Reviews

14 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
"I've made a huge mistake..."
28 August 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Let me preface this by saying that I'm not entirely a horror buff. By any stretch of the imagination. I've really liked some of the J-horror I've seen, the American remake of "The Ring", plus Spanish horror like REC and the excellent "The Orphanage". "The Descent" was also thoroughly enjoyable. I do know a good horror film when I see one, I just don't actively seek them out. I've never seen any of the Evil Dead series and am therefore unfamiliar with Mr Raimi's works.

I went into this film knowing nothing. I've recently moved from one country to another so I haven't been keeping up-to-date on new films in cinemas. I've seen no trailer, promotional materials or anything for this film, so I went in knowing absolutely nothing except that my friends wanted to see it. I was not expecting what I saw.

I have a confession to make: I thought it was a comedy. Hand on heart, honest to God, after some of the first shock moments, the deadpan delivery of lines by the heroine, the gratuitous goo and chin-sucking (mentioned in other reviews) and some of the witty dialogue in the bank and the dinner party scenes, I thought this whole thing was more like "Severed". Some sort of elaborate parody of every cliché in the horror genre. From the first frame to the end credits and the car ride home, I thought this was something akin to "Not Another Stupid Horror Movie". However, whereas "Severed" had some genuinely gruesome and shocking moments, only a few scenes in this film actually gave me a jump. After a while, I thought that this lacklustre dark comedy wasn't quite as funny as I initially expected. After one too many uses of the deafeningly loud creaking gate, wind and house creaks, I thought Sam Raimi and co. were really milking some of their jokes. During the car fight, I chuckled. The séance? I chuckled. The goat? That was just ridiculous. Even for a parody of the genre, that seemed a step way too far.

Imagine, then, my complete surprise when I come to IMDb to see that this is genuinely meant to be a horror film! Folks, there are only two bits in this film which are actually scary in any way SPOILERS: a quick flash of tortured images and fire when the fortune teller takes the heroine's hand, and a dream sequence involving an open window and an unexpected bedfellow. That's it. END SPOILERS. The rest of the film is just plain silly. As a comedy, it's not great. As a horror film? The fact that I didn't even recognise it as such may be the biggest indication I can give.

I left the cinema thinking that it was one of the strangest attempts at black humour I'd seen. After reading some of the reviews on this site, I don't even know what to think any more. This film has stumped me. At least I now know: never let my friends choose films that I don't know of.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The World According to Bush (2004 TV Movie)
10/10
An overshadowed yet incredible work
8 September 2004
I literally accidentally saw this film in a cinema on the Champs-Elysées in Paris one evening in mid-July planning on seeing Shrek 2. I asked the usher what his favourite film was, and he told me "Le Monde Selon Bush", making sure to point out that it was not the film by Michael Moore. Having seen "Fahrenheit 9/11" recently, I decided to see France's take on the Bush administration. I had no idea what I had gone into.

This film is a triumph in terms of documentaries. It's narrated in French, but nearly the entire film is a series of interviews and archive footage, all in English, with French subtitles. The interviews are just amazing. They construct the entire Bush administration from the inauguration in January 2001 up until present day. Several key figures (including Iraqi weapons inspector Hans Blix and notorious Bush aide Paul Wolfowitz) as well as many White House insiders construct a portrait of the interior and goings-on within the Bush administration, frequently focusing on the religious aspects. The facts are so overwhelming and shocking that I literally felt short of breath in several instances. The footage is not doctored, the interviews very articulate and straight-forward, and the effect is absolutely stunning to say the least. Everything speaks for itself. From time to time, the narrator connects the testimonials into a network of characterisations that, with seemingly stunning accuracy, paint the zeal and fervour of the Bush administration, even hinting at the usage/ believing of the medieval divine right. The images of Bush being blessed on his way from Crawford to the White House, an Army General fervently preaching at a Baptist church, and the testimony of a White House staffer being told by Donald Rumsfeld on a Sunday morning that he "missed Bible study" are just some of the amazing and moving images in this film.

Weeks later, after having travelled to Nice and upon my return to Paris, I found the DVD recently released. Seeing as that I was moving to the States (in region 1) and that the DVD was encoded zone 2, I decided not to buy it. However, if you live in Europe, I implore you to find this film. See it by any means necessary. You won't regret it. What I wouldn't give to see the reception of it here.

And for the record, it ran laps around "Fahrenheit 9/11".
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Unreal!
14 May 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I just got home from the newest Matrix installment and I'm still trying to sort it through. It's 1:20 in the morning so please bear with me as I try to express my thoughts as coherently as possible:

First of, some spoilers may be present, but very unlikely. My first impression of the movie was disbelief that this is the sequel to the same Matrix that we all know and love. Within the first 20 minutes of Reloaded, you'll realize just how different the two are. One of the most notable differences is the addition of several supporting characters that have been added in, mainly concerning Zion. My personal favourite is Link, the new operator who takes over for Tank (SPOILER! somehow or another, Tank has managed to die... this is never explained at all, but Link is the new Tank). There is also a lot more sexual influence in this one. Furthermore, the dialogue is much more witty and comical. (SPOILER AGAIN! A funny scene is when Link comes home and opens the door and says "Hey, Puss-...." and stops in the middle of that word when he realizes that there are children in the room. That got quite a laugh from the crowd! Also, it helps to speak French! One of the new characters speaks French, and claims that he loves cursing in French. He tends to use a lot of French slang and REALLY inappropriate words. If you speak fluent French like me, it's truly hilarious!

Secondly, there is FAR more action in this installment than in the first one. The visual effects are far more impressive and the freeway sequence literally left me blown away. The movie is just wild. It's ludicrous. Compared to the original Matrix, this one makes that one's fight sequences look like crap. There's no other way to explain it.

Trust me, if you think hard at juxtaposing Reloaded with the original, you'll see that all the connections make sense. However, prepare to have your mind screwed with near the end. The ending is really abrupt! Keep on your toes and have a great time! 10/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Far and Away (1992)
4/10
Painfully boring and unoriginal
4 April 2003
Warning: Spoilers
I have just seen this movie as a requirement for a course I am taking. My history teacher pulled this one out of the closet when she became sick and was unable to come up with lesson plans. That should give you an idea of where I am going with this review. The plot is so incredibly predictable that, at any given point in the film, you can immediately tell the outcome of the current conflict, whether it be a boxing match or a fight with death. The connection between Cruise and Kidman is there, but it doesn't mean much. They both just.. stand there and act their parts pretty well. However, that doesn't save the horrific screenplay that follows every single basic guideline of a period romance-drama, with nothing extra and exciting which sets a dull movie apart from an above-average one. Simply put, nothing happens. The only remotely cool part in the movie is the wagon race, which comes very close to the end of the film. If you've already seen "Far and Away", you know what I'm talking about. Also, I want to point out that Ron Howard seems to be extremely unskilled in directing when this film was made. The camera shots are boring and uneventful and the way that the film flows almost gives you the impression that the film is apathetic to itself and allows itself to wander and falter from one plot marker to the next. There are some decent camera shots of the sky at sunset and a pretty decent wagon race. The acting isn't terrible, either. Other than that, the movie is a dud. I give it 4/10 and I'm being nice. (*1/2)

SPOILER If you have seen the movie, you'll know exactly what I mean. Tom Cruise is smashed by a horse and fades away in a death-like sequence, and then miraculously comes back to life nearly 30 seconds later. This is a fundamental of any movie: if you're going to perform a resurrection on a principal character, you allow the viewer time to let the death sink in, before slowly and gradually building up to the resuscitation. However, Cruise dies, Kidman mourns for nearly 30 seconds while some sad music plays, and then BOOM Cruise is back alive and better as ever with cheery music. It's not even touching, rather just plain confusing. I will not go any further into the rest of the movie, but rest assured that Howard failed miserably in achieving the result he was going for. At least he redeemed himself with "Apollo 13".
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Oliver Beene (2003–2004)
Second episode much more promising
19 March 2003
It's got heart, and that says a lot. I mean the first episode wasn't a stellar premiere, I'll give you that. But the acting is great! The comedy is more family oriented, and it does a great job at accomplishing what it's set out to do. Isn't that what it's all about? I thought the second episode was very funny, and it's so strange that you can't help but love the way the jokes just seem to just fall out of the scene. It's truly a good-hearted show with some serious moments and real chemistry between these actors. Great job!
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spirited Away (2001)
10/10
Why I feel so much better about the world
29 November 2002
Let me start off by saying that I hate writing reviews. In fact I don't like sharing my comments with others period. From time to time, I cast my vote for a movie and then read other reviews. This is the kind of movie that I want to tell everyone about.

In fact, movies don't move me period. I saw "The Ring" (coincidentally starring Daveigh Chase also) two days ago and it was pretty scary. Sure, I've slept with the light on for two days now, but this just made my day. Maybe even month. Maybe even year.

Word to the wise: it's very helpful to understand something about Japanese culture before seeing this (since you will see it). The main idea is based on kami, which are spirits of the departed that come back to guide family members. As shown in the beginning of the film, shrines ranging from small to enormous are constructed to serve as remembrance for the kami. The idea of the building in the movie is to serve as a first class hotel/bath house for the kami. With this as the background for adventure, the princpial character Chihiro (Daveigh Chase) undergoes one of the most emotional character changes I believe I have ever witnessed. She learns the true value of hard work, friendship and love. Accounting for the second major motif is the idea of the power of love between her and Haku (Jason Marsden). Their relationship in the film is brilliantly developed; sometimes I actually forgot it was animated.

Another aspect is the incredible animation. When Chihiro is on the train, the landscapes she passes awed me. Never before have I seen so much detail and artistic expression captured by animation or live action alike. The graphics alone are enough to justify seeing this movie, but adding in everything I have just seen, this movie should be seen by all.

As compared to the 2001 animé "Metropolis", a love story with a powerful conclusion also develops. However, the romance between Tima and Kenichi seems false largely in part to the fact that Tima was a robot. "Spirited Away" has characters that you can relate to. Chihiro is a scared girl that finds herself in a more-than-troubling scenario. Even if the movie is extremely Japanese, American audiences with an open mind should have no problem feeling at home. This is what movies are all about. It's a shame that a 10 is as high as I can rate it.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lilo & Stitch (2002)
10/10
I'm beyond impressed...
23 June 2002
Warning: Spoilers
CONTAINS POSSIBLE PLOT AND CHARACTER SPOILERS. I just got back from the movies and decided to give Lilo and Stitch a go since I've already seen just about everything else that's out. If I had to sum it up in once phrase, I'd say: Not only was it absolutely brilliant, but the best animated film ever produced. This is why:

Usually, in a Disney movie, you can see plot developments from a mile away. Lilo and Stitch is pretty ambiguous, meaning you can never really tell what's coming up next. It doesn't even seem like a Disney movie. Hardly any little childish jokes or anything. It's absolutely fantastic. The music is WONDERFUL. It's subtle yet sets up the mood of the scene perfectly. The voice acting is superb. Lilo (Daveigh Chase) does a fantastic job of delivering the frequently tense dialogue. David Ogden Stiers is probably the best voice actor I've ever heard. His Russian accent really brings his character to life. Not to mention Chris Sanders, with all the incredible noises that Stitch makes. Stitch alone is probably the funniest thing in the movie, with all his screeches and regurgitation.

Spoilers start here

As far as the story goes, it's great. Nani, Lilo's older sister, is fighting against Social Services to keep Lilo. I'm not gonna expand too much since a synopsis is available anywhere. However, the whole idea that Nani needs a job now really helps the plot so it doesn't bottom out near the beginning. Their social worker, Cobra Bubbles, tells Lilo that she needs to reform Stitch into a model citizen after Stitch throws a book in his face (I was cracking up). Also, Lilo has her fair share of problems. She's an outcast amongst her companions. Just to give you a little taste of what you're in for, I'm gonna completely describe the opening of the movie. Lilo runs into dance lessons late because she was feeding a fish which she believes controls the weather. She says that she was panicking because all they had was tuna and if she fed a fish tuna she would be a bad person so that's why she was late. As she explains this to her dance teacher, this one girl calls her weird and Lilo snaps. She jumps on the girl and smashes her into the floor and starts punching her face. This is the first indication that something's wrong, which is obviously a quantam leap beyond previous Disney movies. Disney has done so many weak movies that you might as well go ahead and disassociate this movie from any other; it's fantastic. Yet another memorable scene is when Lilo tells Stitch to be constructive and build something rather than destroy everything. Stitch then proceeds to rapidly create a scale model of San Francisco (he does this because he is programmed to live in big cities and destroy them. Since Hawaii has no real big cities, he creates one). He then reenacts Godzilla, tearing apart the buildings and screaming and eating little model cars. No other non-human creature in Disney history has ever been so developed as Stitch. I'm not going to spoil any more, but I'll leave you with this:

I don't advise you see this movie, I command it. It will give you not only some joy of watching such a fun film, but it will totally change your whole perspective on animated movies. I mean come on, I'm a 16 year old male and I loved it. That has to count for something, right?

Final rating: 10/10, and believe me, I'd go higher if I could.

Also, some final parting advice: If you don't have kids, go after dark so you won't have to put up with screaming babies and whining kids. It gets old fast.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Company (2002)
9/10
fun movie
16 June 2002
This movie is an extremely fun and enjoyable movie. The comedy, combined with great action and a fairly stable plot make this a great movie. The acting is wonderful, because you can't go wrong with Chris Rock and Anthony Hopkins. The action's great too. Plenty of shootouts and suspense, with some car chases too. Overall, it's a highly enjoyable movie. 8.5/10
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
24 (2001–2010)
incredible
17 May 2002
I don't think TV could get any better. Despite moderately low ratings, the fans it has have stuck with the show. Every plot is phenomenally executed. Some people say it isn't credible because they never eat or go to the bathroom. Do you really care that much? Would it make the show that much better if Kiefer ate a sandwich? All in all, perfect. The best hour of TV a week. Sutherland's performance is rock-solid. Elisha Cuthbert plays a great Kim that you can't help feeling sorry for. I watch this show every week and cannot get enough. Thanks, Fox, for this fantastic show. If only more people watched it...
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Twister: Ride It Out (1998 Video)
9/10
so much fun
20 April 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This ride was a real kicker! I liked it a lot! WARNING MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS/ADVICE. A gas tank thing explodes and a lot of fire comes out. Recommendation: if you're in the front row, it's REALLY hot when the fire comes out. Also, on the back row, I think (but I'm not sure), but it might drop down a little or something. Very fun ride and definitely worth the wait in line!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mad TV (1995–2016)
still good, but the beginning was the best
20 April 2002
I used to love the beginning of this show. It was hilarious! Orlando Jones was wonderful. Mad TV and In Living Colour were my favourite shows until they started adding in new cast members and screwing things up. Now, the only sketches I watch are the ones with Will Sasso, since his talent truly holds this show together. His "Kenny Rogers Jackass" and Arnold Schwarzennager impressions are the best. I recommend muting the TV when he's not on...
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frailty (2001)
9/10
excellent
13 April 2002
I think the two best things about this movie were Bill Paxton's phenomenal acting and the horrifying music. A lot is accomplished in this movie by doing very little. The plot development is interesting, because it's predictable yet somehow still manages to catch you off-guard and by surprise every time. Also, if you predicted the ending, then you're bluffing or I need to see a Yale diploma in movie predictions... All the acting was exceptional and the suspense is what drives this movie; for some reason, it isn't even like it's non-stop action, you just have this gut feeling that something's going to happen next. I would give it a 9/10
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Run Lola Run (1998)
10/10
absolutely amazing
6 April 2002
Quite possibly the most amazing piece of art in the 20th century. The mix of 35mm, video, black and white, and still shots make this movie a theatrical work of art. The acting is fantastic; even the extras are captivating. This is truly an amazing piece of cinema.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
wonderful!
19 January 2002
Honestly, I didn't even know what the movie was about when I imported it from Japan; just that the cover looked cool. Let me tell you: this is a must-see. It starts out as a bouncy comedy; you can't really help but side with the robbers when everything goes horribly wrong. It's funny, the cinematography is great, the action is great and funny too. However, like most foreign films, there's a twist ending. I won't say any more since it might give it away but it's worth buying just to see it. The soundtrack is great. Not only is it full of orchestrated pieces by Akihiko Matsumoto, but the use of popular songs like "Now I'm Here" by Queen, and classical like "Requiem" by Fauré, really add to the movie. If you're looking for a foreign movie to see, this is the one.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed