User Reviews

Where to begin with this one...well, I did manage to get thru it, which I am proud of, as it was difficult to watch and stay engaged with at times. The storyline is not very good. I do understand it is a made-for-TV movie, so maybe I am being a bit too harsh. That said, the script was also rather weak. I have, over the years, noticed that UPtv and ION often have these original movies where there is this, what I call, 'corky' humor. It does not really work for me. The actors too often overact in such scenes; an example in this one is the performance of Kate McGarrigle as Paulette (Angie's friend). Maybe this is bad acting, or maybe it is what they and the director/writer are after, I do not know, but I find it difficult to watch for the most part. The acting overall in this movie was unimpressive. The lead (and writer of the film), Liliana Tandon (playing Angie), was difficult to watch at times. Do not get me wrong, she had a couple of decent scenes, but overall, her performance was mediocre at best. If it was not for the performance of Dean Geyer as Gabe, this movie would have been too difficult to finish. He had a pretty good performance. The supporting cast was not very impressive either. Another reviewer on here stated, 'Angie's former teacher, in a dialogue with her did not even make eye contact with her but was looking over her shoulder to read her lines.' I read this and immediately laughed because I was thinking something was off with her performance. Now I know why. Funny. They should have given more lines to Michael Gross (the dad), as he too had a good performance. There was a bit of Christmas cheer and a festive atmosphere, especially towards the (e.g., the children at school), which was nice. And the scenery and sets were nice, were festive. Overall, I am sorry to say, this edition to UPtv's 2020 Christmas season was a big disappointment.

This was hard to watch. Not terrible, but the lead actress was not believable. Gabe was the only one that was believable. He looked better than the supposed athletic jock.

First i want to say that i am a big fan of Christmas movies and sucker for a nice romance... But..... Allthough i found the story very nice, i found especially Liliana Tandon very very cold! It felt like she was reading her lines, didn't have chemistry with any other actor. And to be honest except Dean Geyer who was as always good and sweet in his role i don't think any other actor or actress played with heart! I think he would be even better with the right cast. The script was good enough (written by Liliana Tandon) but the plot had holes and except being set in Christmas time had nothing to do with the festivities or spirit of Christmas and most certainly didn't put me in the Christmas mood....

When I saw that the writer of this mess was the female lead, that mystery was compounded. The acting of virtually everyone in this show was really really bad. Angie's former teacher, in a dialogue with her did not even make eye contact with her but was looking over her shoulder to read her lines. I kid you not. Check it out. The school scenes were painful to watch. The writer obviously has never met a real child in her life.

The leads were badly cast. The "hot jock/coach" was not only not hot, he was not even fit looking. The female lead did not look the part of the spoiled rich beauty. I thought she was attractive, but she should have been glammed up and had conventionally pretty features. (Because let's face it, if she was spoiled and rich, work would have been done.) The script did not make sense. Why would a loving mother just "just cut her daughter off" from her allowance. Angie was kind and generous hearted and very intelligent. She had some large bills, but no foundation was laid for such an action. She should have insisted her daughter get a job and become self supporting, yes, but get a job first. And put her on a budget. Put a limit on her credit cards.

The whole thing was very disjointed like it was put together with scotch tape. The characters were not consistent. Their personalities did not match their actions. It had a whole "Hey gang, let's put on a show!" feel.

The writer/actress, Liliana Tandon, has an impressive resume. What happened here? Why would she write herself such a dumb part in such a amaturish movie. How did it get green-lighted? The preview made this look funny and entertaining. I hate-watched the last hour and a half. Very disappointed.

If anything, it's the equivalent of a ring that has patches of beauty but has too many patches of ugliness. That is not being said with no malice, despite not being taken by the premise part of me did want to like this. Most of 2020's Christmas output (whether Hallmark, Lifetime or other) was a very mixed one, with no film that was exceptional but very few were also terrible. Most ranged between mediocre and decent, but there were some that fell into the extremes of good and bad.

'A Ring for Christmas' is one of the 2020 Christmas films that fell into the bad extreme. It has a few good things, though they were more just above moderate good things rather than massive, but they are vastly outweighed by the bad things. And sadly the worst of the bad things are executed absolutely awfully. Other than the production values not being too bad all things considered and a couple of decent performances, 'A Ring for Christmas' was pretty difficult to sit through.

The good things shall be mentioned first. The best thing about it is the performance of Dean Geyer, who is very amiable as the one interesting and rootable character in the entire film. Despite being criminally underused, Michael Gross does make much of little and made me smile.

Production values show some degree of professionalism and don't look cheap. Parts of the music were pleasant.

When it comes to the praise, that is pretty much it. The rest of the acting is awful. On one extreme, we have Kate McGarrigle overacting to an embarrassing degree, this kind of scenery chewing wouldn't pass for guilty pleasure fun but merely annoying. On the other extreme, we have Liliana Tandon completely cold and bland lead performance that has so little emotion or committment. There is no chemistry between the actors, what there was felt made up on the spot, and Gabe is the only character that is worth caring for. Everybody else bored and irritated me and Gross is not in it enough to compensate, despite him being pretty good.

In regard to the central relationship, that was on the practically endangered species side. Tandon and Geyer are so disconnected from each other and the relationship itself in the writing goes nowhere for most of the time until rushing it through in the contrived and too pat final quarter. The script throughout is truly awkward and very stilted in a verbose way. Almost like a hastily written first draft not checked through. The story never grabbed me with a very dull first half, which felt slow, over-stretched and uneventful. When it picks up marginally too late, it's very contrived and the whole film has no warmth or charm, no nothing. The direction is routine at best and is often disorganised and hesitant.

Bottom line, not good at all. 3/10.

Granted I watched it just to see the scenes of my Newburyport (and they were beautiful as the city is) but I really did not expect it to be as bad as it was. Terrible script, truly awful acting. How desperate for money would Lorraine Bracco have had to be to be involved in this? It made all the dreck on Hallmark and Lifetime look like great cinema.

The story is a bit unusual, but it is a marriage of convenience story. The lead female is a bit of a spoiled debutante, so mom cuts her off, abruptly. However, Angie discovers she can inherit a trust fund if she marries. There's a problem with the basic assumptions which create some inconsistency. The first scenes intentionally try to show how much of a spoiled spendthrift, Angie is. Then the entire rest of the movie, Angie is intelligent, generous and even at times diligent and industrious. Her attitude wavers back and forth from a little spoiled to a lot generous. Beyond that inconsistency, the story is awkward at times. Conversations. Situations. It's like everyone is trying too hard.

The eventual romantic outcome is obvious almost from the moment Angie returns home. These two have decent chemistry at times. Almost all of the acting is bad. Liliana Tandon is inconsistent - again, it seems like she is trying to hard to make up for lack of experience and natural talent. Paulette, the friend, is too over-the-top greedy. Lorraine Bracco almost slurs her words at times. Dean Geyer is decent, but there's too little of him.

I said the outcome is obvious, but there were a couple of fun bumps getting there.

There's a side story of Angie working with kids at school. There's some sweet moments, but it's too disconnected from the rest of the story. There is a very cute and funny scene with kids helping her practice for an interview.

I would have liked to see this story executed better including resolving some of the clumsiness in the plot. The basic idea has potential and Angie can be an appealing character. There's some definite pluses. There's obvious minuses. Let's put it this way - I could see myself watching this again next year.

Regarding rating and review distributions, something is hinky. Three 10 star reviews are the only one from that reviewer. And for ratings, the quantity of 10 stars outnumbers everything but the median rating. These together imply ballot box stuffing. My advice is ignore the short, nonspecific reviews and give this movie a chance.

A Ring For Christmas (2020)-

We all know that I only watched this film for Dean Geyer and that's probably the case for a number of other viewers too.

I just loved him as Brody in 'Glee' and that cute, perfect smile, Swoon!

It was therefore such a shame that he didn't get the support of a decent cast and direction. Some of the others actors are actual, full on caricatures of humans and some quite vile.

I would have turned it off after 3 minutes if I hadn't known Dean was going to be in it. His character, Gabe, is way too nice for her and that's putting it mildly.

It could have been a good story if it hadn't been for the silly marriage element or the bratty rich kid thing. Maybe they should have picked one, but not both. I really didn't like her as an actress or her character and not just because I'm jealous of how close to Dean she was able to be, although that is definitely a factor.

The story jumps ahead in places without a proper script to move it forwards, just when you think that they are going to show you what they've just talked about, they are already the next step ahead and that bit is forgotten.

I'm pretty sure that her other potential fella, Tyler, was having an affair with the obviously gay bar man.

There was also a bit too much charity work going on for it to be realistic, which proves what a cynical and horrible world we live in, but no one can possibly give so much. As a result the warmth about those thoughtful ideas seems to get lost. Most of these films try to make that the moral of the story, while the romance happens around it, but they focussed too hard on the romance and just used the meaningful acts to push it on and too quickly for me.

There was real snow for a change, but not a huge amount of Christmas, at least to start with, but I have to say that it did grow on me, which combined with Dean is the only reason it scores so high.

6.24ish?/10.

Started seeing reviews for movie couldn't wait to watch because of Michael Gross but he wasn't in it enough which was a big disappointment. The leading actor shows a lack of experience and her makeup turned me off right away. If not turning my stomach. It quickly showed a low budget cheap displays movie, and lost interest almost immediately. Within minutes knew how the story line would turn out, and who she would end up with! Very predictable. The so called captain of the high school football team, prom king isn't believable at all.

I really think some of the other reviewers are being harsh. Christmas movies are supposed to be cheesy and not that believable. Kind of like Santa Claus (sorry, kids). This movie had all the elements of a good Christmas movie: holiday music and snow and making cookies and drinking cocoa. The point is to get into the holiday spirit and this movie certainly will do that for you (though reading the other reviews will not!)

To be sure, the plot isn't perfect. There are some inconsistencies and holes. The main character was a bit problematic, in that she was supposed to be spoiled and bratty at the beginning, then shift to someone more likable, but in fact, she never seemed all that horrible to begin with, which made it difficult to see a real change over the course of the movie. However, the reviews about the actress's looks are plain mean and unnecessary. She is very pretty and played the part well. The other actors also did a nice job and I especially liked Kate McGarrigle, who plays Angie's hilarious best friend. Give this movie a chance, it will make you laugh and give you a warm Christmas feeling, which is really all you can ask for in a Christmas movie.

After months of spending money in an extremely reckless manner, a spoiled, young woman living in New York City named "Angie Moore" (Liliana Tandon) is finally cut off from her allowance by her mother "Margaret Moore" (Lorraine Bracco). Needless to say, Angie is devastated by this news. At least at first. Things change, however, when she learns that her deceased father had started a trust fund for her with the promise to pay an extremely large amount of money to her if she marries someone by Christmas. Not having anyone who will take her up on this, she then travels to her old hometown to look for a former high school crush named "Tyler Davis" (Charles Hittinger) who is not only single but is desperate to acquire enough money to start his own business. While there, she also meets her very best friend "Gabe Hudson" (Dean Geyer) who is also single--and happens to be a good friend of Tyler. And this causes problems for everyone involved. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this wasn't a bad movie necessarily, but it suffered from a rather predictable plot and mediocre acting all around. Not only that, but quite frankly, it also lacked the necessary humor and chemistry needed for a film of this sort as well and for those reasons I have rated this movie accordingly. Slightly below average.

Every year, a group of girlfriends and I pick a couple Christmas movies to watch on a chilly day. We pick new ones each year that are the "Hallmark" style movies, rich city girl goes home for Christmas and falls in love with a baker style movies. So we found this one and LOVED it. Because it doesn't have a huge budget, it seems feels a bit more realistic. All of us girls are in our late 20s and work in professional jobs, so it also feels a bit relatable. Liliana played the perfect character and what a shock to see Lorraine Bracco in it! I love her! I thought it was playful and sweet and just a nice easy Christmas movie to enjoy! Can't wait to see what Liliana puts out next!

I love Christmas movies. This was one of the good ones. Fun plot, actors were great, supporting actors were great ... give it a try. It doesn't disappoint!

This film was nice to watch with the family, it was heartfelt and had a nice message. Loved it!

I watched this with a bunch of friends and though we all loved it, we agreed on one minor tweak that could have made a great script even better. Instead of a love triangle with Taylor and Gob, the love interest should have been Paulette. The chemistry is already there between the actresses in the movie -- those lingering hugs, the "I love you"s on the phone, the glances... Maybe the big movie execs who produced this shot it down as too radical of an idea, I don't know.

Please watch this movie all the way through, and if you agree with me, check out the fanfic I wrote for A Ring for Christmas on AO3. Actually, even if you don't agree with me, please read my fic. I might be able to convince you there. The first story in my series is just 20,000 words.