5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Disappeared (I) (2008)
5/10
Derivative, but extremely competent
22 April 2008
Well acted, nicely shot, and with a solid score, this is a decent feature. It's only real flaws are an extremely derivative, and occasionally confused, plot; and some slightly clumsy dialogue at times.

It looks good, without being spectacular, which entirely suits its council estate setting. Combined with excellent performances from the leads, it could almost work as a pure kitchen sink drama. Despite not being given much to say, Harry Treadaway and Greg Wise are a convincingly troubled father and son. The support is also broadly good; Tom Felton is particularly notable.

The troubles come with the exasperatingly unoriginal plot - it borrows and from a whole selection of similar films. The good news is that it does choose some of the best to steal from; the trouble that it isn't good enough to stand up to these classics. However, it holds together well, at least until the latter stages, when a few too many extraneous ingredients are thrown into the pot.

Broadly, a decent effort if not outstanding. Given the mechanics, I would be interested to see future work from the team behind it - they just need some more original ideas to start with.
35 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Well constructed, but completely misses the point.
19 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Although the production and performances are generally good, I believe the writers of this film neutered what could have been a major work.

The original (comic-book) material deals with the power of ideas, both good and bad, and most particularly how easily a modern state could slip back into the fascism of the last century. Such an occurrence requires the collusion, albeit unwitting, of the population at large. However, the Wachowskis' film is about a conspiracy and a British people kept down only by the force of arms. The number of 'film school 101' shots of members of the public watching propaganda broadcasts and proclaiming them lies ignores the lessons of the past, and the intent of the writer of the original story. Nations were, and could again be, led into fascism by a small group only if the rest of the people were willing to accept this. The majority of the people of Europe in the 20's, 30's, and 40's knew about at least some of what was going on, if not the scale of it, and chose to look the other way, at least until light was shone on the horrors by the Allies. Modern neo-fascist groups thrive on the same denial of the evidence.

I realise the difficulties of adapting previously published work to the screen; virtually every aspect needs to be a candidate for modification, interpretation or removal. However, a successful adaptation must maintain the original intent of the work (I believe William Goldman said as much in one of his excellent works on the screen trade). I am afraid that the creators of V For Vendetta have failed in that respect.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slight, but enjoyable.
31 March 2004
I have to say that I really enjoyed this film. I'd actually gone to see something else, but was running late, so it was a pleasing accident to end up seeing this.

The characters are well rounded and likable, despite their flaws (though these are where the story comes from), and the setting is pretty without overwhelming. Not an awful lot really happens, but then this is really about the developing friendship between the three leads. Too many films are made where this would require some great on screen event as a catalyst, but here a little bit of well introduced history is quite enough. In short, it's about real-life people rather than the usual Hollywood cartoons.

A number of people have commented on unrealistic elements, but I didn't find any problems at all just sitting back and enjoying.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Underworld (2003)
4/10
A bit of a shambles
24 September 2003
I really wanted to like this film; maybe amazingly agile characters in black beating the cr*p out of each other using guns and martial arts isn't the most original of ideas, but it promised fun. Unfortunately the reasonable, if somewhat repetitive use of action is mired in a script marked by clunky dialogue and a massive over-reliance on shaky, blurred flashbacks to explain to the viewer exactly what is going on.

The original premise; vampires and werewolves at war, will have been what interested many people in this film and I still think something good could be done with it. Given the opening box office in the US and the apparent interest from the star maybe a sequel could live up to this film's promise. I'd just suggest the use of a more experienced writer to script as the roots of this film's problems are in the writing.

In summary, while there are the makings of a good film here, this isn't it, although it's not awful.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good clean fun, enjoyably OTT
30 January 2001
Not the sort of film that's is going to trouble the Academy, but very enjoyable nonetheless. It's not supposed to be intellectual, but it is ideal for anybody who just wants to kick back and watch Hollywood do it's work.

Right from the parts the stunts are ridiculously implausible, but that's never really been a problem if the budget is large enough. All three of the Angels look great and do their best to play to the audience, while clearly knowing full well what type of film it is. Despite the rumours of trouble on the set, all those taking part look like they are having fun, and it rubs off on the viewer.

I've not left the cinema feeling quite so harmlessly entertained in some time. Don't see it expecting too much, and you won't be disappointed.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed