Reviews

24 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Indian Lady (1981)
6/10
Below Average, but interesting
18 March 2010
This is not a movie, so much as a collection of old 1960's and 1970's 8mm loops that were thrown together with some more recent footage to try and make some sense.

Since most of the old loops were silent, there was some badly dubbed voices thrown in as well. Debbie (the actress used to tie the clips together) is cute, and gets busy a few times. Most of the time she is peeking in windows at various "friends" as they get it on. And by researching

This is not a bad movie, but would probably mostly appeal to those interested in the old 8mm Loops or "Smokers". The movies used include "Body Lust" and "Interlude of Lust".
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
On Golden Blonde (1984 Video)
8/10
Interesting Movie
16 May 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is an interesting one.

In the 1970's and 1980's half of the pron movies out there seemed to be some kind of rip-off of mainstream movies. Movies ripped off the plots and titles from everything from Blazing Saddles to The Six Million Dollar Man.

This one actually steals the title from one movie (On Golden Pond), and the plot line from another (Heaven Can Wait).

Christy Canyon plays a busty brunette who dies before her time. In order to let her finish her lifespan, she is shown a series of different bodies, and she is allowed to "test drive" them. However, each body is that of a blonde.

This is fairly typical for the era, simply a thin plot that serves as an excuse to have one sexual encounter after another. She experiences 2 threesomes (MFF and MMF), and a few other encounters before she settles into the body she will spend the remainder of her life in.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Right Connections (1997 TV Movie)
8/10
Not a great movie, but not a bad one either
10 November 2002
I just finished watching The Right Connections, and I somewhat enjoyed it.

First of all, I approach movies on an individual basis. I do not care about who is in it or not in it. When it is over, I just ask myself one simple question: did it entertain me?

I think the biggest problems this movie had was both finding the right audience, and in Hammer himself.

The movie is almost a plot lifted from The Brady Bunch (which ironically the kids try to sing the theme song). 4 kids discover that their divorced mom has been laid off, so decides to go back to school. But they discover that their absentee father owes the IRS $5,000. Desperate to prevent their mom from leaving college, they try to find a way to earn the money themselves. When they hear of a "Hip-Hop Contest" with a prize of $5,000, they think they got it made.

They then con an ex-rap artist (Hammer) to train them. In an almost biographical role, Hammer is down on his luck, ignored by his former fans, and is on the verge of losing everything he owns.

Can he take this group of middle-class white kids and make them a Hip-Hop group? No, not really. But he does do his best, and teaches both himself and the kids something in the process.

One of the things I enjoyed most in this movie is both the almost biographical nature of Hammer's career. Him and his producer try to convince a record executive that he still has fans, and the executive is white. But to him, the only thing that matters is money. And while the kids do have little talent, they do try.

Also I enjoyed the clean nature of the story. One of the reasons that Hammer's career failed so fast is that his "fans" suddenly realized that all of his songs were about God. And while the message in this movie is not so heavy-handed, it is centered around family.

Overall, I left this movie with a fairly good feeling, and with several laughs. The sequence where the mother walks in seeing this strange black man in a leather jacket "attacking" her youngest daughter (he was tickeling her) was fairly strong, and handled in a fairly mature manner. Both the mother tries to apologize for her wrong asumption, and Hammer tries to make her feel comfortable, understanding her fear, and why she might have had it.

I rated this movie a 7. Not for the acting, nor the worn story, but simply because I enjoyed it, and it made me feel good at the end. After all, that is why we watch movies, right?

At the end, there was an obvious opening for a sequal, which was obviously never made. I have to admit I am glad for that. If they ever made a sequal of this movie, it would probably be so contrived and silly, I could not enjoy it.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jaded (1998)
1/10
Not what the box says it is
4 November 2002
I had this movie given to me, and have to admit, I am glad that I did not pay money for it.

The back of the box makes it seem like some kind of sex triangle, with 2 women trying to seduce her. But the reality in this movie is far from that.

In reality, the main subject is the victim of a vicious and sadistic rape by the two other characters. There was absolutely nothing in this that I found interesting at all.

Even movies like Silence Of The Lambs and Wild Things (which the box tries to compare this movie to) were riveting, because of the unexpected turns and suspense.

But Jaded has none of this. It concentrates on the rapeists and the sick relationship with the boyfriend of one of them. And the persuit of a videotape that may prove the victims story is true.

While it does show that same sex rape is possible, it is not a movie worth watching.

If at all possible, pass this movie up at all costs.
8 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Love Hina (2000–2001)
One of the best "cartoons" I have ever seen
26 October 2002
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** OK, so this is a cartoon. But it is also one of the most "mature" ones I have ever seen. And I do not mean it in the way of sex or violence. I mean that it has good stories, characters that feel real, and will make you want to see the next one.

And that is saying something, considering I am a 37 year old man!

Love Hina is a cartoon from Japan, that was broadcast on the commercial TV stations in 2000. And the obvious target was teenagers. While it hase some "cutesey" things in it, there are things that makes it obvious that it's audience was more mature.

While it was broadcast in Japan, here this would definately never be shown. It would almost rate a PG-13 or R because of some of the content. While it is violent, it is in the vein of the old Bugs Bunny or Roadrunner style violence. People that get their foreheads cut are perfectly fine 1 minute later. And while Keitarou is constantly beat up and abused by the girls he lives with, he is never seriously hurt. And although there is a definate sexual tension, you never see anything more severe then maybe a panty shot, or Keitarou accidentially grabbing one of the girl's breasts (through clothes).

In a nutshell, Keitarou has failed his entrance exams to Tokyo U. After being told he can no longer live at home, he decides to visit his Grandmother and Aunt, who own an inn and hotspring. Here he hopes he can stay until he gets into college.

The fireworks start when he is relaxing in the hot spring, and an almost naked girl gets in with him and starts commenting on how she is growing up. Once she discovers he is a guy, the fireworks start.

Keitarou learns his grandmother has gone on a world vacation, and turned the inn into a girls dormatory. The girls tell him he can't stay, but his aunt helps talk them into allowing him to stay temporarily as a manager.

Keitarou is your classic teenage klutz. He is shy, clumsy, does the wrong thing at the wrong time, has no real friends, and is a poor student. But he needs to get into Tokyo U because of a promise he made years ago. His only real hobby is collecting "photo stickers", but they are all of himself.

The girls range from Junior High age to his own age. And each of them is very distinct.

Kaolla Su is a Jr. High student from overseas (India is hinted at), a mechanical genious, and is so hyper it makes Jim Carey look like he is on depressants. She is also a mechanical genious, and is constantly making wild devices.

Shinobu is also a Jr. High student, and the daughter of a resterant owner. Her cooking is amazing. She has a crush on Keitarou, but realizes he is interested in somebody else, so keeps it to herself.

Motoko is a High School student, who is also a Kendo master. She has the least trust for Keitarou, and causes him the second most amount of grief. She is sure that he is a pervert, and living in the same Inn as him will ruin her fighting ability.

Mitsune is a scheemer. She tries to poke her nose into everybody's business, and always comes up with plots to make money or get others in trouble. But she has no malice, it is just her way to have fun.

Naru is Keitarou's main focus. She is strongly attracted to him, and because of her denial of this, she is his worst tormenter. She beats him up 2-3 times an episode, in convinced he is a pervert, and yet can't stay away from him. Like Keitarou, she has failed her entrance exam to Tokyo U, and is trying to get in as well. Keitarou believes that she is also the girl he made the promise with years ago.

Haruka is his aunt, and is almost never seen without a cigarette in her mouth. She is very hard, but also feels sorry for her nephew. And while she seems as hard as nails, we see her soft side also.

The main series consists of 27 half-hour shows, and each one both stands on it's own, and builds from earlier ones. I would not reccomend it for children, but definately for teens and up. Teen girls would probably really enjoy it, since there are hints of romance in it, and because Keitarou is constantly getting beat up by all of the girls. And unless you can't stand reading, I recommend watching them with subtitles, not dubbed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
For a vampire movie, it sucked :P
11 September 2002
I remember all the hype around this movie when Aaliyah was killed. Being a fan of Ms. Rice's novels, my first thought was "how can they do Queen Of The Damned without doing Vampire Lestat first?"

Having finally seen the movie, now I can see how they did it. If you have read these books, imagine taking out the gory parts from Vampire Lestat, cramming Marcus and Marius into one character, and removing everything to do with Lestat's beginning (the wolf hunt, his violin playing, the Theatre Of The Vampires, and also Louis, Claudia, and Gabrielle), then in the last 15 minutes cramming in Queen Of The Damned.

What we loose is a very important piece of Lestat's character. His inner agony of having to kill to live, the fact that he carefully tries to select killers as his victims, and his love-hate relationship with Louis, Armand, Gabrielle, and all the other vampires.

Also important to the story is that we loose the "Story Of The Twins", which is the Genesis of Ms. Rice's vampires. And while I am sure the cannibalism was to intense for showing on the screen, they could have done something closer, and showed us more of ancient Egypt.

Even worse, we have this love interest thrown in between Jessie and Lestat. The Vampire Chronicles is basically an American Yoni story. For those that do not know, Yoni is another form of Hentai (Japanese Porn Comics). But in Yoni, it is about gay male relationships, told by a female. While I am sure many men object to the "gayness" of the characters, in this movie they went to the far extreme the opposite way. For instead of Lestat persueing killers, he goes after young female groupies.

And the other flaws in logic and storyline are vast. At the beginning Lestat emerges from a century long sleep, then later on asks Marius how he made it through the 1950's in red velvet. Marius has no idea who Elvis is, and says he slept through that period. Makes you wonder how Lestat knows about 50's fashion and music, since he slept through the same time period himself. And nothing is ever even mentioned about Louis, Claudia, or Gabrielle. I think that is a huge shame. Is like seeing "Snow White and the 3 Dwarfs".

Overall, the movie I thought was really bad. About the only good thing about it was the soundtrack. Most of the acting was poor, the accents drove me up the wall, and all of the really in-depth parts of the book were removed, leaving us only with a hollow shell, kind of like Enkil after he was sucked dry.

If you want to see a good modern vampire movie, get Lost Boys, the original Interview With A Vampire, or even some old episodes of Dark Shadows. Let this one Rest In Piece, with a stake through the heart, cloves of garlic around the neck, and a vial of Holy Water in the mouth.

In ending, remember that before Aaliyah was killed, this was intended to go straight to video, no theatrical release was planned. It is obvious now why this was. It is only sad that somebody as talented as she will be remembered for this dog of a movie, instead of something where she really might have shined.

I rate this a 2 on a scale of 1-10.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Home Team (1998)
Can You Say "Mighty Ducks Ripoff"?
13 October 2001
Other then having already seen the exact same story in the past in a movie called "The Mighty Ducks", this was an OK movie.

This time, the action is on a soccer field, not a hockey rink. But it is pretty much the same. A loser with a hidden past takes on some misfit kids in a soccer team that never wins. He turns out to be a former pro player who lost it all during a gambling scandal.

While it is nice to see Steve acting again, his character is almost the same as in any of his other movies. And the fact that the plot is so obvious does not make this a very enjoyable movie.

Unless you are a Guttenberg fan, go ahead and skip this movie. I hope that Steve can get back to some real roles, like he had in Splash or Short Circut.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Update on a classic movie
22 September 2001
When I wrote my review in the past, it was from memory because I no longer had this movie. But last night I was lucky to find a copy for sale and grabbed it.

I forgot how much Traci Lords is vilified in this movie. She is made to be the ultimate schemer, and knew exactly what she was doing every step of the way. In fact, it was her "negotiation" skills that seem to give her most of her early work.

The names of everybody in the movie is changed, OTHER then Traci Lords. "Mr. Black" stands in for "The Dark Brothers". Dark Brothers was the production company that made Traci a star.

They work hard to make Traci out to be controlling, who only wanted sex and money no matter who was destroyed in the process.

But as far as the movie itself, it is one of the best I have ever seen that was shot on video. Unlike the current adult movies, this was made during a time when story and acting was important.

If you are lucky enough to find a copy, I suggest you get it. I classify this as "classic porn", and wish that they went back to this style of movie making again.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Great retelling of a classic story
27 July 2001
When Pierre Boulle wrote the original book "The Monkey Planet", he was mostly known for the classic story "Bridge Over The River Kwai".

When it was made into a movie in 1968, Charlton Heston ingrained this movie permanently in our minds. He was also a driving force in the creation of the original, having read the original book and helping to bring it to the attention of the money men in Hollywood and carrying it from original concept to final completion.

In fact, the original movie is such a classic, it spawned 4 sequals and 2 TV series (1 live action and one animated). It's influence was so wide, that when "Welcome Back Kotter" premiered on TV, the character Arnold Horshack carried a POTA lunchbox wherever he went.

This new version in many ways is both closer to the original book, and also deviates much more.

The effects and makeup in this version are spectacular. Much as the original revolutionized makeup for decades to come, this one will also show it's influence for a long time. Rather then use computer graphics to create the apes, the use of makeup and appliances is spectacular.

Tim Burton did a fantastic job on this movie. And of course, what is a Tim Burton movie without Danny Elfman doing the musical score. Combined, they have made a movie that is sure to be a classic for years to come.

One of the biggest differences is that the classes of ape are not as seperated as they were in the original.

In the original, Chimps all wore green and were scientists. Gorillas wore black and were military, and Orangutangs wore orange and were clergy/politicians. In this they are more diverse, and there even seems to be hints of cross-species breeding. This makes for a much more diverse history, and more potential for both conflict and support.

Also, the humans in this version are able to talk, but they strive to hide that fact from the apes. And as the humans are more human then in the original, the apes are more ape like. They frequently jump around and climb on things, write with their feet, touch and groom each other, and in general are more like evolved apes should be.

The cast is excellent, with both Michael Clarke Duncan and Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa playing excellent roles. Michael Clarke Duncan is one of the best new actors in the business today, and this role is as far as possible from The Green Mile.

Tim Burton added several subtle and not so subtle pokes and images from both the original and contemporary society into the movie. From Charlton uttering his classic "Damn them all to hell" again, to an Orangutang saying the Rodney King line "Can't we all just get along", to having another orangutang rub himself with flower petals while upside down, very reminiscant to "American Beauty".

Of course, the most memorable part of the original movie is the ending. The image of Charlton Heston looking at the wreckage of the Statue Of Liberty is forever burned into our minds. In much the same way, this ending will also be burned into our minds. And in many ways, the ending this time is much closer to the original ending as written by Pierre Boulle.

I am curious to how they will do a sequal to this movie. In today's market, everything from American Pie to Wayne's World have sequals. And this is really the first time that a movie spawned a series of sequals (the 007 movies do not count, since they do not sequal in any order, and were based on a series of books). So it will be interesting to see if this movie spawns a similar series of sequals.

If you loved the original movie, you have to see this one.

In addition to Charlton Heston, look for a cameo by Linda Harrison, the actress that played Nova in the original movies.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Questor Tapes (1974 TV Movie)
The best Pilot Gene Roddenberry made that was never used
7 July 2001
One thing that Gene Roddenberry was good at was making excellent TV pilots. His only problem was in getting the networks to actually listen to them.

This movie was a pilot for a TV series, and was to far ahead of it's time. Made in the time after Star Trek TV series and the Star Trek motion pictures, it is a classic example of his idea of social commentary hidden as a Sci-Fi movie.

Questor is an android, in search of himself and his past. I remember seeing this when it was first broadcast, and again about 10 years later. But sadly, it is not available on Tape or DVD (NBC - Universal, pay attention).

Two things that are noteable are the connections to Star Trek, both past and future versions. His wife Majel Barrett and Walter Koenig both appear in this movie. But this is not unusual, if you look at most of his projects. Pretty Maids All In A Row, Genesis II, Planet Earth, even all the way back to The Lieutenant. Roddenberry consistantly used a lot of the same actors and actresses over and over again.

One of the things that struck me when I first saw Star Trek: Next Generation was the similarity between Data and Questor. An Android, in search of his mysterious past, a "father" creator that is said to be dead, yet is not dead, the question of who and what he is, man, machine, or both.

So this TV Pilot was just like the "Gary Seven" episode, in that it never took off. But the obvious influence on his later projects is obvious. We can only hope that someday, this will be made available on DVD so more people can discover this movie.

Considering all the "new" Roddenberry TV shows out there, I am actually surprised that this one has not been remade yet.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fail Safe (2000 TV Movie)
One of the best movies EVER made for TV
3 April 2001
I just saw this again last night, and was as stunned as I was the first time I saw it, almost a year ago.

George Clooney is going to be a force for change for a long time I suspect. His love for live performance is what drove the 2 live episodes of ER, and this movie as well. And with this one, he outdid himself.

While there were a few minor glitches ("cream of the cream" instead of either "crem de la crem" or "cream of the crop", never sure which phrase was intended), overall the performances were flawless. And some things gave even greater impact, knowing that they were live rather then re-shot and re-shot until they got them right (Notice Richard Dreyfuss' forehead veins bulge after one act, showing his frustration with the Soviet Premier). That was emotion that is sadly lacking in our Friends-Malcom In The Middle-MTV world of today.

Probably the most puzzling fact of this movie, is that us Americans can't buy it! While it was shown almost a year ago, it still has never been released here in the United States. Luckily, I was able to order it from out friends in England, so can watch it on my DVD here in the US (Hello DVD, goodbye PAL/NTSC).

I put this high in my list of movie "Gotta Have"... right up alongside Doctor Zhivago and The Great Dictator.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Manhunter (1986)
A very good movie, well worth watching
1 February 2001
Well, let me respond to some of the bashers before I add my own opinions.

As far as the movie looking like it was made in the 80's, and too much like Miami Vice.. hey, that is when it was made! You might as well complain about how Yellow Submarine, The Osmonds cartoon, The Jackson Five cartoon, and the Brady Bunch cartoons all looked "too Peter Maxx". Movie directors step out of what is normal at the time only with great caution. You can do it right and get SOTL and Titanic, or you might end up with Ishtar or Heaven's Gate.

As far as who is the better Lecter, I think Brian Cox was better. He was strong, frightening, and did not overpower the part. After all, the movie was called "Manhunter" and the book "Red Dragon"... It was about trying to find Tooth Fairy/Red Dragon. It was not called "Insane Rambelings From Jail". Mr. Hopkins did a FANTASTIC job, but I found the more sedate character from this movie far better. But unlike SOTL, Lector did not steal the show.

Curiously, I read the book Red Dragon at about the time this movie came out, and loved it. But I never saw the movie until recently because of the change of the title. I do not know who or why it was changed, I am sure it has hurt the viewership of those that wanted to find it.

One thing that I have seen nobody else mention was the use of colour in Dr. Lector's cell. From the moment Will Graham walks in, all you see is white. Then the camera pans around. As you look at the items in the cell, you start to see bright red, blue, yellow, green... then once again nothing but white. If this was tried today, people would accuse them of trying to make it look "IMac" coloured.

I great movie, I wish I had discovered it 15 years ago, until having to wait until now. If you are a Lector fan, this is another movie you just have to see.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Was ALMOST a cult classic
1 February 2001
This is one of those movies that ALMOST made it to cult status. But it is also one of those in which anybody that has seen it wants to see it again.

I agree that one thing drug out to much is that Lyle was far too stupid about what happened to him. While I have traveled extensively through Mexico, there is at least SOMETHING modern about even the smallest village, even if it is just Levi jeans and ADIDAS sneakers. When he started to realize something was wrong, why did he not remember what he read on the plaque of the time machine?

But being a fan of alternate reality and time travel, I do enjoy this movie a lot. The idea is believeable, the paradox was well placed and believeable, and it did not get to far into the technical as to bore the viewers. I recommend seeing this if you can ever find it floating around.

My copy is a VHS copy dubbed from my Beta original right before it died. However, I would buy it in a heartbeat if it was re-released on DVD. I hope somebody is listening out there.

PS: For about 2 years after this movie was released, it did have a Midnight Movie viewership in the Los Angeles area. This is where I first saw it, in a theatre that also showed Mad Max, Rocky Horror, and Heavy Metal.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heavy Metal (1981)
10/10
A true Cult Classic, and well worth seeing.
1 February 2001
I have to admit, I loved this movie from when I first saw it. A true cult classic, and second in Midnight Movie viewing only to Rocky Horror.

I think one reason that this movie was looked forward to for so long is that it was unavailable for so long. I remember around 1984 when a release was planned, and a dispute with the multiple musicians caused it to be pulled. But thankfully this was finally resolved, so we can own it again.

I bought a pirate copy when i was in Japan in 1988 (On Beta no less), and almost played it to death. And having been a fan of the comic when I could find it, I think it told the stories very well. I admit that the "green sphere" link was silly and did not work, and that the original "carousel" concept would have been much better (watch the DVD release for details on this). The simple fact that I have bought 3 copies of this time and still own all 3 of them says something about the movie.

Harry Canyon, Den, and Taarna are the be the most remembered pieces of this movie. Each in itself could even be fleshed out to hour long length, and still be enjoyable. So Beautiful, So Dangerous is enjoyable, and Harold Ramis and John Candy steal the show with their voices ("Hey man, you got any of that plutonium niborg left?"). And I admit, the film version of the story was MUCH more enjoyable then the original one from the comic.

PS: Watch for the cameo of a destroyed USS Enterprise. I love pointing that out to people that miss it.
67 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This movie deserves to be finished
1 February 2001
OK, for those of you that will bash this movie because it is not EXACTLY like the book, show me any movie that is! Heck, even a book based off of the movie is often better then the original movie is itself. So get off your high horse, and try to enjoy this (or any other movie) on it's own merits.

As far as the rotoscope work... look at when it was made. In 1978, there was no Disney making animated movies. We had Rankin-Bass and Filmation. If you want an idea how those might have been, look up Happily Ever After by Filmation or The King And I by Rankin-Bass. Even my children hated Happily Ever After when they first saw it. And how often do 4 year old's do that?

Don Bluth was just getting his own studio together. And for those of us that remember when the movie came out, Rotoscope was looking to be the next major evolution in animation (Tron changed all of that, even though it's true vision of computer animation was a tad premature). And while movies like Wizards, Heavy Metal, LOTR, and American Pop are dated by their rotoscope look, at the time it was seen as very advanced and futureistic.

And it is sadly true, the movie was cut short because of funds. The vision originally was to film the entire story, then edit and release the first half. While the first half was in the theatre, they would edit together the second half. But because of cost over-runs and other problems, this never happened. The first half became an orphan, and was never finished.

Of those that said it was dull, or slow, remember the pace of the original work. LOTR is *NOT* fast paced. If anything, Mr. Bakshi should be accused of being to close to the actual book itself.

One last point... it is only recently with the new CGI special effects that a live-action version of this movie is even possible. It it had been tried fully live-action in 1978, we would have had monsters that looked like a combination of the Star Trek TV show and Dragonslayer movie. This is not an attack on either that movie or the TV show, but simply a comment of the ability of FX in that day and age.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A delightful show that was cut short
1 February 2001
One of the best shows of the late 1970's. Jack Albertson was a delight, as the caring old man who went to Washington. While it has been over 22 years since I have seen it, I have long wished I could see this show again. Sadly, with a run of only 1 season, it has never made it into syndication.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A must see for anybody
1 February 2001
Dr. Seuss and live action, who could have imagined it?

I saw an interview the other day and they talked about The Grinch beeing the first live-action Seuss story. How sad that this classic is forgotten. If it was not for the age, I would swear that Tim Burton actually made this movie.

As far as the cast, I have only one thing to add that nobody else here seems to have remembered: Rollerskating Siamese Twins, conjoined at the beard!

And for Dr. T being gay, I do not think that was ever intended. If you check, Peter Lind Hayes served in WWII, and was even given medals for valor. I think the "prissyness" was put in to make him less evil in a way, and less scarey to kids.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Bad Pack (1997)
2/10
Hmmm, this looks familiar
2 January 2001
Hmmmm, a small town of peaceful farmers is taken over by bandits who force them to do what they want, and give them all of their food and supplies.

No, I am not talking about Seven Samuri, nor the western remake The Magnificent Seven. I am not even talking about the Disney remake A Bug's Life.

Except instead of 7, there are only 5 or 6 heros in this movie. And instead of Yul Brynner we get Roddie Piper. He does an OK job of acting, but the tired worn out script was so bad, nobody could have saved it.

I can only say that I bought the DVD for $3 on sale, and the movie was worth the $3. But I would not pay anything more for this thing.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dog of the year
2 January 2001
Well, this movie is one of the worst of all time. And that is saying something, because I am in the turkey.

The one thing this movie is amazing about is that it started the career of Dale Dye as a credible military technical advisor. Later on he got fame for being the advisor for Platoon, and then again on Starship Troopers. But this is where he started.

I was one of the 200 REAL US Marines used in the movie as extras. And even during shooting, we laughed at how unrealistic everything was. But what would we know, we are just stupid Marines. We sat back, and let the experts show how real military equipment was to be used.

The plot stunk (worn out 20 years before), the acting was so-so, neither good nor bad. Unremarkable is a word that comes to mind there. Although Mr. Dye plays the oldest squad leader I have ever seen (he is the one that yells "Fire In The Hole" and shoots the alien with the anti-tank rocket).

If you want to see a comedy in the vein of "Killer Tomatoes", check this movie out. If you are looking for something like serious sci-fi, pass this up and grab something a little more cerebral, like maybe Battlefield Earth.
14 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Flashpoint (1984)
8/10
Bizarre, confusing, but well worth watching
2 January 2001
I remember seeing this movie when it first came out in 1984, and was frankly lost. But several years ago I found it on video and bought it. After seeing it all over again, I now understand it.

This movie is very similar in some ways to The Sixth Sense. There were lots of plot items sitting in the open, but you never see them. Clues and hints are dropped constantly into this movie. And at the end, is where they are all suddenly brought together.

I do not compare this to Sixth Sense for quality, but it is worth seeing in my opinion. Expecially if you are one of the JFK conspiracy nuts. There is enough information in this movie alone to give Oliver Stone 4 or 5 more movies.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Biography of Traci Lords
1 May 2000
This is roughly an attempt by the video industry to tell it's side of the Traci Lords story. It starts with a young girl that knows what she wants to do, and how she wants to get there.

It shows the famous "Penthouse" portfolio in which she claims that she wants to get into porn. It then tracks her meetings with many of the actors and actresses (many play themselves) as she moved up the ladder until she became a superstar.

Jacqueline Lorians looks and sounds almost exactly like Traci Lords, and gives the performance of a lifetime in this movie. The only improvement that should have been done would have been to shoot it on film instead of video.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Raw Talent (1984)
9/10
Very innovative
1 May 2000
One thing that this film is known for in the original uncut version is it's "subliminal messages". During the sex scenes (and many others), a text message was flashed on the screen or 1 or 2 frames. This could range from "SEX" and "KILL" to "EAT" and "LAUGH".

I have never heard if this had any impact on the audience however. But even without this, the film is good and tracks the rise and fall of an actor that moves from Porn to Soap Opera. This may well be where some of the concepts for the more recent "Boogie Nights" may have come from. There are many similar sceens in these two movies.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A "Splash" takeoff
1 May 2000
An adult version of the hit movie SPLASH. This features Traci as a mermaid who runs into Leslie and learns to talk dirty to add to the sexual passion.

This has since been re-released with the 16 year old Traci removed and replaced with another actress. But it was done very badly, with Leslie recreating the scenes (obviously older then when he originally did them), and the replacement were obviously done on video where the original was done on film. The original I rate highly, the re-release I rate poorly.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Simon (1980)
10/10
A great social commentary
1 May 2000
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a true classic. I would compare it with Dr. Strangelove or A Clockwork Orange.

**POSSIBLE SPOILER** This is not a true spoiler, but may give away some parts of the plot.

Simon is a college professor who wants to be special. He plays around with sensory deprevation in an attempt to find his "inner self". A bunch of think-tank scientists convince him that he is an alien with unexpected results.

He soon goes beyond them, and releases a "stupid gas" on them and escapes. Fred Gwynn makes a great role as the General in charge of recapturing him.

He then goes and contacts a cult that worships TV and uses their ability to take over satelite transmission to create his own "fourth network" (remember in 1980 there were only 3).

This is a great movie if you want to relax. Alan Arkin and Madeline Kahn are excellent, along with the rest of the cast.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed