Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Cold Case (2003–2010)
7/10
A good show with two consistent problems
3 July 2010
Make no mistake, I like this show, i like the cast, and I like the idea, but there are two things about it that consistently bug me.

First, the show uses every trick in the book to manipulate the viewer's emotions, culminating in the "ghosts" of the victims etc. making tear-jerking appearances (presumably in the main character's imagination) at the end.

But the biggest weakness is that the crimes frequently lack a convincing motive -- so many episodes end with our discovering that the killer didn't really have a good reason to commit the crime. It may be that this is a common feature of cold cases, but realism isn't a big feature of the show in general, so why the writers would do this escapes me. Usually the red herrings have much stronger motives, which makes almost every episode's outcome seem forced.

It's a nicely acted, well put together show, with a laudable agenda (teaching history, especially civil rights) to it's audience — I just wish they could put in plausible motives.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good moments, but shapeless and unsatisfying
7 January 2008
There's no denying that "Me and You..." has some interesting and original ideas and several good scenes, some of which are very funny, but a few good moments does not make a good movie.

The central problem with the movie is the central character, a wannabe performance artist. She's just not interesting enough.

The movie is full of situations that just don't read as true. Some of them come off as funny set-pieces, but none of them come off as plausible. (If they're drawn from real life, this is even sadder.) I suppose this is exactly the kind of movie that gets awards at small festivals. It's "quirky", but not generally in a good way. I think the writer/director has potential, but this movie is definitely missable.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Burn Notice (2007–2013)
9/10
Literate, Witty, and Entertaining Pilot
28 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, it helps to like the lead actor (Jeffrey Donovan) who has an odd kind of blank faced charisma. Anyway, based on the pilot it's a stylishly put together show, with very dry humor, well done but restrained action scenes, and some nice dialog.

The pilot is something of an episode of "The Equalizer" -- except that instead of the hero being a retired spook the main character is in an imposed hiatus. This worked as a nice vehicle for introducing characters and situations and fleshing out the main character's positive qualities, but if this becomes a recurring formula, the show will probably not survive.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thirtysomething (1987–1991)
9/10
Brilliantly written and acted, ahead of its time
5 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of those shows I miss and could have watched forever. I'd also love to see the characters revisited in fortysomething or fiftysomething, but the creators are having considerable success making movies (most notably Glory) so I'm not holding my breath.

This show was ground-breaking in the depth and honesty of its portrayal of many aspects of modern life that had either never been dealt with on the big or small screen, or which had been treated superficially, including: * becoming a parent (e.g. there's an entire episode about the first time you leave your baby alone all night) * infidelity (one of the two central couples goes through a painful divorce, involving children, shared friends, etc.) * cancer (one of central characters has a long battle with cancer) * infertility * AIDS * unemployment * loneliness (at one point two of the characters get into a video-dating service together) * academic politics And probably a bunch of other things I haven't thought of.

Despite being about "ordinary lives" in a way that only sitcoms such as Seinfeld even approach, it managed to be compelling, funny, and memorable. I was actually hooked sometime in the second season when I was channel surfing and listened to a snippet of conversation where one character referred to someone's behavior as being controlled by their "reptile brain" and realizing it was actually a show pitched at an intelligent audience.

Almost uniquely among American television shows, there were no doctors, lawyers, or policemen. The two central characters (Michael and Elliot) run a small ad agency which goes under. The central idea of the show, according to the two creators in an interview with Playboy (1989, I think) was that it would be about two friends who go into business together and the business fails. This is, perhaps, one of the central experiences of middle class life in the United States, and I don't think it's ever been dealt with in a TV series before or since.

And finally, Miles Drentel (David Clennon) is plays one of the most magnetically evil (insofar as anyone in this show was evil) characters in TV history.

Correction to the data on display: Gary (played by Peter Horton) died towards the end of the final season. He may have appeared in some flashbacks but he was not in every episode. (For that matter, I think not every character appears in every episode... but this is a total quibble.)
13 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
So bad it's funny
22 April 2007
The one redeeming value of this movie is that it is so bad it's funny. Some movies are bad but simply unwatchable, and while this movie does occasionally make you want to avert your eyes, at least you can laugh at the terrible dialog, unfunny one-liners "Hold your horse, Jim" (OMG he's riding a horse, get it?!), bad and inappropriate special effects, and Uhura's fan dance.

I'd stop this review here, but it's too short. William Shatner directed and partially wrote this movie, it was -- apparently -- a labor of love, and he regrets that they couldn't afford the special effects necessary to realize his vision. Unfortunately, better special effects aren't what this film needs even though the special effects are bad (and have not aged well; this movie was made eight years after Bladerunner (which had roughly the same budget and couldn't recycle production design from earlier movies). A movie can't become this bad without layers of poor creative decisions piled on top of one another.
4 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed