Reviews

7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
David Cross: Oh Come On (2019 TV Special)
3/10
Some laughs but not enough
23 February 2021
I've always been a fan of Cross, but this set is so uneven it's painful to watch. The second half devolves into one long incoherent hateful rant. Not what I'd call entertaining. Sad.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Just Terrible
28 December 2020
Outside of the opening, this is one of the worst movies I've seen in a long time. Gadot and Wiig are both beautiful strong women that are wonderful talents but even they have to have a plot to work within. This movie is a train wreck ten minutes in to finish. Just terrible.
31 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Can't Believe How Good After Soooooo Long
30 January 2018
I was amazed by this movie. The original Blade Runner was/is one of my favorite films and this ranks right up there with it. The only thing keeping it from scoring a ten is the thinness of the Leto character. I was very impressed with the visuals, the score and the main performances. I was also glad to see it not cut down to a less than 2 hour cookie cutter time frame. Great job of movie making.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Avatar (2009)
6/10
Great Visuals – Rehashed Plot line
21 December 2009
Warning: Spoilers
There is no denying the truly awesome visual impact of this film. The action sequences and overall visual force of the film are stunning. The plot is something less. While I was impressed by a number of the individual ideas in the film (the avatar concept is interesting as is the communication of information, direction and emotion between species), the underlying plot line is, to say the least, played out. The big bad evil company is looking for an extremely valuable mineral "unobtainium" and will let nothing and no one, least of all the indigenous people, keep them from their profits. Please. All of this retelling of the cowboys (evil humanity) and Indians (the Na'vi) with a fair amount of love for the non-material, Gaia-based lifestyle presented by the Indians is a little hard to take. This is especially true coming from Cameron/Hollywood, a person and place based on materialism in the extreme. The IMDb Trivia Section on this film says it all: Cameron took the cast and crew to Hawaii to commune with nature. They "spent their days trekking through the forests and jungles and living like tribes (building campfires, eating fish, etc), in order to get a better sense of what it would be like to live and move around in the jungle on Pandora." That was only during the days. Their nights were spent at a Four Seasons Hotel.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Let it go.
16 March 2009
Usually I like Ferrell, and I like most of his movies, but good Lord, these people just cannot let it go. I am amazed at the double standard between liberals and conservatives in comedy. I am usually the one saying that people need to lighten-up and quit worrying about being politically correct but even I found the Condi Rice scene offensive. Can you imagine the flap if they did a similar scene using Michelle Obama. I don't know what it is about liberals that makes them so unfunny when dealing with political topics. As I said, usually I like Ferrell (albeit that his brand of humor is typically juvenile) and his Bush is not bad but this show was not funny. It belongs in the same unfunny file as Real Time with Bill Maher. I'm just so tired of the same old non-jokes.
17 out of 120 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stick It (2006)
1/10
What was Jeff Bridges thinking?
10 March 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Jeff Bridges must have a massive substance abuse problem because that is the only reason on earth that I can think of as to why he would be in such a lame film. I started watching the movie while channel surfing and it was so bad that I decided to record it for my wife to watch with me, as she has always liked Jeff Bridges. While watching the movie, my wife commented at least 15 times, "I cannot believe that he (Bridges) is in this movie." I couldn't agree more.

The only redeeming feature of the film is its unintended humor. When the main character stands atop the vault and lifts both arms in the air for the "rock-on" salute, my wife and I laughed until we couldn't breath. 1 star out of 10.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Drivel
22 March 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I give this movie one star. I actually believe the movie to be well acted and filmed but the content is so poor that justice demands the single star rating. Guy Fawkes was a fanatical Catholic that wanted to blow up Parliament to reinstall a Catholic theocracy. Anyone that feels this is a proper analogy to the UK or USA of today (or tomorrow) is an ill informed idiot. The only regimes that have even approached the government portrayed here have been fascist (Nazi Germany, Iraq, etc.) or communist (USSR, Cambodia, PRC, etc.) not the USA or the UK. It sickens me that people actually believe that Blair and Bush are similar to the governmental characters in this film. The people that believe that have obviously never been in a truly totalitarian nation or spoken in depth with anyone from one.
27 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed