reviews
A_Different_Drummer30 October 2015
First thing this reviewer has to say is that in my other reviews I have been very clear that Jai White has taken a bum steer from Hollywood, he is a much better action figure than his CV would indicate.

Therefore, when I notice that MJW has made the effort to turn the Beatdown franchise into a personal nestegg (this review written late in 2015, but I see there is a BEATDOWN 3 in the works) I cannot complain. Man's got to do what a man has got to do.

The film itself is entertaining and that is no small compliment. What it lacks oddly is the sheer meanness that was visible in Beatdown 1. The original in the series was less about MMA than it was about the horror of being a kid having to deal with other kids. The MMA was secondary.

Here the MMA takes center stage and if there was a template for this film it was NOT Beatdown 1 (name notwithstanding) but BEST OF THE BEST, which (if you review that film) had a bit of a Disney flavor to it.

At the very end of this film, if you stick it out past the final fight (and many of you will not) there is a feel-good montage of the kind you usually see in afterschool specials.

Again, the martial arts are not the only thing here that is "mixed." So are the themes.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
It is worthy to watch just for Michael Jai White
eauvision10 October 2012
Let me put it in this way:

  • Bad acting - Horrible plot - And a lot of unnecessary sex and f*** words everywhere


The only thing that is worthy about this movie is Michael, he is an excellent fighter, he knows about MMA, his technique and pretty well mastered and well executed. If you are looking to watch good fights you are gonna find them in this movie, what I did was looked for the fight and skip all the three things that I mentioned before.

The edition of the movie is well done, also the fight scenes are pretty cool, not fantasies just real stuff. If you know about martial arts you are going to noticed and enjoy the development of this matches.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What a waste of time....
unitedcba26 August 2011
Never Back Down 2 (2011) | My Rating☛ 5/10 Director: Michael Jai White Writer: Chris Hauty Stars: Stacey Asaro, Gralen Bryant Banks and Rus Blackwell 103 min- Action

What a waste of time....There was nothing in this movie other than Michael Jai White one single fight with the cops. Acting was way below than one could imagine except Michael Jai White. As far as Michael Jai White debut Direction he was OK but still a long way to go. The story goes like this Four fighters different backgrounds come together to train under an ex MMA rising star (Michael Jai White) and then ultimately have to fight each other and the traitor in heir midst. This movie can only be tolerated by those who love to see anything called "action" and die hard fan of MJW. Rest of the people plz don't bother to see.
21 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Proof that potential means nothing.
kingstonhawke27 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
The business side of movie-making dictates that the wider you cast your net, the more money you will make in return. This movie should be shown to anyone who subscribes to that theory as a cautionary tale.

They literally tried to jam pack so many "can't miss" fight movie clichés into the script that by the end it sort of feels like Scary Movie 5 or something. I'm not even joking, it starts out solid, but half way through the movie when you notice they are just going to keep adding new story lines instead of developing the ones they've started I started scratching my head. Especially since the movie did just enough to not be rated PG-13. Literally, they could've deleted one flashing scene and not cursed so much and it probably would've been PG.

I'm probably giving this movie a 5 only because my expectations were so low to begin with. If I'd of paid money and waited months to see this movie, I'd be irate! Especially since it could've been great if they'd of just scaled it back a bit.

Having Todd Duffee in the movie may have seemed like a cool idea. But his WHOLE storyline is pointless and seems like an addition after the script was turned in. And that's on top of the fact that he's a garbage actor. You cut that WHOLE storyline, and devote that energy to further developing the two main characters stories and the movie may have been good enough to go to theaters.

The ending needed changing as well. I'm guessing they were over budget and just needed to wrap things because it feels extremely rushed and anti-climatic. Hello... no one thinks the bad guy is going to win in this kind of movie, so how about not relying on selling us on that, and instead doing something dramatic. Bad guy should've sucker punched the boxer with the messed up eye, and the wrestler should've taken his revenge using something he learned and won the tourney. Pretty much the ending to Gladiator.

In closing. If you're looking for a serious movie with substance, save your time. If you're an MMA fan that just wants to see some cool fighting, then maybe watch this movie if nothing else is on.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
MMA fights, combined with the typical "step-up" "you got served" kind of storyline.
technoholic8630 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I started to watch this movie with part "one" in mind.

Part one for me was like a fighting-style instead of dancing "Step-up", "You Got Served", boys falls in love with girl kind of movie. But then with MMA scene in them, instead of dancing. Part "two" is no different. But you can't really say that this is a part two other then the character "Max" and a few references throughout the movie.

The start of the movie the first thing you'll notice is the bad acting (dialogues) After a while it gets somewhat better, but still annoyed me throughout the movie.

I kept watching but i wasn't trilled by the cracking of the bones. They should've used the first movies effects on that. However the fighting-scenes did look good, but what almost every directer does is make the camera movie all over the place when a fight starts. Something i hoped this time would be different. The story-line is OK can't say i liked it, can't say i disliked it; lets just say i watched till the end. The story follows 4 fighters, but sometimes it felt like they just needed to fill the movie between the fights/training-scenes.

Overall the movie is OK if you like to see MMA fights, combined with the typical "step-up" "you got served" kind of story line.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible
robert-bowling013 October 2013
After watching the first movie, Never Back Down, I was extremely excited to see this movie.

That's about all the excitement that I had was the anticipation...

The acting is terrible, the lines are cheesy, and the movie is extremely predictable.

The only up to this film is that it made itself into a comedy for me and my friends to have jokes about for a couple weeks and to mock.

I was surprisingly disappointed by this one and would never think to watch it again. There is too much wrong in this film and they completely destroyed the reputation of the first movie as much as I had enjoyed that one.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Totally underrated......
syedtherock14 October 2012
I watched this movie after seeing its IMDb review and expected crap, the main reason I watched it because I enjoyed the first movie a lot. But anyhow after watching this movie I'm like, what??? This movie was awesome! It entertained me thoroughly! Obviously not an Oscar flick, but why would u watch this for? Entertainment! That's what it provides! probably there wasn't any buildup for any fights unlike the first one, it still impressed me. Everyone loves a good training session before fight scene. This is my first ever review and I felt it deserved a better rating. 5.5 is way too low, I don't understand why people think that sequels always suck, I think it did great as a sequel, added extra elements, extra fights and some drama as well. On the whole I would give it a 9/10 just to increase its ratings. Else an 8 probably.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lame ass movie
jason-e-chapman27 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is Facebook meets MMA. There's even a lead character in the movie that curiously resembles Mark Zuckerberg. To break this horrible film down simply, it revolves around a college 'beat down' tournament organized by the Mark Zuckerberg character. A bunch of freshman want to compete in the tournament for their own very personal reasons - for example, one kid's dad left his mom for another man...whoa!! There aren't many fight scenes, which was really disappointing. What really put the crappy icing on the cake for me was the MMA Master Trainer. He's a typical black ex-con type, and guess what? He lives in a trailer on an abandoned property. He can't afford a place of his own, so all he does is train and fight. How predictable can it get??
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Horrendous acting
ryanwinning129 July 2020
Seems like the whole movie was written in less time than it takes to watch it from start to finish. The script plays out like a kids cartoon. Some of the worst acting I can recall seeing on film. Michael J White is ok but everyone else is Amatuer. Then the icing on the cake as if this movie isn't horrible enough it has the absolute worst soundtrack to top it all off. None of the music really fits with the scenes and just seems like bad music.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
More of a remake then a sequel. Many of the same ideas from first are in this, I mean a lot. Still good though. I say B
cosmo_tiger3 September 2011
"An angry mind is a narrow mind." Four teenagers who need an outlet begin to train with ex-UFC fighter Case (White). After one of them betrays the group it is up to the other three to get revenge at the "Beatdown." After liking the first one more then I thought I would I was looking forward to this one. While I did like this movie it was more of a remake then a sequel. Instead of the main characters dad dying he leaves his mom. Instead of the trainer getting in a fight with his brother and living alone he has a run in with the law...and lives alone. The main character liking a fellow fighters girl is in this one, along with a line about Kurt Cobain. There really is not much different in this movie, except the fighting is more professional. Saying all that though, I did like this movie. Overall, a near replica of the first one. If you liked that one you will like this one. I give it a B.

Would I watch again? - I don't know, maybe.

*Also try - Never Back Down
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why would you film that?
destbest26 December 2011
I was very disappointed with this movie. The first Never Back Down easily became one of my favorite movies. Yes, I buy into cheesy stuff like that and I thought it was an amazing movie because not only did it have fighting but it had romance as well and a story that was very easy to follow.

This movie though was utter disappointment and I'm disgusted with the male mind and how far they allowed this movie to go. The sex scenes could have been easily cut out and the topless girls were unnecessary. If they want to keep that, they could have made a theatrical version of the movie for the girls of this world that don't want porn added into an otherwise decent movie.

I liked the characters and the cheesiness but there are parts of this movie that I wish I could unsee. I'm going to call terrible editing skills and horrible calls for which scenes are appropriate.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
We could have done without this one...
Leofwine_draca1 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
THE BEATDOWN is the second instalment of the NEVER BACK DOWN series. The good news is that Michael Jai White is back, the bad news is that he's only in the supporting mentor role, although as tough as ever. He gets about one decent fight scene and that's it. I'm guessing most of his time on set was taken up with his directorial duties, but the direction is nothing other than extremely ordinary, unfortunately. The film is full of new young blood characters seeking to build names and reputations for themselves, but it's all very predictable and the fight scenes veer towards the routine rather than impressive. Final verdict? A B-movie that we could have done without.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Underrated.
stjtrojan83 March 2012
I give this movie an 8 out of 10 because i love the story. It is a little like the last one one but hey, I loved the last one too. I think everybody is judging this movie on the fights and not the actually story. I think the actors did a great job getting you into the story, and Epstein did a good job at being the villain. If you filled out a pro's and con's list of this movie I think there would be far more pro's. The mixed martial arts is greatly displayed and the characters look like real fighters. I hope they make a Never Back Down 3 with possibly bringing back Jake Tyler to add some class into it but as far as this movie goes. I really enjoyed viewing it and if your an mixed martial arts guy or even a boxing guy.. I recommend this movie.
12 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Four college guys who, with a desire to fight, trains under a pro boxing champ.
abhinandanns2213 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
What a bore!! I sat down to watch it with a lot of expectations.But it proved me terribly wrong.It showed what not to expect. It stands no where near the prequel.Micheal Jay White looks his hunky best as the trainer with his cool bod.

Watch it only for the fight sequences because nothing actually makes sense except a bunch of guys kicking each others asses for some random reason.Basically, this movie doesn't make any sense.If you hit the theaters make sure you have something else to entertain you during the run time because you never know when you will walk out. A director can be an actor but an actor can't be a director. This movie proves the point.All in all this movie wasn't a winner for me. I wait for something to happen and there it goes down the drain !! nothing turns up!
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed