"Criminal Minds" 25 to Life (TV Episode 2010) Poster

(TV Series)

(2010)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
One Thought
ttapola10 November 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This is a good episode. It could have been a classic, though. The main plot is solid, and while it isn't revolutionary (an man is out to prove he committed no murder), it is told in more confidence and without almost any of the usual stylistic problems that plague Criminal Minds (for once, the flashback at the crime scene doesn't come off as clumsy), and the guest actors perform really well. The best bit is that until the second kill after the man's release from prison happens, the viewer can't be absolutely certain that Morgan was right when he recommended to the parole board that the man be released back into society. From that point onwards, the main plot offers no surprises for anyone whose watched hundreds of episodes of crime procedurals. Though the way the BAU compare serial killers to power mad businessmen is borderline genius. They are, of course, completely right.

So, the lack of surprises in the second half is the first problem. Were it the only one, this would have been an *excellent* episode. But there is another problem: the way-overlong pre-credits sequence is, at 10½ minutes, simply a textbook example of a structural car-wreck and quite probably the longest pre-credits sequence on TV ever, anywhere. The *function* of the pre-credits sequence is to give a *taste* of what's to come, not to be a complete act in a four-act episode. Luckily, *this* time, it isn't that damaging to the overall dramatic structure.

But the most pressing problem is the character of Strauss. For a moment it seemed, that since Hotch is absent, we would be able to pretend his problematic character did not exist in the show, but then Struss walks into Rossi's office and delivers exposition with all the subtlety of a crowbar. How Hotch is *now* taking time off since it's *almost* a year since his wife was killed (actually, if the original air dates are to be taken as *approximate* dates when each episode takes place in the show's world, it's been 10 days shy of 13 months since she died). Anyway, the problem is Strauss was OK when Hotch *did* beat an unarmed, defenseless man to death with his bare hands, but when she learns that Morgan *may* have made an error in his profiling, thus leading to a killer being released, she goes all kinds of crazy, especially when she starts to want to play it safe near the end. There is *no* consistency in her character. She should have said, "You made a mistake, just like Hotch. And if that politician is the killer, go bust him. Beat him if you want to." This is sarcasm, just in case someone didn't notice - after all, the writers of Criminal Minds treat their audience like dullards most of the time, unlike, say, the writers of The Closer or the late, great, possibly never-to-be-beaten The Wire.

So, two points off, and we end up with a 7/10. Which is still good. Just not great.
12 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Stolen Plot Story
matthewpsprenger5 April 2020
This story is based loosely on the murders in Fort Bragg, NC in February 1970. Captain Jeffery McDonald, a US Army Doctor, killed his pregnant wife and two daughters in the same manner as portrayed in this episode.

The phantom woman, and a group of people coming into his house while he was asleep on the couch.

Check out the actual story by searching for Jeffery McDonald.
2 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Found it rather ho-hum
TheLittleSongbird27 October 2016
As far as Season 6 episodes of 'Criminal Minds' goes, "25 to Life" is better than "Today I Do" and especially "The Thirteenth Step", and there are worse episodes of 'Criminal Minds' overall.

This said, while a long way from a low-point episode it is a rather ho-hum one that started off well but lost its way after the third crime and got more and more ridiculous. While there are worse episodes in Season 6, and of the show, "25 to Life" is to me a lesser episode of a show that is a personal favourite, especially in the first five seasons (from Season 6 onwards 'Criminal Minds' did become hit and miss, with an especially underwhelming Season 11, the little seen of Season 12 has not made me jump out of my chair with excitement).

"25 to Life" started promisingly. Morgan's compassion for Sanderson, his belief in his innocence and his going to great lengths to securing him parole sees a lovely and more sympathetic side to Morgan. Sure he is empathetic with victims and like at times a big brother figure to Reid, but he's tough as nails with the criminals, whether talked about, apprehended or convicted so this compassionate side to a convicted soon to be paroled criminal understandably strikes some fans as odd. That side to him was incredibly effective and beautifully played by Shemar Moore. Kyle Secor also does a great job as Sanderson, so much so that you are convinced that it isn't him and want the real person to be found. The rapport being Moore and Secor comes across really well.

In fact, all the acting is very good, with exception of Rachel Nichols who plays Seaver with her usual blandness. "25 to Life" is a very well-made episode, shot with style and love and an atmospheric but audacious look. The music is haunting and melancholic, never being intrusive or inappropriately melodramatic. Some of the writing in the first half is thought-provoking, intelligent and with enough to keep one gripped, while the concluding reunion was very moving.

However, "25 to Life" does lose its way significantly after the third crime and unfortunately never recovers. The episode by all means wasn't perfect up to then anyway, Seaver again is useless, out-of-place, annoying and with a personality and range of a broomstick and there's too much of her and not enough of much more interesting and likable characters like Reid. Strauss is as cold and dictatorial in leadership as ever, and while Hotch's absence doesn't bring the episode down single-handedly he is missed. The episode did drag at times, and was pretty formulaic where you do become too convinced too early on that it was the doing of somebody else, the one time in the episode where that is questioned is when the second crime is committed where one does temporarily does question whether he is innocent or not.

It is once the real unsub's identity is revealed where the episode falls apart. The way they found out did feel random and tacked on, and there just wasn't much to the unsub himself, nothing to make one feel anything for him, not even hate, in fact the character and his position came over as far-fetched. The reason for the family murder is not made properly clear, even if it was explained it wasn't clear enough and it needed to be elaborated upon much more.

Particularly bad however was regarding the team confrontation and arrest, the scene has to be down there in the top 5 of the most badly written, unrealistic and intelligence-insultingly ridiculous scenes of Season 6, with the self-righteous writing, the team acting out of character when accusing without proper proof in front of people and that painful slow clapping. Am amazed that anybody, especially Morgan, kept their jobs after that. The script showed good potential in the first half, but Garcia's flippant remarks in the profiling and the whole writing for the confrontation stuck out as sloppy.

Overall, rather ho-hum, started off well but lost its way after the third crime and crashed and burned after the revelation of the real unsub. 5/10 Bethany Cox
17 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Nauseatingly bad
Umberto8813 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
What happened to "Criminal Minds" in Season 6? The script writing goes from bad to worse to absolutely ridiculous. The "25 to Life" episode firmly belongs to the latter category. Morgan conducts a risk assessment of a convicted murderer, Don Sanderson, who is up for parole after 25 years in prison. Morgan recommends his release. Almost immediately after being released Sanderson kills another man who Sanderson claims was involved in the murder of his family 25 years ago. The BAU team right away sets out to vindicate Morgan's judgement and clear Sanderson, without giving any consideration to the possibility that Morgan was wrong. After a female accomplice in the original murders of Sanderson's family gets killed by a supposed mastermind of that attack, the BAU team constructs a profile of the killer. The profile is extremely generic (a psychopathic businessman), but by some sort of a cockamamie reasoning the BAU comes up with a suspect: an up and coming politician James Stanworth. Without producing a shred of any connection between Stanworth and the victims, Morgan demands that Strauss authorize the arrest of Stanworth. "He fits the profile!" "He fired 6,000 workers!" Really? Have they ever heard of such a thing as probable cause? Apparently not. When Strauss declines, Rossi accuses her of playing politics. Good grief! Disregarding Strauss' order, the BAU team goes to Stanworth's fundraiser where Morgan publicly confronts Stanworth and accuses him of the murders. Again, Morgan doesn't produce any evidence of any kind and just hurls a bunch of unsubstantiated accusations at Stanworth. Of course, Stanworth crumbles and shouts: "I don't lose control!", which is supposed to reveal his true murderous nature to everybody, and Morgan righteously arrests him. A completely cringeworthy scene, at the MST 3000 level. No judge would agree to hold the suspect on this kind of "evidence", and the case would never proceed to trial. Any police officer or an FBI agent acting the way Morgan does here would be fired on the spot.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A criminally unrealistic episode.
sorseli3481 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
For a huge Criminal Minds fan this was a huge disappointment. An episode almost not worth watching.

It is bizarre how Agent Seaver is suddenly a part of the team - it is never explained how or why this has happened. I'm beginning to feel it's only because of character development for Reid. Who is she? Why does she want to be a part of the BAU? How can she just jump in; what was her training/education like? Granted, she was only introduced in the previous episode, but still it strikes as a little odd. That, however, is only a small part of all the things wrong with this episode.

The major problem with this episode is how the plot is played out. I am usually able to look past the small improbabilities concerning e.g. Garcia's work but here even those bothered me. The way they found the UnSub seemed very unlikely and random. Finally, the fundraiser scene was just plain ridiculous. Slow claps, really? I understand the small breaches to reality for the sake of drama, but these things are both out of character and unrealistic.
13 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Stupid and reckless confrontation
Jackbv12327 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
For once it's not Hotch under the microscope. Morgan says he's not doing it to save himself, but how could that not be a major motivation. The confrontation at the fundraiser was typical of so many television writers who want us to think our heroes will risk anything for truth and justice. It was stupid and reckless. Despite the outcome, Morgan deserves disciplinary action. That was enough to ruin the episode for me, which up to that point was simply on the low side of average or OK.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Spoiler Alert: One Of The Worst Series Scripts
rich-7310617 April 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Spoiler alert:The confrontation scene is so implausible it questions whether the writing team has a grip on how the world actually operates. The actors must have felt demeaned by such a poor script.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I have no words...
sofia555320 January 2020
Like all episodes centered on Morgan... stupid, ridiculous, way over the top
11 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
One of the worst episodes I've seen.
madman-6386229 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
1. A pre-parole psychological evaluation would not be performed by an actual law enforcement agent. Let alone by someone who is not at least a psychologist. Bit of a conflict.

2. The Dr. Still broke into a house and killed someone with an obviously illegally obtained firearm on his person. All in violation of his parole. The person he killed had every right to defend himself.

3. The feds had no jurisdiction to take the prisoner out of DC Metros custody in any way.

4. There is no basis for which they would investigate the former murder.

5. The identification of the female co-conspirator was immediately tainted when they displayed one image.

6. The identification of the candidate as a potential murderer was just ridiculous. Apparently all crime can be solved with her computer.

7. The FBI strolling into the candidate's house and arresting him based on a couple scratches on his hand is essentially official oppression. Just because someone may be a psychopath doesn't make them a criminal or a murderer.

One of the worst written episodes of this show I have seen and there are some pretty bad ones. I actually believe more are bad than not.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst conclusion in the series thus far
mdw661126 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
As with any show, there are ups and downs in terms of episode quality. This episode has bright spots in terms of the guest star's portrayal of the wrongfully convicted man as well as the unique plot (relative to previous Criminal Minds episodes, this one unfolds in a novel way in that the team is not being called to assist on an active case, as is usual). However, the manner in which this episode concludes places as firmly a "down" in quality. As other reviewers have noted, the scene in which Morgan and the team confronts the suspect is entirely ridiculous and tough to watch (particularly Morgan's slow clapping as the team enters; it's difficult to imagine what the writers were thinking of with that). Even if the viewer ignores the glaring legal flaws in the confrontation and how the arrest is made, the set up of this scene and the writing in general are so poor and outlandish that they truly do ruin the entire episode. While such a grandiose and dramatic action might be in the realm of possibility for Morgan based on his actions in episodes, it seems extremely unlikely that Prentiss and Rossi would go along with this, given the established nature of these characters as proper/professional and wise/experienced, respectively. There are certainly other episodes that have left me shaking my head, but for me, this one was the worst. The only across-episode plot development contained here is the addition of Seaver to the team; though she is incidental to this episode's plot. Accounting for that, I would recommend skipping this episode, as it will only leave you frustrated and with diminished respect for the series.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed