"True Detective" Night Country: Part 6 (TV Episode 2024) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
254 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
A Joke.
jennfinn23 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I stuck with it and watched the entire fourth season of True Detective so I could review it honestly. I honestly believe all of the people who are raving about this season must've been paid off by HBO.

If you know anything about True Detective then you know that Nic Pizzolatto created it, he wrote the first three seasons and was showrunner also. Some people don't like season two but I actually enjoyed it. Issa Lopez approached HBO with her idea for a show called "Night Country" instead of letting her have her own thing they convinced (bullied) her into making it a part of the True Detective world.

So they threw in some references to season one (Spiral Symbol, Last name Cohle, Tuttle Inc) which made absolutely no sense whatsoever and slapped the TD name on it to get fans of the original excited. Then they made it seem like things were going the supernatural route up until the very end in which we get a logical explanation for the strange occurrences.

Anyone who criticizes S4 online is immediately called a misogynist because the two main characters were women. I'm a woman and personally I thought that Navarro and Danvers were practically interchangeable except for age and ethnicity. Neither of them were likable until the very end and instead of playing off one another they were basically the same character.
223 out of 264 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Oh come on!
Tostig6620 February 2024
Foster is one of the greatest actors of all time and doesn't know how to give a bad performance. Reid is a revelation and I can't wait to see what she does next. But the screen writers are the BIG problem.

Fortitude and The Thing are great, but they don't need a 2024 remix. True Detective is a mixed bag. Season 1 is peerless, season 2 was seriously underwhelming, season 3 was great but with the original creatives gone season 4 suffers the same issues as 2. It's not fundamentally bad, but it's too derivative and also doesn't know quite what it wants to be.

Season 1 and 3 had the slightest injection of magical realism. Are these hallucinations? Exaggerations? Everything can be explained rationally but there is just the subtlest question marks. Here the whole season has leaned out right into the supernatural. True Detective is not supernatural horror. The solution shouldn't be ghosts, it's rarely satisfying in a detective story and it isn't here. Also the fate of one person makes no sense at all and counts on a group of people not acting in anyway like actual humans. It's not "spur of the moment" it's terrible writing. Unbelievable revelation is stacked on irrational behaviour in this episode. Plus people are freezing to death with no hope only to not be in the next scene- what? Just profoundly disappointing.

An average horror movie stretched over a season of TV that thinks it's much smarter than it is.
88 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing ending
dancinqueen-3860319 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
So it was a bunch of women who got revenge for Annie? How anti climatic. Out of all the endings that it could have been that's it? And they just took of their clothes and then died frozen naked in the snow? How frustrating. The entire first part of this episode was so boring as well. It would have been a better twist if it was Annie maybe possessing Navarro and she was doing it maybe unknowingly because she keeps blacking out. Or maybe someone else. Any body can else ... instead it was such a boring ending. What else can I say. Just bring us back Matthew and woody. Know one asked for these 3 seasons without them.
155 out of 235 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disbelief suspended by the neck until dead.
frizzardi21 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
My girlfriend and I watched this episode last night, and the only way to make this bearable was to comment it a' la MST3K, pointing out the absurdities.

The two detectives go hunting for clues in the ice caves - alone, in the Arctic night, without equipment or backup.

The missing scientist killed the Inuit woman because she was messing with his research on life-saving bacteria; he probably never backed up his hard drive, nor knew how to grow the aforementioned bacteria in a petri dish in the comfort of a non-Alaskan laboratory.

The cleaning ladies avenged the killing by showing amazing SWAT skills and removing every trace of their presence so well that the forensic team never noticed tire tracks or the presence of a veritable mob on the crime scene.

The laboratory has a secret submarine-like hatch concealed under floor tiles. Because reasons.

Jodie Foster falls in the Arctic waters under the ice and survives without hypothermia symptoms.

Jodie Foster randomly finds the only handprint that can be traced to a specific person in the whole town without need for a forensic analysis.

I really, really have issues with two cops discovering clues by beating, torturing and finally killing the only suspect.

If you are wondering why I watched this, I can only say that I fell for the sunk cost fallacy - having seen five episodes so far, I felt that I had invested too much in this series to skip the finale.
325 out of 373 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Nobody Did it!!
GhostReturns19 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Worse ending every!!! This is an example of no creativity or an extreme example of lazy writing!! Everyone did it so no one did it. The writers expect the audience to accept the conclusion that a band of tribal women rush the science lab and didn't leave behind not one shred of evidence that suggested a group attacked the facility. Also, all those women (who are not career criminals) are technologically savvy enough to avoid all camera, not leave footprints, finger prints, or DNA at the scene. Also a group of professional law enforcement office would not find any evidence of group involvement. Pretty far fetched. Also no one is arrested. Additionally, why waste the tie ends to season one if they didn't amount to anything? Why was Rust's father mentioned? Why were the Tuttles mentioned? Waste of resources and potential!!
499 out of 629 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Part 6
bobcobb3013 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
I am not as down as some people were on this season, but this was not a fitting finale. They did an absurd excuse for what happened and what happened to Annie, that kind of gave me vibes of another HBO drama and not this one.

I feel like not all of the stories wrapped up and while I understand the ending for one of the characters being ambiguous, I just think there were many more paths to explore.

I like cut and dry murder mysteries and I feel like there were too many side areas that impacted this one. This was not a perfect ending or even a decent one, but maybe that is just me being bitter.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Are we watching the same show?
noahhaxbender-4419719 February 2024
I've been very critical to the past 2 seasons of true detective. So I was hesitant going into this one. But after now watching it all I actually liked it a lot? Maybe it's because im a huge fan of supernatural elements in crime, but I dont get why everyone hates it? I don't get how people can rate this show below a 5. It's mindboggling to me. The atmosphere, the actors, the plot, the mood of the show - everything is amazing to me. Sure it's a bit slow at times, but isn't that part of true detectives DNA? Even season 1 is a slowburn show, and it's still amazing. Enough with the hate!!

Don't mind the haters, give it a chance yourself.
57 out of 126 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Erm......what?
TartanScorsese19 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This has to be the worst finale I've ever seen. Throughout the entire season there has been very little in terms of plot development, I'd assumed this was because there'd be interesting reveals packed in at the end. Turns out the reason there was no plot development was because there was no plot. None of the things that may have left you guessing in previous episodes were explained. For example, the constant references to "twist and shout", meant nothing. The frequent supernatural sightings, meant nothing. The tongue on the floor, meant nothing. The whale bones, meant nothing. The things that were explained also made absolutely no sense. There's also a pathetic hark back to season one in the form of "time is a flat circle". And what? Is that supposed to be profound in this context? It really was a terrible watch.
157 out of 192 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I must be odd
LRRP19 February 2024
I thought it was great! Like nothing I've ever watched before! Definitely strange premise, but nice to have a show entirely different. Liz and Navrarro make a great team! Wish there was more episodes to watch! More to the story, untold!

Strong women at every turn! Need more of this!

The ending couldn't have been any better in my opinion. They got exactly what they deserved! Revenge for Annie! These women were a force to be reckoned with! Especially Annie! She was determined to make them pay and leave a story behind to be told to future generations!

Perfect ending to a tragic story! Don't understand the negative reviews!
81 out of 188 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
No need to hypothesize why I don't like this season
jimmatheson24 February 2024
This season wasn't very good and you don't need to try to guess why I think this. It's not because I'm a misogynist. It's not because I'm a season 1 fan boy. It's not because I'm afraid of examining history. And it's not because I don't understand the story.

It is really quite simple. Season 4 had a fantastic setting, a mediocre story, terrible dialogue, and mostly terrible acting. The pacing was poor. Almost entire episodes would go by with no plot advancement and minimal character development. There were too many ancillary characters that did nothing to develop the main characters. And by episode 6, when I should have been invested in the characters, I flat out was not. The moral lessons some are going on about were told with the subtlety of a brick to the face.

I will say it again - like what you like. I'm not going to be so arrogant as to assume why you like this season if that's how you feel. Most of these negative reviews quite clearly state why they didn't like the season - and there are plenty of reasons to not like this season. There's no need to hypothesize why when there are glaring reasons staring you right in the face.
30 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Finally don't have to watch anymore
Truedutch21 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
If this was 8-10 episode season I would've stopped watching after episode 4. The horrific writing is the main reason this season never had a chance. Too many story lines that sucked time away from the plot destroyed the interest of 90% of each episode.

The way this season ends is just so underwhelming, the lack of any real detective work or even just a set of clues that just never really peaked your interest of wanting to solve this was just so dumb. It's what a crime show is all about, piecing together the clues and wanting to solve it with the detectives which Danvers and Navarro definitely were not. The way they try dump this ending on you like it's suppose to blow your mind and the way it was solved feels so unearned by the characters that in turn makes you not care or just roll your eyes.

The way Danvers and Navarro go into these ice caves with not telling anyone exactly where they would be and taking no gear just made my head burst. It's silly stuff like this that takes me out of shows and movies once they've piled them up a few times and tell you oh yeah this is a show/movie for idiots. You can forgive a couple things to move the plot but stuff like this kinda nit picking starts to happen when you write something so consistently bad.

The people defending this series I can only think are doing so because they're scared of being called a r*cist or s*xist? I'm not sure. This was a really bad season and will be one of my worst watched shows of the year.

I give it a 2 because the guy who played Peter did a great acting job this final episode and the only decent crime solver there...and also some lovely scenic shots at the end. True Detective has been killed and will never be seen again after this *insert doctor Ian Malcolm line*
175 out of 216 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Powerful Storytelling
angie-83-10327019 February 2024
I've been on the Reddit threads watching the vitriol, and then tonight just perusing the headlines prior to watching the final episode.

Honestly, I was ready to be hugely disappointed. Thankfully, I'm an intelligent and independent thinker. As an EMS dispatcher in my own remote Alaskan community, and having now watched the entire season, I stand by my defense of the intricate detail to the truth of Alaska life that Night Country portrays.

From indigenous women's issues, the razor's edge of spirituality, paranormal, superstition, and the polar night, to the flawless storytelling, I give it a 10.
133 out of 327 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
There is Nothing
thegraydude19 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Despite all the negative reviews of the past few episodes, I really gave this season a chance. I thought it was interesting, I thought it might connect to season one, which it was obviously hinting at, and I found the mysteries to be compelling. My biggest complaint is that nothing really happened for the first five episodes, and episode six does NOT fix this.

The episode is the length of a movie, and I swear, nothing happens. It's just character discussing their feelings and it is so, so tedious, because we've seen this a million times already in this show. This entire show is just characters talking about their feelings. The show has plot, it just won't give it to you, and when it does, it is in short spurts that feel unsatisfying.

The mystery reveal is equally as disappointing. While the first reveal that the lady was killed by the scientists was an interesting reveal, we really lacked the motivations to understand it and appreciate the reveal. All we get is just that the scientists wanted to cover it up to "protect their project", and that motive isn't developed at all. After that, the reveal that a band of women all killed the scientists felt like a punch in the face. The motivation is there, but it really wasn't an interesting conclusion.

If you want to watch a murder mystery similar to this, with equally as important messages about Native Americans issues, but that is 100x better, watch "Wind River" (2017). The film is actually fairly similar to this, but it is far better done and way more interesting, with horrific realism involved. It is basically what this season wanted to be.

My main annoyance is that they purposely brought up all these connections to season 1, knowing it was gonna get people interested in the show, only to have it all not matter. There really was no mystery, there was really no reveal, it was all nothing; a pointless show where characters talk about their feelings and nothing happens.
343 out of 448 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lackluster Finale to a Poor Season
johnspringer-9544020 February 2024
Night Country sputters to a bland and unsatisfying conclusion. The entire season was comprised of tedious conversations between unlikeable characters interspersed with random creepy images. The show spent an inordinate amount of time on its protagonists' personal lives but their behavior and interactions were so repetitive that they felt underdeveloped. There was little in the way of backstory or character development to justify why any of them did the things they did. The modicum of detective work undertaken by the two leads was largely the product of happenstance. The season finale is more of the same. Danvers and Navarro have the fifth version of the same conversation they've been having since episode two, then they stumble onto a trite resolution of the central mystery. Most of the other inconsistencies, plot holes and contradictions remain unexplained. I guess the screenwriters were going for thought-provoking and ambiguous but it comes across as incoherent and inane.
124 out of 159 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This season is pure garbage
iautomu19 February 2024
It is hard to imagine something with Jodie Foster in it being this horrible. Every aspect of this season is ridiculous after a fairly interesting episode 1. From there is just went completely off the rails with bad acting, bad cinematography, bad editing, and ridiculous writing. The story of the young detective and his father are the most interesting plot line in the season. Everything about the Jodie Foster character is uninteresting and it's unlikeable.

I had really high hopes for this season but it just doesn't deliver. It was too big of a challenge to pull off a believable season in Alaska, the fake snow is some really low grade production value.
331 out of 444 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Important storytelling that should've been its own entity
yoshimasu_k19 February 2024
Storytelling from the perspective of indigenous peoples and especially focusing on the crises of missing and murdered indigenous women (MMIW) and girls in North America is NECESSARY in mainstream art and media. That being said, being part of a major franchise inevitably comes with restrictions and limitations; Night Country should've been its own entity, allowed to focus on exactly who and what the storytellers wanted to focus on.

True Crime season 1 purists will trash talk this season until the end of time. NOTHING will compare to season 1 and nothing should be forced to. I agree that season 1 - excessive male gaze aside - was damn near perfect, in large part thanks to the truly lightning-in-a-bottle teaming of two extraordinary Academy Award-winning and -nominated leads and a singular, visionary writer/director.

I've said in past episode reviews that this season should have focused more deeply on the Iñupiat community and the lead characters' tense interactions and strengthening connections within it. The writers and director seemed to focus more on the investigation, though it felt more like a straightforward procedural taking us from point A to B. Had the community been more deeply involved with the main mysteries, I feel the season would've had more of that True Detective vibe: More emphasis on the stillbirths or at least a supporting character having a stillbirth; an episode or half an episode focusing solely on Annie Kowtok; having a stronger build up to the protest and intercutting that suspense with the investigation's suspense.

The major reveal in the season finale proved this even more - without spoiling anything, it goes to show that more community-focused plot points would have built up quite nicely and provided a much more artistically-satisfying major reveal. We do get scenes in the community, but those felt mostly superficial to push the main story (searching for Tagaq) or character-building peripherals (Julia, Leah, Kayla, Qavvik).

I commend the filmmakers for not focusing on murdered women in the same way as season 1. There's discourse on the overuse of marginalized peoples' traumas for the sake of horror/thriller storytelling (see: Them, Lovecraft Country), and a season 1-esque obsession with murdered, abused, and oversexualized women would not have been the way to go. However, diving even deeper into the community and its tensions with the police and the mining corporation could have created a similarly dark and bleak season.

By no means was Night Country perfect, but it was necessary for indigenous stories to reach larger audiences. Though, I still wish it was a standalone series because tere was so much character- and story-based potential that felt stunted by the fact that it was part of a mainstream franchise.
54 out of 125 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Amateurish directing, bland cinematography, bland script
sadako1119 February 2024
It is obvious that the director doesn't have much experience directing mystery/thriller work.

A good thriller not only needs a good story and characters but also a creative cinematography and a director with style and vision things that this show doesn't have.

It tries badly to imitate a bit Twin Peaks and Lost and fails miserably.

This show could have really used David Fincher, Kubric, David Lynch or John Carpenter at the helm.

There was a good story somewhere there. The script was undercooked and needed more revisions.

The story given was poorly constructed and edited.

The supernatural elements were poorly developed and displayed.

Characters were poorly developed. I did not care for any of the characters specially for the secondary ones.

This could have had been a great whodunnit mystery/supernatural/scifi/horror/thriller but it landed in amateurish hands.
298 out of 406 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An excellent 75 minutes of TV
alexhellyer19 February 2024
This season has received some poor reviews, mainly due to the comparisons drawn between this and season 1. This episode really makes this season stand out on its own. This was an excellent episode that served a payoff that we deserved. The ending of the last episode felt a bit out-of-place with the tone of this season and it feels like they've corrected the path here. They go back to The Thing in terms of inspiration and we get the closure we need on almost all the loose ends. Jodie Foster is phenomenal in this episode and the direction is masterful. Admittedly some of the middle episode wander in the snow, but they definitely course correct in this.

I don't really understand the absolute negative reviews. If you're here you've seen the last 5 episodes so you know what you're in for. This just stuck the landing so well.
79 out of 189 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A passable but underwhelming season.
svederen20 February 2024
I'm one of those quirky people who really enjoyed both season 1 and 2 of True Detective. The third season felt too much like a repeat of the first for my taste. Knowing where I stand on those might give you perspective when I say that Night Country stands out to me as the worst season yet.

It's not all bad though, there's a lot to like here. The setting in Alaska is both beautiful and eery. Jodie Foster is a beast and her performance doesn't disappoint. There's a murder mystery, it's freaky and it has a touch of occult undertones. True Detective right? Well, not quite. Night Country lets us down on a number of fronts, as compared to previous installments.

The writing is off. You sense it already in the first episode, when characters engaged in conversation explicitly say things that are clearly for the viewer's benefit. The first two seasons were powerhouses in visual storytelling, and you had to be an observant viewer to piece the plot together. It takes some writing skill to fully utilize the visual nature of the medium, and sadly the writers for season 4 kept holding our hands with awkward, exposition-laden dialogue. They didn't trust that we can use our eyes and make connections on our own.

Alaska IS very beautiful, but the CGI version of it is less so. There are just too many shots where the poor visual effects shattered my suspension of disbelief. From animals that are CGI-rendered well within the uncanny valley, to people standing in what's supposedly a blizzard without a single snowflake landing on coats or skin, to freezing characters with obvious fake breath added on later. These things stack on top of each other and detract from what could have been a compelling visual experience. The audience might not be able to see the green screen, but we can sense its there.

I give it a 6 out of 10, mostly for Jodi Fosters performance, for some impressive sets, and for a passable but underwhelming muder mystery with a bit of a flat finale.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An insult. We just want a good story. Why is that too much to ask?
TheMara6120 February 2024
After the last episode, I changed all my previous ratings from 5 -7 stars to one star for all episodes.

I mean, the audacity to pretend this is a story!

Aside for the issues the other people underlined (lazy writing and half-baked plots and futile second characters) the disinterest to deliver at least the scheme of a narrative is mind-blowing. Do they really think people watching are half-wits?

While they still tried in season two and three to deliver, season four is an insult. To storytelling, to actors, to Innuit lore.

I don't know who greenlighted this s**t and I'm not that mean so to wish the writer and producers won't get work again.

Someone has to carry the blame, though.

Someone has to take some creative lessons in what charaters, themes, story arc is about. How ridiculness is defined in Merriam Webster.

Someone in a high chair at HBO has to step down for this waste of money. This is not entertainement. It's insult.
206 out of 279 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Please Don't Listen To The Bad Reviews
cnh-9557320 February 2024
It really makes me wonder if a lot of these reviewers actually enjoy anything at all. These are overly critical reviews of a show that is meant to enjoy as it is and not constantly think about what it could have been or should have been. That's a really bad way to watch anything. This season of True Detective has a supernatural feel to it. It's very mysterious, I definitely didn't see that ending coming and I'm sure no one else did either. I liked the characters and their stories. The mysterious nature of the stories and scenery of it being dark every day/night really added to the haunting feel of it.

I think episode 5 and 6 really delivered after following the first 4 episodes. If you like a mysterious, haunting story with characters that have a lot of issues their dealing with then this is for you. If you don't like stuff like that then guess what.

You'll be missing out on a great show and mystery by listening to these negative reviews. I honestly just don't get it.
67 out of 158 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't trust them
andrewrussell-6633420 February 2024
Almost all of these bad reviews are from people that either missed major plot points because they weren't paying attention or they are mad about the heroes being women.

The supernatural parts of this season really set a tone that I enjoyed, not all of the characters were likeable and some plot points were far fetched but its a tv show. If you want realism watch documentaries. All in all watch the show and make up your mind for yourself but don't let all of these negative reviews from thin skinned people keep you from watching it. It's better than season 2 even though 2 has my favorite scene from the series.
18 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrendous season
tatuteee21 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
What a horrible season piggybacking under the exceptional title of "True Detective".

There was nothing TD in this season.

Garbage writing and directing, full of plotholes and goofs. Cinematography was decent, acting ok from Foster, this former boxer lady was cringey.

On to this episode:

Danvers and Navarro are in such a hurry to investigate the caves-in a storm, no less-that they leave Peter to clean up not only the corpse of the junky, Otis, but his own father who he just killed. He has to clean this up and then visit Rose, who is apparently just perfectly happy to help the poor young man cover up these deaths.

Danvers and Navarro go break through the ice and of course make it directly into the tunnel system nobody but the teacher guy had ever heard about somehow. They fall through to a lower section where-shocker of all shockers!-they run into Raymond Clark, the lone survivor of the scientists. They pursue him and come to a science room that we soon learn is directly below Tsalal station. Did I just miss how close they were to Tsalal? Because it seems like they walked about fifty meters or so and are directly beneath the base. Wtf.

They follow Clark up into the station and eventually catch him. At this point they have never spoken with him about what happened to Annie or the other scientists so naturally they sit him down and start asking questions. Oh wait, nevermind, they take the loop of Annie screaming and tape the earbuds to his ears so that he has to sit there hearing the sounds of the woman he loved screaming and probably dying over and over again. Danvers and Navarro have him tied to a chair and just leave him there to be tortured while they go have another tedious conversation. For all they know, remember, he was completely innocent in her death.

After he's been properly tortured they decide it's time to ask the right questions and go back to do that, though there's a confusing segment where it seems like they're just going to kill him instead, but then decide that maybe he'd actually make a valuable witness with the whole mine / Tsalal stuff. Crazy police masterminds we have here!

Clark reveals how Annie discovered what they were doing, which was actually pushing the mine to pollute as much as possible because it made the permafrost softer so that they could get to the miracle organism they were investigating. She tried to destroy their research and was caught and stabbed to death, though Raymond didn't participate.

When Raymond Clark said "Time is a flat circle" I had to restrain myself from scratching my face off. You got to be kidding with me.

They're basically stuck at Tsalal during the ice storm and at one point Navarro walks off into the ice (because that's what they do in Ennis) but then Danvers falls through into the icy water and Navarro somehow shows up in time to save her and warms her by a fire all while Danvers is still wearing the same wet and cold clothes.

Then they realize that it was the cleaning ladies who killed the scientists and since I guess the blizzard is no longer an issue, they go to where I guess all the women involved in scientists' deaths are conveniently hanging out. (Unlike previous seasons, which often have investigations that span many years or even decades, this one is wrapped up in two weeks!) Navarro and Danvers decide to cover up the whole thing, which basically just involved all these "Badass" Cleaning Ladies SEAL Team showing up to Tsalal and turning off the power (and Raymond randomly saying "she's awake!" for no reason) and then rounding up the scientists at gunpoint, driving them out into the ice, forcing them to strip and then run off into the night. Where they froze to death. They blame this on a spirit who, had it been merciful, would have let the men survive. I blame it on the women forcing them all out there at gunpoint and making them strip and run off into the ice. I guess the vet was wrong and the dudes really did just die by freezing to death.

Jesus christ.

The mine company wanted all of this covered up. Well it looks like the mine will get its way. Everybody wants it all covered up.

In the end, we get a little nod to earlier seasons with them interviewing Danvers about what happened and where Navarro and Hank disappeared to. It's all just wildly unsatisfying as far as resolution goes. None of the cringey supernatural stuff paid off.

The scientists murdered Annie, which was the first theory almost everyone had. People had guessed that the cleaning ladies were responsible for the scientists' deaths but the way it went down just came across as a massive, unearned head-fake that tried to have its supernatural cake and eat it, too.

Danvers and Navarro end up being some of the worst police on this show, turning directly to torture the moment they find the guy they've been searching for - not to mention leaving poor Peter to deal with his dead father.

I'm not sure how anybody walks away from this finale thinking it worked. None of the more interesting fan theories came true. As far as the murder mysteries of the scientists and Annie go, neither was much of a mystery at all.

If there is ever going to be season 5, I really, really hope we get to see Nic back in the writers' chair.

Only good thing about this season is, that it's over.
76 out of 101 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Trash!
RussHog24 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This season started off pretty good with a cool crime, but what followed was six episodes where nothing happened culminating in a final episode that made no real sense what-so-ever. It's pretty clear the people who made this show had no idea what was going on - and the story feels like it was written in a few drafts without much thought.

There was still good cinematography in this show, and the acting was ok enough. It was watchable. But, int he end, it was a lazy meaningless disappointment that was saying old tribal women overpower the patriarchy. (And the patriarchy are some scientists in Alaska.)

The cops in this show were terrible. Dreadful. No detective work whatsoever. They didn't solve any crime more than they stood around and learned about the crimes and did nothing. And, apparently, they were guilty of murder themselves.

Oh lort - this show as a mess.
46 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
From others reviews, it seems like we watched a different episode!
dylanpatterson198719 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This was an amazing episode. People who say "well nobody did it" are missing the point of the episode. The creators of this season are also, I think, saying that "truth" is subjective. These other people don't understand the way that the ending was explained. Because, as I see it, no ONE PERSON killed every one. This was a near Shakespearian tragedy. Also, the individuals who createdt this series more as a play, where everyone has a part play. To show an unassuming arch that no one else could see. It's a brave piece and I think that fits the puzzle together perfectly, and doesn't give you the one main evil villain, because there is an evil villain. It was several small groups of people who had awful grudges against each other, and I think they just felt this way too express themselves.

Either way, I get it a nine out of 10 overall with this last episode giving me a 10 out of 10 overall because I thought it was brilliant how they put it together just to work of brilliance.
140 out of 354 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed