Demon (2017) Poster

(IV) (2017)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
I was once like you.
nogodnomasters17 April 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This is a series of horror shorts most with a foreseeable twist. The first two episodes were fairly decent and could have been developed into a film. The second feature reminded me of the film "They Live." While the rest of the features weren't bad, they lacked the entertainment value of the first two. The title for the segments and credits all come at the end. The shorts could have used a demon narrator in between the features and give an introduction as well as the title.

Guide: F-word. No sex or nudity.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Banal, often risible.
coldwarkid16 November 2019
Moon, Life of Pi, Brazil, Do the Right Thing,District 9, Josie Wales, Children of Men, Spinal Tap, John Wick 2; these are all movies that I have enjoyed that have scored 7.9 on IMDB. Demon is rated 7.9. The disparity between the score and the actual quality of this barely watchable trash-fest is breathtaking. The horror anthology genre is a bit of a curates egg, in most of them I usually find that I'm interested in one or two characters, or stories that I would like to see developed or expanded, not so here. It's just bad, in the most mediocre way. Ultimately , giving dishonest or delusional ratings on sites like IMDB, is detrimental to film makers and viewers alike. If this film had been realistically rated I may have viewed it as a low quality/low budget movie that tried hard, and offered positive criticism , instead I feel I've been duped and am bereft of any goodwill. The best thing about Demon was the mercifully short 70 mins run time.
29 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Really really bad!!
psychodammert7 June 2020
Different stories, the first one catching, ends terribly... then hope to continue better but it didn't... at least is not so much time invested.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Don't waste your time
aldiboronti18 April 2022
The stories are bad, the acting worse. I kept watching until the bitter end in the belief that surely all the stories couldn't be as bad as the first ones. But they were. Not a single redeeming segment. Do yourself a favor, go stare at the wall for an hour or so, you'll have a much better time.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
no 10 out of 10 but still good.
jacobjohntaylor112 February 2020
This is a very scary movie. If you like to get scared see this movie. It has great story lines and great acting. The fist story is good the second story is better. The third story is better then the second. The fourth story is better is better then the second but not has good has the third. the fifth story is better then the fourth but not has good has the third. the sixth story is not has good has the first 5 but it is okay.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"What the Hell!?" A Review of "DEMON" (2017)
jordirozsa1 November 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A smokescreen dressed in a burst of sparks, under the luminescence of a fire whose flames remain invisible to the viewer's gaze, is all we have as a transition or curtain between each of the six segments that make up this curious and interesting anthology discussing the "Devil" (his form, nature, methods, and presentations). This backdrop might be considered the most minimalist "wraparound" that the film's producers introduced to weave these diverse tales together, all focusing on one of the beings that has most concerned, terrified, intrigued, and even fascinated humanity.

Is he an entity with an ontic existence in and of himself? A construct and/or projection of what we reject within ourselves? An intrinsic part of humans, reflecting the Light that created us?

Throughout literature, countless films, and a myriad of artistic expressions, a frequently anthropomorphized archetype of him has been created.

In "DEMON" (2017), a film produced under the auspices of UCLA's Film School, we're presented with yet another rendition of our friendly "Old Nick", often depicted with (or without) a tail and the unmistakable goat-like horns and hooves. When he "chooses" to appear on a cinema, TV, or computer screen, he's one of the most unsettling figures. Despite his age-old presence in the collective imagination, inducing sheer terror in franchises like "The Exorcist" (1973), "The Omen" (1976), or unforgettable titles like "Rosemary's Baby" (1968), this recent and relatively unknown project, primarily a showcase for budding directors fresh from UCLA, daringly and skillfully offers a fresh compilation of perspectives in various narrative formats.

The anthology kicks off with a contemplative demon, portrayed by a young and handsome Sean Guse, who delivers an intriguing monologue about his purpose on Earth. Titled "Demon Dilemma", it's essentially a plea for free will, juxtaposed against the inescapable fate seemingly assigned to our protagonist.

This existential gloom continues in "Devil Town", where a businessman, initially oblivious to his surroundings, finds himself ensnared in a horrifying reality, revealed to him by a vagrant-a recurring symbol of human frailty in many films.

The fourth and fifth segments, "Incubus" and "Van", shift from a philosophical portrayal of evil to a more explicit representation of diabolical figures. In "Incubus", the malevolent figure haunting our protagonist, played by Victor Gralak, is genuinely unsettling. "Van", on the other hand, presents a more comical demon, but the story is crafted with care and delivered convincingly by its lead actress.

Sandwiched between these tales is "Little Soldier", a heartwarming story of a young boy who confronts his worst nightmares with the help of his toy soldiers. This lighthearted segment, reminiscent of 80s action flicks, offers a breather from the anthology's darker themes.

The anthology concludes with a futuristic dystopia featuring the dashing actors Michael King and Yoshua Sudarso as FBI agents investigating a sinister plot in a distant time and place.

With the diverse settings in the film, it seems the intent is to overwhelm the viewer with the omnipresence of evil and its ability to thwart any resistance. Only the innocence of a child, with his toy soldiers, stands firm against the looming threat.

Technically, the film is well-executed, particularly the cinematography, which seamlessly complements the scripts. The soundtrack and effects are modest but fitting. The actors, while relatively unknown, deliver convincing performances, especially given the introspective and thought-provoking dialogues one might not expect from a student film. Perhaps it's this lack of pretension, combined with the film's authenticity and humility, that makes it more commendable than some of the more hyped productions from major distributors and renowned festivals.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed