Reviews

25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Dredd (2012)
10/10
Work of Art, with the second worst trailer of all time.
28 April 2020
This is the only movie I can rewatch a hundred times because it is like watching art unfold for an hour and some. Every scene is perfect. It's the weirdest thing to say about an action movie, it's poetic.

To Alex Garland: Don't be bitter, your movie flopped because the trailer was terrible., not because the audience didn't appreciate it. That's why good movies flop. You should have put it in the contract you could do it yourself. Expectations from the trailer were set for just another superhero movie and one that most people never heard of, and some drug who cares. If you had made a trailer that was like a music video, everyone would have got that this was special.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Girls: Au Jus (2020)
Season 3, Episode 5
9/10
another quite shocking turn
25 March 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Well Lucy gets killed. Now I'm writing this because I kind of felt this was the right progression even though unexpected, and explored why I felt it. The reason I figured is because Lucy had it coming. She placed her moral objections above the lives of three women who were almost their friends, who pleaded with her. Then she couldn't read the sincerity of Beth trying to protect her. Then she didn't care or try to defend the three when she felt secure and out of the woods. But it is still sad.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark (2017–2020)
4/10
Excellent acting, terrible script and pacing
30 September 2019
Finally got annoyed too much after a full 3 episodes with the inept pacing of the show and lack of depth. Someone needs to educate the creators that the point of a series is telling a story that doesn't fit into a movie. As far as I can tell, they'll just keep cutting back and forth between minimal content scenes until the end of season 2. Too bad and what a waste of acting talent and money on this wanna-be mystery script.
3 out of 83 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The I-Land (2019)
10/10
Very original story, excellent casting.
16 September 2019
I almost feel sorry for some of the actors, because they really appear creepy just looking at them. Some great casting for sure. I like how anything can happen here, and unlike 'Lost', everything makes sense in the end. Excellent and unforced twists.

And here is an appeal to Netflix etc: can we please just start open demographic audience targeting? These shows really don't deserve to be dragged down by the lowest common denominator of people voting here. I'm sure internet companies already know everything about me, so just start a social system where smart people get to see smart shows, and don't let the people take out their anger on shows that are too much for them to appreciate.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another Life (2019–2021)
10/10
Help! Are there only mentally handicapped people reviewing this show?
15 September 2019
This show is very smart, but apparently its target audience is not, as it cannot appreciate it. The unspoken premise is that in the future, people are allowed to remain individuals with emotions, instead of becoming brainwashed soldier types that will obey every order no matter how stupid. Because we figured out that that works better, unless you have some sort of hidden agenda. In any case I find the idea of capable twenty-somethings (presumably you can be educated faster in the future, not a stretch really) very refreshing.

I just went through 30 of the most recent negative reviews. About half were from fake accounts: only one review in the account, a one liner or no actual references to the show, and user names that end in a long number. Guys, this show is being thrashed by the powers that be so we don't get any ideas and so the show doesn't get renewed.

Anyhow, back to my review. I love the idea that there is a whole backup crew in metastasis waiting to be woken up if their counterpart expires for unforeseen reasons. That's just smart. I found everything well researched and believable, on par with say the original star trek, in its time.

The story is very rich, it never becomes derivative, everything has its own twists. I love the characters, they are very fresh and not your typical crew for sure. I think this is the first show ever where I thoroughly enjoyed a female lead in a role usually reserved for males (I could not stand the snotty next generation star trek number one), because the acting is real and smart.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Beautiful muppet world, but lacking spark
5 September 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I felt the pangs of disappointment whenever I became aware of the hugely derivative elements. The first, that the clan world was clearly modeled after the power struggles of GoT, I got over first, but I have to say that must be the worst idea of all. Even the music reminds of comparable GoT scenes. There is a dragon-like creature. A puppet aristocracy just is ridiculous when it's taken seriously, as in the case of the Gelflings. The Skeksis on the other hand are the main stars as their degeneracy is very life like, and the Chamberlain says some things that you actually stop and think. Unfortunately even the good ideas are derivative, like the very funny interplay between the heretic and his alter ego: this is straight from the Henson movie the Labyrinth, the old man with the talking hat, even the voices are exactly the same. The spider creatures forming faces is also taken straight of that movie, the talking hands. I mean, what did you hire 10 writers for that can't come up with a new thought? But I was missing the Henson expressive puppet world, and there it did never disappoint.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
RoboCop (2014)
10/10
Unexpectedly groundbreaking
20 September 2018
Wow. From a reboot of a cult 80's movie from an unknown director I certainly did not expect what was coming. This must be the most realistic sci-fi movie ever made, as well as the most realistic portrayal on corporate greed. The latter blew my mind: the script manages to have the corporate executives use language that lets them convince themselves that their reasoning is sound and just, even brilliant, while letting them arrive at decisions that are absolutely villainous. That is the problem with corporations, laid bare for the first time in history. The casting of Beetlejuice as the CEO is genius, he applies the same kind of charm he manages in telling every lie. Gary Oldman as the scientist makes for the most human cast member, trying to reconcile conflicting orders with his own ethics and objectives.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Silicon Valley (2014–2019)
9/10
Mike Judge directing almost ruined 5th season
9 April 2018
I completely wrote off Silicon Valley after the first two horrible episodes of season 5. None of the well-honed character interplay was at work, it was all over-the-top standard Hollywood underbelly humor with the characters caricatures of themselves, and silly plots. Out of boredom, I gave the third episode a try (director: Babbit), and oh wonder: back to its old self, as if nothing had ever happened! Which is: a gold standard in playing off opposites, all the types of real and demented Silicon Valley nerds. While extremely funny, at the same time it hits home because the scenarios and people are actually so believable.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twin Peaks (2017)
10/10
The most touching piece of art on ageing ever made
2 March 2018
There is no artist who has even attempted to capture the human drama of ageing AFAIK. This is a grand masterpiece. It displays a sadness and compassion that is unsurpassed, illuminating the space between godlike youth and contemplative transition.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Black Panther (2018)
5/10
A politically charged movie
20 February 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Reading the wiki entry on the black panther party: the FBI considered the movement 'the greatest threat to internal security of the country' at the time. Curiously enough, the Marvel comic character also preceded the forming of the party in 1966, though nowhere can you read that it had any influence. Also strangely enough, the new movie encourages the same practises that the party did, namely community outreach and medical clinics. And just like the party, the movie makes it clear that politics is about power. Where the film differs from previous black superhero movies is that the hero here does not live with other Americans in a harmonious melting pot: they are their own kingdom, and vastly superior to the 'colonializers' (word used in the movie, FYI Imdb editors..). Well I guess in the end all superhero movies are empowering to their constituency (spiderman: the geeky teenagers; superman: the goody two shoes; the avengers: the groupies? Thor: the rednecks). That's the positive thing I can see here. The movie is also reasonably entertaining.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
You're right fanboys, it destroys the last Star Wars
17 January 2018
For those who absolutely hated the last Force Awakens gibberish by JJ Abrams, this movie borders on a miracle: how can anyone pick up from where so many unlikable, moronic characters have been spawned? Well apparently Rian Johnson, that's who. He turns everyone into an acting genius, with the deepest character development I've seen in ages. Even an unredeemably childish Kylo Ren becomes some kind of grunge rock star. Genius. Johnson even takes on the unbearable cute animal props. It almost seems like Disney told him 'hey we need X,Y,Z in there but you can do whatever you want with the story other than that.' Oh boy, he sure did. It's basically as if the characters woke up and asked themselves what they were doing in this fake universe, and trying to adjust to it as much as they could.

The only thing that is lost from the earlier Lucas versions is the grandiosity and the spectacle of the giant war machines, planets, etc. Hell, this is not really a Star Wars movie at all. It's someone who had to take the precept and made it his own movie. A good one at that.
8 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Theater close up
20 May 2016
LCK's new vehicle to get his insights and ideas across is fascinating to watch. He never quite lets go of the comedic view as a necessary to face some of the drama that develops. The lack of musical score allows the viewer to bring in and discover their own emotions. The last season episode is fascinating. It seriously made me ponder if I had the 'good old times' backwards. Having everybody act and talk like people did in the 70's appears grotesquely wrong, like watching a bunch of barbarians. When you watch movies from the 70's that is not apparent as they don't focus on the mundane. I don't know..very thought provoking. I can't think of any recent media that made me feel like watching art - LCK is like a painter who discovered film as the canvas to express what he sees.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The most realistic space movie ever, with the worst trailer/ad ever
25 December 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Some of the scenes are literally cinematic history. If people got off on 2001 by Kubrik, they should be putting a shrine to this one. The drama that unfolds in the space scenes is out of this world. Not since Dr. Zhivago have I seen more grand film making. The cinematic score is embedded so well it feels like a direct extension of the visual cortex. Ennio Morricone has not written more fitting music since The Good, the Bad & the Ugly.

I initially was put off by the ending. I guess I felt it fizzles into a Utopian aliens-are-like-us kind of escape from better screen writing. Well I still am disappointed. But that can never take away from the breathtaking accomplishment that is the first 4/5ths of the movie.

Brian, your movie flopped because of the incredibly terrible trailer that made it out to be some documentary movie about alien origins like anyone wants to watch that. Trailers are everything, you need to do it yourself. DO NOT WATCH THE TRAILER: It has the whole story in it as a cheap sequence of spoiler highlights, huge letdown by telling you everything that happens, without any buildup or creating suspense.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What Force
25 December 2015
Unimaginative parroting and reshuffling of core narratives seem to be JJ Abrams' trademark. 99% of the production value was spent on replicating that original 70's look (where even Lucas decided to go with something fresher), and signing up those 70's actors who are in their 70's now. I can't find one original spark: *SPOILER ALERT* the metal mask of the bad guy looks like General Grievous (I believe) mechanical head but really makes no sense as a mask here. Now instead of daddy, bad guy is son whose inferiority complex is not being evil enough. Let me elaborate on this for a second. 'I'm your father' is the quintessential scene of Star Wars. It was a shock moment at the climax fight of the movie. You cannot possibly stoop lower in writing creed than rehash that scene rendering it a mere cultural reference. It certainly does not make for the attempted climax. And to round off the empty progression, he had to finish with a cameo of the original 'son'. The rest of the movie is summarized quickly: sequences of boring fight scenes, gratuitous genocide without much emotional or plot impact, and absolutely terrible acting throughout by the two main protagonists. Daisy Ridley makes even John Boyega seem to possess uncanny depth in comparison, whose only emotional statements are confusion and urgency.

JJ Abrams: overrated infantile megalomaniac. It takes a lot of delusional thinking to think you're the right person for both of the two top sci-fi franchises ever. At least stick to directing, not screen writing.
31 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Go see it for the grandiosity
30 August 2015
The visuals are incredible. Some of the most beautiful backgrounds ever made, and certainly the most perfect. If there ever was a movie you can smell the hundreds of millions in production value, this is it. This takes Star Wars to the next level, quite frankly, in terms of realistic alien worlds. There are two letdowns in this movie. One is it fails to have a great script. The dialogue is excellent, believable and profound, yet the main plot line is a straight forward chase till the end and lots of saved by the bell moments. The other problem is casting. Neither of the two heros has sufficient spark. Tatum is your everyday football team captain. Kunis seems very old in spirit. Naturally, the actors with any depth were the British. Oh well.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty stupid
15 August 2015
Am I surprised to learn this director/screenwriter wrote Batman and Robin? No. While I don't really recall the last installation, I had high expectations, still remembering how good the first three were, made, respectively, by star directors Brian de Palma, John Woo, and J.J. Abrams. Sorry, this is Impossible Mission, you can't do any of the following: O.K. stunts, mediocre pacing, and a boring villain, as it turns out. 'Oh my, he might get a hold of 2.4B Dowlars!'. And USB sticks is so yesterday. Really. Get a clue, audience. And wtf about "the IMF!" "the IMF!" this, the IMF that. I mean, are we supposed to assume the audience has no freaking idea who the real IMF is? I get it that this is a carry-over from an old show, but it's supposed to play in today's world. Get a clue. Basically, the IQ of this franchise dropped by roughly 40 points without notice, which, you know, is a kind of false advertising.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
If you saw this and haven't caught on, I can't help you
30 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Disney kills every mother of children in this movie (three on last count). Nobody else dies. I've heard some rumors that for some reason Disney was doing that, but this movie is the proof. Without any comment from me, a few more examples of this splendid flick: The wolf howls (in the way of howling for a hot woman) after meeting Little Red Riding Hood, who is portrayed by an actual child actress. Jack the boy, who's only pastime is to milk his cow, and insists on thinking the cow is a 'he', gets slapped by his mother after she tells him only females give milk while he gives her a look of 'not true'. Pretty much everybody is gay. Everybody is behaving badly, but that's considered o.k. because they also have a good side.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hilarious, rare feel-good-about-world-after-seeing movie effect
20 November 2014
Carey and Daniels truly still are 10 year olds. I could not wipe a grin off my face during the whole movie. There isn't any other comedy couple that portrays that kind of innocent hilarious energy. While not as campy maybe as the first, this one is more fluid and consistently funny. The supporting cast interacts more believably with the duo than in the first movie. No concern whatsoever is wasted on political correctness. Looking at the head shots of the critics majority who couldn't laugh in this movie, I seem to recognize the type that's full of themself. The jokes are quite elaborate, as is the script, in my opinion, making for a fully enjoyable experience.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kung Fu: The Movie (1986 TV Movie)
1/10
intent: diminish Kung Fu legacy
28 April 2012
This appears to have been the first calculated step taken towards diminishing the legacy of the incredible Kung Fu TV series. Look at the writer's credits. The Shaolin order has been destroyed! (says you). How much more awful can you get? No more spring of wisdom and center of peace, while the carrier of the flame is wrapped up in family affairs with the man we don't give two farts about (the father of the nephew), and an illegitimate son intent to kill him. Caine was a role model for many that grew up with the TV show. It is such a pleasure to observe the regular folks interact with the thoughtful and humble one. (ok IMDb here's your 10th line)
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Juno (2007)
1/10
it should be 'NR' for seeing Diablo Cody's mind
7 January 2008
Warning: Spoilers
There is so much wrong with this movie. I have to get it out of my system. I haven't been this disappointed since'Rattatouille' in people's ability to spot devious junk when they see it. This contains spoilers but oh my, I wouldn't know what to spoil.

Ellen Page manages to annoy in the first minutes of the film, a little know-it-all twerp with improbable snappy one liners her only way of communicating. Somewhat helping is the oh-so-cute Cera, but this character is so clearly copied from Napoleon Dynamite and Superbad, it's trite. Page really looks more like 13 than 16 - pregnant, while almost a toddler herself. But in her world everybody at once thinks she should be treated like a responsible adult, while on the other hand not holding her responsible because of her age. Well if that isn't some dreamy lala land. Everything works out for her of course. Seemingly she is running into trouble because the adoptive parents break up. Crying because she wants her little son to have an intact family, this seems to be her biggest struggle. But without further ado, the foster mom still takes the baby (I guess the contract was binding), and Page decides she loves Cera and they play the guitar together. Let's see: Tiny teen gets pregnant. Nothing wrong with that. While a premeditated act, as is confirmed about three times in the movie, Page doesn't think of using a condom. Why? She gets off the hook (doesn't even look at the baby) by finding adoptive parents. Worst case she could always give it to Jolie.

The kid gets to live with a single mom, but she has money and it's not Page so nothing to think about.

Much more important according to the movie is for Page to be in a happy relationship, as otherwise she might run out of time, being 13 already (I mean 16).

Cutie little indie music suggesting everything is dandy.

Not much of a story, ridiculous dialog, very dubious messages.

But you won't notice any of this, because the movie is boring as hell.

Putting in some good words about smoking (that was actually a good satire), Reitman feels the need to promote kiddie pregnancy. I kind of pity Diablo Cody, as the script reveals sociopathic tendencies. But what drove Reitman to implement this 'vision' I don't even want to know.

What age is the audience supposed to be? Thirteen? Most kids we saw at the movie seemed to be that age. Whatever middle aged critics find to recommend for adults is beyond me. Actually kids should be protected from this movie.

Oh final warning: don't discuss the movie with your girlfriend. While the enormity of the sickness of this movie may sink into her slowly, she will initially be too prejudiced towards womanhood in the form of the script writer, the main actor, and the compassion towards unwanted pregnancy to realize what the hell she just watched.
68 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cube Zero (2004)
1/10
enormous lack of talent
24 June 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The screen writing is so dumb it pains me to have wasted 2 hours of my life I'll never get back (where have I heard this before). The acting is so-so. Things change often enough to keep you watching and waiting for something gruesome to happen. Nevertheless there isn't a single original thing in this movie. While the first Cube was a nerdy horror movie, which didn't make a whole lot of sense in the end, cube zero has picked up on that and tries to retell exactly the same story, except this time it makes an obnoxious point of trying to spoon-feed explanations for every detail that the first movie didn't answer. The comic thing is, the director recycles the exact scenes of the first movie that were somewhat weird, and tries to explain them. But the scenes are just copied over, there is no coherence whatsoever. This script is sooo pointless. I can imagine it being written by some half-wit 15 year old with a baseball cap and a pack of beer for a class project. The best part is in the end, they cripple the 'good' wunderkind guy, and he becomes the retarded fellow in the first movie, and you see him when they find him ('this room is green..') in Cube 1997. Goodie gooodie, clap clap, what a twist. First of all, what about if you haven't seen the first one, this doesn't make any sense you nitwit director. Oh, another great idea: instead of the numbers to identify x,y,z coordinates of the room (cube 1997), this time it is 3 letters, each one giving one of 26 possible coordinate values. Duh. Except now permutations don't make much sense anymore..so he lets the letters disappear before anybody can use them..I want my money back.

I guess I had to write this down since there are just so many bad, inconsistent, or just stupid ideas in this movie. Directors/writers should be required to possess some talent.
60 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Batman Begins (2005)
10/10
blown away
24 June 2005
You must have heard it by now: this movie rocks. Apart from the pitch-perfect casting, incredible script, whatever else, what strikes me most about this movie is there is not one ounce of cheese, over-the-top emotions, or a single line of dialog that doesn't seem 100% natural. You get everybody's viewpoint, even the bad guys. Nobody (not even the villains) are self-absorbed. I LOVE IT!!! At least I thought explaining 'batman' and his costume etc in today's time was going to be silly, but no. I buy everything. More!!! Oh yes let me order now those 70-80's batman comic books, they had the same spirit. I have a bad memory, which is why it probably isn't true, but I seriously can't think of any better movie ever made right now. As a side note: everybody thinks Katie Holmes was the only bad casting decision. Well I don't. The point is that in this movie, the love interest does not take center stage, and it is rather a completely believable, normal relationship as it could happen in real life. Why do all superhero movies have to pretend to be a super-sized love story as well? See?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Peter Pan (2003)
This is anything but a faithful adaptation
29 December 2003
I went in to see the movie with expecations that this would be a 'serious' fantasy movie event, after all the reviews claiming faithful adaptation etc. However, the story is so bad I need to dissect it, because it made me feel all wrong: If Wendy and Peter love each other, then the happy ending doesn't make any sense since they don't ever see each other again. Female attention brings victory to Peter and John in the movie, making them 'strong'. So apparently the director's intention was showing that is what 'growing up' will buy you: Getting your hormones flowing. I was p***ed because the director tried to portray such a thing as that to be love (in the climax of the movie) when obviously, since in the end Peter and Wendy simply part, it was the former kind. What a great moral message.

I decided to read the book by Barrie to see if that was really the story: Turns out the movie has nothing to do with it. What people call 'faithful adaptation' are snippets from the book taken out of context. The climax ('love' leads to victory) is not in the book, neither are all the slapstick and jokes. So yes the book is very consistent and makes complete sense. It is also a very sad book. And no, love does not really play part in it.

I think without love, there is no reconciliation between childhood and adulthood, and would (only) then agree with Barrie that growing up isn't worth it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
old pirate movies put this one to shame
30 August 2003
The old pirate movies put this one to shame. The main couple is so dislikable with babbling honorably sounding dialogue but without showing one shred of goodness that you expect in a pirate movie. This is also reflected in the script, which makes them act as if with good intentions, but when you reflect, only to make them look good. Naturally the end is incredibly cheesy, events without motivation, impossible action, and quite good special effects and big breasts to keep the eye interested.
19 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My favorite movie
16 June 2001
This is simply the best movie I have ever seen. It captured me when I watched it as a 10 year old boy, and hasn't aged (or I haven't).

It puzzles me that this truly amazing film was very difficult to obtain (for a long time at least). Made by an obscure Japanese director never heard of again.

When I saw it the first time as a boy, I constantly thought that story was too good to be true - for my personal expectations of how good a story could be that is - and was anxious and convinced, that either the movie would end prematurely, the princess die, or some other let-down would take place at some point, because it was setting itself up just too high to carry through. But it did.

(If I had to nitpick, changing the mice back into their human form was less than ideally 'cast', but then these characters only were there for a few seconds, so can't expect it to be perfect I guess)
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed