Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tripwire (1989)
1/10
So bad it is worth watching
21 July 2011
Okay, this is one of those 'tick the box' films. Evil terrorist, shady mid eastern organisations, "hot shot" FBI agent playing by his own rules, son who is moody and listening to bad metal music because dad is never around, black police chief. I could go on ... and I will - loads of opportunities for set up fights, where just shooting someone would've been much more logical, oh too obvious plot introductions that set the scene for "a-ha" moments later, the loose cannon cop sacked from "the feds" and takes up bareknuckle boxing "somewhere near Arizona (or wherever"), evil dudes called "carlos" and "el tigre". Yep, it is just that bad. Who funds these things????? But really funny and worth it for the 1980s kitsch.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mare nero (2006)
6/10
Full of style, low on narrative
4 July 2009
This stylish tour de force is a beauty to watch. I must admit that I don't, for one second, believe that Italian police stations are decked out in minimalist/modernist furniture and Italian detectives get around like Paul Smith models, but there is definitely something appealing in suspending disbelief to look at beautiful things.

David Lynch's Blue Velvet and Twin Peaks appear to have been a huge influence for this. The film reads like a beautiful coffee table book on modernist furniture/photography. The leads are gorgeous and the lighting and cinematography sublime. There is also a huge amount of sexual expression, again done in a beautifully stylish manner that allows us to be the voyeur without feeling like we are watching cheap porn or tacky Hollywood T & A.

Unfortunately, the storyline is confused. I get the distinct feeling that this film would've made sense had the editing been less brutal (but I could be totally wrong and perhaps the script is non-sensical). By the end I was wondering what the hell was going on (although I didn't care that much because it looked so great). Perhaps something was lost in translation? The story gets to the point where the viewer thinks they have 'got it', then it ends up on a tangent. Perhaps this is deliberate and we are asked to fill in the gaps ourselves, which is another Lynchian throw back ...

If you like looking at Vogue fashion shoots, you will love this ...
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth watching ... interesting take on this war
23 January 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I came across this on cable television in Australia, perhaps not so ironically at the same time that Israel was bombing Hamas in Palestine in January 2009. Possibly a deliberate programming choice - perhaps not.

This is an interesting film. Without knowing anything about its production, it is apparent that some of the footage is real, and many of the cast are actual civilians affected during the Israeli-Hezbollah/Lebanon war of 2006. What is central to the film is the developing relationship between Zeina, a woman looking for her son, and Tony, a taxi driver with a colourful past. I must admit I did particularly like that the two main characters are not perfect, and indeed their flaws further serve to foster a sense of identification with them. They are not your usual Hollywood war victims. Zeina is a woman who has sent her young son to the South of Lebanon to escape a messy divorce and supposedly philandering husband. Tony the taxi driver is someone trying to make a spare dollar by selling black market medication and there are several references to a brother with a criminal history in Israel. What I most enjoyed about "under the bombs" was the raw reality of the story and the lack of morality and bias. The victims of all sides of the war are clearly shown and no one is attached to any particular side. Nada Abou Farhat is a naturally beautiful central actor, and I mean "naturally" in that she doesn't present some kind of blow-dried version of war. She is a powerful actor being able to portray the anguish of a mother seeking a lost child. Similarly Georges Khabbaz is a real character - not your sexy leading man - in fact he is a relatively average looking man, not unattractive, but definitely not with stereotyped leading man good looks. He clearly passes as a realistic representation of a Lebanese taxi driver and is quite likable. He really does look the part! Also, the support cast are clearly locals, and I got the sense that many of the stories told were real. The child actors are particularly good.

The relationship between Tony and Zeina is interesting, but with some flaws. It is clear that Zeina is a beautiful and quite sexy woman, wearing a figure hugging dress that seems somewhat out of type for the south of Lebanon, but this is okay because it further creates Zeina as a individual ... obviously a woman from the South of Lebanon who has married a 'man of the world' and left her traditional life behind. I wonder whether Tony falls a little into a stereotype of the Arabic male (I would be interested in Arabic men's opinion on this), in that whilst he feels for Zeina's predicament, he sees her as a sexual being. It is often the case that people form intense relationships in traumatic situations, but it is a wonder whether Tony's feelings are totally realistic. In one scene, he is lamenting that Zeina is "a woman looking for her son but who won't acknowledge me!" (paraphasing) when a journalist approaches him for a fare while Zeina is looking for her son. I wondered whether this was a little unrealistic. Would an Arabic man let out emotions like these after knowing a woman for two days? Maybe ... but I wondered whether the romantic relationship was paying lip service to traditional cinematic storytelling. I actually feel the film would've benefited more from this romantic tension being far more 'beneath the surface'.

What I did really love about this film was its simplicity. It is a simple demonstration of the suffering of people in war. Zeina's grief, when she finds her sister is dead, is palpable and intense to watch. Similarly, the end of the film is bitter and lends itself towards the reality of war.

I would recommend this film as a good example of cinema verite and an important contribution to showing the victims of war in a way that doesn't use the usual soft focus, blow dried Hollywood stereotype. Nice work!

Gen_x
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Journey to the heart of laugher!
24 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Sorry for the lame summary title! Was trying to reference Vietnam war movies and failed miserably ... unlike this film which pretty much gets it!

I loved Tropic Thunder but I must admit I am a big fan of Ben Stiller and think that Zoolander is hilarious. Also I am a huge Apocalypse Now fan, and the references in this film were great for Vietnam movie fans. One of the funniest introductions to any film with the fake trailers (Tobey Mcguire!). Great character development based on Hollywood stereotypes ... I am surprised that I haven't seen any reference to the Lazarus (Robert Downey Jr) character being based on Russell Crowe (mentions rugby, assaults people) and the Portnoy character is a dead ringer for Chris Farley. Nice little "in" jokes and references (comment about the Jack Black - Portnoy - character being "uninsurable" could have been about Downey Jr himself!) and I loved all of the clichés about action films.

For anyone who likes Ben Stiller and loves Vietnam war films but can laugh at them!

Very funny!
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Satisfaction (2007–2010)
10/10
Thank god! More than one dimensional working girls!
19 January 2008
As someone who has worked in a similar type establishment, I was really curious to see how this portrayal of sex workers and their client in a legal Melbourne brothel would pan out. There is a long history of sex workers being portrayed in film and television as victims. I know that there are women in the industry who have had horrible experiences, but there are a lot of women in every day life who have also had these kind of experiences, but prostitutes are usually disproportionately portrayed as having being sexually abused, being drug dependent or being abused by men.

I was so pleased with Satisfaction. Although it is a television drama, (and it does look like one) with gorgeous characters in gorgeous clothes living in gorgeous homes, what it succeeds so well at is its portrayal of the workers as complex women from different backgrounds, working in a well run industry for their own reasons. It is interesting that there is a focus on sexual fantasy type bookings, which is not the general brothel experience, but I guess it is the most interesting for television! The sex scenes are realistic, and not tacky, and the clients are also more than the usual one dimensional 'john'. This is really great Australian television! And for those Australian women (and few men) who have never set foot in an Australian brothel, this is about as close as television/film gets to portraying something close to the real thing. 10/10.
73 out of 78 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oldboy (2003)
9/10
Freaked me out
29 July 2007
I haven't written a comment on IMDb for about 3 years but was inspired to with this film. It is not very often that I come across a film by accident (World Movies on cable) and the spend the next day scouring the internet to find out information about it and can't get it out of my head! Anyway, yep there are plot holes, but Old boy borrows a lot from surrealism and you are meant to suspend your disbelief! I don't buy comments when people say "it is so unrealistic because he should've done this ..." because it is a surrealist film and meant to be unrealistic! For me the sign of a good film is if it sticks on your head! THis one surely does (althought I did have to look away a few times ... ) Loved it!!!! Work of cruel genius!!! (HOLLYWOOD - Please don't ruin it by remaking it!!!)
357 out of 508 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Amores Perros (2000)
10/10
The antithesis of pretension
22 July 2006
For all those who see the comment that states this is a "pretentious indie film" ... well this is the other side of that (bizarre) comment.

Amores Perros is one of my top ten films. It shows a fragmented display of human kind in an apparent lawless section of society. It allows the viewer to get just close enough to some of the (flawed) characters, then wretches them away ... and submerges the viewer into another (flawed) story. There are obvious biblical themes (Cain and Abel) which will be apparent to viewers before the themes are (post modernly) announced by one of the stars. It is, perhaps, a validation and verbalization of what the viewer is thinking in watching this powerful example of love and tragedy.

For those unaware of the structure of Amores Perros, it is an example of temporal distortion. This, however, doesn't distract from the deep relationships the viewer has with the characters. The flawed lovers, the scarred beauty, the family man who has fled his nest and the complex hit-man. The obvious motif - of canine relationship with man/woman - serves as a connection between seemingly unconnected characters and perhaps demonstrates the base level violence that the characters are a part of.

Amores Perros is a complex film that rewards the viewer. In basic terms, it will make you cry and make you feel. It is not pretentious. It is, in fact, quite beautiful. Apologies for the pretentious nature of this review, but I figured the undereducated "pretentious indi film" review called for some of these comments! Basically, Amores Perros it is a great flick!!!!!!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Crash (I) (2004)
6/10
All too obvious representation of racism
12 April 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I must admit that I didn't run out to see this film during its cinematic release in Australia, and only ended up viewing it on Cable TV. My main criticism of Crash is that its theme (racism) is too obvious. Subtly is an art form in cinema and difficult to achieve. Crash presents a view of Los Angeles as a city full of racism, but to its credit, examines all of the characters and gives them depth. The racist cop is also represented as a caring son, the 'liberal' minded cop ends up perpetuating all that he hates. However, despite the relatively interesting dichotomies in many of the characters, I still had difficulty with the 'blatent' nature of the theme. There were basically no scenes that didn't re-in force the basic tenet of the film, leaving the viewer with a feeling of being slapped around the face by the end. Maybe this was the aim? Maybe American culture has become so obsessed with racism, that these kinds of representations are necessary in a film of this kind. Despite my hesitations, I still felt that Crash has a lot to offer with a fantastic ensemble cast. I loved the Iranian shop owner and the Latino locksmith and the interplay that racism isn't always white vs everyone else. That racism is a multi-layered reality and, despite its abhorrence, may be easier to understand, just not easier to forgive.
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Last Days (2005)
1/10
yawn
12 April 2006
I was so excited when I saw the posters for this film, being someone who sobbed for days after Kurt Cobain's death. mmm ... yes, I am a grunge devotee! Unfortunately I was so disappointed. I know that Gus Van Sant's films can be a little slow, and of course, you don't need a million miles an hour action for a great film (case in point, "Wings of desire"). But this film just didn't move at all. It was kinda weird, as I got a feeling in the first few minutes that it just wasn't going to go anywhere. I get what Van Sant was trying to do - representation of the monotony of Cobain's final days, and the mundane existence of a washed out/drug addled rock star, but fundamentally this film lacked any kind of passion or devotion to it's subjects. One would imagine that the cynical sense of humour that Cobain would cause him to roll his eyes at this film. There was no exploration of the "why's" of his suicide. In fact there was little exploration of anything apart from the aforementioned monotony. It has been a long time since I have walked out of a film before the ending ... but this one caused me to. So unless something mind-blowing occurred in the final few minutes, this is the worst film I have paid to see at the cinema in a long time.
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Over-the-top parody of the criminal justice system - Queensland Style
29 November 2003
Went to see this on a whim, the film we intended to see was booked out. However, I am extremely glad this was the case, as Gettin' Square gave me one of the best laughs I've had in ages! As I am a drug and alcohol worker, the Johnny Spit character really appealed. Whilst he is obviously an extremely exaggerated parody of your 'crim/scammer junkie' type, David Whenham's performance gave us an over-the-top version of many people who I know (although, in defence of people who use drugs, this type of character is certainly in the minority). Sam Worthington's character presented a sense of identification and humility. There is no anti-crime message in this film, indeed the baddies are the police (played with snearing nastiness by David Field) and the slimy crime boss (Gary Sweet). The heroes are low-level criminals trying to 'get straight', but who end up committing an armed robbery and getting away with it. All of the characters in this film are appealing, and you will be rolling around in laughter at Whenham's court room scene. Best crime caper since Two Hands.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Laden with punk cred!
26 January 2002
Didn't know what to expect from this film, but it was recommended by a friend who I spent lots of time with in the Melbourne punk scene, so I thought it would be worth a shot. Usually films about the punk scene are so off the mark, that no matter whether they are good films or not, people are usually so insulted by the 'fakeness' of them all, that they are disregarded by punk-rock fans. However, this film really manages to capture the punk rock scene to a T! The characters are likeable and realistic, the music is authentic, and the plot-line is so close to the reality of touring it is eerie. The relationship between the two main characters, (singer and lead-guitarist - a relationship that is often tense in most bands) gives this film something more than if it had just relied on the 'road-movie' genre to keep it moving. I really loved this film!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not a nice experience ... but art isn't always nice
30 July 2001
I had heard a lot about this film before I saw it being a fan of horror, and also a film student who had spent significant time studying horror films. In Australia 'Last House on the Left' is not available - it was banned on release and this ban has never (to my knowledge) been lifted, so I obtained it though a mail-order pirate (sorry to Wes Craven for missing out on the royalties ... but you can blame the Australian censor for that). It is not a nice film to watch. It is violent, cruel and relentless - but it is important. I recently saw 'American Nightmare', a documentary on American horror in the 60s and 70s and Wes Craven spoke about his feelings when he made 'Last House on the Left'. He said that when it was made he was a very angry young man. Scenes from the film were spliced together with a montage of scenes from the Vietnam war, the shooting of students at Penn State, the burning of blacks in the South of the US, and other horrific scenes. Wes' anger at the society that he was living in, manifested itself into a violent and cruel film where two teenagers, who are going to see a rock band and trying to score pot (hippies?) are killed by a gang of psychotics. A simple metaphor is that of the violent death of the sixties flower children ... and a death to innocence. The second part of the film where we see average people, do violent things, is perhaps not so unlike taking an average American kid and sending him off to slaughter a bunch of Vietnamese. There really are countless metaphors in this film especially within the context of its time. I don't recommend it for the faint hearted ... I also don't recommend it for people who like violence for violence's sake. The violence has got to be seen for what it is.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Siege (1998)
5/10
Nothing new
25 March 2001
I watched this film by accident on cable, having no idea what it was until half way through when I bothered to pick up the TV guide. Started off interesting enough, displaying flashes of a (far superior) Arlington Road, then unfortunately degenerating into a US/"freedom"/"we are becoming just like them!"/"I love my country" babble fest. Interesting to note that half the production team have Jewish names. On the surface you could look at this film and say, "but its saying that racism against Arabs is bad:", but the 'we are becoming just like them' quotes that just keep coming really show where the true colours of the script writer lie. Politics aside, I did watch this to the end, and found most of the acting okay, (although Bening is annoying). Best part of this film is that it goes to extremes that we haven't come to expect from Hollywood. A bus blows, then a theatre, then a school under siege, it's like "god, what will they blow up next?", then the whole city is under siege!!! One good point that I did note in one of the above reviews was about the citizens of NYC not fighting back against the army, but if we can't have a little suspension of disbelief then Hollywood would be out of business. Overall, watch it if it is too cold or wet to go to the video library and/or you just want to stare blankly at the screen.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nil by Mouth (1997)
10/10
Hard to watch, but ultimately worth it
21 February 2001
I had been wanting to see this film for a long time but never got around to it. Finally caught it on cable a few weeks ago and was very impressed. Everything about this film demonstrates the skill of the film-maker in staying true to the gritty subject matter. Use of hand held camera adds to the cinematic realism as does the way the family are never seen together in one shot until the very end of the film. The subject matter, especially the drug abuse, is shot with gritty realism that I have rarely seen before. It looks like Gary Oldman knows his stuff about life in working class London. All performances are outstanding, Ray Winstone is always worth watching, but the lesser know members of the case also amazed me with the honesty of their performances. Although this film is difficult to watch in some scenes, it is a must see for anyone serious about realism in cinema.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed