While I understand the intended argument made by this documentary, I must say it is truly the most poorly edited film that I have ever watched on a big screen. Frequently cutting from clip to clip of different, even in mid-sentence, leads to a continual feeling of mental discomfort. I've never seen a movie that actually gave me a headache, but in effect that's what it did.
I don't understand why it would be pieced together this way. For most people who watch it, it will seem like someone is trying to edit film to make an argument that they couldn't except by putting words in peoples mouths. Although I don't think that's what was happening, it's how the average person with no background in these topics WILL perceive it.
Was this really some kind of experiment in avant-garde film or was it supposed to be some kind of weird deconstruction of anti-new world order beliefs? That's the only thing I can think of regarding how it played out, but that is probably false because it sounds too much like what a critic would say about a horrible film that only they would love.
It saddens me because I see how it could have been edited in a different way and it would have made a stronger argument instead of weakening the case that it was trying to build. Watching this could forever sway someone not to consider any of the point of views that are offered. This isn't how you build interest with an audience.
Despite all of that, there are lots of interesting viewpoints expressed. There were even a couple of really funny moments. I just can't understand why good material got wasted at so many different points in the editing process. I would fix it and re- release it on DVD to try recouping some of the money spent on it.